Europe: INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURE AND TRADE -- SUMMARY October 1999, ERS-WRS-99-2 October 21, 1999 Approved by the World Agricultural Outlook Board -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SUMMARY is published by the Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20036-5831. The complete text of The EU's Common Agricultural Policy: Pressures Change: INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURE & TRADE will be available electronically about 2 weeks following this summary release. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Agenda 2000 Lays Groundwork for EU Enlargement and WTO Negotiations but Pressures on the CAP Still Abound In March 1999 the European Union adopted a reform package--Agenda 2000- that attempts to smooth the process of EU enlargement, ensures that the EU meets its commitments to the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture, and eases the pressures on the CAP budget. In undertaking these reforms, the EU has established its position for the upcoming round of World Trade Organization (WTO) negotiations on agriculture. However, there are domestic market imbalances, WTO constraints, EU enlargement costs, consumer concerns, and CAP budget guidelines, which combine to form continuing pressures on the CAP. Agenda 2000 calls for a review of the reforms; analysis in this report supports the view that further reforms will be needed to address market imbalances. Agenda 2000 is not the first attempt to reform the CAP. Some of the features of the reforms, notably lowering of prices and direct payments to farmers to offset some of their losses, are extensions of the reforms of 1992. Unlike previous reforms, however, Agenda 2000 attempts to maintain the CAP budget at its present level in real terms for the next 7 years. Analysis presented in this report suggests that in spite of Agenda 2000, high stock levels of several commodities are likely to accumulate because of continued high yields, little or no growth in domestic consumption, WTO constraints on exports, and EU enlargement to the East. Analysis shows that EU enlargement to include the Central and Eastern European countries (CEEC) of Hungary, Poland, Estonia, Slovenia, and the Czech Republic in 2002 could bring additional budget pressures on the CAP. Enlargement could also exacerbate the surplus problem for some commodities, particularly beef, pork, and rye. But many experts do not believe that these countries will be ready for EU accession until 2006 or later. Furthermore, the acceding countries will likely have difficulty adopting a very large number of EU rules and regulations required to meet minimum quality standards, hence production response to higher prices suggested by the analysis represent the upper bounds. Agenda 2000 does alleviate the WTO constraint on exports for some commodities. With a lower government purchase price for wheat and expected higher world wheat prices, the EU is forecast to export wheat without subsidy starting as early as 2002. Lower grain prices will also allow the EU to marginally increase pork, poultry, and egg exports without subsidy. EU enlargement could also allow an EU-18 or EU-20 to become more competitive in world markets for beef, pork, and coarse grains but only if the CEEC can successfully adopt all EU legislation and narrow quality differentials by 2002. Implementation by the acceding countries of EU measures demanded by consumers and environmentalists may also restrict their imports of food and agricultural goods. EU consumer and environmentalists' concerns have resulted in measures that could lead to trade disputes in the future. EU concerns with food safety have been heightened by "mad cow" disease, and, with pressures from political activists and consumers, the European Commission has enacted legislation (labeling products containing genetically engineered material, for example) that has disrupted U.S. exports to the EU. Delays in approving genetically engineered crops have significantly slowed U.S. corn exports to the EU and threaten U.S. exports of soybeans and soybean products. EU consumers are also concerned about the process of food production and have directed their attention to animal welfare issues. The EU recently passed legislation stipulating a minimum space per laying hen that will be phased in over the next few years. The EU Commission has indicated that animal welfare issues should be addressed in the next round of WTO negotiations. On the whole, the analysis shows that internal market forces, EU enlargement, and upcoming WTO negotiations all put pressure on the CAP largely by undermining its reliance on export subsidies to rid itself of surplus. Until these pressures force significant changes on the CAP, it will continue to depress world markets as Agenda 2000 does not substantially reduce incentives to produce and export agricultural commodities. Printed copies of The EU's Common Agricultural Policy: Pressures for Change will be available in about 3 weeks. For more information, contact David Kelch (202) 694-5151. The full report also will be available electronically via the ERS web site at www.econ.ag.gov. END_OF_FILE