Ag Ch 1 (06) United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service Agricultural Chemical Usage 2005 Field Crops Summary May 2006 Table of Contents Page Overview 2 Agricultural Chemical Applications - Highlights 3 Agricultural Chemical Applications Tables: Corn 7 Fall Potatoes 37 Oats 57 Upland Cotton 73 Soybeans 95 Agricultural Chemical Distribution Tables - Highlights 101 Agricultural Chemical Distribution Tables: Corn 102 Fall Potatoes 106 Oats 110 Upland Cotton 112 Pest Management Practices - Highlights 117 Pest Management Practices Tables: Corn 118 Fall Potatoes 126 Oats 130 Upland Cotton 136 Survey and Estimation Procedures 140 Reliability 141 Terms and Definitions 142 Pesticide Class, Common Name, and Trade Name 146 Survey Instrument (Fertilizer, Pesticide, and Pest Management Sections) 154 Index 160 Report Features 166 Overview The agricultural chemical use estimates in this report refer to on-farm use of commercial fertilizers and pesticides on field crops for the 2005 crop year. Field crops include corn, upland cotton, oats, fall potatoes, and soybeans. Farm and ranch operators were enumerated late in the growing season after the farm operator had indicated that planned applications were completed. The chemical use data were not summarized for geographical areas other than by those States published in this report. The data were compiled from 2 surveys, the Agricultural Resources Management Survey (ARMS) and Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP). Data collection occurred primarily during the months of September to December of 2005. An example of the survey instrument used in data collection is included in the back of this publication. This report excludes pesticides used for seed treatments and postharvest applications to the commodity. Spot treatments, which account for a very small percentage of total applications, are mentioned only in the AActive Ingredients and Publication Status@ tables. The table below shows the number of States included in the survey, the number of summarized reports from the States, and the percent of the Program States= acres planted to that commodity compared with the U.S. total. Producers of corn, fall potatoes, and upland cotton were last surveyed in 2003, and soybeans growers were recently surveyed in 2004 and can be used as a comparison to this year=s data. Oats were last included in the1998 Fall Area Survey and summarized by geographical region, not by State. Agricultural Chemical Use Survey Coverage, 2005 and 2003 2005 2003 States Reports U.S. States Reports U.S. in Summarized Acreage in Summarized Acreage Survey Included in Survey Included in Survey Survey Crop - - Number - - Percent - - Number - - Percent Corn 19 3,300 93 18 3,013 92 Fall Potatoes 8 761 87 10 872 80 Oats/1, /2 15 1,592 82 48 278 100 Upland Cotton 9 1,866 89 12 1,751 90 Soybeans/3 17 1,220 89 11 3,163 81 /1 2005 is the first time NASS set State level estimates for Oats. /2 Oats survey coverage from the 1998 Fall Area Survey. /3 Soybean survey coverage from the Agricultural Chemical Usage 2004 Field Crops Summary. Highlights Corn: Nitrogen was applied to 96 percent of the 2005 corn planted acreage in the 19 Program States: Colorado, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Texas, and Wisconsin. Corn growers applied an average of 138 pounds of nitrogen per acre per crop year. Phosphate was applied to 81 percent of the corn acreage in the Program States at an average rate of 58 pounds per acre per crop year. Potash, applied at 84 pounds per acre per crop year, was applied to 65 percent of the acreage planted to corn. For the first time, sulfur use was included in the survey and 13 percent of the acres planted received an application at an average rate of 12 pounds per acre per crop year. Herbicides were applied to 97 percent of the corn planted acreage in 2005 in the Program States. Atrazine continues to be the most widely applied herbicide with 66 percent of the planted acreage being treated. It was applied at an average rate of 1.133 pounds per acre per crop year. Glyphosate isopropylamine salt (formerly recorded as Glyphosate) was applied to 31 percent of planted acres, up from 19 percent in 2003, at an average rate of 0.963 pounds per acre per crop year. In terms of area applied, that was followed closely by S-Metolachlor and Acetochlor, at 23 percent of the planted corn acreage treated in the Program States. In 2005, 23 percent of the corn planted acreage was treated with insecticides in the Program States. Tefluthrin, Cyfluthrin, and Tebupirimphos were the most widely applied insecticides, at 7, 7, and 6 percent, respectively, to the acres planted to corn in the States surveyed. Chlorpyrifos was only applied to 2 percent of the acres, but total applied is more than 3 times greater than next highest at 2.0 million pounds. Fall Potatoes: Eight fall producing States were included in the 2005 survey: Colorado, Idaho, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, North Dakota, Washington, and Wisconsin. Nitrogen averaged 4.1 applications per field with a total of 180.3 million pounds applied to 99 percent of the fall potato acreage. Phosphate was applied to 98 percent of the fall potato acres, with a total of 132.5 millions pounds applied. A total of 145.4 million pounds of Potash were applied to 92 percent of the planted acreage. Sulfur recorded 41.3 million pounds applied to 72 percent of the acres planted. The total pounds of all pesticides were down for fall potatoes in 2005 compared to 2003. Herbicides were applied to 92 percent of the fall potato acreage in 2005 in the 8 Program States. Metribuzin was the most widely applied herbicide, applied to 74 percent of the planted acreage treated, at a rate of 0.441 pounds per acre per crop year. The next three most widely applied herbicides applied to fall potatoes, Pendimethalin, Rimsulfuron, EPTC, were applied to 31, 27, and 24 percent of the acres planted, respectively. Of the insecticides covering 79 percent of the 2005 fall potato planted acreage, the three most commonly applied were Imidacloprid, Cyfluthrin, and Esfenvalerate and, 38, 29, and 27 percent, respectively. Fungicide treatments were applied to 90 percent of the fall potato acreage in the Program States. Mancozeb was used most commonly, as it was applied to 61 percent of the planted acres at a rate of 4.215 pounds per acre per crop year, followed by Chlorothalonil, Azoxystrobin, and Mefenoxam, applied to 55, 37, and 25 percent of the fall potato acreage in the States surveyed, respectively. Usage of Other Chemicals varied widely among the States surveyed. Percent of acreage treated ranged from 2 percent in Michigan to 70 percent in Washington. Overall, 40 percent of the acres planted to fall potatoes, down 7 percentage points from 2003, received an application of an Other Chemical. Only 0.129 million pounds of Diquat dibromide were applied, but was spread over 30 percent of the planted acreage. However, 35.4 and 20.8 million pounds of Sulfuric acid and Metam-sodium, respectively, were applied to 12 and 16 percent of the fall potato acreage, respectively. Oats: Fifteen States were included in the 2005 survey: California, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New York, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Texas, and Wisconsin. This compares to 1998 when oats were last surveyed in which an area survey was conducted drawing possible samples from any of the 48 states. Nitrogen recorded 107.4 million pounds applied to 56 percent of the oats acreage in these States. Approximately 50 million pounds each of Phosphate and Potash were applied to 40 and 28 percent, respectively, of the oats acreage in the States surveyed. For the first time, sulfur usage data were collected and 3.2 million pounds were applied to 9 percent of the acres planted. Herbicides were applied to 31 percent of the oat acreage in 2005 with 2,4-D dimethylamine salt being the most widely applied herbicide on 9 percent of the planted acreage for a total of 147 thousand pounds. It was followed by Glyphosate isopropylamine salt (formerly recorded as Glyphosate) and 2,4-D, 2-EHE, at 117 and 79 thousand pounds, respectively, to 5 percent of the planted acreage. Lambda-cyhalothrin was the only insecticide with enough reports to publish usage data. It was applied to less than one half of one percent of the 2005 oats planted acreage, at an average application rate of 0.027 pounds per acre per crop year. Upland Cotton: Nine cotton producing States were included in the 2005 survey: Alabama, Arkansas, California, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas. Nitrogen applications averaged 90 pounds per acre per crop year adding up to 978.0 million pounds being applied to 88 percent these States' planted acres. A total of 370.9 millions pounds of phosphate was applied to 65 percent of the upland cotton planted acres in the Program States. Potash was applied to 55 percent of the planted acreage totaling 498.9 million pounds in the States surveyed. Sulfur was applied on 38 percent of the acres planted for a total of 69.4 million pounds. Herbicides were applied to 95 percent of the upland cotton acreage in 2005 in the 9 Program States. Glyphosate isopropylamine salt (formerly recorded as Glyphosate) was the most widely applied herbicide, applied to 71 percent of the planted acreage at a rate of 1.592 pounds per acre per crop year for a total of 14.1 million pounds. The next most commonly applied herbicide on a per acre basis, Trifluralin, at 32 percent, was also the second most used, in total pounds, at 3.5 million pounds. That was followed by Diuron being applied to 27 percent of the planted acreage for upland cotton. Insecticides were applied to 71 percent of the 2005 upland cotton planted acreage. The 3 most commonly applied insecticides reported in the States surveyed were Acephate, Aldicarb, and Dicrotophos which were applied to 27, 19, and 19 percent of the planted acreage, respectively. However, Malathion was the most applied, in terms of total pounds, at 7.3 million pounds, but was applied to just 15 percent of the planted acreage. Fungicide treatments were applied to 3 percent of the upland cotton acreage in the Program States. PCNB was applied most heavily at 87 thousand pounds to the planted acres, followed by Mefenoxam and Azoxystrobin at 19 and 12 thousand pounds, respectively, for the upland cotton planted acreage in the States surveyed. Usage of Other Chemicals, primarily desiccants, varied among the States surveyed. Overall, 72 percent of the acres planted to upland cotton in the Program States received an application of an Other Chemical. Ethephon was used most commonly as 8.2 million pounds were applied to 58 percent of the planted acres, followed by Mepiquat chloride and Tribufos being applied to 33 and 26 percent of the upland cotton acreage in the States surveyed, respectively. Soybeans: This year, soybeans were included in this report to capture farmers' reactions to Asian Soybean Rust. However, data were only available from the CEAP survey for 17 states (Arkansas, Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Carolina, Ohio, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Virginia), because soybeans were not selected as a target crop for ARMS. Asian Soybean Rust is a fungus, therefore, we focused on farmers' use of fungicides. For 2005, farm operations reported 6 active ingredients applied to 2 percent of the planted soybean acreage, versus 4 active ingredients reported on 1 percent of the planted acreage in 2004. In the Agricultural Chemical Usage 2004 Field Crops Summary, Azoxystrobin was the only publishable fungicide at the Program State level. All 6 of the active ingredients reported for 2005 are recommended for Asian Soybean Rust. Herbicides were applied to 98 percent of the Program State acreage though 1 active ingredient clearly dominated. Glyphosate isopropylamine salt (formerly recorded as Glyphosate) was used on 88 percent of all the acres treated. The average application rate of 1.101 pounds was applied per acre per crop year for a total of 63.0 million pounds applied. No other herbicide was applied to more than 4 percent of the total planted acres. Insecticides were used on 14 percent of the Program State acres, but individual active ingredients only covered a maximum of 6 percent of soybean Program State acreage. Program States Surveyed for 2005 Field Crops Corn Fall Potatoes Oats Upland Cotton Soybeans Alabama + Arkansas + + California + + Colorado + + Georgia + + Idaho + + Illinois + + + Indiana + + Iowa + + + Kansas + + + Kentucky + + Louisiana + + Maine + Michigan + + + + Minnesota + + + + Mississippi + + Missouri + + Montana + Nebraska + + + New York + + North Carolina + + + North Dakota + + + Ohio + + Pennsylvania + + South Dakota + + + Tennessee + + Texas + + + Virginia + Washington + Wisconsin + + + Corn: Fertilizer Use by State, 2005 Percent of Acres Treated and Total Applied ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : Percent of Acres Treated and Total Applied State : Planted :---------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Acreage : Nitrogen : Phosphate : Potash : Sulfur ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :1,000 Acres Percent Mil. lbs. Percent Mil. lbs. Percent Mil. lbs. Percent Mil. lbs. : CO : 1,100 89 126.2 63 24.4 21 4.2 33 3.3 GA : 270 98 38.7 86 16.1 87 24.5 53 2.5 IL : 12,100 98 1,728.3 84 780.4 84 1,160.5 4 14.9 IN : 5,900 100 869.3 93 420.2 88 648.2 14 8.1 IA : 12,800 92 1,653.2 70 579.0 71 762.3 5 4.5 KS : 3,650 97 482.1 81 112.7 26 34.9 17 5.3 KY 1/ : 1,250 98 210.5 78 75.5 77 86.9 MI : 2,250 97 277.8 88 89.6 81 148.4 21 3.7 MN : 7,300 94 953.9 86 378.1 77 400.3 9 8.2 MO : 3,100 99 489.5 79 149.5 78 180.1 19 10.0 NE : 8,500 99 1,162.5 75 237.3 22 38.8 30 35.0 NY 1/ : 990 94 62.2 88 33.2 79 34.9 NC : 750 97 90.5 74 25.5 86 53.1 18 1.1 ND : 1,410 99 169.3 94 58.8 38 13.3 8 0.9 OH : 3,450 99 551.7 87 224.9 76 264.5 12 3.2 PA : 1,350 88 108.4 64 40.7 58 37.4 6 3.0 SD : 4,450 95 477.7 79 154.2 37 41.9 13 5.5 TX : 2,050 94 282.0 81 73.9 28 10.6 29 6.9 WI : 3,800 93 380.9 84 118.8 84 191.7 22 9.1 : Total : 76,470 96 10,114.7 81 3,592.8 65 4,136.5 13 125.9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Insufficient reports to publish data for one or more of the fertilizer primary nutrients. Corn: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2005 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Primary : Planted : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Nutrient : Acreage : Applied : cations :Application : Crop Year : Applied ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Mil. lbs : : Colorado : 1,100 Nitrogen : 89 1.9 67 129 126.2 Phosphate : 63 1.1 33 35 24.4 Potash : 21 1.6 12 19 4.2 Sulfur : 33 1.3 7 9 3.3 : Georgia : 270 Nitrogen : 98 2.0 74 147 38.7 Phosphate : 86 1.3 54 70 16.1 Potash : 87 1.1 98 104 24.5 Sulfur : 53 1.1 15 18 2.5 : Illinois : 12,100 Nitrogen : 98 1.8 83 146 1,728.3 Phosphate : 84 1.0 73 76 780.4 Potash : 84 1.0 111 114 1,160.5 Sulfur : 4 1.0 31 31 14.9 : Indiana : 5,900 Nitrogen : 100 2.2 67 147 869.3 Phosphate : 93 1.4 56 77 420.2 Potash : 88 1.1 111 124 648.2 Sulfur : 14 1.0 10 10 8.1 : Iowa : 12,800 Nitrogen : 92 1.4 98 141 1,653.2 Phosphate : 70 1.1 60 64 579.0 Potash : 71 1.0 80 84 762.3 Sulfur : 5 1.0 7 7 4.5 : Kansas : 3,650 Nitrogen : 97 1.6 87 136 482.1 Phosphate : 81 1.1 35 38 112.7 Potash : 26 1.0 37 37 34.9 Sulfur : 17 1.0 9 9 5.3 : Kentucky : 1,250 Nitrogen : 98 1.6 107 171 210.5 Phosphate : 78 1.1 73 77 75.5 Potash : 77 1.0 89 90 86.9 Sulfur 1/ : : Michigan : 2,250 Nitrogen : 97 2.3 55 128 277.8 Phosphate : 88 1.2 39 45 89.6 Potash : 81 1.2 69 82 148.4 Sulfur : 21 1.0 7 8 3.7 : ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Corn: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2005 (continued) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Primary : Planted : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Nutrient : Acreage : Applied : cations :Application : Crop Year : Applied ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Mil. lbs : : Minnesota : 7,300 Nitrogen : 94 1.7 81 139 953.9 Phosphate : 86 1.2 49 60 378.1 Potash : 77 1.1 68 71 400.3 Sulfur : 9 1.0 12 13 8.2 : Missouri : 3,100 Nitrogen : 99 1.4 113 160 489.5 Phosphate : 79 1.1 56 61 149.5 Potash : 78 1.0 72 75 180.1 Sulfur : 19 1.2 14 17 10.0 : Nebraska : 8,500 Nitrogen : 99 2.2 63 138 1,162.5 Phosphate : 75 1.2 32 37 237.3 Potash : 22 1.3 15 20 38.8 Sulfur : 30 1.5 9 14 35.0 : New York : 990 Nitrogen : 94 1.5 46 67 62.2 Phosphate : 88 1.1 34 38 33.2 Potash : 79 1.1 41 45 34.9 Sulfur 1/ : : North Carolina : 750 Nitrogen : 97 2.1 59 124 90.5 Phosphate : 74 1.2 39 46 25.5 Potash : 86 1.1 72 83 53.1 Sulfur : 18 1.0 8 8 1.1 : North Dakota : 1,410 Nitrogen : 99 1.9 65 121 169.3 Phosphate : 94 1.1 40 45 58.8 Potash : 38 1.0 24 25 13.3 Sulfur : 8 1.0 8 8 0.9 : Ohio : 3,450 Nitrogen : 99 2.1 76 161 551.7 Phosphate : 87 1.2 63 75 224.9 Potash : 76 1.1 89 101 264.5 Sulfur : 12 1.0 8 8 3.2 : Pennsylvania : 1,350 Nitrogen : 88 1.5 62 92 108.4 Phosphate : 64 1.1 44 47 40.7 Potash : 58 1.1 44 48 37.4 Sulfur : 6 1.1 33 37 3.0 : ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Corn: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2005 (continued) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Primary : Planted : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Nutrient : Acreage : Applied : cations :Application : Crop Year : Applied ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Mil. lbs : : South Dakota : 4,450 Nitrogen : 95 1.4 79 113 477.7 Phosphate : 79 1.1 40 44 154.2 Potash : 37 1.0 26 26 41.9 Sulfur : 13 1.0 9 9 5.5 : Texas : 2,050 Nitrogen : 94 1.9 79 147 282.0 Phosphate : 81 1.1 41 44 73.9 Potash : 28 1.1 17 18 10.6 Sulfur : 29 1.2 10 12 6.9 : Wisconsin : 3,800 Nitrogen : 93 2.0 53 107 380.9 Phosphate : 84 1.1 34 37 118.8 Potash : 84 1.1 52 60 191.7 Sulfur : 22 1.4 8 11 9.1 : Total : 76,470 Nitrogen : 96 1.8 77 138 10,114.7 Phosphate : 81 1.1 51 58 3,592.8 Potash : 65 1.1 78 84 4,136.5 Sulfur : 13 1.2 10 12 125.9 : ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Insufficient reports to publish fertilizer data. Corn : Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2005 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Program States :----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : CO : GA : IL : IN : IA : KS : KY : MI : MN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D : * * * 2,4-D, 2-EHE : P P P P P P * P * 2,4-D, BEE : P * * * * * * 2,4-D, dieth sal : P 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : P P * * * * P P P * 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : P * P 2,4-DP, 2-BEE : * * Acetochlor : P * P P P P P P P Alachlor : P * * * * P * * * Ametryn : P Atrazine : P P P P P P P P P P Bentazon : * * Bromoxynil : P P * * * * Bromoxynil heptanoat : P * * * * Bromoxynil octanoate : P * * * * Butoxyethyl triclopy : * * Carfentrazone-ethyl : P * * * * Chlorimuron-ethyl : * * Chlorsulfuron : * * Clethodim : * * * Clopyralid : P * P P P * * P P Cloransulam-methyl : * * * Cyanazine : P * Dicamba : P * P * * * * P * Dicamba, Digly Salt : P P P * * * * P P Dicamba, Dimet. salt : P P * P * P * * Dicamba, Pot. salt : P * P * P * P Dicamba, Sodium salt : P P P P P P P P P Diflufenzopyr-sodium : P P P P P P P P P Dimethenamid : P * * * * * * Dimethenamid-P : P P * P * * P P Diuron : * EPTC : * * Flucarbazone-sodium : * * Flufenacet : P P P P * * * * Flumetsulam : P * P P P * * P P Flumiclorac-pentyl : * Flumioxazin : * * Fluroxypyr : * Fomesafen : * * Foramsulfuron : P * P P * * * * Glufosinate-ammonium : P * P * P * P Glyphosate : P * * * * * P Glyphosate amm. salt : P * Glyphosate iso. salt : P P P P P P P P P P Halosulfuron : P * * * ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Corn : Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2005 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Program States :----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : CO : GA : IL : IN : IA : KS : KY : MI : MN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides (continued) : Imazamox : * Imazapyr : P * P P * * P Imazethapyr : P * P P * * P Iodosulfuron-Met-Sod : P * * * * Isoxaflutole : P * P P P P P Linuron : P * MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : * * MCPA, sodium salt : P * * * Mesotrione : P P P P P P P P P Metolachlor : P P * P * P P Metribuzin : P * * * * Metsulfuron-methyl : * * Nicosulfuron : P P P P P P P P P P Oxyfluorfen : * Paraquat : P * * * * P Pendimethalin : P * P * * * P P Primisulfuron : P P P * P * P * Propachlor : * Prosulfuron : P P P * P * Pyraflufen-ethyl : * * Quinclorac : * * Quizalofop-ethyl : * * Rimsulfuron : P P * P P P P P P P S-Metolachlor : P * * P P P P P P P Simazine : P * P P * P P Sulfosate : P * * * * * * * Thifensulfuron : P * * * * * * * Tribenuron-methyl : * * * Triclopyr : * Trifluralin : P * * * * * Vernolate : P * P : Insecticides : Acephate : * Azadirachtin : * * Azinphos-methyl : * Benzoic acid : * Bifenthrin : P * * * * * P * Carbaryl : * * * Carbofuran : P * * * * * Chlorethoxyfos : * * Chlorpyrifos : P * P P * P P Cyfluthrin : P P P P P * * P Diazinon : * * Dimethoate : P * Esfenvalerate : P * * ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Corn : Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2005 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Program States :----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : CO : GA : IL : IN : IA : KS : KY : MI : MN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Insecticides (continued) : Fipronil : P * * * * * * Gamma-cyhalothrin : * Imidacloprid : * * Lambda-cyhalothrin : P * P * P * Methyl parathion : P * * P Permethrin : P P * * * * Petroleum distillate : * Phorate : * * Propargite : P P Tebupirimphos : P P P P P * * P Tefluthrin : P * * P P P * P Terbufos : P * P * * * Thiamethoxam : * Zeta-cypermethrin : P * * * * * : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : * * * * Chlorothalonil : * * Propiconazole : * * : Other Chemicals : Garlic oil : * * ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Corn : Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2005 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Program States :----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : MO : NE : NY : NC : ND : OH : PA : SD : TX : WI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D : * * 2,4-D, 2-EHE : P P * * P P * P * 2,4-D, BEE : * * P * 2,4-D, dieth sal : * * * * 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : * P * P P P * P * 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : * * 2,4-DP, 2-BEE : * Acetochlor : P P * * P P P * P Alachlor : P P P P * * * * Ametryn : P Atrazine : P P P P P P P P P P Bentazon : * * Bromoxynil : * * * * Bromoxynil heptanoat : * * Bromoxynil octanoate : * * Butoxyethyl triclopy : Carfentrazone-ethyl : * P * * * Chlorimuron-ethyl : Chlorsulfuron : * Clethodim : Clopyralid : P P * P * * * P Cloransulam-methyl : Cyanazine : * * * Dicamba : * * * * * * * * Dicamba, Digly Salt : * P * P * * P * * Dicamba, Dimet. salt : * P * P * P * P * Dicamba, Pot. salt : * * * * * Dicamba, Sodium salt : * * * P P P P P P Diflufenzopyr-sodium : * P P P P P P Dimethenamid : * * * * * Dimethenamid-P : * P * * P * * P * Diuron : * EPTC : Flucarbazone-sodium : Flufenacet : P P * * P Flumetsulam : P P * * P * * * P Flumiclorac-pentyl : * Flumioxazin : * * Fluroxypyr : * Fomesafen : Foramsulfuron : * P * * Glufosinate-ammonium : * P * * P P Glyphosate : * * * * P * P * * Glyphosate amm. salt : * * Glyphosate iso. salt : P P P P P P P P P P Halosulfuron : * * P * * ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Corn : Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2005 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Program States :----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : MO : NE : NY : NC : ND : OH : PA : SD : TX : WI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides (continued) : Imazamox : * Imazapyr : * * * * * Imazethapyr : * * * * * * Iodosulfuron-Met-Sod : Isoxaflutole : P P * P P P P Linuron : * P MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : MCPA, sodium salt : * P * * Mesotrione : P P P * P P P * P Metolachlor : P * * * P Metribuzin : * * Metsulfuron-methyl : * Nicosulfuron : P P P P P P P P P P Oxyfluorfen : * Paraquat : * P * P * Pendimethalin : * P * * P * P P Primisulfuron : * * * * * * * * Propachlor : * * Prosulfuron : * * * * Pyraflufen-ethyl : * Quinclorac : Quizalofop-ethyl : Rimsulfuron : P P P P P * P P P P S-Metolachlor : P P P P P P P P P Simazine : P * P P * Sulfosate : * * * * * * * * Thifensulfuron : * * * * * * Tribenuron-methyl : * Triclopyr : * Trifluralin : * * * * Vernolate : * : Insecticides : Acephate : * Azadirachtin : Azinphos-methyl : * Benzoic acid : * Bifenthrin : * * * * * * P * Carbaryl : Carbofuran : Chlorethoxyfos : Chlorpyrifos : * * P P P P P * * Cyfluthrin : * P * P * P P Diazinon : Dimethoate : * Esfenvalerate : * * * ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Corn : Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2005 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Program States :----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : MO : NE : NY : NC : ND : OH : PA : SD : TX : WI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Insecticides (continued) : Fipronil : P * * * * * Gamma-cyhalothrin : * Imidacloprid : * Lambda-cyhalothrin : * * * * * P * * Methyl parathion : * Permethrin : * * * * * * Petroleum distillate : * * Phorate : * * Propargite : P Tebupirimphos : * P * * * P P Tefluthrin : P P * * P P * P Terbufos : * * P * P Thiamethoxam : * Zeta-cypermethrin : P * * * * * * : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : Chlorothalonil : Propiconazole : : Other Chemicals : Garlic oil : * ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ P Usage data are published for this active ingredient. * Usage data are not published for this active ingredient. Corn: Planted Acreage, Pesticide, Percent of Area Receiving Applications and Total Applied, Program States and Total, 2005 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : Area Receiving and Total Applied State :Planted :----------------------------------------------------------------------- :Acreage : Herbicide : Insecticide : Fungicide : Other ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 : Acres lbs lbs lbs lbs : : CO : 1,100 90 1,494 24 252 GA : 270 91 495 14 25 IL 1/ : 12,100 99 30,967 52 1,426 IN 1/ : 5,900 97 14,136 41 722 IA : 12,800 96 24,726 11 187 KS : 3,650 87 7,436 11 89 KY : 1,250 100 3,187 18 26 MI 1/ : 2,250 99 5,145 14 153 MN : 7,300 100 10,361 12 214 MO : 3,100 96 7,707 11 41 NE : 8,500 98 18,416 20 456 NY : 990 96 2,325 21 146 NC : 750 98 1,669 17 130 ND 1/ : 1,410 99 1,094 OH 1/ : 3,450 99 9,322 9 215 PA : 1,350 97 3,346 21 154 SD : 4,450 100 6,036 12 239 TX : 2,050 94 3,344 24 236 WI : 3,800 97 6,369 22 134 : Total1/ : 76,470 97 157,575 23 4,849 * 93 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Applied on less than one percent of acres. 1/ Insufficient reports to publish data for one or more pesticide classes. Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 3 1.1 0.450 0.474 1,160 2,4-D, BEE : * 1.0 0.339 0.339 126 2,4-D, dieth sal : * 1.0 0.451 0.451 25 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 3 1.0 0.352 0.360 799 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : 1 1.3 0.068 0.087 38 Acetochlor : 23 1.0 1.645 1.661 29,802 Alachlor : 1 1.0 1.747 1.765 1,562 Ametryn : * 1.0 0.857 0.857 18 Atrazine : 66 1.1 1.028 1.133 57,390 Bromoxynil : 1 1.0 0.243 0.243 199 Bromoxynil heptanoat : * 1.0 0.250 0.260 56 Bromoxynil octanoate : * 1.0 0.251 0.257 85 Carfentrazone-ethyl : * 1.0 0.013 0.013 5 Clopyralid : 5 1.0 0.110 0.110 449 Cyanazine : * 1.0 1.337 1.337 389 Dicamba : 1 1.0 0.137 0.142 154 Dicamba, Digly Salt : 2 1.0 0.198 0.203 377 Dicamba, Dimet. salt : 3 1.1 0.146 0.156 302 Dicamba, Pot. salt : 2 1.0 0.354 0.354 557 Dicamba, Sodium salt : 4 1.0 0.103 0.105 349 Diflufenzopyr-sodium : 4 1.0 0.040 0.041 123 Dimethenamid : 1 1.0 1.144 1.144 685 Dimethenamid-P : 4 1.0 0.741 0.747 2,372 Flufenacet : 3 1.0 0.378 0.378 725 Flumetsulam : 6 1.0 0.045 0.045 200 Foramsulfuron : 2 1.0 0.026 0.026 32 Glufosinate-ammonium : 5 1.0 0.370 0.377 1,388 Glyphosate : 2 1.2 0.632 0.737 957 Glyphosate amm. salt : * 1.7 0.042 0.071 2 Glyphosate iso. salt : 31 1.3 0.727 0.963 22,967 Halosulfuron : 1 1.0 0.036 0.036 22 Imazapyr : 1 1.0 0.013 0.014 14 Imazethapyr : 1 1.0 0.038 0.039 43 Iodosulfuron-Met-Sod : * 1.0 0.002 0.002 2/ Isoxaflutole : 6 1.0 0.051 0.053 233 Linuron : * 1.0 0.803 0.803 110 MCPA, sodium salt : 1 1.0 0.666 0.666 258 Mesotrione : 20 1.0 0.116 0.119 1,853 Metolachlor : 2 1.0 1.578 1.578 1,933 Metribuzin : * 1.0 0.088 0.088 30 Nicosulfuron : 10 1.0 0.021 0.021 163 Paraquat : 1 1.0 0.570 0.575 394 Pendimethalin : 2 1.0 0.846 0.854 1,309 Primisulfuron : 2 1.0 0.024 0.024 38 Prosulfuron : 1 1.0 0.009 0.009 8 Rimsulfuron : 8 1.0 0.017 0.017 108 S-Metolachlor : 23 1.0 1.323 1.354 23,652 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2005 1/ (continued) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides (continued) : Simazine : 3 1.0 1.076 1.076 2,424 Sulfosate : 1 1.1 1.065 1.162 537 Thifensulfuron : * 1.1 0.052 0.056 21 Trifluralin : 1 1.0 0.754 0.754 379 Vernolate : * 1.0 1.907 1.907 334 : Insecticides : Bifenthrin : 2 1.0 0.055 0.057 72 Carbofuran : * 1.0 0.593 0.593 113 Chlorpyrifos : 2 1.0 1.112 1.112 2,047 Cyfluthrin : 7 1.0 0.007 0.007 38 Dimethoate : * 2.3 0.437 1.012 68 Esfenvalerate : * 1.0 0.041 0.041 8 Fipronil : 1 1.0 0.113 0.117 88 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 1 1.1 0.023 0.026 25 Methyl parathion : * 1.1 0.283 0.323 82 Permethrin : 1 1.0 0.107 0.109 116 Propargite : * 1.0 1.764 1.776 289 Tebupirimphos : 6 1.0 0.115 0.115 573 Tefluthrin : 7 1.0 0.118 0.118 637 Terbufos : * 1.0 0.870 0.872 331 Zeta-cypermethrin : * 1.3 0.022 0.029 11 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Area applied is less than 0.5 percent. 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for the 19 Program States was 76.5 million acres. States included are CO, GA, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY, MI, MN, MO, NE, NY, NC, ND, OH, PA, SD, TX, and WI. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Colorado, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 6 1.1 0.228 0.240 15 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 3 1.0 0.160 0.160 4 Atrazine : 33 1.1 0.760 0.817 295 Dicamba, Digly Salt : 7 1.0 0.176 0.176 14 Dicamba, Dimet. salt : 12 1.0 0.053 0.053 7 Dicamba, Sodium salt : 6 1.2 0.110 0.128 9 Diflufenzopyr-sodium : 6 1.0 0.045 0.045 3 Glyphosate iso. salt : 64 1.5 0.729 1.104 782 Mesotrione : 8 1.0 0.113 0.113 9 Nicosulfuron : 6 1.0 0.024 0.024 1 Rimsulfuron : 6 1.0 0.019 0.019 1 : Insecticides : Cyfluthrin : 6 1.0 0.012 0.012 1 Propargite : 7 1.0 1.581 1.600 131 Tebupirimphos : 5 1.0 0.136 0.136 7 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Colorado was 1.1 million acres. Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Georgia, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : Atrazine : 68 1.2 1.341 1.560 288 Glyphosate iso. salt : 56 1.4 0.778 1.058 160 Nicosulfuron : 14 1.0 0.029 0.029 1 Pendimethalin : 3 1.0 0.814 0.814 7 : Insecticides : Terbufos : 3 1.0 0.740 0.740 7 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Georgia was 270,000 acres. Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Illinois, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 4 1.2 0.439 0.510 253 Acetochlor : 30 1.0 1.845 1.845 6,635 Atrazine : 87 1.1 1.153 1.304 13,729 Bromoxynil : 3 1.0 0.236 0.236 72 Clopyralid : 7 1.0 0.117 0.117 101 Dicamba : 4 1.0 0.150 0.150 72 Dicamba, Digly Salt : 3 1.0 0.202 0.202 71 Dicamba, Pot. salt : 4 1.0 0.384 0.384 180 Dicamba, Sodium salt : 9 1.0 0.105 0.105 116 Diflufenzopyr-sodium : 7 1.0 0.039 0.039 33 Dimethenamid-P : 7 1.0 0.689 0.712 614 Flufenacet : 4 1.0 0.428 0.428 213 Flumetsulam : 7 1.0 0.058 0.058 52 Foramsulfuron : 3 1.0 0.031 0.031 10 Glufosinate-ammonium : 3 1.1 0.305 0.345 139 Glyphosate iso. salt : 11 1.2 0.734 0.875 1,176 Imazapyr : 1 1.0 0.013 0.013 2 Imazethapyr : 1 1.0 0.038 0.038 6 Isoxaflutole : 9 1.0 0.060 0.060 67 Mesotrione : 24 1.1 0.108 0.114 329 Metolachlor : 2 1.0 1.566 1.566 340 Nicosulfuron : 12 1.0 0.020 0.020 29 Primisulfuron : 4 1.0 0.024 0.024 13 Prosulfuron : 2 1.0 0.009 0.009 2 Rimsulfuron : 10 1.1 0.028 0.031 36 S-Metolachlor : 30 1.0 1.327 1.381 5,005 Simazine : 6 1.0 1.051 1.051 736 : Insecticides : Chlorpyrifos : 3 1.0 1.260 1.260 496 Cyfluthrin : 20 1.0 0.006 0.006 14 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 3 1.0 0.020 0.020 7 Permethrin : 4 1.0 0.114 0.114 56 Tebupirimphos : 20 1.0 0.115 0.115 280 Tefluthrin : 23 1.0 0.125 0.125 349 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Illinois was 12.1 million acres. Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Indiana, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 4 1.0 0.428 0.428 110 Acetochlor : 23 1.0 1.823 1.823 2,470 Atrazine : 80 1.1 1.094 1.194 5,670 Clopyralid : 1 1.0 0.136 0.136 11 Dicamba, Dimet. salt : 3 1.0 0.121 0.121 23 Dicamba, Sodium salt : 4 1.0 0.106 0.106 26 Diflufenzopyr-sodium : 4 1.0 0.042 0.042 10 Flufenacet : 6 1.0 0.463 0.463 153 Flumetsulam : 3 1.0 0.044 0.044 8 Foramsulfuron : 4 1.0 0.028 0.028 6 Glyphosate iso. salt : 14 1.1 0.867 0.964 772 Imazapyr : 5 1.0 0.014 0.014 4 Imazethapyr : 5 1.0 0.042 0.042 13 Isoxaflutole : 10 1.0 0.049 0.049 30 Mesotrione : 31 1.1 0.128 0.145 265 Nicosulfuron : 8 1.0 0.020 0.020 9 Primisulfuron : 5 1.0 0.027 0.027 8 Prosulfuron : 5 1.0 0.009 0.009 3 Rimsulfuron : 5 1.0 0.017 0.017 5 S-Metolachlor : 38 1.1 1.234 1.341 3,001 Simazine : 9 1.0 1.236 1.236 638 : Insecticides : Chlorpyrifos : 6 1.0 1.336 1.336 510 Cyfluthrin : 8 1.0 0.006 0.006 3 Tebupirimphos : 8 1.0 0.113 0.113 51 Tefluthrin : 20 1.0 0.107 0.107 126 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Indiana was 5.9 million acres. Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Iowa, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 2 1.0 0.564 0.564 113 Acetochlor : 32 1.0 1.661 1.662 6,706 Atrazine : 61 1.1 0.955 1.055 8,276 Clopyralid : 7 1.0 0.128 0.128 112 Dicamba, Pot. salt : 3 1.0 0.391 0.391 146 Dicamba, Sodium salt : 1 1.0 0.122 0.122 18 Diflufenzopyr-sodium : 1 1.0 0.049 0.049 7 Dimethenamid-P : 6 1.0 0.746 0.746 602 Flufenacet : 3 1.0 0.338 0.338 130 Flumetsulam : 7 1.0 0.046 0.046 40 Glufosinate-ammonium : 13 1.0 0.398 0.398 639 Glyphosate iso. salt : 21 1.1 0.745 0.836 2,230 Isoxaflutole : 6 1.0 0.054 0.054 41 Mesotrione : 32 1.0 0.108 0.108 443 Nicosulfuron : 14 1.0 0.022 0.022 39 Rimsulfuron : 13 1.0 0.011 0.011 18 S-Metolachlor : 22 1.0 1.520 1.530 4,335 : Insecticides : Cyfluthrin : 6 1.0 0.006 0.006 4 Tebupirimphos : 6 1.0 0.115 0.115 89 Tefluthrin : 2 1.0 0.107 0.107 30 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Iowa was 12.8 million acres. Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Kansas, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 8 1.1 0.258 0.288 84 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 15 1.1 0.236 0.252 141 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : 8 1.0 0.069 0.069 21 Acetochlor : 10 1.0 1.388 1.388 491 Alachlor : 2 1.0 2.163 2.163 163 Atrazine : 59 1.3 1.027 1.290 2,767 Dicamba, Dimet. salt : 15 1.2 0.103 0.121 68 Dicamba, Sodium salt : 3 1.0 0.082 0.082 9 Diflufenzopyr-sodium : 3 1.0 0.033 0.033 4 Glyphosate iso. salt : 59 1.6 0.713 1.117 2,409 Isoxaflutole : 6 1.5 0.027 0.041 9 Mesotrione : 6 1.0 0.102 0.102 23 Metolachlor : 6 1.0 1.432 1.432 302 Nicosulfuron : 4 1.0 0.021 0.021 3 Primisulfuron : 3 1.0 0.030 0.030 3 Prosulfuron : 3 1.0 0.010 0.010 1 Rimsulfuron : 4 1.0 0.012 0.012 2 S-Metolachlor : 17 1.0 1.175 1.231 762 : Insecticides : Methyl parathion : 2 1.1 0.405 0.456 40 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Kansas was 3.7 million acres. Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Kentucky, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 6 1.0 0.452 0.452 32 Acetochlor : 14 1.0 1.375 1.375 237 Atrazine : 83 1.3 1.219 1.542 1,593 Dicamba, Sodium salt : 9 1.3 0.071 0.090 10 Diflufenzopyr-sodium : 9 1.3 0.028 0.036 4 Glyphosate iso. salt : 49 1.1 0.875 0.992 606 Imazapyr : 13 1.2 0.012 0.014 2 Imazethapyr : 13 1.2 0.036 0.043 7 Isoxaflutole : 6 1.0 0.038 0.038 3 Mesotrione : 16 1.1 0.126 0.133 26 Nicosulfuron : 19 1.0 0.023 0.023 6 Paraquat : 14 1.0 0.401 0.401 68 Rimsulfuron : 15 1.0 0.011 0.011 2 S-Metolachlor : 19 1.0 1.299 1.299 306 Simazine : 12 1.0 0.889 0.889 129 : Insecticides : Lambda-cyhalothrin : 8 1.0 0.022 0.022 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Kentucky was 1.3 million acres. Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Michigan, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 2 1.3 0.426 0.549 26 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 1 1.0 0.342 0.342 7 Acetochlor : 28 1.0 1.832 1.832 1,148 Atrazine : 71 1.1 1.117 1.225 1,952 Clopyralid : 8 1.0 0.112 0.112 21 Dicamba : 2 1.0 0.143 0.143 5 Dicamba, Digly Salt : 7 1.0 0.226 0.226 38 Dicamba, Sodium salt : 3 1.0 0.128 0.128 10 Diflufenzopyr-sodium : 3 1.0 0.050 0.050 4 Dimethenamid-P : 7 1.0 0.750 0.750 116 Flumetsulam : 13 1.0 0.039 0.039 11 Glyphosate iso. salt : 33 1.1 0.843 0.935 699 Mesotrione : 11 1.0 0.155 0.155 38 Metolachlor : 1 1.0 1.162 1.162 28 Nicosulfuron : 12 1.0 0.018 0.018 5 Pendimethalin : 8 1.0 0.928 0.928 164 Primisulfuron : 2 1.0 0.024 0.024 1 Rimsulfuron : 8 1.0 0.012 0.012 2 S-Metolachlor : 23 1.0 1.319 1.319 676 Simazine : 1 1.0 1.183 1.183 39 : Insecticides : Bifenthrin : 5 1.0 0.043 0.043 5 Chlorpyrifos : 4 1.0 0.926 0.926 90 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Michigan was 2.3 million acres. Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Minnesota, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : Acetochlor : 33 1.0 1.271 1.271 3,095 Atrazine : 41 1.1 0.490 0.551 1,660 Clopyralid : 6 1.0 0.104 0.104 42 Dicamba, Digly Salt : 3 1.0 0.277 0.277 69 Dicamba, Pot. salt : 5 1.0 0.363 0.363 120 Dicamba, Sodium salt : 5 1.0 0.137 0.137 45 Diflufenzopyr-sodium : 5 1.0 0.054 0.054 18 Dimethenamid-P : 6 1.0 0.950 0.950 388 Flumetsulam : 6 1.0 0.035 0.035 14 Glufosinate-ammonium : 7 1.0 0.319 0.319 163 Glyphosate : 5 1.1 0.722 0.777 270 Glyphosate iso. salt : 44 1.2 0.738 0.896 2,853 Mesotrione : 17 1.0 0.099 0.099 125 Metolachlor : 2 1.0 1.730 1.730 219 Nicosulfuron : 12 1.0 0.025 0.025 22 Pendimethalin : 1 1.0 0.869 0.869 73 Rimsulfuron : 9 1.0 0.011 0.011 7 S-Metolachlor : 8 1.0 1.164 1.164 681 Vernolate : 1 1.0 2.309 2.309 213 : Insecticides : Chlorpyrifos : 2 1.0 0.874 0.874 107 Cyfluthrin : 5 1.0 0.016 0.017 7 Tebupirimphos : 5 1.0 0.112 0.112 43 Tefluthrin : 2 1.0 0.109 0.109 16 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Minnesota was 7.3 million acres. Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Missouri, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 6 1.0 0.417 0.417 72 Acetochlor : 32 1.0 1.852 1.852 1,842 Alachlor : 3 1.0 1.937 1.937 156 Atrazine : 80 1.1 1.363 1.513 3,768 Clopyralid : 5 1.0 0.103 0.103 15 Flumetsulam : 6 1.0 0.107 0.107 19 Glyphosate iso. salt : 14 1.2 0.759 0.903 388 Isoxaflutole : 6 1.0 0.048 0.048 8 Mesotrione : 20 1.0 0.092 0.092 57 Metolachlor : 6 1.0 1.679 1.679 300 Nicosulfuron : 16 1.0 0.020 0.020 10 Rimsulfuron : 16 1.0 0.018 0.018 9 S-Metolachlor : 18 1.0 1.409 1.409 781 Simazine : 3 1.0 0.815 0.815 64 : Insecticides : Zeta-cypermethrin : 3 1.0 0.011 0.011 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Missouri was 3.1 million acres. Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Nebraska, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 5 1.0 0.660 0.660 278 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 2 1.0 0.537 0.537 111 Acetochlor : 17 1.1 1.552 1.742 2,510 Alachlor : 4 1.0 1.747 1.747 533 Atrazine : 77 1.1 1.052 1.131 7,361 Carfentrazone-ethyl : 2 1.0 0.013 0.013 2 Clopyralid : 7 1.0 0.087 0.087 48 Dicamba, Digly Salt : 4 1.0 0.184 0.184 68 Dimethenamid-P : 5 1.0 0.684 0.684 264 Flufenacet : 3 1.0 0.279 0.279 80 Flumetsulam : 7 1.0 0.029 0.029 16 Glufosinate-ammonium : 6 1.0 0.415 0.415 198 Glyphosate iso. salt : 33 1.4 0.769 1.055 2,963 Isoxaflutole : 7 1.0 0.040 0.040 24 Mesotrione : 18 1.0 0.120 0.120 182 Nicosulfuron : 4 1.0 0.020 0.020 6 Rimsulfuron : 4 1.0 0.010 0.010 3 S-Metolachlor : 26 1.0 1.209 1.209 2,678 : Insecticides : Cyfluthrin : 5 1.0 0.013 0.013 5 Fipronil : 3 1.0 0.117 0.117 32 Tebupirimphos : 3 1.0 0.126 0.126 32 Tefluthrin : 3 1.0 0.124 0.124 26 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Nebraska was 8.5 million acres. Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, New York, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : Alachlor : 6 1.0 1.695 1.695 108 Atrazine : 75 1.1 1.020 1.121 832 Dicamba, Dimet. salt : 5 1.0 0.228 0.228 11 Glyphosate iso. salt : 31 1.0 0.833 0.855 264 Halosulfuron : 7 1.0 0.020 0.020 1 Mesotrione : 34 1.1 0.161 0.171 58 Nicosulfuron : 11 1.0 0.018 0.018 2 Pendimethalin : 17 1.0 1.054 1.054 180 Rimsulfuron : 16 1.0 0.022 0.022 3 S-Metolachlor : 44 1.1 1.684 1.770 778 : Insecticides : Chlorpyrifos : 3 1.0 1.636 1.636 43 Tefluthrin : 8 1.0 0.113 0.113 9 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for New York was 990,000 acres. Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, North Carolina, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 5 1.0 0.397 0.397 16 Alachlor : 12 1.1 1.597 1.750 162 Ametryn : 3 1.0 0.857 0.857 18 Atrazine : 67 1.1 1.143 1.207 603 Glyphosate iso. salt : 53 1.3 0.701 0.899 357 Linuron : 7 1.0 0.804 0.804 44 Nicosulfuron : 13 1.0 0.024 0.024 2 Paraquat : 8 1.1 0.614 0.668 42 Rimsulfuron : 11 1.0 0.011 0.011 1 S-Metolachlor : 19 1.0 1.196 1.196 166 : Insecticides : Chlorpyrifos : 8 1.0 1.058 1.058 65 Terbufos : 6 1.0 1.095 1.095 53 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for North Carolina was 750,000 acres. Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, North Dakota, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : Atrazine : 20 1.0 0.332 0.332 95 Dicamba, Digly Salt : 5 1.0 0.239 0.239 18 Dicamba, Dimet. salt : 6 1.0 0.188 0.188 16 Dicamba, Sodium salt : 18 1.0 0.108 0.108 27 Diflufenzopyr-sodium : 18 1.0 0.043 0.043 11 Foramsulfuron : 14 1.0 0.020 0.020 4 Glyphosate iso. salt : 56 1.5 0.640 0.972 771 Nicosulfuron : 18 1.0 0.022 0.022 5 Rimsulfuron : 12 1.0 0.011 0.011 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for North Dakota was 1.4 million acres. Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Ohio, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 8 1.0 0.392 0.392 106 2,4-D, BEE : 3 1.0 0.294 0.294 28 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 4 1.0 0.324 0.324 50 Acetochlor : 34 1.0 1.826 1.826 2,154 Atrazine : 83 1.0 1.278 1.287 3,667 Clopyralid : 3 1.0 0.121 0.121 12 Dicamba, Sodium salt : 1 1.0 0.090 0.090 4 Diflufenzopyr-sodium : 1 1.0 0.036 0.036 2 Dimethenamid-P : 3 1.0 0.825 0.825 99 Flufenacet : 3 1.0 0.386 0.386 45 Flumetsulam : 3 1.0 0.042 0.042 5 Glyphosate : 7 1.0 0.628 0.647 153 Glyphosate iso. salt : 20 1.1 0.755 0.829 580 Isoxaflutole : 10 1.0 0.071 0.071 25 MCPA, sodium salt : 2 1.0 0.745 0.745 64 Mesotrione : 9 1.0 0.141 0.141 43 Nicosulfuron : 2 1.0 0.014 0.014 1 S-Metolachlor : 32 1.0 1.233 1.233 1,373 Simazine : 18 1.0 1.103 1.103 700 : Insecticides : Chlorpyrifos : 3 1.0 1.466 1.466 149 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Ohio was 3.5 million acres. Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Pennsylvania, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 5 1.0 0.597 0.597 40 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 6 1.2 0.623 0.731 63 Acetochlor : 11 1.0 1.610 1.610 234 Atrazine : 87 1.0 1.063 1.096 1,291 Dicamba, Dimet. salt : 5 1.0 0.194 0.194 14 Dicamba, Sodium salt : 2 1.0 0.106 0.106 2 Diflufenzopyr-sodium : 2 1.0 0.042 0.042 1 Glyphosate iso. salt : 28 1.1 0.766 0.832 319 Isoxaflutole : 5 1.0 0.062 0.062 5 Mesotrione : 26 1.0 0.136 0.136 47 Metolachlor : 3 1.0 1.217 1.217 49 Nicosulfuron : 13 1.0 0.020 0.020 4 Paraquat : 9 1.0 0.458 0.458 54 Pendimethalin : 26 1.0 0.928 0.928 324 Rimsulfuron : 13 1.0 0.011 0.011 2 S-Metolachlor : 48 1.0 1.220 1.220 783 Simazine : 1 1.0 1.123 1.123 14 : Insecticides : Chlorpyrifos : 9 1.0 1.018 1.018 128 Cyfluthrin : 2 1.4 0.009 0.013 2/ Lambda-cyhalothrin : 2 1.0 0.014 0.014 2/ Tefluthrin : 7 1.0 0.097 0.097 9 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Pennsylvania was 1.4 million acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, South Dakota, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : Acetochlor : 19 1.0 1.286 1.286 1,109 Atrazine : 33 1.0 0.599 0.604 893 Dicamba, Digly Salt : 2 1.0 0.220 0.220 21 Dicamba, Sodium salt : 3 1.0 0.114 0.114 13 Diflufenzopyr-sodium : 3 1.0 0.045 0.045 5 Glufosinate-ammonium : 4 1.0 0.399 0.399 62 Glyphosate : 2 1.0 0.504 0.519 54 Glyphosate iso. salt : 71 1.4 0.663 0.956 3,030 Isoxaflutole : 7 1.0 0.058 0.058 17 Mesotrione : 11 1.0 0.101 0.101 50 Nicosulfuron : 4 1.0 0.023 0.023 4 Rimsulfuron : 4 1.0 0.011 0.011 2 S-Metolachlor : 6 1.0 1.256 1.256 329 : Insecticides : Chlorpyrifos : 4 1.0 0.988 0.988 163 Tefluthrin : 3 1.0 0.109 0.109 13 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for South Dakota was 4.5 million acres. Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Texas, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 4 1.0 0.481 0.481 39 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 9 1.0 0.426 0.426 74 Atrazine : 55 1.2 0.781 0.907 1,024 Dicamba, Dimet. salt : 3 1.0 0.186 0.186 11 Dicamba, Sodium salt : 8 1.0 0.086 0.086 14 Diflufenzopyr-sodium : 8 1.0 0.034 0.034 6 Dimethenamid-P : 3 1.0 0.405 0.405 28 Glyphosate iso. salt : 70 1.8 0.620 1.116 1,596 Isoxaflutole : 6 1.0 0.034 0.034 4 Nicosulfuron : 9 1.0 0.019 0.019 4 Pendimethalin : 9 1.1 0.646 0.700 132 Rimsulfuron : 8 1.0 0.010 0.010 2 S-Metolachlor : 10 1.0 0.962 0.962 194 : Insecticides : Bifenthrin : 4 1.1 0.074 0.084 6 Cyfluthrin : 6 1.0 0.004 0.004 1 Propargite : 4 1.0 1.954 1.954 157 Tebupirimphos : 6 1.0 0.083 0.083 11 Terbufos : 3 1.0 0.712 0.712 40 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Texas was 2.1 million acres. Corn: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Wisconsin, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : Acetochlor : 16 1.0 1.669 1.669 1,009 Atrazine : 54 1.0 0.782 0.792 1,627 Clopyralid : 20 1.0 0.107 0.107 79 Dicamba, Sodium salt : 3 1.0 0.093 0.093 12 Diflufenzopyr-sodium : 3 1.0 0.037 0.037 5 Flufenacet : 4 1.0 0.442 0.442 64 Flumetsulam : 21 1.0 0.037 0.037 30 Glufosinate-ammonium : 9 1.0 0.348 0.348 118 Glyphosate iso. salt : 28 1.2 0.766 0.946 1,013 Mesotrione : 25 1.0 0.142 0.142 133 Nicosulfuron : 12 1.0 0.019 0.019 9 Pendimethalin : 6 1.0 0.948 0.948 231 Rimsulfuron : 7 1.0 0.012 0.012 3 S-Metolachlor : 30 1.0 1.473 1.473 1,677 : Insecticides : Cyfluthrin : 7 1.0 0.006 0.006 2 Tebupirimphos : 7 1.0 0.127 0.127 36 Tefluthrin : 9 1.0 0.126 0.126 41 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Wisconsin was 3.8 million acres. Fall Potatoes: Fertilizer Use by State, 2005 Percent of Acres Treated and Total Applied ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : Percent of Acres Treated and Total Applied State : Planted :---------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Acreage : Nitrogen : Phosphate : Potash : Sulfur ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :1,000 Acres Percent Mil. lbs. Percent Mil. lbs. Percent Mil. lbs. Percent Mil. lbs. : CO : 58 92 9.4 86 7.9 64 3.2 89 2.6 ID : 325 100 72.9 99 56.9 92 40.0 82 21.7 ME 1/ : 58 100 10.2 100 10.1 100 11.9 MI : 44 99 9.2 94 4.9 100 10.2 58 1.4 MN : 46 100 8.2 100 5.0 81 7.7 55 0.7 ND : 92 100 14.7 100 8.4 96 13.7 54 1.3 WA : 154 100 37.8 98 30.2 92 38.2 89 9.5 WI : 68 100 17.9 99 9.1 99 20.5 72 4.1 : Total : 845 99 180.3 98 132.5 92 145.4 72 41.3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Insufficient reports to publish data for one or more of the fertilizer primary nutrients. Fall Potatoes: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2005 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Primary : Planted : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Nutrient : Acreage : Applied : cations :Application : Crop Year : Applied ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Mil. lbs : : Colorado : 58 Nitrogen : 92 4.4 40 177 9.4 Phosphate : 86 2.7 59 157 7.9 Potash : 64 2.2 39 85 3.2 Sulfur : 89 3.4 15 51 2.6 : Idaho : 325 Nitrogen : 100 4.8 47 225 72.9 Phosphate : 99 2.0 88 178 56.9 Potash : 92 1.8 73 134 40.0 Sulfur : 82 2.0 41 81 21.7 : Maine : 58 Nitrogen : 100 1.2 142 176 10.2 Phosphate : 100 1.0 169 174 10.1 Potash : 100 1.2 167 204 11.9 Sulfur 1/ : : Michigan : 44 Nitrogen : 99 3.2 65 211 9.2 Phosphate : 94 1.5 77 119 4.9 Potash : 100 1.8 126 232 10.2 Sulfur : 58 1.4 37 54 1.4 : Minnesota : 46 Nitrogen : 100 3.2 55 178 8.2 Phosphate : 100 1.0 105 110 5.0 Potash : 81 1.2 179 208 7.7 Sulfur : 55 1.7 17 29 0.7 : North Dakota : 92 Nitrogen : 100 4.6 35 159 14.7 Phosphate : 100 1.5 61 91 8.4 Potash : 96 1.2 125 154 13.7 Sulfur : 54 1.2 22 26 1.3 : Washington : 154 Nitrogen : 100 2.8 86 245 37.8 Phosphate : 98 1.9 108 201 30.2 Potash : 92 1.6 166 269 38.2 Sulfur : 89 1.7 42 70 9.5 : Wisconsin : 68 Nitrogen : 100 6.4 41 264 17.9 Phosphate : 99 2.1 64 135 9.1 Potash : 99 4.0 76 303 20.5 Sulfur : 72 3.6 23 83 4.1 : ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Fall Potatoes: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2005 (continued) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Primary : Planted : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Nutrient : Acreage : Applied : cations :Application : Crop Year : Applied ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Mil. lbs : : Total : 845 Nitrogen : 99 4.1 52 215 180.3 Phosphate : 98 1.8 88 160 132.5 Potash : 92 1.9 101 188 145.4 Sulfur : 72 2.1 33 68 41.3 : ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Insufficient reports to publish fertilizer data. Fall Potatoes : Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2005 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Program States :-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : CO : ID : ME : MI : MN : ND : WA : WI --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : P * * * 2,4-D, dieth sal : * * 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : P * * * Bentazon : * * Carfentrazone-ethyl : * * * Clethodim : P * * * * * * Dimethenamid-P : P * P * EPTC : P * P * P Fluroxypyr : * * Glufosinate-ammonium : P * * * * P * Glyphosate : * * Glyphosate iso. salt : P * P * * * P P Halosulfuron : * * Imazamox : * * Linuron : P P P P P Metolachlor : P * * * Metribuzin : P P P P P P P P P Pendimethalin : P P P * * P P P Quizalofop-P-ethyl : * * Rimsulfuron : P P * P * P P P S-Metolachlor : P P P P P P P Sethoxydim : P * * * P Sulfentrazone : * * Trifluralin : P P P : Insecticides : Acetamiprid : * * * Aldicarb : P P P Azadirachtin : * * Azinphos-methyl : P * * Bifenthrin : * * Bt subsp tenebrionis : * * Bt subsp. kurstaki : * * * Carbaryl : P * P * * Carbofuran : P P * * Cryolite : * * Cyfluthrin : P * P P P * P P P Cypermethrin : * * Diazinon : P P * * Dimethoate : P * * * P P P Endosulfan : P * P * P * P Esfenvalerate : P P P * P P * P P Ethoprop : P P * P * Imidacloprid : P * P P P P * P P Indoxacarb : * * * Lambda-cyhalothrin : * * * --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Fall Potatoes : Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2005 (continued) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Program States :-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : CO : ID : ME : MI : MN : ND : WA : WI --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Insecticides (continued) : Malathion : * * * Methamidophos : P P P * * P * Methomyl : P P Novaluron : P * * Oxamyl : P * P * * P * Permethrin : P P * P * P P Phorate : P P * * Phosmet : P * P * P Propargite : P * * Pymetrozine : P P * * Pyrethrins : * * * * Rotenone : * * Spinosad : P * * * * * Spiromesifen : P P Thiamethoxam : P P P * P P P * P Zeta-cypermethrin : * * : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : P P P P P P P P P Boscalid : P P * * P P Captan : * * Chlorothalonil : P P P P P P P P P Coniothyrium minitan : * * Copper amm. complex : * * Copper chloride hyd. : * * Copper hydroxide : P * P * P * P P Copper resinate : * * Copper sulfate : P * * * Cymoxanil : P P * * P P P P Dicloran : * * Dimethomorph : P * * Famoxadone : P P * * P P P Fenamidone : P P Fluazinam : P * P * P Flutolanil : P P * * * * Iprodione : P * * Mancozeb : P P P P P P P P P Maneb : P * * * Mefenoxam : P * P P * P P P P Metiram : P * P * * P P PCNB : P P * P * Phosphorous acid : P P Propamocarb hydroch. : P P Pyraclostrobin : P P * * * * P P Rhamnolipid : * * Sulfur : P P --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Fall Potatoes : Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2005 (continued) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Program States :-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : CO : ID : ME : MI : MN : ND : WA : WI --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Fungicides (continued) : Trichoderma harz. : * * Trifloxystrobin : * * Triphenyltin hydrox. : P * * P P P P * P Zoxamide : P P * P * P * : Other Chemicals : Chloropicrin : * * * Cytokinins : * * Dichloropropene : P P P Diquat dibromide : P P P P P P P P P Endothall : * * * GABA : * * Gibberellic acid : * * Harpin protein : * * Indolebutyric acid : * * L-Glutamic acid : * * Maleic hydrazide : P P P * P * Metaldehyde : * * Metam-potassium : P * * Metam-sodium : P P * P * Paraquat : P * * * P * Pyrimethanil : P * * * Sulfuric Acid : P P P --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P Usage data are published for this active ingredient. * Usage data are not published for this active ingredient. Fall Potatoes: Planted Acreage, Pesticide, Percent of Area Receiving Applications and Total Applied, Program States and Total, 2005 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : Area Receiving and Total Applied State :Planted :----------------------------------------------------------------------- :Acreage : Herbicide : Insecticide : Fungicide : Other ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 : Acres lbs lbs lbs lbs : : CO : 58 78 101 57 10 78 87 34 9,678 ID : 325 90 694 65 331 81 813 49 37,732 ME : 58 100 35 91 18 100 607 12 46 MI : 44 98 68 97 20 98 391 2 55 MN : 46 97 33 97 10 98 578 8 7 ND : 92 89 57 76 11 96 854 7 15 WA : 154 96 328 97 517 99 1,394 70 17,171 WI : 68 99 78 97 62 99 810 49 3,327 : Total : 845 92 1,394 79 979 90 5,534 40 68,031 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fall Potatoes: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 1 2.7 0.058 0.154 1 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 1 1.4 0.059 0.081 1 Clethodim : 3 1.0 0.129 0.135 3 Dimethenamid-P : 7 1.0 0.770 0.770 44 EPTC : 24 1.0 3.222 3.261 648 Glufosinate-ammonium : 4 1.0 0.363 0.374 14 Glyphosate iso. salt : 5 1.0 0.625 0.655 27 Linuron : 7 1.0 0.665 0.665 41 Metolachlor : 1 1.0 1.698 1.698 16 Metribuzin : 74 1.1 0.401 0.441 278 Pendimethalin : 31 1.0 0.712 0.713 187 Rimsulfuron : 27 1.1 0.020 0.021 5 S-Metolachlor : 12 1.0 1.202 1.206 120 Sethoxydim : * 1.0 0.168 0.168 1 Trifluralin : 2 1.0 0.489 0.502 8 : Insecticides : Aldicarb : 9 1.0 2.839 2.839 211 Azinphos-methyl : 1 1.1 0.726 0.779 8 Carbaryl : * 1.2 1.072 1.330 3 Carbofuran : 4 1.0 0.847 0.847 26 Cyfluthrin : 29 1.8 0.028 0.051 12 Diazinon : 2 1.0 2.255 2.255 29 Dimethoate : 5 1.7 0.310 0.528 22 Endosulfan : 2 1.1 0.685 0.745 14 Esfenvalerate : 27 1.7 0.030 0.050 12 Ethoprop : 3 1.0 5.200 5.353 116 Imidacloprid : 38 1.3 0.103 0.135 44 Methamidophos : 12 1.6 0.885 1.427 139 Methomyl : 2 1.1 0.505 0.549 7 Novaluron : 2 1.6 0.069 0.108 2 Oxamyl : 13 2.1 0.798 1.656 177 Permethrin : 5 1.6 0.119 0.188 8 Phorate : 4 1.0 2.688 2.688 98 Phosmet : 1 1.2 0.850 1.041 10 Propargite : 2 1.1 1.556 1.697 22 Pymetrozine : 3 1.6 0.085 0.135 3 Spinosad : 1 1.0 0.050 0.050 2/ Spiromesifen : 3 1.5 0.182 0.264 7 Thiamethoxam : 13 1.1 0.065 0.071 8 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Fall Potatoes: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2005 1/ (continued) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number -- Pounds per Acre -- 1,000 lbs : : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 37 1.5 0.109 0.168 52 Boscalid : 17 1.4 0.223 0.302 43 Chlorothalonil : 55 4.8 0.940 4.547 2,129 Copper hydroxide : 8 1.6 0.571 0.940 62 Copper sulfate : 2 1.6 0.484 0.752 13 Cymoxanil : 16 1.9 0.111 0.213 30 Dimethomorph : 1 1.5 0.122 0.179 2 Famoxadone : 10 1.4 0.094 0.136 12 Fenamidone : 1 1.0 0.179 0.179 1 Fluazinam : 15 1.7 0.234 0.393 50 Flutolanil : 6 1.0 0.447 0.447 24 Iprodione : 4 1.1 0.666 0.751 24 Mancozeb : 61 3.4 1.235 4.215 2,187 Maneb : 1 1.0 1.472 1.472 11 Mefenoxam : 25 1.4 0.230 0.325 69 Metiram : 9 2.6 1.404 3.607 288 PCNB : 7 1.6 2.317 3.712 233 Phosphorous acid : 1 2.3 1.011 2.311 19 Propamocarb hydroch. : 1 1.8 0.727 1.305 12 Pyraclostrobin : 12 1.8 0.119 0.215 22 Sulfur : 4 2.7 2.544 6.800 208 Triphenyltin hydrox. : 10 1.8 0.140 0.247 20 Zoxamide : 5 1.1 0.112 0.125 6 : Other Chemicals : Dichloropropene : 6 1.0 166.474 166.474 7,878 Diquat dibromide : 30 1.5 0.342 0.504 129 Maleic hydrazide : 12 1.0 1.966 1.966 200 Metam-potassium : 2 1.0 188.196 188.196 3,555 Metam-sodium : 16 1.0 151.222 151.222 20,823 Paraquat : 2 1.2 0.494 0.588 12 Pyrimethanil : 2 1.1 0.273 0.299 4 Sulfuric Acid : 12 1.1 313.891 346.085 35,422 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Area applied is less than 0.5 percent. 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for the 8 Program States was 845,000 acres. States included are CO, ID, ME, MI, MN, ND, WA, and WI. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Fall Potatoes: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Colorado, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number -- Pounds per Acre -- 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : Metribuzin : 64 1.0 0.341 0.341 13 Pendimethalin : 17 1.0 0.699 0.699 7 S-Metolachlor : 38 1.0 1.345 1.345 30 : Insecticides : Esfenvalerate : 15 1.0 0.022 0.022 2/ Permethrin : 23 1.0 0.114 0.114 2 Thiamethoxam : 16 1.0 0.018 0.018 2/ : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 53 1.2 0.072 0.085 3 Chlorothalonil : 43 1.2 0.768 0.955 24 Mancozeb : 28 1.9 1.037 1.928 31 : Other Chemicals : Diquat dibromide : 41 1.0 0.399 0.414 10 Sulfuric Acid : 34 1.5 331.269 486.599 9,668 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Colorado was 58,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Fall Potatoes: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Idaho, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number -- Pounds per Acre -- 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : Dimethenamid-P : 17 1.0 0.761 0.761 42 EPTC : 38 1.0 3.166 3.219 396 Glyphosate iso. salt : 4 1.0 0.881 0.881 10 Metribuzin : 84 1.1 0.422 0.452 124 Pendimethalin : 38 1.0 0.719 0.719 90 Rimsulfuron : 28 1.0 0.022 0.022 2 S-Metolachlor : 4 1.0 1.526 1.565 21 Trifluralin : 2 1.1 0.453 0.487 3 : Insecticides : Aldicarb : 6 1.0 2.613 2.613 53 Carbofuran : 5 1.0 0.826 0.826 14 Cyfluthrin : 26 1.2 0.030 0.037 3 Diazinon : 3 1.0 2.412 2.412 25 Endosulfan : 2 1.0 0.647 0.647 5 Esfenvalerate : 17 1.1 0.037 0.039 2 Ethoprop : 3 1.0 5.246 5.246 47 Imidacloprid : 32 1.2 0.077 0.095 10 Methamidophos : 4 1.0 0.897 0.936 12 Oxamyl : 10 2.0 0.815 1.608 51 Phorate : 11 1.0 2.683 2.683 95 Pymetrozine : 5 1.4 0.084 0.118 2 Thiamethoxam : 9 1.0 0.047 0.047 1 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 36 1.4 0.116 0.159 19 Boscalid : 15 1.1 0.254 0.285 14 Chlorothalonil : 28 1.8 0.985 1.776 162 Copper hydroxide : 4 1.0 0.382 0.396 5 Cymoxanil : 7 1.0 0.115 0.115 3 Famoxadone : 6 1.0 0.115 0.115 2 Fluazinam : 8 1.0 0.210 0.212 5 Flutolanil : 5 1.0 0.536 0.536 8 Mancozeb : 54 1.9 1.463 2.824 500 Mefenoxam : 12 1.4 0.359 0.497 19 Metiram : 3 1.2 1.604 1.969 21 PCNB : 2 1.0 2.016 2.016 10 Phosphorous acid : 3 2.3 1.011 2.311 19 Pyraclostrobin : 19 1.4 0.123 0.177 11 Zoxamide : 5 1.0 0.139 0.139 2 : Other Chemicals : Dichloropropene : 5 1.0 177.501 177.501 2,984 Diquat dibromide : 5 1.0 0.430 0.438 7 Maleic hydrazide : 11 1.0 2.203 2.203 81 Metam-sodium : 14 1.0 141.239 141.239 6,645 Sulfuric Acid : 25 1.0 307.797 312.077 25,708 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Idaho was 325,000 acres. Fall Potatoes: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Maine, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : Linuron : 26 1.0 0.780 0.780 12 Metribuzin : 72 1.5 0.343 0.531 22 : Insecticides : Cyfluthrin : 34 1.8 0.028 0.050 1 Imidacloprid : 65 1.1 0.159 0.175 7 Methamidophos : 12 2.0 0.548 1.081 8 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 26 1.4 0.079 0.113 2 Chlorothalonil : 86 7.4 0.700 5.157 258 Mancozeb : 75 7.7 0.934 7.161 310 Mefenoxam : 40 1.1 0.232 0.244 6 Triphenyltin hydrox. : 9 2.3 0.117 0.263 1 : Other Chemicals : Diquat dibromide : 95 2.0 0.277 0.542 30 Maleic hydrazide : 12 1.0 1.939 1.939 14 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Maine was 58,000 acres. Fall Potatoes: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Michigan, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : Linuron : 60 1.0 0.688 0.688 18 Metribuzin : 55 1.1 0.295 0.316 8 Rimsulfuron : 24 1.0 0.021 0.021 2/ S-Metolachlor : 75 1.0 1.099 1.099 36 : Insecticides : Carbaryl : * 2.3 0.744 1.725 2/ Cyfluthrin : 43 3.5 0.028 0.098 2 Endosulfan : 4 1.2 0.623 0.747 1 Esfenvalerate : 15 1.4 0.031 0.042 2/ Imidacloprid : 56 1.3 0.106 0.141 3 Permethrin : 9 3.5 0.089 0.310 1 Phosmet : * 2.0 0.724 1.464 2/ Thiamethoxam : 23 1.0 0.100 0.103 1 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 53 2.0 0.108 0.216 5 Chlorothalonil : 70 7.5 0.925 6.976 215 Copper hydroxide : 6 2.8 0.711 1.993 5 Mancozeb : 66 4.5 1.194 5.416 157 Triphenyltin hydrox. : 22 1.8 0.111 0.202 2 : Other Chemicals : Diquat dibromide : 58 1.5 0.314 0.468 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Area applied is less than 0.5 percent. 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Michigan was 44,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Fall Potatoes: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Minnesota, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : Linuron : 8 1.0 0.820 0.820 3 Metribuzin : 81 1.0 0.309 0.309 12 S-Metolachlor : 28 1.0 1.029 1.029 13 : Insecticides : Esfenvalerate : 39 1.7 0.014 0.024 2/ Imidacloprid : 59 1.1 0.201 0.217 6 Thiamethoxam : 13 1.3 0.040 0.050 2/ : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 7 2.3 0.105 0.239 1 Chlorothalonil : 83 9.9 1.065 10.506 399 Cymoxanil : 15 1.0 0.094 0.094 1 Mancozeb : 75 3.3 1.347 4.405 152 Mefenoxam : 29 1.0 0.238 0.238 3 Metiram : 3 2.1 1.082 2.304 4 Triphenyltin hydrox. : 7 2.0 0.118 0.239 1 Zoxamide : 6 1.5 0.158 0.241 1 : Other Chemicals : Diquat dibromide : 22 1.5 0.343 0.526 5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Minnesota was 46,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Fall Potatoes: Agricultural Chemical Applications, North Dakota, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : Metribuzin : 47 1.1 0.426 0.457 20 Pendimethalin : 37 1.0 0.757 0.757 26 Rimsulfuron : 38 1.2 0.017 0.020 1 : Insecticides : Cyfluthrin : 28 2.7 0.020 0.054 1 Dimethoate : 11 1.5 0.167 0.244 3 Thiamethoxam : 17 1.1 0.032 0.034 1 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 13 1.0 0.119 0.119 1 Chlorothalonil : 78 6.9 1.039 7.152 510 Cymoxanil : 20 1.5 0.086 0.126 2 Famoxadone : 20 1.5 0.086 0.126 2 Mancozeb : 71 3.7 1.265 4.728 308 Mefenoxam : 41 1.0 0.153 0.153 6 Triphenyltin hydrox. : 23 2.2 0.167 0.361 8 : Other Chemicals : Diquat dibromide : 30 1.4 0.346 0.475 13 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for North Dakota was 92,000 acres. Fall Potatoes: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Washington, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number -- Pounds per Acre -- 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : EPTC : 38 1.0 3.444 3.465 202 Glufosinate-ammonium : 9 1.0 0.363 0.364 5 Glyphosate iso. salt : 11 1.0 0.412 0.420 7 Metribuzin : 76 1.1 0.421 0.475 56 Pendimethalin : 40 1.0 0.700 0.705 44 Rimsulfuron : 32 1.0 0.018 0.018 1 S-Metolachlor : 3 1.0 1.241 1.241 7 Trifluralin : 7 1.0 0.511 0.511 5 : Insecticides : Aldicarb : 35 1.0 2.924 2.924 159 Cyfluthrin : 33 2.0 0.029 0.060 3 Dimethoate : 12 2.0 0.358 0.715 13 Esfenvalerate : 60 1.7 0.031 0.053 5 Ethoprop : 6 1.1 5.012 5.378 47 Imidacloprid : 29 1.9 0.041 0.078 3 Methamidophos : 49 1.7 0.927 1.556 117 Methomyl : 9 1.1 0.505 0.549 7 Oxamyl : 41 2.2 0.790 1.731 110 Permethrin : 10 1.6 0.120 0.188 3 Spiromesifen : 18 1.5 0.182 0.264 7 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 47 1.8 0.116 0.211 15 Boscalid : 15 1.0 0.272 0.272 6 Chlorothalonil : 64 2.2 0.923 2.064 204 Copper hydroxide : 14 1.9 0.605 1.152 26 Cymoxanil : 33 2.7 0.124 0.334 17 Famoxadone : 9 1.0 0.097 0.097 1 Fenamidone : 3 1.0 0.179 0.179 1 Fluazinam : 59 1.9 0.235 0.457 42 Mancozeb : 67 3.0 1.386 4.111 427 Mefenoxam : 40 1.7 0.146 0.248 15 Metiram : 40 2.4 1.545 3.678 224 PCNB : 26 2.0 2.000 3.917 155 Propamocarb hydroch. : 6 1.8 0.727 1.305 12 Pyraclostrobin : 11 1.4 0.116 0.156 3 Sulfur : 20 2.7 2.544 6.800 208 Zoxamide : 7 1.0 0.075 0.077 1 : Other Chemicals : Dichloropropene : 20 1.0 160.396 160.396 4,892 Diquat dibromide : 30 1.1 0.419 0.466 21 Maleic hydrazide : 27 1.0 1.866 1.866 77 Metam-sodium : 45 1.0 157.959 157.959 10,868 Paraquat : 5 1.0 0.384 0.384 3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Washington was 154,000 acres. Fall Potatoes: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Wisconsin, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : Glyphosate iso. salt : 12 1.2 0.653 0.787 6 Linuron : 25 1.0 0.497 0.497 9 Metribuzin : 79 1.0 0.432 0.452 24 Pendimethalin : 28 1.0 0.697 0.697 13 Rimsulfuron : 43 1.1 0.021 0.023 1 S-Metolachlor : 19 1.0 1.036 1.038 13 Sethoxydim : 2 1.0 0.253 0.253 2/ : Insecticides : Cyfluthrin : 42 1.4 0.033 0.046 1 Dimethoate : 2 1.0 0.319 0.319 1 Endosulfan : 7 1.2 0.872 1.006 5 Esfenvalerate : 54 2.1 0.036 0.077 3 Imidacloprid : 56 1.2 0.175 0.204 8 Permethrin : 2 4.0 0.150 0.594 1 Phosmet : 7 1.4 0.808 1.145 6 Thiamethoxam : 35 1.3 0.081 0.107 3 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 55 1.7 0.108 0.183 7 Boscalid : 51 1.6 0.174 0.287 10 Chlorothalonil : 93 6.1 0.935 5.671 357 Copper hydroxide : 23 1.7 0.624 1.066 17 Cymoxanil : 41 2.1 0.090 0.191 5 Famoxadone : 41 2.1 0.089 0.186 5 Mancozeb : 73 5.5 1.111 6.091 304 Mefenoxam : 46 1.9 0.321 0.621 19 Pyraclostrobin : 20 4.1 0.117 0.481 7 Triphenyltin hydrox. : 35 1.5 0.104 0.152 4 : Other Chemicals : Diquat dibromide : 76 1.7 0.353 0.586 30 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Wisconsin was 68,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Oats: Fertilizer Use by State, 2005 Percent of Acres Treated and Total Applied ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : Percent of Acres Treated and Total Applied State : Planted :---------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Acreage : Nitrogen : Phosphate : Potash : Sulfur ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :1,000 Acres Percent Mil. lbs. Percent Mil. lbs. Percent Mil. lbs. Percent Mil. lbs. : CA 1/ : 270 26 4.4 ID : 90 42 1.6 22 1.4 5 0.1 12 0.2 IL 1/ : 60 15 0.4 12 0.4 26 1.7 IA 1/ : 210 31 1.8 30 2.5 40 6.9 KS 1/ : 100 84 4.4 39 1.4 17 0.8 MI 1/ : 90 82 2.6 72 2.8 77 3.4 MN : 310 28 4.2 22 2.4 28 5.9 5 0.2 MT : 90 53 2.0 35 1.0 14 0.4 9 0.1 NE : 150 68 4.5 24 1.3 7 0.1 5 0.0 NY 1/ : 95 75 1.9 72 2.7 72 2.8 ND : 490 71 15.8 49 5.7 9 0.7 5 0.1 PA : 140 90 4.5 81 4.9 82 5.1 2 0.1 SD 1/ : 380 64 11.8 46 5.6 17 1.7 TX : 690 79 45.4 56 12.7 39 4.9 25 1.7 WI : 400 23 2.1 24 3.9 35 15.1 8 0.4 : Total : 3,565 56 107.4 40 48.8 28 49.7 9 3.2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Insufficient reports to publish data for one or more of the fertilizer primary nutrients. Oats: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2005 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Primary : Planted : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Nutrient : Acreage : Applied : cations :Application : Crop Year : Applied ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Mil. lbs : : California : 270 Nitrogen : 26 1.0 63 64 4.4 Phosphate 1/ : Potash 1/ : Sulfur 1/ : : Idaho : 90 Nitrogen : 42 1.2 37 43 1.6 Phosphate : 22 1.0 70 70 1.4 Potash : 5 1.0 19 19 0.1 Sulfur : 12 1.1 14 15 0.2 : Illinois : 60 Nitrogen : 15 1.2 38 47 0.4 Phosphate : 12 1.0 61 62 0.4 Potash : 26 1.0 109 109 1.7 Sulfur 1/ : : Iowa : 210 Nitrogen : 31 1.1 26 28 1.8 Phosphate : 30 1.0 39 39 2.5 Potash : 40 1.0 82 82 6.9 Sulfur 1/ : : Kansas : 100 Nitrogen : 84 1.1 48 52 4.4 Phosphate : 39 1.0 37 37 1.4 Potash : 17 1.0 47 47 0.8 Sulfur 1/ : : Michigan : 90 Nitrogen : 82 1.1 32 35 2.6 Phosphate : 72 1.0 43 44 2.8 Potash : 77 1.0 49 49 3.4 Sulfur 1/ : : Minnesota : 310 Nitrogen : 28 1.0 47 48 4.2 Phosphate : 22 1.0 36 36 2.4 Potash : 28 1.0 68 68 5.9 Sulfur : 5 1.0 12 12 0.2 : Montana : 90 Nitrogen : 53 1.1 39 43 2.0 Phosphate : 35 1.0 30 32 1.0 Potash : 14 1.1 25 28 0.4 Sulfur : 9 1.2 10 12 0.1 : ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Oats: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2005 (continued) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Primary : Planted : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Nutrient : Acreage : Applied : cations :Application : Crop Year : Applied ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Mil. lbs : : Nebraska : 150 Nitrogen : 68 1.0 43 44 4.5 Phosphate : 24 1.0 35 35 1.3 Potash : 7 1.0 14 14 0.1 Sulfur : 5 1.0 4 4 0.0 : New York : 95 Nitrogen : 75 1.1 25 27 1.9 Phosphate : 72 1.0 38 39 2.7 Potash : 72 1.1 38 41 2.8 Sulfur 1/ : : North Dakota : 490 Nitrogen : 71 1.3 34 45 15.8 Phosphate : 49 1.0 23 24 5.7 Potash : 9 1.0 17 17 0.7 Sulfur : 5 1.0 3 3 0.1 : Pennsylvania : 140 Nitrogen : 90 1.1 33 36 4.5 Phosphate : 81 1.0 43 43 4.9 Potash : 82 1.0 45 45 5.1 Sulfur : 2 1.0 34 34 0.1 : South Dakota : 380 Nitrogen : 64 1.0 48 48 11.8 Phosphate : 46 1.0 32 32 5.6 Potash : 17 1.0 25 25 1.7 Sulfur 1/ : : Texas : 690 Nitrogen : 79 1.5 55 83 45.4 Phosphate : 56 1.1 31 33 12.7 Potash : 39 1.0 18 18 4.9 Sulfur : 25 1.0 10 10 1.7 : Wisconsin : 400 Nitrogen : 23 1.1 22 23 2.1 Phosphate : 24 1.0 42 42 3.9 Potash : 35 1.0 107 107 15.1 Sulfur : 8 1.0 13 13 0.4 : Total : 3,565 Nitrogen : 56 1.2 44 54 107.4 Phosphate : 40 1.0 34 35 48.8 Potash : 28 1.0 49 50 49.7 Sulfur : 9 1.0 10 11 3.2 : ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Insufficient reports to publish fertilizer data. Oats : Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2005 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Program States :----------------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : CA : ID : IL : IA : KS : MI : MN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : P * P * * * 2,4-D, BEE : P * 2,4-D, dieth sal : P * * P * 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : P P P * * P P 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : * 2,4-DB, dimeth. salt : P * * * Acetochlor : * * Atrazine : * * Bromoxynil : P * * * * * Bromoxynil heptanoat : P * * * * * Bromoxynil octanoate : P * * * * * * Carfentrazone-ethyl : * * Chlorsulfuron : P P * Clethodim : * Clopyralid : P * * Dicamba : * * Dicamba, Digly Salt : P * * * * Dicamba, Dimet. salt : P * * * Dicamba, Sodium salt : * Dicamba, iso salt : * Flufenacet : * Fluroxypyr : * Fluroxypyr 1-methylh : * * Glyphosate : * Glyphosate iso. salt : P * P * P * Halosulfuron : * Imazamox : * Imazethapyr : * * MCPA : * * MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : P * * * * * MCPA, dimethyl. salt : P * * P * MCPA, sodium salt : P * * Metsulfuron-methyl : * Paraquat : * Picloram, K salt : * Prosulfuron : P * S-Metolachlor : * Thifensulfuron : P * * * Triasulfuron : * Tribenuron-methyl : P P * * Triclopyr : * ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Oats : Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2005 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Program States :----------------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : CA : ID : IL : IA : KS : MI : MN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Insecticides : Carbaryl : * Chlorpyrifos : * * Lambda-cyhalothrin : P * Malathion : * Methomyl : * Permethrin : * * * Zeta-cypermethrin : * : Fungicides : Propiconazole : * Pyraclostrobin : * ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Oats : Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2005 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Program States :----------------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : MT : NE : NY : ND : PA : SD : TX : WI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : P * * P * * P * 2,4-D, BEE : * * * 2,4-D, dieth sal : * * P * 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : P P P P P P P P 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : * * 2,4-DB, dimeth. salt : P P * Acetochlor : Atrazine : * Bromoxynil : * * * Bromoxynil heptanoat : * P * * Bromoxynil octanoate : * * P * P Carfentrazone-ethyl : Chlorsulfuron : * Clethodim : * * Clopyralid : * P Dicamba : * * * Dicamba, Digly Salt : * Dicamba, Dimet. salt : * * * * * * Dicamba, Sodium salt : * Dicamba, iso salt : * Flufenacet : * Fluroxypyr : * * Fluroxypyr 1-methylh : * Glyphosate : * Glyphosate iso. salt : P * P * P * * Halosulfuron : * Imazamox : * Imazethapyr : MCPA : * MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : * * P * P * MCPA, dimethyl. salt : P P P * * * MCPA, sodium salt : * * * * * Metsulfuron-methyl : * * Paraquat : * Picloram, K salt : * * Prosulfuron : * * * S-Metolachlor : * Thifensulfuron : * * P * P * Triasulfuron : * Tribenuron-methyl : * * P * P * Triclopyr : * ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Oats : Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2005 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Program States :----------------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : MT : NE : NY : ND : PA : SD : TX : WI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Insecticides : Carbaryl : * Chlorpyrifos : * * Lambda-cyhalothrin : * * * * Malathion : * Methomyl : * Permethrin : Zeta-cypermethrin : * : Fungicides : Propiconazole : * * Pyraclostrobin : * ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ P Usage data are published for this active ingredient. * Usage data are not published for this active ingredient. Oats: Planted Acreage, Pesticide, Percent of Area Receiving Applications and Total Applied, Program States and Total, 2005 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : Area Receiving and Total Applied State :Planted :----------------------------------------------------------------------- :Acreage : Herbicide : Insecticide : Fungicide : Other ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 : Acres lbs lbs lbs lbs : : CA : 270 36 59 ID 1/ : 90 26 17 IL 1/ : 60 7 1 IA 1/ : 210 3 2 KS : 100 27 13 MI : 90 61 26 MN : 310 21 26 MT : 90 34 18 NE : 150 7 4 NY 1/ : 95 51 23 ND 1/ : 490 54 167 PA 1/ : 140 58 46 SD : 380 37 52 TX 1/ : 690 26 80 18 35 WI 1/ : 400 18 25 : Total1/ : 3,565 31 559 4 35 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Insufficient reports to publish data for one or more pesticide classes. Oats: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 5 1.0 0.450 0.450 79 2,4-D, BEE : * 1.0 0.347 0.347 4 2,4-D, dieth sal : 1 1.0 0.598 0.598 24 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 9 1.1 0.424 0.447 147 2,4-DB, dimeth. salt : 1 1.0 0.630 0.630 12 Bromoxynil : 1 1.0 0.270 0.270 8 Bromoxynil heptanoat : 1 1.0 0.224 0.224 10 Bromoxynil octanoate : 3 1.0 0.236 0.236 22 Chlorsulfuron : 1 1.0 0.014 0.014 2/ Clopyralid : 1 1.0 0.083 0.084 2 Dicamba, Digly Salt : * 1.0 0.109 0.109 1 Dicamba, Dimet. salt : 2 1.0 0.066 0.066 5 Glyphosate iso. salt : 5 1.0 0.586 0.604 117 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 4 1.1 0.377 0.407 52 MCPA, dimethyl. salt : 3 1.0 0.338 0.338 37 MCPA, sodium salt : * 1.0 0.815 0.815 14 Prosulfuron : * 1.0 0.005 0.005 2/ Thifensulfuron : 2 1.0 0.010 0.010 1 Tribenuron-methyl : 2 1.0 0.005 0.005 2/ : Insecticides : Lambda-cyhalothrin : * 1.0 0.027 0.027 2/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Area applied is less than 0.5 percent. 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for the 13 Program States was 3.6 million acres. States included are CA, ID, KS, MI, MN, MT, NE, NY, ND, PA, SD, TX, and WI. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Oats: Agricultural Chemical Applications, California, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 11 1.6 0.547 0.888 25 Chlorsulfuron : 7 1.0 0.014 0.014 2/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for California was 270,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Oats: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Idaho, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 5 1.0 0.516 0.516 2 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 7 1.0 0.867 0.867 5 Glyphosate iso. salt : 4 1.0 1.033 1.033 4 Tribenuron-methyl : 2 1.0 0.008 0.008 2/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Idaho was 90,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Oats: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Kansas, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : Glyphosate iso. salt : 13 1.0 0.721 0.721 9 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Kansas was 100,000 acres. Oats: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Michigan, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, dieth sal : 7 1.0 0.546 0.546 3 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 36 1.0 0.456 0.456 15 MCPA, dimethyl. salt : 5 1.0 0.359 0.359 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Michigan was 90,000 acres. Oats: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Minnesota, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 3 1.0 0.502 0.502 5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Minnesota was 310,000 acres. Oats: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Montana, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 10 1.0 0.381 0.381 3 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 11 1.0 0.466 0.466 5 Glyphosate iso. salt : 12 1.1 0.505 0.560 6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Montana was 90,000 acres. Oats: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Nebraska, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 1 1.0 0.444 0.444 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Nebraska was 150,000 acres. Oats: Agricultural Chemical Applications, New York, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, dieth sal : 9 1.0 0.501 0.501 4 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 19 1.0 0.526 0.526 10 2,4-DB, dimeth. salt : 2 1.0 0.694 0.694 2 MCPA, dimethyl. salt : 15 1.0 0.402 0.402 6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for New York was 95,000 acres. Oats: Agricultural Chemical Applications, North Dakota, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 1 1.0 0.329 0.329 2 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 21 1.0 0.387 0.387 39 Bromoxynil heptanoat : 3 1.0 0.213 0.213 3 Bromoxynil octanoate : 9 1.0 0.213 0.213 9 Clopyralid : 4 1.0 0.089 0.090 2 Glyphosate iso. salt : 17 1.0 0.643 0.643 53 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 18 1.1 0.398 0.444 40 MCPA, dimethyl. salt : 5 1.0 0.290 0.290 8 Thifensulfuron : 3 1.0 0.009 0.009 2/ Tribenuron-methyl : 3 1.0 0.006 0.006 2/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for North Dakota was 490,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Oats: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Pennsylvania, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 16 1.0 0.378 0.387 9 2,4-DB, dimeth. salt : 8 1.0 0.580 0.580 6 MCPA, dimethyl. salt : 15 1.0 0.350 0.350 8 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Pennsylvania was 140,000 acres. Oats: Agricultural Chemical Applications, South Dakota, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 14 1.0 0.190 0.190 10 Bromoxynil octanoate : 3 1.0 0.351 0.351 3 Glyphosate iso. salt : 11 1.0 0.413 0.413 18 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 4 1.0 0.313 0.313 5 Thifensulfuron : 5 1.0 0.012 0.012 2/ Tribenuron-methyl : 5 1.0 0.006 0.006 2/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for South Dakota was 380,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Oats: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Texas, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 15 1.0 0.504 0.504 52 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 3 1.0 0.745 0.745 15 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Texas was 690,000 acres. Oats: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Wisconsin, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 4 1.0 0.359 0.359 6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Wisconsin was 400,000 acres. Upland Cotton: Fertilizer Use by State, 2005 Percent of Acres Treated and Total Applied ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : Percent of Acres Treated and Total Applied State : Planted :---------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Acreage : Nitrogen : Phosphate : Potash : Sulfur ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :1,000 Acres Percent Mil. lbs. Percent Mil. lbs. Percent Mil. lbs. Percent Mil. lbs. : AL : 550 98 51.4 87 27.0 90 37.0 39 3.4 AR : 1,050 96 112.8 73 33.3 82 71.2 33 8.5 CA : 430 96 79.8 32 10.2 22 8.3 4 0.2 GA : 1,220 97 112.6 88 63.8 90 103.7 56 11.7 LA : 610 99 47.5 47 12.3 49 23.3 35 1.3 MS : 1,210 99 144.5 35 22.6 58 82.7 17 2.8 NC : 815 95 57.9 74 25.7 95 79.0 40 7.1 TN : 640 100 60.6 90 31.1 99 58.3 42 2.1 TX : 5,900 77 310.9 64 144.9 32 35.4 40 32.3 : Total : 12,425 88 978.0 65 370.9 55 498.9 38 69.4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Upland Cotton: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2005 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Primary : Planted : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Nutrient : Acreage : Applied : cations :Application : Crop Year : Applied ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Mil. lbs : : Alabama : 550 Nitrogen : 98 1.6 61 96 51.4 Phosphate : 87 1.0 54 57 27.0 Potash : 90 1.1 70 75 37.0 Sulfur : 39 1.0 15 16 3.4 : Arkansas : 1,050 Nitrogen : 96 1.6 71 112 112.8 Phosphate : 73 1.1 40 44 33.3 Potash : 82 1.1 74 82 71.2 Sulfur : 33 1.1 23 24 8.5 : California : 430 Nitrogen : 96 2.1 94 194 79.8 Phosphate : 32 1.1 70 76 10.2 Potash : 22 1.5 60 89 8.3 Sulfur : 4 1.2 8 9 0.2 : Georgia : 1,220 Nitrogen : 97 1.9 50 95 112.6 Phosphate : 88 1.1 53 60 63.8 Potash : 90 1.3 72 95 103.7 Sulfur : 56 1.1 15 17 11.7 : Louisiana : 610 Nitrogen : 99 1.3 62 78 47.5 Phosphate : 47 1.0 42 43 12.3 Potash : 49 1.1 71 78 23.3 Sulfur : 35 1.0 6 6 1.3 : Mississippi : 1,210 Nitrogen : 99 1.5 81 120 144.5 Phosphate : 35 1.1 49 54 22.6 Potash : 58 1.1 106 117 82.7 Sulfur : 17 1.4 10 13 2.8 : North Carolina : 815 Nitrogen : 95 1.9 40 75 57.9 Phosphate : 74 1.1 37 43 25.7 Potash : 95 1.2 89 102 79.0 Sulfur : 40 1.1 19 22 7.1 : Tennessee : 640 Nitrogen : 100 1.3 76 95 60.6 Phosphate : 90 1.0 52 54 31.1 Potash : 99 1.0 88 92 58.3 Sulfur : 42 1.0 8 8 2.1 : ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Upland Cotton: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2005 (continued) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Primary : Planted : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Nutrient : Acreage : Applied : cations :Application : Crop Year : Applied ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Mil. lbs : : Texas : 5,900 Nitrogen : 77 1.4 49 68 310.9 Phosphate : 64 1.1 34 38 144.9 Potash : 32 1.1 17 19 35.4 Sulfur : 40 1.1 12 14 32.3 : Total : 12,425 Nitrogen : 88 1.5 59 90 978.0 Phosphate : 65 1.1 42 46 370.9 Potash : 55 1.1 63 73 498.9 Sulfur : 38 1.1 13 15 69.4 : ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Upland Cotton : Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2005 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Program States :----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : AL : AR : CA : GA : LA : MS : NC : TN : TX ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : P P * * P P * * 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : P * P P P P P * P 2,4-DB, dimeth. salt : * * Atrazine : * * Bensulfuron-methyl : * * Carfentrazone-ethyl : P P P P P P P P P P Clethodim : P P * * P P * P Clomazone : P * * P Cloransulam-methyl : * * DSMA : * * * Desmedipham : * * Dicamba, Digly Salt : P P P * * P Dicamba, Dimet. salt : P * * * * Dimethenamid : * * Diuron : P P P P P P P P P P Fenoxaprop : * * Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl : * * * Flumioxazin : P * P P * P P P * * Fluometuron : P P P * P * P P P P Glufosinate-ammonium : P P * * * P P Glyphosate : P P P * * P P P * * Glyphosate amm. salt : P P * * * * Glyphosate iso. salt : P P P P P P P P P P Imazamethabenz : * * Lactofen : * * * * Linuron : P * * * * P * MSMA : P P P P P P P Metolachlor : P * * * * Metribuzin : * * Norflurazon : * * Oxyfluorfen : P P * * * Pendimethalin : P P P P P * P P * P Phenmedipham : * * Prometryn : P P P P P P P P P P Propanil : * * Pyraflufen-ethyl : P P * P P * * P * P Pyrithiobac-sodium : P P P P P * P P * P Quinclorac : * * Quizalofop-P-ethyl : P * * * * Rimsulfuron : * * * S-Metolachlor : P P P P P P P P P P Sethoxydim : P * * * * Sulfosate : P P * P P P * * Thifensulfuron : P * * * Thiobencarb : * * Tribenuron-methyl : P * * * ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Upland Cotton : Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2005 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Program States :----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : AL : AR : CA : GA : LA : MS : NC : TN : TX ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides (continued) : Trifloxysulfuron-sod : P P P P P P P * * Trifluralin : P P P P P P * * P : Insecticides : Abamectin : P * P * Acephate : P P P P P P P P P P Acetamiprid : P P P P P Aldicarb : P P P P P P P P P P Benzoic acid : P P * P * * Bifenthrin : P * P P * P * * * * Bt subsp. kurstaki : * * * Buprofezin : * * * Carbaryl : * * * Chlorpyrifos : P * P * P * P * Cyfluthrin : P * P * P P P P P P Cypermethrin : P P P P P P P P P Deltamethrin : P P * * Diazinon : * * * * Dicofol : P * P * * * Dicrotophos : P P P P P P P P P Diflubenzuron : * * Dimethoate : P * * * P * * * P Disulfoton : * * * Emamectin benzoate : * * * Endosulfan : P * * Esfenvalerate : P * P * P * P * * P Etoxazole : P * P * Fenpropathrin : * * Imidacloprid : P * P P P P P * Indoxacarb : P * * P * * P Lambda-cyhalothrin : P * P * P P P P P P Malathion : P P * P * P P Methamidophos : P * * * Methomyl : P * * * Methyl parathion : P P * * Naled : P * P * Novaluron : P * * P * Oxamyl : P * P P P P * P Oxydemeton-methyl : * * Permethrin : P * * * * * Petroleum distillate : P * * * * Phorate : P * * * * Phosphamidon : * * Profenofos : P * P * * * Propargite : P * * Pyriproxyfen : * * ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Upland Cotton : Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2005 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Program States :----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : AL : AR : CA : GA : LA : MS : NC : TN : TX ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Insecticides (continued) : Spinosad : P * * * * Spiromesifen : P P Thiamethoxam : P P P P * P P * P P Thiodicarb : * * Tralomethrin : * * * * Zeta-cypermethrin : P P P * P * P P P P : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : P * * * * P * P * Carboxin : * * Chlorothalonil : * * Dinocap : * * Etridiazole : P * * * * * * * Iprodione : * * Mancozeb : * * Mefenoxam : P P * * P P Metalaxyl : * * PCNB : P * * * * * * P P Propiconazole : * * Pyraclostrobin : * * : Other Chemicals : Bacillus cereus : P P P P P P P P P P Cacodylic acid : * * * * Cyclanilide : P P P P P P P P P P Dichloropropene : * * Dimethipin : P * * * * * Endothall : P P * * Ethephon : P P P P P P P P P P Gibberellic acid : P * * * * * Harpin a B protein : * * Indolebutyric acid : P * * * * * Kinetin : P P P * P P P P P * Mepiquat chloride : P P P P P P P P P P Mepiquat pentaborate : P P P * P * P P P Monocarbamide dihyd. : P * P P P P P P * P Paraquat : P P * P * * P P P P Sodium chlorate : P P P P * P P * P * Thidiazuron : P P P P P P P P P P Tribufos : P P P P P P P P P P ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ P Usage data are published for this active ingredient. * Usage data are not published for this active ingredient. Upland Cotton: Planted Acreage, Pesticide, Percent of Area Receiving Applications and Total Applied, Program States and Total, 2005 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : Area Receiving and Total Applied State :Planted :----------------------------------------------------------------------- :Acreage : Herbicide : Insecticide : Fungicide : Other ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 : Acres lbs lbs lbs lbs : : AL : 550 98 1,186 74 192 2 3 89 697 AR : 1,050 95 2,997 84 2,669 6 18 87 1,910 CA : 430 92 551 96 574 4 2 96 1,570 GA : 1,220 99 2,958 88 1,145 * 1 95 2,539 LA : 610 98 1,897 94 1,358 3 7 99 888 MS : 1,210 100 3,947 92 1,917 6 28 98 1,880 NC : 815 99 2,181 82 597 7 41 92 1,642 TN : 640 99 1,339 87 253 11 23 94 1,030 TX 1/ : 5,900 93 8,677 53 5,946 47 3,075 : Total : 12,425 95 25,733 71 14,651 3 123 72 15,231 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Applied on less than one percent of acres. 1/ Insufficient reports to publish data for one or more pesticide classes. Upland Cotton: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 1 1.2 0.538 0.653 68 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 6 1.0 0.592 0.619 458 Carfentrazone-ethyl : 6 1.1 0.015 0.017 12 Clethodim : 1 1.0 0.123 0.125 19 Clomazone : * 1.0 0.272 0.272 12 Dicamba, Digly Salt : 2 1.0 0.232 0.235 69 Dicamba, Dimet. salt : * 1.4 0.065 0.090 3 Diuron : 27 1.1 0.462 0.508 1,707 Flumioxazin : 3 1.1 0.056 0.062 20 Fluometuron : 5 1.1 0.759 0.800 487 Glufosinate-ammonium : 4 1.5 0.416 0.633 297 Glyphosate : 3 1.9 0.627 1.175 428 Glyphosate amm. salt : * 1.2 0.344 0.398 18 Glyphosate iso. salt : 71 2.2 0.713 1.592 14,112 Linuron : 1 1.1 0.551 0.590 55 MSMA : 6 1.1 1.222 1.327 937 Metolachlor : * 1.0 1.668 1.668 90 Oxyfluorfen : 1 1.0 0.222 0.222 18 Pendimethalin : 12 1.0 0.791 0.816 1,211 Prometryn : 7 1.1 0.726 0.797 669 Pyraflufen-ethyl : 4 1.0 0.003 0.003 1 Pyrithiobac-sodium : 9 1.0 0.041 0.043 50 Quizalofop-P-ethyl : * 1.0 0.046 0.046 1 S-Metolachlor : 6 1.1 0.999 1.078 757 Sethoxydim : * 1.0 0.262 0.262 10 Sulfosate : 2 2.0 1.031 2.098 593 Thifensulfuron : * 1.0 0.009 0.009 2/ Tribenuron-methyl : * 1.0 0.005 0.005 2/ Trifloxysulfuron-sod : 4 1.1 0.006 0.006 3 Trifluralin : 32 1.0 0.862 0.900 3,522 : Insecticides : Abamectin : 2 1.2 0.006 0.007 2 Acephate : 27 2.1 0.412 0.862 2,897 Acetamiprid : 7 1.0 0.037 0.038 34 Aldicarb : 19 1.0 0.657 0.673 1,554 Benzoic acid : 1 1.3 0.098 0.123 17 Bifenthrin : 1 1.2 0.080 0.094 17 Chlorpyrifos : 2 1.2 0.612 0.708 219 Cyfluthrin : 8 1.3 0.034 0.043 41 Cypermethrin : 13 1.3 0.055 0.071 115 Deltamethrin : 1 2.7 0.026 0.072 10 Dicofol : 1 1.4 0.988 1.362 181 Dicrotophos : 19 1.6 0.289 0.452 1,090 Dimethoate : 2 1.5 0.320 0.466 96 Endosulfan : * 1.1 0.291 0.332 7 Esfenvalerate : 3 1.2 0.044 0.055 19 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Upland Cotton: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2005 1/ (continued) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Insecticides (continued) : Etoxazole : * 1.0 0.044 0.044 2 Imidacloprid : 6 1.5 0.038 0.058 46 Indoxacarb : 2 1.3 0.095 0.125 26 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 12 1.4 0.031 0.043 62 Malathion : 15 4.3 0.891 3.829 7,297 Methamidophos : 1 1.0 0.140 0.140 10 Methomyl : * 1.6 0.169 0.275 7 Methyl parathion : 2 1.4 0.622 0.895 183 Naled : * 1.5 0.692 1.030 38 Novaluron : 1 1.4 0.041 0.056 6 Oxamyl : 3 1.4 0.346 0.492 196 Permethrin : 1 1.1 0.063 0.073 6 Petroleum distillate : * 1.3 3.131 4.094 190 Phorate : 1 1.0 1.183 1.183 78 Profenofos : * 1.2 0.727 0.898 54 Propargite : * 1.1 1.281 1.384 39 Spinosad : 1 1.2 0.050 0.059 5 Spiromesifen : * 1.1 0.172 0.197 4 Thiamethoxam : 8 1.5 0.023 0.036 37 Zeta-cypermethrin : 6 1.4 0.021 0.030 23 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 1 1.0 0.083 0.083 12 Etridiazole : * 1.0 0.142 0.142 3 Mefenoxam : 2 1.0 0.087 0.087 19 PCNB : 1 1.0 0.678 0.678 87 : Other Chemicals : Bacillus cereus : 9 2.0 3/ 3/ 2/ Cyclanilide : 12 1.0 0.129 0.132 202 Dimethipin : * 1.0 0.190 0.190 6 Endothall : * 1.0 0.067 0.067 4 Ethephon : 58 1.1 1.055 1.147 8,248 Gibberellic acid : * 1.7 3/ 3/ 2/ Indolebutyric acid : * 1.7 3/ 3/ 2/ Kinetin : 4 2.1 3/ 3/ 2/ Mepiquat chloride : 33 2.1 0.030 0.063 260 Mepiquat pentaborate : 4 2.0 0.052 0.106 49 Monocarbamide dihyd. : 6 1.0 2.505 2.600 2,078 Paraquat : 15 1.1 0.324 0.355 642 Sodium chlorate : 3 1.1 2.577 2.917 931 Thidiazuron : 35 1.1 0.064 0.070 308 Tribufos : 26 1.1 0.534 0.590 1,937 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Area applied is less than 0.5 percent. 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for the 9 Program States was 12.4 million acres. States included are AL, AR, CA, GA, LA, MS, NC, TN, and TX. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. 3/ Rate per acre is less than 0.0005 lbs. Upland Cotton: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Alabama, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 5 1.0 0.535 0.535 14 Carfentrazone-ethyl : 5 1.0 0.015 0.015 2/ Clethodim : 3 1.0 0.123 0.123 2 Dicamba, Digly Salt : 5 1.0 0.207 0.207 6 Diuron : 44 1.2 0.322 0.378 91 Fluometuron : 5 1.0 0.927 0.927 24 Glyphosate : 6 2.2 1.122 2.475 75 Glyphosate iso. salt : 91 2.2 0.676 1.521 763 MSMA : 3 1.0 1.349 1.349 22 Pendimethalin : 17 1.0 0.783 0.783 73 Prometryn : 8 1.0 0.932 0.932 42 Pyraflufen-ethyl : 6 1.0 0.003 0.003 2/ Pyrithiobac-sodium : 17 1.0 0.050 0.051 5 S-Metolachlor : 2 1.0 0.803 0.803 11 Trifloxysulfuron-sod : 7 1.0 0.008 0.008 2/ Trifluralin : 8 1.0 0.556 0.556 25 : Insecticides : Acephate : 15 1.2 0.364 0.418 34 Aldicarb : 19 1.0 0.649 0.649 68 Cypermethrin : 30 1.4 0.057 0.082 13 Dicrotophos : 23 1.5 0.228 0.335 43 Thiamethoxam : 6 1.2 0.028 0.034 1 Zeta-cypermethrin : 6 1.1 0.017 0.019 1 : Other Chemicals : Bacillus cereus : 4 2.6 3/ 3/ 2/ Cyclanilide : 42 1.0 0.130 0.130 30 Ethephon : 74 1.0 1.121 1.145 464 Kinetin : 7 1.3 3/ 3/ 2/ Mepiquat chloride : 36 2.2 0.032 0.069 14 Mepiquat pentaborate : 6 1.1 0.080 0.089 3 Paraquat : 4 1.0 0.426 0.442 9 Sodium chlorate : 6 1.1 0.748 0.857 28 Thidiazuron : 46 1.0 0.046 0.046 12 Tribufos : 30 1.0 0.627 0.627 102 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Alabama was 550,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. 3/ Rate per acre is less than 0.0005 lbs. Upland Cotton: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Arkansas, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 5 1.2 0.461 0.557 28 Carfentrazone-ethyl : 7 1.2 0.015 0.018 1 Dicamba, Digly Salt : 8 1.0 0.250 0.250 22 Diuron : 17 1.1 0.540 0.573 104 Flumioxazin : 8 1.0 0.062 0.062 5 Fluometuron : 8 1.0 0.603 0.628 52 Glufosinate-ammonium : 10 1.2 0.483 0.581 58 Glyphosate : 7 1.6 0.559 0.893 61 Glyphosate amm. salt : 1 1.5 0.649 0.970 12 Glyphosate iso. salt : 88 3.0 0.830 2.456 2,281 MSMA : 2 1.6 1.224 1.897 41 Pendimethalin : 3 1.0 0.724 0.724 25 Prometryn : 4 1.2 0.707 0.822 31 Pyrithiobac-sodium : 7 1.0 0.036 0.036 3 S-Metolachlor : 11 1.3 0.900 1.187 132 Sulfosate : 2 2.1 1.394 2.943 70 Trifloxysulfuron-sod : 6 1.1 0.008 0.009 1 Trifluralin : 4 1.0 1.391 1.391 52 : Insecticides : Acephate : 43 1.9 0.436 0.838 380 Aldicarb : 19 1.0 0.704 0.718 146 Benzoic acid : 2 2.7 0.125 0.333 6 Bifenthrin : 4 1.0 0.089 0.089 4 Cyfluthrin : 10 1.3 0.023 0.031 3 Cypermethrin : 14 1.4 0.040 0.057 9 Dicrotophos : 38 1.4 0.235 0.320 129 Esfenvalerate : 4 1.5 0.036 0.053 2 Imidacloprid : 14 1.6 0.035 0.055 8 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 24 1.7 0.024 0.040 10 Malathion : 48 4.9 0.769 3.763 1,883 Oxamyl : 9 1.6 0.363 0.592 57 Thiamethoxam : 15 1.6 0.022 0.035 6 Zeta-cypermethrin : 5 1.7 0.016 0.026 1 : Fungicides : Mefenoxam : 5 1.0 0.055 0.055 3 : Other Chemicals : Bacillus cereus : 10 2.3 2/ 2/ 3/ Cyclanilide : 4 1.0 0.147 0.147 6 Ethephon : 63 1.5 0.976 1.417 936 Kinetin : 8 3.0 2/ 2/ 3/ Mepiquat chloride : 53 2.7 0.032 0.086 48 Mepiquat pentaborate : 2 1.6 0.055 0.087 2 Monocarbamide dihyd. : 9 1.3 2.452 3.217 290 Sodium chlorate : 3 1.4 1.805 2.481 67 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Upland Cotton: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Arkansas, 2005 1/ (continued) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Other Chemicals (continu : d) Thidiazuron : 28 1.1 0.063 0.072 22 Tribufos : 62 1.4 0.591 0.815 530 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Arkansas was 1.1 million acres. 2/ Rate per acre is less than 0.0005 lbs. 3/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Upland Cotton: Agricultural Chemical Applications, California, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : Carfentrazone-ethyl : 11 1.2 0.022 0.027 1 Diuron : 63 1.1 0.031 0.033 9 Flumioxazin : 4 1.1 0.077 0.085 1 Glyphosate iso. salt : 55 1.9 0.637 1.184 278 Oxyfluorfen : 8 1.0 0.386 0.386 13 Pendimethalin : 15 1.0 0.913 0.913 58 Prometryn : 7 1.4 1.236 1.689 49 Pyraflufen-ethyl : 18 1.0 0.003 0.003 2/ Pyrithiobac-sodium : 9 1.0 0.066 0.066 3 S-Metolachlor : 6 1.0 1.153 1.153 32 Trifluralin : 24 1.0 0.839 0.848 88 : Insecticides : Abamectin : 65 1.2 0.006 0.007 2 Acephate : 4 1.3 0.542 0.728 12 Acetamiprid : 25 1.0 0.053 0.053 6 Aldicarb : 26 1.3 1.118 1.448 164 Bifenthrin : 11 1.1 0.059 0.062 3 Chlorpyrifos : 21 1.1 0.980 1.101 99 Dicofol : 23 1.3 0.990 1.261 125 Etoxazole : 3 1.0 0.063 0.063 1 Imidacloprid : 11 1.3 0.044 0.058 3 Indoxacarb : 22 1.2 0.099 0.119 11 Naled : 8 1.4 0.696 0.946 31 Oxamyl : 12 1.0 0.877 0.877 47 Spiromesifen : 4 1.1 0.172 0.197 4 Thiamethoxam : 15 1.0 0.028 0.028 2 : Other Chemicals : Bacillus cereus : 16 1.1 3/ 3/ 2/ Cyclanilide : 7 1.2 0.130 0.158 4 Endothall : 11 1.0 0.083 0.083 4 Ethephon : 65 1.1 0.961 1.051 293 Mepiquat chloride : 50 1.3 0.047 0.061 13 Monocarbamide dihyd. : 39 1.0 2.520 2.520 427 Paraquat : 33 1.1 0.423 0.470 68 Sodium chlorate : 36 1.2 3.678 4.324 664 Thidiazuron : 65 1.1 0.055 0.059 17 Tribufos : 13 1.0 1.474 1.474 79 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for California was 430,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. 3/ Rate per acre is less than 0.0005 lbs. Upland Cotton: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Georgia, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 3 1.0 0.594 0.594 23 Carfentrazone-ethyl : 4 1.2 0.015 0.018 1 Diuron : 41 1.1 0.581 0.656 324 Fluometuron : 3 1.5 0.591 0.914 30 Glyphosate iso. salt : 93 1.9 0.684 1.273 1,439 MSMA : 18 1.1 1.484 1.572 340 Pendimethalin : 29 1.1 0.853 0.922 328 Prometryn : 9 1.0 0.787 0.787 85 Pyraflufen-ethyl : 10 1.0 0.002 0.002 2/ Pyrithiobac-sodium : 20 1.1 0.045 0.049 12 S-Metolachlor : 4 1.0 1.018 1.018 56 Trifloxysulfuron-sod : 5 1.0 0.005 0.005 2/ Trifluralin : 22 1.0 0.882 0.882 236 : Insecticides : Acephate : 5 1.6 0.330 0.535 34 Aldicarb : 46 1.0 0.746 0.749 417 Benzoic acid : 3 1.1 0.053 0.059 2 Cyfluthrin : 12 1.4 0.039 0.054 8 Cypermethrin : 7 1.5 0.073 0.107 9 Deltamethrin : 3 1.4 0.022 0.032 1 Dicrotophos : 52 1.7 0.375 0.648 407 Esfenvalerate : 4 1.5 0.063 0.093 5 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 19 1.6 0.033 0.051 12 Methyl parathion : 11 1.4 0.705 0.966 133 Zeta-cypermethrin : 14 1.6 0.025 0.040 7 : Other Chemicals : Bacillus cereus : 20 2.1 3/ 3/ 2/ Cyclanilide : 25 1.0 0.135 0.136 42 Ethephon : 79 1.0 1.228 1.273 1,230 Kinetin : 5 2.1 3/ 3/ 2/ Mepiquat chloride : 58 2.1 0.034 0.070 50 Monocarbamide dihyd. : 8 1.0 3.396 3.471 330 Thidiazuron : 46 1.0 0.059 0.060 34 Tribufos : 46 1.0 0.472 0.484 274 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Georgia was 1.2 million acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. 3/ Rate per acre is less than 0.0005 lbs. Upland Cotton: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Louisiana, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 7 1.3 0.466 0.614 27 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 33 1.1 0.666 0.744 148 Carfentrazone-ethyl : 6 1.3 0.012 0.016 1 Clethodim : 5 1.0 0.161 0.161 5 Diuron : 51 1.1 0.737 0.816 256 Flumioxazin : 7 1.2 0.058 0.072 3 Glyphosate : 11 2.7 0.567 1.517 101 Glyphosate iso. salt : 78 2.7 0.697 1.888 893 MSMA : 21 1.2 0.860 1.011 129 Prometryn : 13 1.1 0.651 0.727 60 S-Metolachlor : 12 1.0 1.008 1.054 76 Sulfosate : 13 2.0 0.918 1.875 147 Trifloxysulfuron-sod : 13 1.2 0.004 0.005 2/ : Insecticides : Acephate : 70 2.7 0.462 1.256 535 Acetamiprid : 4 1.7 0.049 0.084 2 Aldicarb : 7 1.0 0.610 0.610 25 Bifenthrin : 6 1.4 0.107 0.147 5 Chlorpyrifos : 12 1.5 0.438 0.654 46 Cyfluthrin : 16 1.6 0.033 0.052 5 Cypermethrin : 27 1.4 0.050 0.070 12 Dicrotophos : 51 1.7 0.289 0.480 149 Dimethoate : 16 1.3 0.327 0.437 44 Imidacloprid : 21 1.6 0.045 0.073 9 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 33 1.3 0.031 0.041 8 Malathion : 20 4.1 0.918 3.767 468 Oxamyl : 2 1.3 0.274 0.367 5 Profenofos : 7 1.3 0.610 0.813 35 Thiamethoxam : 19 1.7 0.028 0.047 6 : Other Chemicals : Bacillus cereus : 5 2.5 3/ 3/ 2/ Cyclanilide : 5 1.4 0.084 0.116 3 Ethephon : 86 1.2 0.862 1.044 545 Kinetin : 5 2.5 3/ 3/ 2/ Mepiquat chloride : 29 2.7 0.031 0.081 15 Mepiquat pentaborate : 7 1.6 0.074 0.118 5 Monocarbamide dihyd. : 11 1.0 1.695 1.695 111 Sodium chlorate : 5 1.0 1.381 1.381 39 Thidiazuron : 84 1.0 0.088 0.091 47 Tribufos : 46 1.1 0.405 0.425 118 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Louisiana was 610,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. 3/ Rate per acre is less than 0.0005 lbs. Upland Cotton: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Mississippi, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 2 1.0 0.718 0.718 14 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 13 1.0 0.597 0.597 95 Carfentrazone-ethyl : 8 1.3 0.014 0.018 2 Clethodim : 3 1.0 0.124 0.124 4 Diuron : 49 1.2 0.634 0.748 441 Flumioxazin : 7 1.2 0.059 0.072 6 Fluometuron : 8 1.1 0.524 0.576 54 Glyphosate : 7 1.5 0.582 0.886 78 Glyphosate iso. salt : 95 3.1 0.731 2.271 2,605 Linuron : 3 1.2 0.548 0.651 23 MSMA : 11 1.1 0.977 1.051 145 Pendimethalin : 12 1.0 0.717 0.752 113 Prometryn : 5 1.5 0.708 1.090 72 Pyrithiobac-sodium : 8 1.0 0.044 0.046 4 S-Metolachlor : 7 1.0 0.717 0.717 59 Sulfosate : 6 2.3 1.116 2.581 182 Trifloxysulfuron-sod : 3 1.0 0.008 0.008 2/ Trifluralin : 1 1.0 0.949 0.949 13 : Insecticides : Acephate : 71 3.2 0.447 1.433 1,232 Acetamiprid : 4 1.1 0.034 0.038 2 Aldicarb : 20 1.0 0.616 0.616 152 Cyfluthrin : 14 1.2 0.031 0.036 6 Cypermethrin : 31 1.4 0.039 0.053 20 Dicrotophos : 33 1.9 0.282 0.536 212 Esfenvalerate : 4 1.7 0.051 0.089 4 Imidacloprid : 15 2.1 0.039 0.081 15 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 15 1.2 0.026 0.032 6 Novaluron : 8 1.3 0.039 0.050 5 Oxamyl : 6 1.8 0.249 0.437 32 Thiamethoxam : 31 1.8 0.023 0.041 16 Zeta-cypermethrin : 7 1.5 0.031 0.047 4 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 3 1.0 0.096 0.096 4 : Other Chemicals : Bacillus cereus : 17 3.2 3/ 3/ 2/ Cyclanilide : 16 1.0 0.100 0.100 20 Ethephon : 90 1.0 1.052 1.099 1,200 Kinetin : 6 2.3 3/ 3/ 2/ Mepiquat chloride : 52 2.9 0.027 0.077 48 Monocarbamide dihyd. : 5 1.0 2.553 2.553 168 Paraquat : 5 1.1 0.458 0.498 28 Sodium chlorate : 2 1.0 2.461 2.461 60 Thidiazuron : 88 1.0 0.077 0.080 86 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Upland Cotton: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Mississippi, 2005 1/ (continued) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Other Chemicals (continu : d) Tribufos : 34 1.1 0.577 0.650 268 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Mississippi was 1.2 million acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. 3/ Rate per acre is less than 0.0005 lbs. Upland Cotton: Agricultural Chemical Applications, North Carolina, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 12 1.0 0.321 0.321 31 Carfentrazone-ethyl : 10 1.1 0.011 0.012 1 Diuron : 10 1.1 0.448 0.474 40 Flumioxazin : 3 1.3 0.038 0.047 1 Fluometuron : 12 1.0 1.079 1.079 109 Glyphosate : 9 2.0 0.559 1.094 85 Glyphosate iso. salt : 87 2.3 0.657 1.483 1,056 MSMA : 23 1.0 1.372 1.393 260 Pendimethalin : 20 1.0 0.676 0.676 111 Prometryn : 27 1.0 0.754 0.767 166 Pyraflufen-ethyl : 10 1.1 0.002 0.003 2/ Pyrithiobac-sodium : 12 1.0 0.048 0.048 5 S-Metolachlor : 20 1.0 1.086 1.086 178 Sulfosate : 4 2.5 0.989 2.447 81 Trifloxysulfuron-sod : 13 1.0 0.006 0.006 1 : Insecticides : Acephate : 37 1.1 0.245 0.279 85 Aldicarb : 46 1.0 0.718 0.718 269 Cyfluthrin : 18 1.2 0.036 0.043 6 Cypermethrin : 8 1.2 0.089 0.103 7 Dicrotophos : 22 1.0 0.282 0.289 52 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 20 1.2 0.031 0.036 6 Zeta-cypermethrin : 10 1.2 0.022 0.027 2 : Fungicides : Mefenoxam : 6 1.0 0.037 0.037 2 PCNB : 6 1.0 0.751 0.751 38 : Other Chemicals : Bacillus cereus : 19 1.4 3/ 3/ 2/ Cyclanilide : 40 1.0 0.154 0.154 50 Ethephon : 81 1.1 1.197 1.261 829 Kinetin : 12 1.7 3/ 3/ 2/ Mepiquat chloride : 63 1.6 0.036 0.057 30 Mepiquat pentaborate : 16 1.4 0.069 0.097 12 Monocarbamide dihyd. : 20 1.0 3.424 3.424 556 Paraquat : 4 1.0 0.441 0.441 13 Thidiazuron : 34 1.0 0.056 0.058 16 Tribufos : 40 1.0 0.397 0.409 132 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for North Carolina was 815,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. 3/ Rate per acre is less than 0.0005 lbs. Upland Cotton: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Tennessee, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : Carfentrazone-ethyl : 4 1.0 0.006 0.006 2/ Clomazone : 3 1.0 0.100 0.100 2 Dicamba, Digly Salt : 27 1.0 0.227 0.231 40 Diuron : 25 1.2 0.308 0.363 59 Fluometuron : 12 1.0 0.732 0.732 56 Glufosinate-ammonium : 4 1.0 0.360 0.360 10 Glyphosate iso. salt : 97 2.6 0.663 1.717 1,070 Prometryn : 9 1.1 0.644 0.677 39 S-Metolachlor : 2 1.0 0.973 0.973 10 : Insecticides : Acephate : 45 1.2 0.352 0.429 122 Aldicarb : 2 1.3 0.184 0.234 3 Chlorpyrifos : 3 1.1 0.716 0.790 16 Cyfluthrin : 17 1.1 0.029 0.032 3 Cypermethrin : 14 1.3 0.048 0.061 6 Dicrotophos : 23 1.3 0.255 0.328 49 Imidacloprid : 26 1.2 0.031 0.037 6 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 12 1.3 0.023 0.029 2 Malathion : 7 1.0 0.624 0.624 29 Thiamethoxam : 26 1.4 0.018 0.025 4 Zeta-cypermethrin : 20 1.2 0.018 0.021 3 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 6 1.0 0.091 0.091 4 Mefenoxam : 6 1.0 0.176 0.176 7 PCNB : 3 1.0 0.679 0.679 11 : Other Chemicals : Bacillus cereus : 16 1.2 3/ 3/ 2/ Cyclanilide : 42 1.0 0.136 0.140 38 Ethephon : 87 1.1 1.261 1.396 774 Kinetin : 12 2.1 3/ 3/ 2/ Mepiquat chloride : 65 1.8 0.036 0.064 27 Mepiquat pentaborate : 7 1.4 0.050 0.071 3 Paraquat : 18 1.1 0.444 0.495 57 Sodium chlorate : 4 1.0 1.177 1.177 31 Thidiazuron : 20 1.0 0.035 0.036 5 Tribufos : 47 1.0 0.303 0.306 92 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Tennessee was 640,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. 3/ Rate per acre is less than 0.0005 lbs. Upland Cotton: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Texas, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 2 1.0 0.767 0.767 106 Carfentrazone-ethyl : 5 1.0 0.016 0.016 5 Clethodim : 1 1.0 0.112 0.114 8 Diuron : 17 1.0 0.369 0.375 382 Fluometuron : 2 1.0 0.915 0.915 126 Glufosinate-ammonium : 5 1.6 0.391 0.616 184 Glyphosate iso. salt : 53 1.7 0.702 1.197 3,726 Pendimethalin : 10 1.0 0.794 0.808 479 Prometryn : 3 1.1 0.594 0.634 124 Pyraflufen-ethyl : 2 1.0 0.003 0.003 2/ Pyrithiobac-sodium : 8 1.0 0.035 0.036 17 S-Metolachlor : 3 1.1 1.110 1.223 204 Trifluralin : 58 1.0 0.858 0.901 3,077 : Insecticides : Acephate : 15 1.5 0.345 0.532 463 Acetamiprid : 12 1.0 0.034 0.034 24 Aldicarb : 11 1.0 0.464 0.472 310 Cyfluthrin : 3 1.3 0.039 0.049 8 Cypermethrin : 9 1.1 0.068 0.076 41 Dicrotophos : 4 1.4 0.160 0.223 49 Dimethoate : 1 2.1 0.176 0.366 17 Esfenvalerate : 3 1.0 0.035 0.035 6 Indoxacarb : 1 1.5 0.099 0.145 11 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 5 1.4 0.039 0.055 17 Malathion : 19 4.6 0.948 4.347 4,783 Oxamyl : 2 1.3 0.258 0.343 50 Thiamethoxam : 2 1.1 0.027 0.030 3 Zeta-cypermethrin : 4 1.3 0.017 0.021 5 : Other Chemicals : Bacillus cereus : 2 1.2 3/ 3/ 2/ Cyclanilide : 2 1.0 0.082 0.082 9 Ethephon : 35 1.0 0.959 0.961 1,977 Mepiquat chloride : 13 1.3 0.017 0.022 16 Mepiquat pentaborate : 3 2.9 0.041 0.118 21 Monocarbamide dihyd. : 2 1.0 1.164 1.164 157 Paraquat : 24 1.1 0.291 0.320 444 Thidiazuron : 18 1.2 0.057 0.069 71 Tribufos : 9 1.0 0.634 0.634 342 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for Texas was 5.9 million acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. 3/ Rate per acre is less than 0.0005 lbs. Soybeans : Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2005 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Program States :-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : AR : IL : IN : IA : KS : KY : LA : MI --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : P * P * * * * * 2,4-D, BEE : P * * * 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : P * * * 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : * 2,4-DB, dimeth. salt : * 2,4-DP, 2-BEE : * Acetochlor : * * Acifluorfen, sodium : * * Alachlor : * * Atrazine : P * * * Barban : * Bentazon : * * Carfentrazone-ethyl : * * Chlorimuron-ethyl : P * P * * * * * * Chlorsulfuron : * Clethodim : P * * * Clomazone : * * * Clopyralid : * Cloransulam-methyl : P * * * * Dicamba, Digly Salt : P * Dicamba, Dimet. salt : * * Ethalfluralin : * Fenoxaprop : P * * * * Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl : * Fluazifop-P-butyl : P * * * * Flufenacet : * Flumetsulam : * * Flumiclorac-pentyl : P * * * * Flumioxazin : P * P * * * Fluometuron : * Fomesafen : P * P * * * Glyphosate : P * * * * * Glyphosate amm. salt : * * * Glyphosate iso. salt : P P P P P P P P P Imazamox : P * Imazaquin : P * * Imazethapyr : P * * * * P Imazethapyr, ammon : * * Lactofen : P * * Linuron : * * MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : * MCPA, sodium salt : * Metolachlor : * * * * Metribuzin : P * * * * * Metsulfuron-methyl : * Paraquat : P * --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Soybeans : Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2005 (continued) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Program States :-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : AR : IL : IN : IA : KS : KY : LA : MI --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Herbicides (continued) : Pendimethalin : P * P * * * P Quizalofop-P-ethyl : P * * * * S-Metolachlor : P * * * Sethoxydim : * * Simazine : * * Sulfentrazone : P P * * * * Sulfosate : P * * * * * * Thifensulfuron : P * * * * * * * Tribenuron-methyl : * * * Triclopyr : * * Trifluralin : P * * P * : Insecticides : Acephate : P P Benzoic acid : * * Bifenthrin : * * Carbofuran : * * * Chlorpyrifos : P P * P P Cyfluthrin : P * * Cypermethrin : * * Diflubenzuron : * Emamectin benzoate : * * Esfenvalerate : P * P Gamma-cyhalothrin : * * Lambda-cyhalothrin : P P * * * * * P Malathion : * * Methyl parathion : * * Permethrin : P * * * * Petroleum distillate : * * Phorate : * Propargite : * Thiodicarb : * * Zeta-cypermethrin : P * * * P : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : P P * Propiconazole : * Pyraclostrobin : P * * * * * Tebuconazole : P * * * Tetraconazole : * Trifloxystrobin : * --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Soybeans: Planted Acreage, Pesticide, Percent of Area Receiving Applications and Total Applied, Program States and Total, 2005 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : Area Receiving and Total Applied State :Planted :----------------------------------------------------------------------- :Acreage : Herbicide : Insecticide : Fungicide : Other ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 : Acres lbs lbs lbs lbs : : AR : 3,030 95 4,152 14 344 8 21 IL : 9,500 99 11,767 9 384 IN : 5,400 99 6,511 18 209 IA 1/ : 10,100 96 11,281 16 509 KS : 2,900 100 3,549 KY 1/ : 1,260 89 1,385 2 9 LA : 880 97 1,285 44 277 13 15 MI 1/ : 2,000 92 2,061 42 172 MN 1/ : 6,900 99 7,310 30 125 MS 1/ : 1,610 100 2,860 10 9 MO 1/ : 5,000 99 5,382 NE : 4,700 100 5,856 NC : 1,490 86 1,427 11 94 OH : 4,500 99 5,358 18 152 3 13 SD 1/ : 3,900 98 5,046 13 12 TN : 1,130 96 1,436 15 5 25 39 VA 1/ : 530 97 521 : Total : 64,830 98 77,187 14 2,390 2 192 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Insufficient reports to publish data for one or more pesticide classes. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2005 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 4 1.0 0.440 0.440 998 2,4-D, BEE : 1 1.0 0.436 0.436 298 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 1 1.0 0.501 0.501 243 Atrazine : * 1.0 3.257 3.257 542 Chlorimuron-ethyl : 4 1.0 0.013 0.013 34 Clethodim : 3 1.0 0.086 0.086 156 Cloransulam-methyl : 1 1.1 0.032 0.034 31 Dicamba, Digly Salt : * 1.0 0.263 0.263 40 Fenoxaprop : 2 1.0 0.032 0.032 31 Fluazifop-P-butyl : 2 1.0 0.109 0.109 125 Flumiclorac-pentyl : 1 1.0 0.013 0.013 7 Flumioxazin : 3 1.0 0.061 0.062 105 Fomesafen : 3 1.0 0.247 0.247 411 Glyphosate : 3 1.2 0.861 1.020 1,683 Glyphosate iso. salt : 88 1.5 0.755 1.101 63,047 Imazamox : * 1.0 0.028 0.028 6 Imazaquin : 1 1.0 0.099 0.099 39 Imazethapyr : 2 1.1 0.050 0.057 85 Lactofen : 1 1.0 0.128 0.128 57 Metribuzin : 2 1.0 0.148 0.148 204 Paraquat : * 1.0 0.479 0.479 151 Pendimethalin : 3 1.0 0.968 0.968 2,123 Quizalofop-P-ethyl : * 1.0 0.052 0.052 8 S-Metolachlor : 1 1.0 0.951 0.951 549 Sulfentrazone : 2 1.0 0.083 0.083 131 Sulfosate : 2 1.5 1.162 1.752 2,681 Thifensulfuron : 2 1.0 0.005 0.005 6 Trifluralin : 4 1.0 0.782 0.782 1,791 : Insecticides : Acephate : * 1.4 0.603 0.826 220 Chlorpyrifos : 5 1.0 0.477 0.482 1,413 Cyfluthrin : * 1.4 0.026 0.038 8 Esfenvalerate : 1 1.1 0.040 0.043 25 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 6 1.0 0.023 0.023 88 Permethrin : 1 1.0 0.122 0.122 67 Zeta-cypermethrin : 1 1.0 0.024 0.024 19 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 1 1.0 0.100 0.100 57 Pyraclostrobin : 1 1.0 0.104 0.104 80 Tebuconazole : * 1.0 0.177 0.177 48 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Area applied is less than 0.5 percent. 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for the 17 Program States was 64.8 million acres. States included are AR, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, MI, MN, MS, MO, NE, NC, OH, SD, TN, and VA. Distribution Tables - Highlights This section provides details about the distribution of agricultural chemical active ingredients commonly applied to the selected field. Chemical distribution rates are listed by active ingredient for the Percent of Acres Treated, Number of Applications, Rate per Application, and Rate per Crop year. In order for an active ingredient to be published in these tables, at least 30 farm operators would have had to report applying the active ingredient on the specified crop. The data in each table are summarized for a specific group of States, called Program States. The Program States designation is specific for each crop and provided in tables within the publication (See page 6). These distribution tables show the 10th percentile, median, 90th percentile, mean, and coefficient of variation (cv) of the reported rates. The 10th percentile is the value below which 10 percent of all application rates fall. Thus, only 10 percent of operators reported an application rate for the active ingredient on the specified crop that was lower than the 10th percentile value. Likewise, the 90th percentile is a value for which 90 percent of all applications were at rates lower than this value. The median is the midpoint of the distribution with half of the reported application rates higher and half lower than the median value. The mean is the weighted average that is calculated by summing the application rate multiplied by the acres applied and then dividing by the acres applied. The cv is a relative measure of the variability, expressed as a percentage of the estimate. For a specific commodity, the states have different agricultural practices which can lead to a wide range of pesticide rate uses. These ranges can lead to higher cv rates for different active ingredients. Some active ingredients are only applied in one manner resulting in smaller cv=s, while other active ingredients have more varied agricultural uses which will have larger cv=s. Please see the Survey and Estimation Procedures and Reliability sections for more information. The Number of Applications, Rate per Application, and Rate per Crop Year distribution tables are calculated using data only from reports where the farm operator applied the active ingredient. Data presented in the Percent of Acres Treated table account for all operations in the sample producing the target commodity, whether or not the listed active ingredient was applied. Corn: Percent of Acres Treated Distribution, Program States, 2005 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 0 0 0 3 14 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 0 0 0 3 16 Acetochlor : 0 0 100 23 4 Alachlor : 0 0 0 1 18 Atrazine : 0 100 100 66 2 Clopyralid : 0 0 0 5 11 Dicamba : 0 0 0 1 21 Dicamba, Digly Salt : 0 0 0 2 15 Dicamba, Dimet. salt : 0 0 0 3 15 Dicamba, Pot. salt : 0 0 0 2 23 Dicamba, Sodium salt : 0 0 0 4 14 Diflufenzopyr-sodium : 0 0 0 4 14 Dimethenamid-P : 0 0 0 4 17 Flufenacet : 0 0 0 3 19 Flumetsulam : 0 0 0 6 11 Foramsulfuron : 0 0 0 2 28 Glufosinate-ammonium : 0 0 0 5 12 Glyphosate : 0 0 0 2 18 Glyphosate iso. salt : 0 0 100 31 3 Imazapyr : 0 0 0 1 22 Imazethapyr : 0 0 0 1 21 Isoxaflutole : 0 0 0 6 13 Mesotrione : 0 0 100 20 5 Metolachlor : 0 0 0 2 20 Nicosulfuron : 0 0 21 10 7 Paraquat : 0 0 0 1 22 Pendimethalin : 0 0 0 2 14 Primisulfuron : 0 0 0 2 18 Prosulfuron : 0 0 0 1 23 Rimsulfuron : 0 0 0 8 8 S-Metolachlor : 0 0 100 23 5 Simazine : 0 0 0 3 13 : Insecticides : Bifenthrin : 0 0 0 2 33 Chlorpyrifos : 0 0 0 2 18 Cyfluthrin : 0 0 0 7 11 Fipronil : 0 0 0 1 25 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 0 0 0 1 24 Permethrin : 0 0 0 1 24 Tebupirimphos : 0 0 0 6 12 Tefluthrin : 0 0 0 7 10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for the 19 Program States was 76.5 million acres. Corn: Number of Applications Distribution, Program States, 2005 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 3 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 Acetochlor : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 Alachlor : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 Atrazine : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1 Clopyralid : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 Dicamba : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4 Dicamba, Digly Salt : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3 Dicamba, Dimet. salt : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 4 Dicamba, Pot. salt : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 Dicamba, Sodium salt : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 Diflufenzopyr-sodium : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 Dimethenamid-P : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 Flufenacet : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 Flumetsulam : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 Foramsulfuron : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 Glufosinate-ammonium : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 Glyphosate : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.2 7 Glyphosate iso. salt : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.3 2 Imazapyr : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2 Imazethapyr : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2 Isoxaflutole : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3 Mesotrione : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 Metolachlor : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 Nicosulfuron : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 Paraquat : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 Pendimethalin : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 Primisulfuron : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 Prosulfuron : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 Rimsulfuron : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2 S-Metolachlor : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 Simazine : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 : Insecticides : Bifenthrin : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3 Chlorpyrifos : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 Cyfluthrin : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 Fipronil : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.1 10 Permethrin : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 Tebupirimphos : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 Tefluthrin : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for the 19 Program States was 76.5 million acres. Corn: Rate Per Application Distribution, Program States, 2005 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : lbs per Acre lbs per Acre lbs per Acre lbs per Acre : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 0.219 0.448 0.700 0.450 7 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 0.118 0.336 0.475 0.352 9 Acetochlor : 0.900 1.750 2.400 1.645 2 Alachlor : 0.625 1.875 2.500 1.747 7 Atrazine : 0.450 0.978 1.705 1.028 2 Clopyralid : 0.056 0.117 0.156 0.110 3 Dicamba : 0.100 0.137 0.185 0.137 6 Dicamba, Digly Salt : 0.094 0.125 0.406 0.198 11 Dicamba, Dimet. salt : 0.063 0.125 0.250 0.146 10 Dicamba, Pot. salt : 0.206 0.406 0.481 0.354 6 Dicamba, Sodium salt : 0.063 0.107 0.138 0.103 5 Diflufenzopyr-sodium : 0.025 0.043 0.053 0.040 5 Dimethenamid-P : 0.319 0.850 0.978 0.741 4 Flufenacet : 0.120 0.400 0.577 0.378 9 Flumetsulam : 0.023 0.043 0.058 0.045 10 Foramsulfuron : 0.015 0.028 0.033 0.026 10 Glufosinate-ammonium : 0.219 0.417 0.418 0.370 2 Glyphosate : 0.445 0.563 0.750 0.632 6 Glyphosate iso. salt : 0.500 0.750 0.949 0.727 2 Imazapyr : 0.011 0.014 0.014 0.013 3 Imazethapyr : 0.016 0.042 0.042 0.038 5 Isoxaflutole : 0.025 0.047 0.075 0.051 5 Mesotrione : 0.063 0.094 0.198 0.116 4 Metolachlor : 0.808 1.500 2.100 1.578 10 Nicosulfuron : 0.012 0.023 0.025 0.021 2 Paraquat : 0.313 0.563 1.219 0.570 13 Pendimethalin : 0.413 0.825 1.444 0.846 6 Primisulfuron : 0.019 0.027 0.027 0.024 3 Prosulfuron : 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.009 5 Rimsulfuron : 0.008 0.012 0.012 0.017 21 S-Metolachlor : 0.653 1.332 2.005 1.323 3 Simazine : 0.500 1.000 1.600 1.076 8 : Insecticides : Bifenthrin : 0.033 0.055 0.080 0.055 5 Chlorpyrifos : 0.640 1.125 1.350 1.112 6 Cyfluthrin : 0.003 0.006 0.008 0.007 14 Fipronil : 0.078 0.125 0.131 0.113 5 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 0.016 0.020 0.025 0.023 5 Permethrin : 0.038 0.100 0.150 0.107 6 Tebupirimphos : 0.065 0.122 0.151 0.115 4 Tefluthrin : 0.066 0.129 0.135 0.118 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for the 19 Program States was 76.5 million acres. Corn: Rate per Crop Year Distribution, Program States, 2005 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : lbs per Acre lbs per Acre lbs per Acre lbs per Acre : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 0.234 0.462 0.950 0.474 8 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 0.118 0.336 0.475 0.360 9 Acetochlor : 0.900 1.750 2.430 1.661 2 Alachlor : 0.625 1.875 2.500 1.765 7 Atrazine : 0.469 1.000 1.938 1.133 2 Clopyralid : 0.056 0.117 0.156 0.110 3 Dicamba : 0.100 0.137 0.231 0.142 7 Dicamba, Digly Salt : 0.094 0.125 0.406 0.203 10 Dicamba, Dimet. salt : 0.063 0.125 0.250 0.156 9 Dicamba, Pot. salt : 0.206 0.406 0.481 0.354 6 Dicamba, Sodium salt : 0.063 0.109 0.138 0.105 5 Diflufenzopyr-sodium : 0.025 0.043 0.053 0.041 5 Dimethenamid-P : 0.319 0.850 0.984 0.747 4 Flufenacet : 0.120 0.400 0.577 0.378 9 Flumetsulam : 0.023 0.043 0.058 0.045 10 Foramsulfuron : 0.015 0.028 0.033 0.026 10 Glufosinate-ammonium : 0.219 0.417 0.418 0.377 2 Glyphosate : 0.375 0.563 1.500 0.737 10 Glyphosate iso. salt : 0.560 0.773 1.500 0.963 2 Imazapyr : 0.013 0.014 0.014 0.014 2 Imazethapyr : 0.025 0.042 0.042 0.039 4 Isoxaflutole : 0.031 0.047 0.075 0.053 5 Mesotrione : 0.063 0.094 0.201 0.119 4 Metolachlor : 0.808 1.500 2.100 1.578 10 Nicosulfuron : 0.012 0.023 0.025 0.021 2 Paraquat : 0.313 0.563 1.219 0.575 13 Pendimethalin : 0.413 0.825 1.444 0.854 6 Primisulfuron : 0.019 0.027 0.027 0.024 3 Prosulfuron : 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.009 5 Rimsulfuron : 0.008 0.012 0.012 0.017 23 S-Metolachlor : 0.658 1.340 2.010 1.354 3 Simazine : 0.500 1.000 1.600 1.076 8 : Insecticides : Bifenthrin : 0.039 0.055 0.080 0.057 5 Chlorpyrifos : 0.640 1.125 1.350 1.112 6 Cyfluthrin : 0.003 0.006 0.008 0.007 14 Fipronil : 0.078 0.125 0.156 0.117 6 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 0.016 0.020 0.050 0.026 13 Permethrin : 0.038 0.100 0.150 0.109 7 Tebupirimphos : 0.065 0.122 0.151 0.115 4 Tefluthrin : 0.066 0.129 0.135 0.118 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for the 19 Program States was 76.5 million acres. Fall Potatoes: Percent of Acres Treated Distribution, Program States, 2005 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : Dimethenamid-P : 0 0 0 7 20 EPTC : 0 0 100 24 11 Glyphosate iso. salt : 0 0 0 5 21 Linuron : 0 0 0 7 15 Metribuzin : 0 100 100 74 3 Pendimethalin : 0 0 100 31 9 Rimsulfuron : 0 0 100 27 9 S-Metolachlor : 0 0 100 12 11 : Insecticides : Aldicarb : 0 0 0 9 18 Cyfluthrin : 0 0 100 29 7 Dimethoate : 0 0 0 5 24 Endosulfan : 0 0 0 2 21 Esfenvalerate : 0 0 100 27 8 Imidacloprid : 0 0 100 38 6 Methamidophos : 0 0 100 12 11 Oxamyl : 0 0 100 13 18 Permethrin : 0 0 0 5 21 Phorate : 0 0 0 4 17 Thiamethoxam : 0 0 100 13 16 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 0 0 100 37 6 Boscalid : 0 0 100 17 14 Chlorothalonil : 0 100 100 55 3 Copper hydroxide : 0 0 0 8 21 Cymoxanil : 0 0 100 16 15 Famoxadone : 0 0 100 10 22 Fluazinam : 0 0 100 15 12 Mancozeb : 0 100 100 61 4 Mefenoxam : 0 0 100 25 11 Metiram : 0 0 0 9 21 Pyraclostrobin : 0 0 100 12 15 Triphenyltin hydrox. : 0 0 0 10 21 : Other : Diquat dibromide : 0 0 100 30 7 Maleic hydrazide : 0 0 100 12 18 Metam-sodium : 0 0 100 16 14 Sulfuric Acid : 0 0 100 12 11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for the 8 Program States was 845 thousand acres. Fall Potatoes: Number of Applications Distribution, Program States, 2005 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : Dimethenamid-P : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 EPTC : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 Glyphosate iso. salt : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4 Linuron : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 Metribuzin : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 4 Pendimethalin : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 Rimsulfuron : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 2 S-Metolachlor : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 : Insecticides : Aldicarb : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 Cyfluthrin : 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.8 9 Dimethoate : 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.7 19 Endosulfan : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 5 Esfenvalerate : 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.7 11 Imidacloprid : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.3 6 Methamidophos : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.6 9 Oxamyl : 1.0 2.0 4.0 2.1 15 Permethrin : 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.6 16 Phorate : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 Thiamethoxam : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 6 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.5 7 Boscalid : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.4 12 Chlorothalonil : 1.0 4.0 11.0 4.8 7 Copper hydroxide : 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.6 10 Cymoxanil : 1.0 2.0 3.0 1.9 9 Famoxadone : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.4 9 Fluazinam : 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.7 12 Mancozeb : 1.0 3.0 7.0 3.4 6 Mefenoxam : 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.4 10 Metiram : 1.0 2.0 4.0 2.6 10 Pyraclostrobin : 1.0 1.0 5.0 1.8 19 Triphenyltin hydrox. : 1.0 2.0 3.0 1.8 9 : Other : Diquat dibromide : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.5 4 Maleic hydrazide : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 Metam-sodium : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 Sulfuric Acid : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.1 8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for the 8 Program States was 845 thousand acres. Fall Potatoes: Rate Per Application Distribution, Program States, 2005 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : lbs per Acre lbs per Acre lbs per Acre lbs per Acre : : Herbicides : Dimethenamid-P : 0.703 0.750 0.844 0.770 3 EPTC : 1.750 3.500 4.375 3.222 5 Glyphosate iso. salt : 0.347 0.539 1.125 0.625 14 Linuron : 0.380 0.500 1.000 0.665 10 Metribuzin : 0.248 0.375 0.563 0.401 3 Pendimethalin : 0.413 0.722 0.825 0.712 3 Rimsulfuron : 0.016 0.023 0.023 0.020 4 S-Metolachlor : 0.955 1.267 1.433 1.202 4 : Insecticides : Aldicarb : 2.250 3.000 3.000 2.839 2 Cyfluthrin : 0.016 0.030 0.032 0.028 6 Dimethoate : 0.125 0.334 0.500 0.310 10 Endosulfan : 0.375 0.750 0.975 0.685 8 Esfenvalerate : 0.015 0.030 0.041 0.030 8 Imidacloprid : 0.038 0.047 0.250 0.103 10 Methamidophos : 0.542 1.000 1.000 0.885 4 Oxamyl : 0.500 0.942 0.990 0.798 9 Permethrin : 0.088 0.125 0.175 0.119 7 Phorate : 2.100 3.000 3.000 2.688 4 Thiamethoxam : 0.016 0.061 0.125 0.065 12 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 0.077 0.100 0.150 0.109 3 Boscalid : 0.153 0.241 0.263 0.223 4 Chlorothalonil : 0.709 0.963 1.155 0.940 3 Copper hydroxide : 0.300 0.633 0.800 0.571 7 Cymoxanil : 0.074 0.107 0.125 0.111 5 Famoxadone : 0.074 0.094 0.125 0.094 4 Fluazinam : 0.195 0.254 0.261 0.234 4 Mancozeb : 0.750 1.219 1.562 1.235 2 Mefenoxam : 0.081 0.141 0.844 0.230 20 Metiram : 0.800 1.600 1.600 1.404 3 Pyraclostrobin : 0.098 0.114 0.147 0.119 4 Triphenyltin hydrox. : 0.094 0.125 0.188 0.140 8 : Other : Diquat dibromide : 0.250 0.375 0.500 0.342 4 Maleic hydrazide : 1.500 2.250 2.400 1.966 7 Metam-sodium : 115.0 158.8 213.0 151.2 4 Sulfuric Acid : 306.5 306.5 332.1 313.9 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for the 8 Program States was 845 thousand acres. Fall Potatoes: Rate per Crop Year Distribution, Program States, 2005 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : lbs per Acre lbs per Acre lbs per Acre lbs per Acre : : Herbicides : Dimethenamid-P : 0.703 0.750 0.844 0.770 3 EPTC : 1.750 3.500 4.375 3.261 6 Glyphosate iso. salt : 0.375 0.557 1.500 0.655 15 Linuron : 0.380 0.500 1.000 0.665 10 Metribuzin : 0.248 0.398 0.625 0.441 4 Pendimethalin : 0.413 0.722 0.825 0.713 3 Rimsulfuron : 0.014 0.023 0.023 0.021 4 S-Metolachlor : 0.955 1.267 1.433 1.206 4 : Insecticides : Aldicarb : 2.250 3.000 3.000 2.839 2 Cyfluthrin : 0.026 0.044 0.097 0.051 7 Dimethoate : 0.150 0.500 1.335 0.528 21 Endosulfan : 0.375 0.750 0.998 0.745 10 Esfenvalerate : 0.018 0.036 0.089 0.050 12 Imidacloprid : 0.040 0.094 0.250 0.135 8 Methamidophos : 0.750 1.000 2.000 1.427 10 Oxamyl : 0.500 1.000 3.366 1.656 12 Permethrin : 0.023 0.141 0.469 0.188 15 Phorate : 2.100 3.000 3.000 2.688 4 Thiamethoxam : 0.016 0.087 0.125 0.071 12 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 0.076 0.130 0.300 0.168 6 Boscalid : 0.153 0.241 0.394 0.302 12 Chlorothalonil : 0.825 3.750 9.904 4.547 8 Copper hydroxide : 0.200 0.750 1.900 0.940 15 Cymoxanil : 0.094 0.148 0.360 0.213 13 Famoxadone : 0.094 0.125 0.188 0.136 9 Fluazinam : 0.179 0.277 0.591 0.393 10 Mancozeb : 1.252 3.375 8.250 4.215 7 Mefenoxam : 0.080 0.189 0.945 0.325 19 Metiram : 1.600 3.200 6.400 3.607 11 Pyraclostrobin : 0.098 0.147 0.490 0.215 17 Triphenyltin hydrox. : 0.125 0.188 0.400 0.247 14 : Other : Diquat dibromide : 0.250 0.500 0.750 0.504 4 Maleic hydrazide : 1.500 2.250 2.400 1.966 7 Metam-sodium : 115.0 158.8 213.0 151.2 4 Sulfuric Acid : 306.5 306.5 536.4 346.1 8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for the 8 Program States was 845 thousand acres. Oats: Percent of Acres Treated Distribution, Program States, 2005 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 0 0 0 5 39 2,4-D, dieth sal : 0 0 0 1 23 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 0 0 0 9 15 Bromoxynil octanoate : 0 0 0 3 24 Glyphosate iso. salt : 0 0 0 5 16 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 0 0 0 4 22 MCPA, dimethyl. salt : 0 0 0 3 17 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for the 15 Program States was 3.6 million acres. Oats: Number of Applications Distribution, Program States, 2005 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 2,4-D, dieth sal : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 5 Bromoxynil octanoate : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 Glyphosate iso. salt : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 6 MCPA, dimethyl. salt : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for the 15 Program States was 3.6 million acres. Oats: Rate Per Application Distribution, Program States, 2005 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : lbs per Acre lbs per Acre lbs per Acre lbs per Acre : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 0.238 0.438 0.700 0.450 8 2,4-D, dieth sal : 0.475 0.475 0.950 0.598 8 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 0.090 0.470 0.940 0.424 10 Bromoxynil octanoate : 0.125 0.250 0.375 0.236 10 Glyphosate iso. salt : 0.328 0.563 1.000 0.586 9 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 0.125 0.313 0.544 0.377 17 MCPA, dimethyl. salt : 0.125 0.250 0.500 0.338 11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for the 15 Program States was 3.6 million acres. Oats: Rate per Crop Year Distribution, Program States, 2005 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : lbs per Acre lbs per Acre lbs per Acre lbs per Acre : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 0.238 0.438 0.700 0.450 8 2,4-D, dieth sal : 0.475 0.475 0.950 0.598 8 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 0.090 0.470 0.940 0.447 12 Bromoxynil octanoate : 0.125 0.250 0.375 0.236 10 Glyphosate iso. salt : 0.333 0.563 1.000 0.604 10 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 0.125 0.313 1.088 0.407 20 MCPA, dimethyl. salt : 0.125 0.250 0.500 0.338 11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for the 15 Program States was 3.6 million acres. Upland Cotton: Percent of Acres Treated Distribution, Program States, 2005 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 0 0 0 6 10 Carfentrazone-ethyl : 0 0 0 6 16 Clethodim : 0 0 0 1 33 Dicamba, Digly Salt : 0 0 0 2 17 Diuron : 0 0 100 27 5 Flumioxazin : 0 0 0 3 15 Fluometuron : 0 0 0 5 12 Glufosinate-ammonium : 0 0 0 4 19 Glyphosate : 0 0 0 3 15 Glyphosate iso. salt : 0 100 100 71 2 MSMA : 0 0 0 6 8 Pendimethalin : 0 0 100 12 6 Prometryn : 0 0 0 7 11 Pyraflufen-ethyl : 0 0 0 4 14 Pyrithiobac-sodium : 0 0 0 9 9 S-Metolachlor : 0 0 0 6 10 Sulfosate : 0 0 0 2 21 Trifloxysulfuron-sod : 0 0 0 4 13 Trifluralin : 0 0 100 32 4 : Insecticides : Abamectin : 0 0 0 2 9 Acephate : 0 0 100 27 4 Acetamiprid : 0 0 0 7 15 Aldicarb : 0 0 100 19 6 Bifenthrin : 0 0 0 1 21 Chlorpyrifos : 0 0 0 2 34 Cyfluthrin : 0 0 0 8 11 Cypermethrin : 0 0 100 13 10 Dicofol : 0 0 0 1 19 Dicrotophos : 0 0 100 19 4 Dimethoate : 0 0 0 2 24 Esfenvalerate : 0 0 0 3 23 Imidacloprid : 0 0 0 6 10 Indoxacarb : 0 0 0 2 20 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 0 0 100 12 8 Malathion : 0 0 100 15 9 Methyl parathion : 0 0 0 2 21 Oxamyl : 0 0 0 3 14 Thiamethoxam : 0 0 0 8 9 Zeta-cypermethrin : 0 0 0 6 12 : Fungicides : Mefenoxam : 0 0 0 2 20 PCNB : 0 0 0 1 22 : Other : Bacillus cereus : 0 0 0 9 8 Cyclanilide : 0 0 100 12 7 Ethephon : 0 100 100 58 2 Kinetin : 0 0 0 4 12 Mepiquat chloride : 0 0 100 33 3 Mepiquat pentaborate : 0 0 0 4 16 Monocarbamide dihyd. : 0 0 0 6 11 Paraquat : 0 0 100 15 10 Sodium chlorate : 0 0 0 3 10 Thidiazuron : 0 0 100 35 3 Tribufos : 0 0 100 26 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for the 9 Program States was 12.4 million acres. Upland Cotton: Number of Applications Distribution, Program States, 2005 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3 Carfentrazone-ethyl : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 3 Clethodim : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2 Dicamba, Digly Salt : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 Diuron : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1 Flumioxazin : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.1 4 Fluometuron : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 3 Glufosinate-ammonium : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.5 6 Glyphosate : 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.9 9 Glyphosate iso. salt : 1.0 2.0 4.0 2.2 2 MSMA : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 3 Pendimethalin : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 Prometryn : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 4 Pyraflufen-ethyl : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2 Pyrithiobac-sodium : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 S-Metolachlor : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 3 Sulfosate : 1.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 7 Trifloxysulfuron-sod : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 3 Trifluralin : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 : Insecticides : Abamectin : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.2 7 Acephate : 1.0 2.0 4.0 2.1 4 Acetamiprid : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2 Aldicarb : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 Bifenthrin : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.2 6 Chlorpyrifos : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.2 8 Cyfluthrin : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.3 4 Cypermethrin : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.3 5 Dicofol : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.4 14 Dicrotophos : 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.6 3 Dimethoate : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.5 9 Esfenvalerate : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.2 8 Imidacloprid : 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.5 7 Indoxacarb : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.3 10 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.4 5 Malathion : 1.0 3.0 10.0 4.3 8 Methyl parathion : 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.4 15 Oxamyl : 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.4 9 Thiamethoxam : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.5 5 Zeta-cypermethrin : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.4 6 : Fungicides : Mefenoxam : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 PCNB : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 : Other : Bacillus cereus : 1.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 6 Cyclanilide : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 Ethephon : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1 Kinetin : 1.0 2.0 3.0 2.1 7 Mepiquat chloride : 1.0 2.0 4.0 2.1 3 Mepiquat pentaborate : 1.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 25 Monocarbamide dihyd. : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2 Paraquat : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 4 Sodium chlorate : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.1 6 Thidiazuron : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 2 Tribufos : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.1 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for the 9 Program States was 12.4 million acres. Upland Cotton: Rate Per Application Distribution, Program States, 2005 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : lbs per Acre lbs per Acre lbs per Acre lbs per Acre : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 0.176 0.475 0.950 0.592 8 Carfentrazone-ethyl : 0.006 0.016 0.025 0.015 7 Clethodim : 0.055 0.125 0.167 0.123 6 Dicamba, Digly Salt : 0.125 0.250 0.250 0.232 4 Diuron : 0.016 0.500 1.000 0.462 5 Flumioxazin : 0.032 0.064 0.067 0.056 6 Fluometuron : 0.400 0.750 1.000 0.759 6 Glufosinate-ammonium : 0.261 0.418 0.522 0.416 8 Glyphosate : 0.406 0.563 0.773 0.627 9 Glyphosate iso. salt : 0.469 0.703 0.925 0.713 2 MSMA : 0.563 1.500 1.815 1.222 5 Pendimethalin : 0.413 0.825 1.139 0.791 3 Prometryn : 0.250 0.750 1.000 0.726 6 Pyraflufen-ethyl : 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.003 3 Pyrithiobac-sodium : 0.016 0.037 0.064 0.041 5 S-Metolachlor : 0.591 0.953 1.429 0.999 4 Sulfosate : 0.703 0.938 1.406 1.031 7 Trifloxysulfuron-sod : 0.002 0.006 0.009 0.006 7 Trifluralin : 0.500 0.781 1.250 0.862 4 : Insecticides : Abamectin : 0.004 0.005 0.009 0.006 5 Acephate : 0.135 0.438 0.720 0.412 4 Acetamiprid : 0.018 0.031 0.066 0.037 10 Aldicarb : 0.450 0.600 0.900 0.657 3 Bifenthrin : 0.047 0.078 0.100 0.080 10 Chlorpyrifos : 0.250 0.500 1.000 0.612 12 Cyfluthrin : 0.023 0.031 0.048 0.034 4 Cypermethrin : 0.020 0.052 0.098 0.055 5 Dicofol : 0.375 1.000 1.500 0.988 8 Dicrotophos : 0.113 0.250 0.500 0.289 3 Dimethoate : 0.164 0.200 0.668 0.320 16 Esfenvalerate : 0.015 0.041 0.086 0.044 11 Imidacloprid : 0.026 0.039 0.048 0.038 3 Indoxacarb : 0.078 0.100 0.107 0.095 2 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 0.014 0.031 0.055 0.031 6 Malathion : 0.776 0.909 1.080 0.891 2 Methyl parathion : 0.333 0.625 0.750 0.622 7 Oxamyl : 0.125 0.262 0.625 0.346 9 Thiamethoxam : 0.016 0.021 0.031 0.023 4 Zeta-cypermethrin : 0.010 0.019 0.040 0.021 6 : Fungicides : Mefenoxam : 0.024 0.035 0.250 0.087 29 PCNB : 0.472 0.700 0.900 0.678 6 : Other : Bacillus cereus : * * * * 5 Cyclanilide : 0.083 0.141 0.164 0.129 2 Ethephon : 0.516 1.125 1.500 1.055 2 Kinetin : * * * * 6 Mepiquat chloride : 0.014 0.029 0.044 0.030 2 Mepiquat pentaborate : 0.022 0.045 0.102 0.052 23 Monocarbamide dihyd. : 0.912 2.736 3.648 2.505 7 Paraquat : 0.063 0.313 0.750 0.324 6 Sodium chlorate : 0.300 2.400 4.800 2.577 8 Thidiazuron : 0.031 0.053 0.100 0.064 3 Tribufos : 0.188 0.375 1.000 0.534 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for the 9 Program States was 12.4 million acres. * Less than 0.0005 pounds per acre. Upland Cotton: Rate per Crop Year Distribution, Program States, 2005 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : lbs per Acre lbs per Acre lbs per Acre lbs per Acre : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 0.197 0.470 0.950 0.619 9 Carfentrazone-ethyl : 0.006 0.016 0.025 0.017 8 Clethodim : 0.055 0.125 0.167 0.125 6 Dicamba, Digly Salt : 0.125 0.250 0.250 0.235 4 Diuron : 0.016 0.500 1.000 0.508 6 Flumioxazin : 0.032 0.064 0.096 0.062 7 Fluometuron : 0.400 0.750 1.250 0.800 6 Glufosinate-ammonium : 0.261 0.522 0.992 0.633 9 Glyphosate : 0.422 0.703 2.508 1.175 14 Glyphosate iso. salt : 0.563 1.406 2.813 1.592 2 MSMA : 0.660 1.500 1.950 1.327 5 Pendimethalin : 0.413 0.825 1.237 0.816 4 Prometryn : 0.250 0.793 1.031 0.797 8 Pyraflufen-ethyl : 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.003 3 Pyrithiobac-sodium : 0.016 0.037 0.064 0.043 6 S-Metolachlor : 0.714 0.953 1.500 1.078 4 Sulfosate : 0.820 1.875 3.437 2.098 10 Trifloxysulfuron-sod : 0.002 0.006 0.011 0.006 7 Trifluralin : 0.500 0.781 1.500 0.900 4 : Insecticides : Abamectin : 0.004 0.005 0.013 0.007 8 Acephate : 0.169 0.485 2.250 0.862 7 Acetamiprid : 0.018 0.031 0.066 0.038 10 Aldicarb : 0.450 0.600 0.900 0.673 4 Bifenthrin : 0.050 0.078 0.188 0.094 11 Chlorpyrifos : 0.250 0.500 1.000 0.708 13 Cyfluthrin : 0.023 0.033 0.071 0.043 6 Cypermethrin : 0.020 0.050 0.137 0.071 7 Dicofol : 0.500 1.000 1.500 1.362 18 Dicrotophos : 0.125 0.375 0.937 0.452 4 Dimethoate : 0.200 0.334 1.000 0.466 12 Esfenvalerate : 0.015 0.033 0.119 0.055 18 Imidacloprid : 0.028 0.047 0.117 0.058 8 Indoxacarb : 0.098 0.104 0.200 0.125 10 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 0.014 0.033 0.083 0.043 9 Malathion : 0.758 2.728 9.486 3.829 9 Methyl parathion : 0.500 0.750 1.406 0.895 17 Oxamyl : 0.094 0.324 0.962 0.492 12 Thiamethoxam : 0.016 0.031 0.063 0.036 5 Zeta-cypermethrin : 0.012 0.023 0.050 0.030 9 : Fungicides : Mefenoxam : 0.024 0.035 0.250 0.087 29 PCNB : 0.472 0.700 0.900 0.678 6 : Other : Bacillus cereus : * * * * 7 Cyclanilide : 0.083 0.141 0.176 0.132 2 Ethephon : 0.563 1.125 1.650 1.147 2 Kinetin : * * * * 7 Mepiquat chloride : 0.016 0.049 0.131 0.063 4 Mepiquat pentaborate : 0.026 0.102 0.205 0.106 15 Monocarbamide dihyd. : 0.912 2.736 3.648 2.600 8 Paraquat : 0.047 0.375 0.750 0.355 8 Sodium chlorate : 0.281 2.760 5.760 2.917 11 Thidiazuron : 0.031 0.063 0.125 0.070 4 Tribufos : 0.188 0.375 1.125 0.590 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2005 for the 9 Program States was 12.4 million acres. * Less than 0.0005 pounds per acre. Pest Management Practices - Highlights Producers of corn, upland cotton, and fall potatoes were last asked about their pest management practices in 2003. Oats were last surveyed in 1998, but pest management practices were not captured at that time. Corn: No-till or minimum tillage practices were incorporated on 62 percent of the corn acreage in the prevention of pests, while 80 percent of the planted acreage was rotated with some other crop(s) over the past 3 years to avoid pests. Scouting for weeds was used on 86 percent of the farms growing corn and on 90 percent of the corn acres. Fall Potatoes: To prevent pests, 69 percent of the farms chopped, sprayed, mowed, plowed, or burned field edges, lanes, ditches, roadways, or fence lines. In addition, 91 percent the potato acreage had been rotated with some other crop over the past 3 to control pests. Ninety-eight percent of the potato acreage was scouted for weeds, insects or mites, and diseases, and the scouting was performed by the operator, partner, or family member on at least 53 percent of the farms. Oats: Over the past 3 years, 62 percent of oats planted acreage was rotated with some other crop(s). Just 59 percent of the farms scouted for weeds, with 53 percent of the farms using weather data to monitor pests as well. Upland Cotton: To aid in the prevention of pests, 64 percent of the farms chopped, sprayed, mowed, plowed, or burned field edges, lanes, ditches, roadways, or fence lines. In addition, 52 of percent upland cotton acres were planted to a crop variety that was resistant to pests. Scouting for weeds, insects, and diseases took place on 89, 94 and 83 percent, respectively, of the cotton acres. Pest Management Practices Percent of Farms Receiving Practice Corn, 2005 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Practice : States :--------------------------------------- : US : CO : GA : IL : IN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 61 60 51 60 63 Plow down crop residue : 24 36 49 19 19 Remove crop residue : 6 28 12 1 3 Clean implements after fieldwork : 33 50 65 29 35 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 41 56 55 55 39 Water management practices : 2 19 10 1 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 9 20 15 8 10 Rotate crops to control pests : 79 56 61 84 89 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 44 55 42 40 38 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 14 17 9 9 12 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 42 46 67 40 41 Deliberate scouting activities : 45 52 12 53 49 Field was not scouted : 13 2 21 7 10 Scouted for pests : 14 25 * 20 8 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 7 10 3 16 7 Scouting due to pest development model : 7 9 3 9 4 Scouted for weeds : 86 98 78 91 89 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 81 71 100 83 87 An Employee : 1 2 2 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 10 4 12 9 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 8 24 3 3 Scouted for insects or mites : 59 80 28 71 68 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 77 55 100 82 80 An Employee : 1 3 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 11 5 12 16 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 11 38 5 4 Scouted for diseases : 43 69 21 49 52 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 75 58 100 86 74 An Employee : 1 3 * 4 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 11 5 8 17 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 13 35 7 5 Field mapping of weed problems : 10 13 3 10 15 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 4 18 4 2 7 Records kept to track pests : 17 34 6 19 14 Weather monitoring : 58 56 65 68 49 : Suppression Practices: : Biological pesticides : 5 1 1 5 1 Scouting used to make decisions : 18 28 1 21 17 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 42 60 37 32 32 Adjust planting methods : 12 26 7 11 7 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 28 23 12 34 17 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Pest Management Practices Percent of Farms Receiving Practice Corn, 2005 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Practice : States :--------------------------------------- : IA : KS : KY : MI : MN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 73 73 88 55 34 Plow down crop residue : 12 14 14 44 25 Remove crop residue : 3 3 9 5 6 Clean implements after fieldwork : 27 43 45 45 45 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 48 29 35 27 33 Water management practices : 8 * : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 15 12 11 7 6 Rotate crops to control pests : 78 85 76 73 81 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 62 50 36 31 49 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 13 17 7 13 12 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 41 51 63 33 30 Deliberate scouting activities : 45 43 29 44 59 Field was not scouted : 14 5 7 23 11 Scouted for pests : 15 14 8 11 13 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 9 6 * 5 7 Scouting due to pest development model : 7 10 5 3 4 Scouted for weeds : 86 95 93 77 89 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 81 83 92 87 80 An Employee : * * 2 5 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 14 1 3 6 11 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 4 16 3 2 9 Scouted for insects or mites : 60 53 72 55 65 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 77 74 93 83 77 An Employee : * 1 1 5 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 16 1 3 10 10 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 7 24 4 3 12 Scouted for diseases : 46 45 60 44 42 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 77 71 92 85 77 An Employee : * 1 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 17 * 3 10 9 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 6 28 4 3 14 Field mapping of weed problems : 12 11 5 2 9 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 2 2 2 5 2 Records kept to track pests : 12 20 17 13 22 Weather monitoring : 70 61 30 64 73 : Suppression Practices: : Biological pesticides : 5 15 6 1 10 Scouting used to make decisions : 23 15 8 24 16 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 48 57 35 39 32 Adjust planting methods : 14 17 13 19 12 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 35 34 22 37 36 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Pest Management Practices Percent of Farms Receiving Practice Corn, 2005 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Practice : States :--------------------------------------- : MO : NE : NY : NC : ND ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 62 77 22 57 55 Plow down crop residue : 25 11 48 37 20 Remove crop residue : 3 3 8 17 7 Clean implements after fieldwork : 15 35 18 33 69 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 51 42 28 54 51 Water management practices : 1 8 3 2 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 9 10 7 11 13 Rotate crops to control pests : 86 76 46 82 94 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 46 58 16 49 58 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 16 17 14 17 38 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 48 48 34 38 22 Deliberate scouting activities : 43 39 30 37 70 Field was not scouted : 9 13 36 25 8 Scouted for pests : 5 15 10 8 22 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 2 7 5 * 4 Scouting due to pest development model : 4 7 9 1 9 Scouted for weeds : 91 87 63 74 92 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 93 75 78 93 73 An Employee : * 3 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 3 4 3 * Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 4 21 19 3 27 Scouted for insects or mites : 65 66 37 60 62 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 91 70 69 94 60 An Employee : * 3 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 3 5 3 * Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 5 26 28 3 40 Scouted for diseases : 50 41 31 50 52 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 90 58 67 93 52 An Employee : * 3 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 2 6 1 * 2 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 7 35 32 4 47 Field mapping of weed problems : 4 10 16 * 9 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 3 8 7 3 4 Records kept to track pests : 10 24 15 8 36 Weather monitoring : 31 60 47 58 83 : Suppression Practices: : Biological pesticides : 14 7 5 5 Scouting used to make decisions : 15 23 13 7 30 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 33 62 23 46 61 Adjust planting methods : 13 16 6 15 27 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 21 31 21 13 23 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Pest Management Practices Percent of Farms Receiving Practice Corn, 2005 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Practice : States :--------------------------------------- : OH : PA : SD : TX : WI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 54 63 65 41 63 Plow down crop residue : 32 37 19 67 24 Remove crop residue : 6 16 5 7 10 Clean implements after fieldwork : 32 30 39 43 30 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 36 39 34 51 31 Water management practices : * 3 1 12 * : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 2 5 10 18 9 Rotate crops to control pests : 81 71 83 74 78 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 25 42 68 48 37 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 9 15 26 21 15 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 47 46 31 51 46 Deliberate scouting activities : 36 43 56 36 37 Field was not scouted : 17 11 13 12 17 Scouted for pests : 17 14 11 17 11 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 4 3 15 5 4 Scouting due to pest development model : 5 10 4 7 10 Scouted for weeds : 83 89 87 86 82 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 90 78 86 82 68 An Employee : * 2 2 4 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 9 7 8 3 21 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 13 4 12 10 Scouted for insects or mites : 45 53 50 59 50 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 82 73 82 68 62 An Employee : * 3 2 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 17 4 11 10 25 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 1 20 7 20 12 Scouted for diseases : 35 36 35 37 35 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 78 69 81 58 56 An Employee : 4 4 3 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 21 4 9 11 25 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 1 23 10 27 17 Field mapping of weed problems : 4 14 6 4 14 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : * 3 3 6 4 Records kept to track pests : 11 18 14 19 17 Weather monitoring : 55 60 75 49 39 : Suppression Practices: : Biological pesticides : 2 4 8 6 4 Scouting used to make decisions : 14 20 20 16 13 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 31 49 55 34 48 Adjust planting methods : 7 8 22 18 8 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 20 23 15 11 30 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ * Percentage is less than 0.5 Pest Management Practices Percent of Acres Receiving Practice Corn, 2005 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Practice : States :--------------------------------------- : US : CO : GA : IL : IN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 62 71 60 60 59 Plow down crop residue : 22 25 45 26 22 Remove crop residue : 4 17 13 2 2 Clean implements after fieldwork : 35 52 61 34 37 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 44 47 57 63 41 Water management practices : 3 23 13 1 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 10 28 18 8 13 Rotate crops to control pests : 80 48 64 81 89 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 52 54 37 43 42 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 16 20 8 8 8 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 41 49 71 42 37 Deliberate scouting activities : 50 51 15 51 53 Field was not scouted : 9 1 14 7 10 Scouted for pests : 17 26 * 22 15 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 9 12 2 15 9 Scouting due to pest development model : 8 9 2 10 9 Scouted for weeds : 90 99 84 92 89 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 79 59 100 82 85 An Employee : 1 3 1 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 9 1 13 9 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 11 37 4 4 Scouted for insects or mites : 67 84 31 78 70 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 74 48 100 80 75 An Employee : 1 4 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 10 1 13 18 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 15 48 6 7 Scouted for diseases : 49 67 21 56 54 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 71 50 100 81 70 An Employee : 1 4 1 3 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 10 2 9 18 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 19 44 8 9 Field mapping of weed problems : 11 20 2 11 17 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 5 15 3 3 8 Records kept to track pests : 21 41 9 21 19 Weather monitoring : 61 65 61 70 52 : Suppression Practices: : Biological pesticides : 7 2 1 5 2 Scouting used to make decisions : 23 35 1 25 23 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 42 69 45 27 28 Adjust planting methods : 14 34 6 14 7 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 29 24 9 33 22 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Pest Management Practices Percent of Acres Receiving Practice Corn, 2005 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Practice : States :--------------------------------------- : IA : KS : KY : MI : MN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 68 75 87 61 34 Plow down crop residue : 16 14 11 41 22 Remove crop residue : 3 4 8 4 4 Clean implements after fieldwork : 21 50 51 48 41 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 47 28 40 30 34 Water management practices : 15 2 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 10 10 10 5 7 Rotate crops to control pests : 79 80 81 80 82 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 60 57 37 35 58 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 13 25 15 10 14 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 44 43 60 34 28 Deliberate scouting activities : 45 53 32 49 66 Field was not scouted : 10 4 8 17 7 Scouted for pests : 14 21 10 13 17 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 8 7 * 6 10 Scouting due to pest development model : 7 11 6 7 5 Scouted for weeds : 90 96 92 82 93 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 83 72 85 86 80 An Employee : * 1 3 3 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 13 2 5 5 9 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 4 26 7 6 11 Scouted for insects or mites : 66 66 73 65 69 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 81 61 84 83 77 An Employee : * 2 3 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 13 2 6 8 8 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 6 36 7 8 15 Scouted for diseases : 50 51 56 50 48 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 81 53 81 80 76 An Employee : * 4 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 14 1 6 9 9 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 5 46 9 10 15 Field mapping of weed problems : 11 17 8 4 9 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 2 4 5 7 2 Records kept to track pests : 11 33 17 15 23 Weather monitoring : 66 61 31 63 75 : Suppression Practices: : Biological pesticides : 5 19 9 2 12 Scouting used to make decisions : 20 25 11 29 18 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 45 65 38 44 36 Adjust planting methods : 13 18 15 10 12 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 31 31 26 36 37 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Pest Management Practices Percent of Acres Receiving Practice Corn, 2005 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Practice : States :--------------------------------------- : MO : NE : NY : NC : ND ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 57 76 25 68 55 Plow down crop residue : 28 8 48 35 16 Remove crop residue : 3 2 5 33 6 Clean implements after fieldwork : 14 36 23 34 72 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 55 43 34 54 48 Water management practices : 1 9 12 4 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 12 11 13 8 13 Rotate crops to control pests : 83 74 52 82 94 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 44 68 23 54 60 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 18 18 14 22 31 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 38 46 36 36 15 Deliberate scouting activities : 51 45 40 44 79 Field was not scouted : 11 9 24 20 5 Scouted for pests : 6 27 18 14 22 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 2 12 6 3 4 Scouting due to pest development model : 5 11 10 4 8 Scouted for weeds : 89 91 74 80 95 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 86 62 75 90 72 An Employee : * 6 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 4 5 4 1 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 10 33 21 4 28 Scouted for insects or mites : 67 68 41 67 70 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 83 53 63 92 62 An Employee : * 5 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 4 6 4 1 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 13 41 33 3 38 Scouted for diseases : 48 50 34 52 60 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 80 44 61 89 57 An Employee : 1 6 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 1 7 1 1 2 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 18 49 38 4 41 Field mapping of weed problems : 7 11 22 3 9 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 4 10 8 3 4 Records kept to track pests : 16 35 20 9 41 Weather monitoring : 31 58 52 50 82 : Suppression Practices: : Biological pesticides : 13 10 8 5 Scouting used to make decisions : 16 33 20 7 37 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 36 58 26 48 59 Adjust planting methods : 15 17 14 24 26 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 20 37 23 14 24 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Pest Management Practices Percent of Acres Receiving Practice Corn, 2005 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Practice : States :--------------------------------------- : OH : PA : SD : TX : WI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 65 68 71 45 59 Plow down crop residue : 23 31 15 66 25 Remove crop residue : 4 14 6 7 8 Clean implements after fieldwork : 26 33 46 49 31 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 29 45 31 59 26 Water management practices : 1 2 * 15 * : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 3 4 12 23 15 Rotate crops to control pests : 83 71 89 68 79 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 26 51 71 58 42 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 9 11 32 33 24 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 52 39 37 52 40 Deliberate scouting activities : 35 43 54 42 47 Field was not scouted : 14 18 8 7 13 Scouted for pests : 12 12 12 20 15 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 8 1 13 9 8 Scouting due to pest development model : 6 8 4 12 11 Scouted for weeds : 86 82 92 93 87 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 89 79 83 72 66 An Employee : 1 1 3 5 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 10 8 11 2 15 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 12 3 21 16 Scouted for insects or mites : 53 49 53 64 54 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 83 75 80 58 61 An Employee : * 1 6 3 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 15 7 15 6 12 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 1 16 5 30 23 Scouted for diseases : 43 37 34 44 43 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 81 73 78 44 54 An Employee : 1 9 4 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 17 8 14 6 13 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 2 18 8 41 30 Field mapping of weed problems : 3 11 6 9 27 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 1 6 3 12 8 Records kept to track pests : 12 17 13 25 26 Weather monitoring : 47 63 71 53 37 : Suppression Practices: : Biological pesticides : 3 4 6 8 6 Scouting used to make decisions : 15 17 15 19 26 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 31 44 54 36 46 Adjust planting methods : 9 6 23 22 12 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 21 29 12 10 35 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ * Percentage is less than 0.5 Pest Management Practices Percent of Farms Receiving Practice Fall Potatoes, 2005 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Practice : States :--------------------------------------- : US : CO : ID : ME : MI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 29 51 20 39 21 Plow down crop residue : 65 58 54 83 94 Remove crop residue : 12 27 12 8 Clean implements after fieldwork : 67 98 62 48 63 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 69 98 76 59 31 Water management practices : 39 38 55 2 50 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 22 22 23 13 31 Rotate crops to control pests : 88 90 83 77 88 Grow trap crop to control insects : 3 2 2 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 22 14 18 19 41 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 28 24 24 10 44 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 25 12 34 36 27 Deliberate scouting activities : 74 87 65 64 72 Field was not scouted : 1 1 1 1 Scouted for pests : 46 67 24 49 56 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 23 14 16 28 12 Scouting due to pest development model : 25 14 12 30 19 Scouted for weeds : 96 99 95 91 97 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 58 43 63 75 59 An Employee : 6 6 10 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 11 5 16 6 2 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 26 46 12 19 38 Scouted for insects or mites : 98 99 96 100 99 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 54 43 55 74 57 An Employee : 6 6 11 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 12 5 21 5 2 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 28 46 14 21 39 Scouted for diseases : 98 99 97 100 97 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 53 43 55 68 57 An Employee : 6 6 11 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 12 5 18 8 2 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 29 46 16 25 40 Field mapping of weed problems : 38 34 28 44 48 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 43 70 50 24 38 Records kept to track pests : 48 60 32 27 52 Weather monitoring : 79 79 62 87 76 : Suppression Practices: : Beneficial organisms : 2 13 4 1 1 Biological pesticides : 3 2 1 5 2 Scouting used to make decisions : 51 21 35 73 43 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 54 45 51 51 67 Adjust planting methods : 23 39 20 10 37 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 58 44 61 34 77 Biological pest controls : 13 9 4 28 18 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Pest Management Practices Percent of Farms Receiving Practice Fall Potatoes, 2005 (continued) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Practice : States :------------------------------- : MN : ND : WA : WI ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 31 37 15 41 Plow down crop residue : 56 29 81 53 Remove crop residue : 21 7 35 9 Clean implements after fieldwork : 87 81 82 66 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 71 79 90 48 Water management practices : 52 33 50 65 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 27 20 25 30 Rotate crops to control pests : 98 96 100 97 Grow trap crop to control insects : 15 3 7 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 26 17 22 35 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 56 38 39 30 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 8 15 13 14 Deliberate scouting activities : 92 85 87 85 Field was not scouted : * * 2 Scouted for pests : 53 45 56 74 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 30 9 45 29 Scouting due to pest development model : 52 24 25 48 Scouted for weeds : 99 99 100 92 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 51 47 48 31 An Employee : 22 1 5 14 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 1 34 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 27 51 13 55 Scouted for insects or mites : 100 91 99 98 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 52 41 47 28 An Employee : 22 1 5 9 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 1 34 1 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 26 57 14 62 Scouted for diseases : 99 90 97 98 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 52 42 47 27 An Employee : 22 1 5 9 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 1 35 1 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 26 56 13 62 Field mapping of weed problems : 61 33 34 43 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 40 49 58 40 Records kept to track pests : 71 63 74 78 Weather monitoring : 85 80 94 83 : Suppression Practices: : Beneficial organisms : 1 3 Biological pesticides : 3 9 Scouting used to make decisions : 68 35 51 70 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 41 51 65 66 Adjust planting methods : 41 10 30 36 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 70 54 77 75 Biological pest controls : 21 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Percentage is less than 0.5 Pest Management Practices Percent of Acres Receiving Practice Fall Potatoes, 2005 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Practice : States :--------------------------------------- : US : CO : ID : ME : MI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 30 48 20 39 18 Plow down crop residue : 60 61 53 88 94 Remove crop residue : 18 30 13 5 Clean implements after fieldwork : 75 98 66 48 61 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 79 98 78 70 27 Water management practices : 53 34 54 2 58 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 27 22 26 13 46 Rotate crops to control pests : 91 93 85 80 87 Grow trap crop to control insects : 3 3 * Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 23 17 22 23 53 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 30 24 23 6 53 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 20 12 33 42 17 Deliberate scouting activities : 79 88 66 58 83 Field was not scouted : 1 * 1 * Scouted for pests : 50 66 24 46 74 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 27 15 15 30 12 Scouting due to pest development model : 26 16 14 23 30 Scouted for weeds : 98 100 96 93 99 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 46 46 59 78 42 An Employee : 11 4 14 3 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 15 6 15 8 2 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 28 44 12 14 53 Scouted for insects or mites : 98 100 97 100 100 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 41 46 47 77 41 An Employee : 10 4 15 3 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 18 6 22 7 2 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 32 44 16 16 54 Scouted for diseases : 98 100 98 100 100 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 40 46 48 66 41 An Employee : 10 4 14 3 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 17 6 20 15 2 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 32 44 18 19 54 Field mapping of weed problems : 37 30 31 36 62 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 54 72 50 29 62 Records kept to track pests : 58 58 39 22 61 Weather monitoring : 79 79 64 91 85 : Suppression Practices: : Beneficial organisms : 3 13 4 1 * Biological pesticides : 2 3 2 3 3 Scouting used to make decisions : 48 18 38 74 50 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 54 43 49 40 80 Adjust planting methods : 25 39 21 15 55 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 64 39 62 36 85 Biological pest controls : 10 7 3 34 21 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Pest Management Practices Percent of Acres Receiving Practice Fall Potatoes, 2005 (continued) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Practice : States :------------------------------- : MN : ND : WA : WI ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 42 44 17 57 Plow down crop residue : 69 33 76 48 Remove crop residue : 26 5 44 17 Clean implements after fieldwork : 90 77 92 75 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 78 81 96 65 Water management practices : 71 38 64 84 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 45 16 34 26 Rotate crops to control pests : 100 95 100 98 Grow trap crop to control insects : 27 3 4 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 28 15 14 37 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 67 30 42 23 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 4 8 6 7 Deliberate scouting activities : 96 92 94 93 Field was not scouted : * * * Scouted for pests : 71 58 66 89 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 34 13 62 42 Scouting due to pest development model : 60 33 24 56 Scouted for weeds : 100 99 100 98 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 32 35 32 21 An Employee : 36 1 8 20 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 1 46 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 32 62 14 59 Scouted for insects or mites : 100 94 100 100 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 32 29 31 12 An Employee : 36 1 8 7 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 1 46 1 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 32 68 15 80 Scouted for diseases : 100 94 99 100 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 32 32 31 12 An Employee : 36 1 8 7 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 1 46 1 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 32 66 15 80 Field mapping of weed problems : 76 37 25 59 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 47 60 62 57 Records kept to track pests : 82 73 82 92 Weather monitoring : 91 83 97 91 : Suppression Practices: : Beneficial organisms : 1 1 Biological pesticides : 3 3 Scouting used to make decisions : 79 36 53 85 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 48 50 71 59 Adjust planting methods : 54 6 27 30 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 70 60 69 89 Biological pest controls : 29 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Percentage is less than 0.5 Pest Management Practices Percent of Farms Receiving Practice Oats, 2005 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Practice : States :----------------------------------------------- : US : CA : ID : IL : IA : KS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 37 37 34 27 56 59 Plow down crop residue : 37 86 47 20 25 21 Remove crop residue : 15 40 27 8 11 19 Clean implements after fieldwork : 26 53 49 19 17 49 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 23 61 41 29 33 14 Water management practices : 2 22 14 3 1 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 11 20 18 9 14 7 Rotate crops to control pests : 71 50 61 59 81 74 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 11 21 9 9 13 11 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 10 17 6 2 7 13 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 42 55 54 25 45 41 Deliberate scouting activities : 19 16 19 24 15 18 Field was not scouted : 38 28 27 50 40 41 Scouted for pests : 3 5 2 4 5 4 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 1 2 2 3 1 Scouting due to pest development model : 2 1 1 3 5 Scouted for weeds : 59 72 72 48 56 59 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 92 73 92 97 100 95 An Employee : 1 3 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 6 14 6 1 1 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 2 10 1 1 * 4 Scouted for insects or mites : 33 45 39 33 43 35 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 88 79 87 90 96 94 An Employee : 1 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 9 20 12 8 3 1 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 2 1 2 * 5 Scouted for diseases : 27 47 31 31 36 29 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 87 77 87 91 100 94 An Employee : 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 10 19 13 7 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 2 3 2 * 6 Field mapping of weed problems : 4 2 17 1 6 3 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 1 19 2 * Records kept to track pests : 6 14 11 4 2 4 Weather monitoring : 53 60 48 71 15 29 : Suppression Practices: : Biological pesticides : Scouting used to make decisions : 4 3 5 10 3 4 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 36 25 34 26 44 42 Adjust planting methods : 7 22 13 4 7 3 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 14 15 14 16 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Pest Management Practices Percent of Farms Receiving Practice Oats, 2005 (continued) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Practice : States :----------------------------------------------- : MI : MN : MT : NE : NY : ND -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 18 27 42 50 18 39 Plow down crop residue : 51 16 58 11 57 31 Remove crop residue : 7 19 27 3 11 12 Clean implements after fieldwork : 30 41 45 26 18 49 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 26 29 26 30 28 13 Water management practices : 2 4 5 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 7 5 17 3 7 28 Rotate crops to control pests : 80 74 68 58 85 68 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 7 19 10 5 1 5 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 8 14 16 11 3 13 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 47 36 48 55 37 47 Deliberate scouting activities : 19 20 24 3 24 9 Field was not scouted : 34 43 28 43 39 44 Scouted for pests : 3 5 6 1 4 1 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 3 * 1 * * Scouting due to pest development model : 1 3 1 * 3 * Scouted for weeds : 62 55 72 57 60 54 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 99 94 99 98 93 100 An Employee : 1 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 6 1 2 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 1 * 5 Scouted for insects or mites : 27 18 43 45 16 14 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 100 98 99 99 90 100 An Employee : 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 2 1 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : * 10 Scouted for diseases : 19 14 38 29 11 12 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 95 98 99 98 85 100 An Employee : 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 2 2 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 5 * 15 Field mapping of weed problems : 1 1 22 6 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : * 4 Records kept to track pests : 8 * 6 1 9 1 Weather monitoring : 50 48 67 70 37 72 : Suppression Practices: : Biological pesticides : Scouting used to make decisions : 3 6 7 4 1 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 28 27 43 50 32 44 Adjust planting methods : 7 5 14 3 2 6 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 8 31 24 15 18 21 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Pest Management Practices Percent of Farms Receiving Practice Oats, 2005 (continued) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Practice : States :------------------------------- : PA : SD : TX : WI ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 16 41 20 52 Plow down crop residue : 53 33 55 31 Remove crop residue : 20 15 14 13 Clean implements after fieldwork : 16 39 14 16 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 19 19 21 17 Water management practices : 1 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 11 13 8 8 Rotate crops to control pests : 87 84 18 75 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 2 8 8 17 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 12 11 4 8 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 42 51 41 39 Deliberate scouting activities : 20 22 15 25 Field was not scouted : 39 26 44 36 Scouted for pests : 1 3 1 5 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 3 1 Scouting due to pest development model : * * 2 2 Scouted for weeds : 59 73 48 60 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 96 99 90 83 An Employee : 8 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 2 1 15 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 3 1 2 Scouted for insects or mites : 26 43 42 41 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 91 99 87 76 An Employee : 9 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 4 3 22 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 5 1 3 Scouted for diseases : 24 36 35 30 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 92 98 89 69 An Employee : 11 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 4 29 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 4 2 1 Field mapping of weed problems : 3 3 * 6 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 2 * Records kept to track pests : 10 3 2 9 Weather monitoring : 55 46 47 50 : Suppression Practices: : Biological pesticides : Scouting used to make decisions : 3 1 * 8 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 31 34 26 41 Adjust planting methods : 4 6 9 9 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 14 3 2 13 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Percentage is less than 0.5 Pest Management Practices Percent of Acres Receiving Practice Oats, 2005 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Practice : States :----------------------------------------------- : US : CA : ID : IL : IA : KS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 38 32 30 21 56 66 Plow down crop residue : 39 82 47 13 20 17 Remove crop residue : 15 46 28 6 9 8 Clean implements after fieldwork : 32 51 57 15 21 56 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 24 67 48 25 31 14 Water management practices : 2 19 12 1 3 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 12 19 15 7 13 4 Rotate crops to control pests : 62 52 61 44 77 76 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 11 18 6 8 8 9 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 10 14 7 1 8 7 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 40 42 41 18 38 42 Deliberate scouting activities : 24 22 32 21 20 18 Field was not scouted : 37 36 27 62 43 41 Scouted for pests : 4 6 3 7 5 8 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 1 2 2 5 1 Scouting due to pest development model : 3 1 * 3 3 Scouted for weeds : 60 64 73 37 53 59 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 88 62 90 97 99 89 An Employee : 5 3 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 5 24 7 1 * Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 2 11 * 2 1 11 Scouted for insects or mites : 38 43 45 28 40 41 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 83 64 81 90 97 85 An Employee : 8 8 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 6 29 11 7 2 * Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 3 6 3 1 15 Scouted for diseases : 30 44 37 26 32 37 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 82 63 88 92 99 83 An Employee : 9 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 6 28 12 5 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 3 8 3 1 17 Field mapping of weed problems : 4 3 19 1 4 5 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 2 18 1 * Records kept to track pests : 6 16 16 5 2 8 Weather monitoring : 53 57 53 73 17 35 : Suppression Practices: : Biological pesticides : Scouting used to make decisions : 5 4 8 9 4 8 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 33 22 31 21 42 43 Adjust planting methods : 9 21 14 3 6 4 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 13 18 22 20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Pest Management Practices Percent of Acres Receiving Practice Oats, 2005 (continued) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Practice : States :----------------------------------------------- : MI : MN : MT : NE : NY : ND -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 19 28 45 40 22 55 Plow down crop residue : 53 17 48 5 50 25 Remove crop residue : 11 22 36 4 16 9 Clean implements after fieldwork : 33 42 41 18 23 48 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 22 31 33 22 28 21 Water management practices : 1 4 1 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 9 7 22 2 8 19 Rotate crops to control pests : 81 81 64 57 80 69 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 7 24 10 5 2 6 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 9 18 15 5 4 14 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 40 34 45 55 37 39 Deliberate scouting activities : 25 26 25 2 28 12 Field was not scouted : 34 41 31 43 36 49 Scouted for pests : 5 4 3 1 7 1 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 6 1 1 1 * Scouting due to pest development model : 2 5 1 1 3 * Scouted for weeds : 61 56 69 57 62 49 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 98 89 99 98 90 100 An Employee : 1 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 11 * 2 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 2 1 8 Scouted for insects or mites : 28 13 41 37 18 20 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 100 90 99 99 77 100 An Employee : 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 7 1 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 3 23 Scouted for diseases : 19 13 31 26 14 18 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 93 90 98 99 72 100 An Employee : 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 7 1 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 7 3 28 Field mapping of weed problems : 2 2 21 9 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : * 3 Records kept to track pests : 6 2 9 * 8 2 Weather monitoring : 47 51 73 62 40 65 : Suppression Practices: : Biological pesticides : Scouting used to make decisions : 4 6 4 8 1 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 28 27 48 41 25 41 Adjust planting methods : 7 5 16 1 2 7 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 9 31 25 12 13 17 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Pest Management Practices Percent of Acres Receiving Practice Oats, 2005 (continued) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Practice : States :------------------------------- : PA : SD : TX : WI ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 21 54 19 49 Plow down crop residue : 54 25 62 36 Remove crop residue : 17 10 9 14 Clean implements after fieldwork : 21 38 14 22 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 24 13 15 16 Water management practices : * : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 11 14 4 15 Rotate crops to control pests : 88 82 20 78 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 4 12 8 19 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 12 14 4 11 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 42 48 40 32 Deliberate scouting activities : 23 26 32 30 Field was not scouted : 35 26 27 38 Scouted for pests : 3 3 4 8 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 2 4 Scouting due to pest development model : * * 6 4 Scouted for weeds : 63 73 62 58 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 92 99 76 85 An Employee : 23 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 3 1 11 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 5 1 4 Scouted for insects or mites : 29 40 63 40 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 84 98 74 78 An Employee : 23 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 7 3 16 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 9 2 6 Scouted for diseases : 26 33 43 30 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 83 98 69 75 An Employee : 31 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 7 21 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 9 2 3 Field mapping of weed problems : 4 4 * 9 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 5 * Records kept to track pests : 12 5 1 12 Weather monitoring : 52 48 46 50 : Suppression Practices: : Biological pesticides : Scouting used to make decisions : 4 2 * 17 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 31 37 23 40 Adjust planting methods : 6 7 12 14 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 16 5 1 13 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Percentage is less than 0.5 Pest Management Practices Percent of Farms Receiving Practice Upland Cotton, 2005 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Practice : States :--------------------------------------- : US : AL : AR : CA : GA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 60 64 74 26 68 Plow down crop residue : 46 25 57 89 49 Remove crop residue : 15 6 25 46 20 Clean implements after fieldwork : 53 38 58 57 66 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 64 47 78 83 77 Water management practices : 8 4 22 39 16 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 25 25 24 40 36 Rotate crops to control pests : 56 44 23 63 82 Grow trap crop to control insects : 14 8 4 9 4 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 58 48 71 46 71 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 22 17 19 29 29 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 27 28 18 23 29 Deliberate scouting activities : 71 72 82 75 70 Field was not scouted : 2 * * 3 1 Scouted for pests : 58 63 63 68 52 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 18 13 13 20 17 Scouting due to pest development model : 24 35 16 27 29 Scouted for weeds : 92 96 85 93 95 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 56 66 30 26 57 An Employee : 3 4 1 7 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 5 * 2 28 * Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 36 30 67 39 40 Scouted for insects or mites : 96 100 99 96 97 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 40 57 10 13 43 An Employee : 3 4 1 3 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 5 2 2 26 * Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 52 38 87 57 54 Scouted for diseases : 87 95 92 92 96 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 44 60 16 13 47 An Employee : 2 3 1 4 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 6 1 2 24 * Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 48 35 81 59 51 Field mapping of weed problems : 25 27 22 32 17 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 11 9 12 20 19 Records kept to track pests : 55 54 72 70 60 Weather monitoring : 74 71 64 60 87 : Suppression Practices: : Beneficial organisms : 1 2 2 5 Biological pesticides : 20 20 29 9 27 Scouting used to make decisions : 46 43 56 61 43 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 39 44 28 18 47 Adjust planting methods : 20 10 20 34 23 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 37 20 48 57 50 Biological pest controls : 60 49 55 24 51 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Pest Management Practices Percent of Farms Receiving Practice Upland Cotton, 2005 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Practice : States :--------------------------------------- : LA : MS : NC : TN : TX ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 65 46 74 72 40 Plow down crop residue : 61 50 32 28 61 Remove crop residue : 24 20 8 7 12 Clean implements after fieldwork : 50 43 45 55 61 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 88 42 60 79 56 Water management practices : 8 5 2 1 7 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 19 11 28 31 20 Rotate crops to control pests : 57 24 74 45 52 Grow trap crop to control insects : 11 39 19 11 9 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 79 33 73 53 42 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 16 8 34 14 15 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 17 9 24 26 42 Deliberate scouting activities : 83 90 76 74 50 Field was not scouted : 1 * 7 Scouted for pests : 80 71 65 46 43 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 19 17 23 19 17 Scouting due to pest development model : 18 28 19 43 17 Scouted for weeds : 96 93 99 96 79 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 33 64 52 53 74 An Employee : 2 3 3 4 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 11 8 4 4 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 64 23 38 39 19 Scouted for insects or mites : 100 99 99 96 88 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 12 8 49 45 55 An Employee : 3 12 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : * 8 5 9 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 88 92 40 39 35 Scouted for diseases : 97 72 96 96 69 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 14 25 51 53 57 An Employee : 2 4 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 13 8 5 7 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 86 62 38 38 35 Field mapping of weed problems : 26 19 34 27 21 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 16 7 14 6 5 Records kept to track pests : 87 81 53 51 30 Weather monitoring : 80 91 81 85 52 : Suppression Practices: : Beneficial organisms : 1 2 * 2 Biological pesticides : 34 17 23 21 10 Scouting used to make decisions : 49 42 56 44 31 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 21 18 63 25 31 Adjust planting methods : 15 4 21 29 20 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 46 27 47 53 10 Biological pest controls : 77 82 72 51 54 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ * Percentage is less than 0.5 Pest Management Practices Percent of Acres Receiving Practice Upland Cotton, 2005 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Practice : States :--------------------------------------- : US : AL : AR : CA : GA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 52 66 78 22 72 Plow down crop residue : 53 29 51 92 45 Remove crop residue : 18 13 29 60 18 Clean implements after fieldwork : 59 29 60 65 65 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 62 50 76 87 75 Water management practices : 11 14 21 41 19 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 22 19 21 42 41 Rotate crops to control pests : 48 38 23 72 83 Grow trap crop to control insects : 11 6 5 9 3 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 52 58 67 51 78 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 18 24 17 31 31 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 32 23 17 22 29 Deliberate scouting activities : 64 77 83 77 71 Field was not scouted : 4 * * 1 * Scouted for pests : 53 68 58 74 56 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 17 14 16 23 16 Scouting due to pest development model : 21 49 17 26 27 Scouted for weeds : 89 95 83 97 96 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 59 67 23 28 55 An Employee : 3 4 1 7 3 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 4 * 1 26 * Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 34 28 74 39 42 Scouted for insects or mites : 94 100 100 97 98 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 39 52 8 12 41 An Employee : 2 3 1 3 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 5 2 1 26 * Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 55 43 90 59 56 Scouted for diseases : 83 96 91 94 97 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 44 61 13 12 45 An Employee : 2 3 1 3 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 5 2 1 25 * Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 49 33 85 59 53 Field mapping of weed problems : 22 32 23 31 16 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 11 6 13 21 23 Records kept to track pests : 50 56 71 76 59 Weather monitoring : 65 73 61 71 91 : Suppression Practices: : Beneficial organisms : 1 2 1 4 Biological pesticides : 16 23 29 8 32 Scouting used to make decisions : 40 52 53 62 45 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 31 45 26 17 45 Adjust planting methods : 19 10 20 38 24 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 27 19 45 65 50 Biological pest controls : 56 55 49 27 55 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Pest Management Practices Percent of Acres Receiving Practice Upland Cotton, 2005 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Practice : States :--------------------------------------- : LA : MS : NC : TN : TX ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 60 44 67 70 41 Plow down crop residue : 63 56 36 31 57 Remove crop residue : 31 23 12 10 12 Clean implements after fieldwork : 58 43 43 64 65 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 89 38 54 86 58 Water management practices : 8 4 5 2 9 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 17 11 28 20 20 Rotate crops to control pests : 56 25 77 33 46 Grow trap crop to control insects : 9 36 17 20 8 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 77 29 73 53 41 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 15 9 34 8 14 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 26 10 21 22 45 Deliberate scouting activities : 74 90 79 78 47 Field was not scouted : 1 * 8 Scouted for pests : 71 67 71 58 40 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 20 16 21 30 14 Scouting due to pest development model : 17 21 22 37 16 Scouted for weeds : 96 95 100 97 83 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 32 56 53 42 76 An Employee : 7 2 3 8 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 10 6 4 3 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 61 32 38 46 19 Scouted for insects or mites : 100 99 99 97 89 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 6 9 50 40 55 An Employee : 3 10 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 1 6 4 7 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 94 90 40 46 37 Scouted for diseases : 97 73 97 97 73 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 9 21 51 42 61 An Employee : 3 8 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 12 7 4 6 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 91 66 40 45 33 Field mapping of weed problems : 27 16 35 25 20 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 15 7 16 6 7 Records kept to track pests : 83 83 51 55 30 Weather monitoring : 82 90 80 84 46 : Suppression Practices: : Beneficial organisms : 1 2 * 1 Biological pesticides : 33 15 22 22 6 Scouting used to make decisions : 47 39 62 51 28 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 20 16 62 25 29 Adjust planting methods : 13 6 23 16 21 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 52 27 52 41 8 Biological pest controls : 77 78 70 56 51 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ * Percentage is less than 0.5 Survey and Estimation Procedures Survey Procedures: Data for corn, upland cotton, oats, fall potatoes, and soybeans were collected on two 2005 surveys, the Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS), which collected 6,034 usable records, and the Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP), which collected 2,705 usable records with commodities matching the ARMS. Data collecting for the ARMS and CEAP survey occurred during the months of September through December 2005 and only those CEAP samples that matched the ARMS crops and states were included. Data collection and sampling procedures were similar for both the ARMS and CEAP surveys. Although CEAP was a nationwide, area-based sample survey based on National Resources Inventory (NRI) points, only a subset of CEAP data was used in this publication. As for ARMS, screening samples were drawn from the NASS List Sampling Frame. This extensive sampling frame covers all types of farms and accounts for approximately 90 percent of all land in farms in the United States. All farms on the list had a possibility of being selected for the screening sample. Farms thought to have the crops of interest were more likely to be in the screening sample. Sampled farms were screened to determine if they grew the target crops in 2005. From this subpopulation of operations identified as producing a crop of interest, a subsample of farms was selected in such a way as to insure that each identified producer had an opportunity to be selected. In general, larger farms were more likely to be selected than smaller farms. Once a farm producing corn, fall potatoes, oats, or upland cotton was selected, one field was randomly selected from all the fields on the farm. The operator of the sampled field was personally interviewed to obtain information on chemical applications made to the selected field. Estimation Procedures: The chemical application data, reported by product name or trade name, are reviewed within each State and across States for reasonableness and consistency. This review compares reported data with manufacturers= recommendations and with data from other farm operators using the same product. Following this review, product information is converted to an active ingredient level. The chemical usage estimates in this publication consist of survey estimates of those active ingredients. For this publication, detailed data within a table may not multiply across or add down due to independent rounding of the published values. Estimates of the total amount of active ingredient applied are based on the acreage estimates published in the annual NASS report ACrop Production - 2005 Summary@ [Cr Pr 2-1 (06)] for corn, upland cotton, oats, fall potatoes, and soybeans. Please note that the estimates for total amount of an active ingredient applied will not be revised even if there are subsequent revisions to acreage for a given crop. Reliability The surveys were designed so that the estimates are statistically representative of chemical use on the targeted crops in the surveyed States. The reliability of these survey results is affected by sampling variability and non-sampling errors. Since all operations producing the crops of interest are not included in the sample, survey estimates are subject to sampling variability. The sampling variability expressed as a percent of the estimate is called the coefficient of variation (cv). Sampling variability of the estimates differed considerably by chemical and crop. Variability for estimates of percent of acres treated will be higher than the variability for estimates of application rates. This is because application rates have a narrower range of responses, which are recommended by the manufacturer of the product, and are generally followed. In general, the more often the chemical was applied, the smaller the sampling variability. For example, estimates of a commonly used active ingredient such as Glyphosate isopropylamine salt, will exhibit less variability than a rarely used chemical. A commonly used active ingredient is defined as an active ingredient used on at least 40 percent of the acres planted for a crop at the program state level. For these active ingredients, cv=s range from 1 percent to 10 percent at the program state level and 1 percent to 52 percent at the individual state level. Active ingredients that are less frequently used have cv=s that range from 2 percent to 70 percent. Terms and Definitions Active ingredient: Refers to the mechanism of action in pesticides which kills or controls the target pests. Usage data are reported by pesticide product and are converted to an amount of active ingredient. A single method of conversion has been chosen for active ingredients having more than one way of being converted. For example in this report, copper compounds are expressed in their metallic copper equivalent, and others such as 2,4-D and glyphosate are expressed in their acid equivalent. Allelopathic: The release of chemical compounds from a plant that will inhibit the growth of another plant, such as weeds. Application Rates: Refer to the average number of pounds of a fertilizer primary nutrient or pesticide active ingredient is applied to an acre of land. Rate per application is the average number of pounds applied per acre in one application. Rate per crop year is the average number of pounds applied per acre counting multiple applications. Number of applications is the average number of times a treated acre received a specific primary nutrient or active ingredient. Area applied: Represents the percentage of crop acres receiving one or more applications of a specific primary nutrient or active ingredient. This report does not contain acre treatments. However, acre treatments can be calculated by multiplying the acres planted by the percent of area applied and the average number of applications. Avoidance: May be practiced when pest populations exist in a field or site but the impact of the pest on the crop can be avoided through some cultural practice. Examples of avoidance tactics include crop rotation such that the crop of choice is not a host for the pest, choosing cultivars with genetic resistance to pests, using trap crops, choosing cultivars with maturity dates that may allow harvest before pest populations develop, fertilization programs to promote rapid crop development, and simply not planting certain areas of fields where pest populations are likely to cause crop failure. Some tactics for prevention and avoidance strategies may overlap. The following pest management questions were categorized as avoidance practices: Were planting or harvesting dates adjusted for this field to manage pests? Were crops rotated in this field during the past 3 years for the purpose of managing pests? Were planting locations planned to avoid infestation of pests? Was a trap crop grown to help manage insects in this field? Was a seed variety chosen to plant in this field because it had resistance to a specific pest? Beneficial Insects: Insects collected and introduced into locations because of their value in biologic control as prey on harmful insects and parasites. Chemigation: Application of an agricultural chemical by injecting it into irrigation water. Common name: An officially recognized name for an active ingredient. This report shows active ingredient by common name. Terms and Definitions (continued) Crop year: Refers to the period immediately following harvest of the previous crop through harvest of the current crop. Cultivar: A horticulturally or agriculturally derived variety of a plant, as distinguished from a natural variety. Farm: Any establishment from which $1,000 or more of agricultural products were sold or would normally be sold during the year. Government payments are included in sales. Places with all acreage enrolled in set aside or other government programs are considered operating. Fertilizer: Refers to applications of the primary nutrients; nitrogen, phosphate, and potash. Fungi: A lower form of parasitic plant life which often reduces crop production and/or lowers the grade quality of its host. Land in Farms: All land operated as part of a farming operation during the year. It includes crop and livestock acreage, wasteland, woodland, pasture, land in summer fallow, idle cropland, and land enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program and other set-aside, conservation, or commodity acreage programs. It excludes public, industrial, and grazing association land, and nonagricultural land. It excludes all land operated by establishments not qualifying as farms. Mechanism of Action (MOA): The method/biological pathway the pesticide uses to kill the pest. Monitoring: Includes proper identification of pests through systematic sampling or counting or other forms of scouting. Also, weather monitoring to predict levels of pest populations or to determine the most effective time to make pesticide applications, and soil testing where appropriate. The following pest management practices questions were categorized as monitoring practices: In 2005, how was this field primarily scouted for insects, weeds, diseases and/or beneficial organisms? (By conducting general observations while performing routine tasks? By deliberately going to the field specifically for scouting activities? This field was not scouted?) Was an established scouting process used (systematic sampling, recording counts, etc.) or were insect traps used in this field? Was scouting for pests done in this field due to a pest advisory warning? Was scouting for pests done in this field due to a pest development model? Was this field scouted for weeds? (If so, Who did the majority of the scouting? Operator, partner or family member, OR An employee, OR Farm supply or chemical dealer, OR Independent crop consultant or commercial scout?) Terms and Definitions (continued) Monitoring (continued): Was this field scouted for insects and mites? (If so, Who did the majority of the scouting? Operator, partner or family member, OR An employee, OR Farm supply or chemical dealer, OR Independent crop consultant or commercial scout?) Was this field scouted for diseases? (If so, Who did the majority of the scouting? Operator, partner or family member, OR An employee, OR Farm supply or chemical dealer, OR Independent crop consultant or commercial scout?) Were written or electronic records kept for this field to track the activity or numbers of weeds, insects or diseases? Was field mapping data used for making weed management decisions on this field? Were the services of a diagnostic laboratory used for pest identification or soil or plant tissue pest analysis for this field? Was weather data used to assist in determining either the need or when to make pesticide applications? Were floral lures, attractants, repellants, pheromone traps or other biological pest controls used on this field? Nematodes: Microscopic, worm-shaped parasitic animals. Damage to many crops can be severe. Pesticides: As defined by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), pesticides include any substance or mixture of substances intended for preventing, destroying, repelling or mitigating any pest, and any substance or mixture of substances intended for use as a plant regulator, defoliant, or desiccant. The four classes of pesticides presented in this report and the pests targeted are: herbicides - weeds, insecticides - insects, fungicides - fungi, and other chemicals - other forms of life. Miticides and nematicides are included as insecticides while soil fumigants, growth regulators, defoliants, and desiccants are included as other chemicals. Pheromone: A chemical substance produced by an insect which serves as a stimulus to other individuals of the same species for one or more behavioral responses. Terms and Definitions (continued) Prevention: The practice of keeping a pest population from infesting a crop or field. It includes such tactics as using pest-free seeds or transplants, alternative tillage approaches such as no-till or strip-till systems, choosing cultivars with genetic resistance to insects or disease, irrigation scheduling to avoid situations conducive to disease development, cleaning tillage and harvesting equipment between fields or operations, using field sanitation procedures, and eliminating alternate hosts or sites for insect pests and disease organisms. The following pest management questions were categorized as prevention practices: Were field edges, lanes, ditches, roadways or fence lines chopped, mowed, plowed, or burned to manage pests for this field? Were crop residues plowed down or removed in this field to manage pests? Were equipment and implements cleaned after completing field work in this field to reduce the spread of pests? Were water management practices such as irrigation scheduling, controlled drainage, or treatment of retention water used on this field to manage pests? Was this field cultivated for weed control during the growing season? Was no-till or minimum till used to manage pests in this field? Suppression: Tactics include cultural practices such as narrow row spacings or optimized in-row plant populations, using cover crops or mulches, or using crops with allelopathic potential in the rotation. Physical suppression tactics may include cultivation or mowing for weed control, baited or pheromone traps for certain insects, and temperature management or exclusion devices for insect and disease management. Biological pesticides and controls, including mating disruption for insects, can be considered as alternatives to conventional pesticides. Determining pest thresholds and alternating pesticide active ingredients to avoid resistance buildup are suppression methods which minimize pesticide use. The following questions were categorized as suppression practices: Was scouting data compared to published information on infestation thresholds to determine when to take measures to manage pests in this field? Were any biological pesticides such as Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis), insect growth regulators (Courier, Intrepid, etc.) neem or other natural/biological based products sprayed or applied to manage pests in this field? Were any beneficial organisms (insects, nematodes, fungi) applied or released in this field to manage pests? Were ground covers, mulches, or other physical barriers maintained for this field to manage pest problems? Was row spacing or plant density adjusted in this field to manage pests? Were pesticides with different mechanisms of action rotated or tank mixed for the primary purpose of keeping pests from becoming resistant to pesticides? Trade name: A trademark name given to a specific formulation of a pesticide product. A formulation contains a specific concentration of the active ingredient, carrier materials, and other ingredients such as emulsifiers and wetting agents. Pesticide class, Common name, and Trade name The following is a list of common name, associated class and trade name of active ingredients in this publication. The classes are herbicides (H), insecticides (I), fungicides (F), and other chemicals (O). This list is provided as an aid in reviewing pesticide data. Pre-mixes are not cataloged. The list is not complete for all pesticides used on field crops and NASS does not mean to promote use of any specific trade name. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Class : Common Name : Trade Name ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ H :24-D Dacamine 4D, Scorpion III, Shotgun Flowable Herbicide H :24-D 2-EHE 2,4-D LV4, 2,4-D LV6, Agsco 400, Barrage, Double Up B+D, : LV 400 2,4-D Weed Killer, : Low Vol 4 Ester Weed Killer, Nufarm Esteron 99, : Outlaw, Salvan, Salvo, Turret, WECO MAX, : Weed Killer 4D, Weedone 650, Weedone LV4 Solventless H :24-D BEE Crossbow, Weedone 170, Weedone 638, Weedone LV6 H :24-D dieth sal Hi-Dep, Weedar 64A H :24-D dimeth. salt 2,4-D Amine, 2,4-D Amine 4, 2,4-D Amine 6, : Banvel + 2,4-D, Brash, Formula 40, Hi-Dep, : Range Star, Savage, Weedar 64, Weedmaster H :24-D isoprop. salt Landmaster BW, RT Master H :24-DB dimeth. salt Butyrac 200 H :24-DP 2-BEE Weedone 170 I :Abamectin Epi-mek 0.15 EC, Zephyr 0.15 EC I :Acephate Acephate 75 WSP, Acephate 90SP, Bracket 90, : Orthene 75 S, Orthene 75 WSP, Orthene 90 WSP, : Orthene 90S, Orthene 97 I :Acetamiprid Assail 70WP, Intruder WSP H :Acetochlor Confidence, Degree Xtra, Field Master, : Fultime Herbicide, Harness, Harness 20G, : Harness Xtra, Harness Xtra 5.6L, Keystone, : Keystone LA, Surpass 100, Surpass 20G, Surpass EC, : TopNotch, Volley ATZ Lite H :Alachlor Bullet, Lariat, Lasso, Micro-Tech, Partner WDG, Saddle 4EC I :Aldicarb Temik 15G H :Ametryn Evik 80W H :Atrazine Aatrex 4L, Aatrex 80W, Aatrex Nine-O (WP), : Atrazine 4L, Atrazine 5L, Atrazine 80 (WP), : Atrazine 90DF, Basis Gold, Bicep 6L, Bicep II, : Bicep II Magnum, Bicep Lite II Magnum, : Buctril + Atrazine (1+2EC), Bullet, : Cinch ATZ, Degree Xtra, Extrazine 4L, : Extrazine II 4L, Field Master, Fultime Herbicide, : G-Max Lite, Guardsman Herbicide, Guardsman Max, : Harness Xtra, Harness Xtra 5.6L, Keystone, : Keystone LA, Lariat, Lasso/Atrazine 4EC, : LeadOff, Lexar Herbicide, Liberty ATZ, Lumax, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --continued Pesticide class, Common name, and Trade name ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Class : Common Name : Trade Name ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Marksman, Rifle Plus, Shotgun Flowable Herbicide, : Simazat 4L, Steadfast ATZ, Surpass 100, : Volley ATZ Lite I :Azadirachtin Agroneem, Azatin XL Plus I :Azinphos-methyl Azinphos-M 50 WP, Azinphosmethyl 50W, : Guthion Solupak 50% F :Azoxystrobin Amistar, Quadris, Uniform O :Bacillus cereus Pix Plus H :Bentazon Basagran I :Benzoic acid Intrepid 2F I :Bifenthrin Capture 2EC, Discipline 2EC, Double Threat, : Empower 2, Fanfare 2EC F :Boscalid Endura, Pristine H :Bromoxynil Buctril, Buctril + Atrazine (1+2EC) H :Bromoxynil heptanoat Bronate Advanced, Buctril 4EC, WECO MAX H :Bromoxynil octanoate Bromox/MCPA 2-2, Bronate (4EC), : Bronate (Bronate Pro #2), Bronate Advanced, : Buctril 4EC, Connect 20 WSP, Double Up B+D, : WECO MAX I :Bt subsp tenebrionis Novodor I :Bt subsp. kurstaki Biobit HP WP, Dipel 2X, Dipel 4L, Dipel ES, : MVP II Bioinsecticide, Thuricide HP I :Buprofezin Courier H :Butoxyethyl triclopy Crossbow O :Cacodylic acid Bolls-Eye, Cotton-Aide HC F :Captan Captan 50W I :Carbaryl Carbaryl 4L, Sevin 4F, Sevin 80S, Sevin SL, : Sevin XLR Plus I :Carbofuran Furadan 4F F :Carboxin Prevail H :Carfentrazone-ethyl Aim, Aim EC, Aim EW, Shark I :Chlorethoxyfos Fortress 5G O :Chloropicrin Telone C-17 F :Chlorothalonil Bravo 500, Bravo S, Bravo Ultrex, : Bravo Weather Stik, Bravo ZN, Chloronil 720, : Chlorothalonil 4L, Chlorthalonil 720 F, Echo 720, : Echo 90DF, Echo Zn, Equus 500 ZN, Equus 720, : Equus DF, Ridomil Gold + Bravo Liquid, : Ridomil Gold/Bravo I :Chlorpyrifos Chlorpyrifos 4E AG, Lorsban 15G, Lorsban 4E, : Nufos 15G, Nufos 4E, Warhawk H :Chlorsulfuron Glean FC, Telar H :Clethodim Arrow 2EC, Prism, Select 2 EC, Volunteer H :Clomazone Command 3ME H :Clopyralid Accent Gold, Curtail M, Hornet, Hornet WDG, : Scorpion III, Stinger, WideMatch H :Clopyralid mono salt Transline H :Cloransulam-methyl FirstRate F :Coniothyrium minitan Intercept or Contans WG F :Copper amm. complex Copper-Count-N ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --continued Pesticide class, Common name, and Trade name ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Class : Common Name : Trade Name ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- F :Copper chloride hyd. Microsperse COC 50DF F :Copper hydroxide Champ Formula 2, Champ Formula II DF/Champ DP, : Coppercide 50, Kocide 101 (WP), Kocide 2000, : Kocide 4.5 LF, Kocide DF, Kocide LF, Nu-Cop 50DF, : Ridomil Gold Copper F :Copper resinate Tenn-Cop 5E F :Copper sulfate Copper Sulfate I :Cryolite Kryocide (96% dry) H :Cyanazine Extrazine 4L, Extrazine II 4L O :Cyclanilide Finish, Finish 6 I :Cyfluthrin Aztec 2.1% Granular, Aztec 4.67% Granular, : Baythroid 2, Leverage 2.7 F :Cymoxanil Curzate 60DF, Curzate M-8, Tanos I :Cypermethrin Ammo 2.5EC, Battery 2.5 EC, Up-Cyde 2.5 EC O :Cytokinins Early Harvest H :DSMA DSMA Liquid (3.6 lbs), DSMA Slurry (7.2 lbs) I :Deltamethrin Decis 1.5EC I :Diazinon Diazinon 4E, Diazinon 50W, Diazinon AG500 (4E) H :Dicamba Banvel SGF, Celebrity, Fallow Master, : NorthStar, Oracle Dicamba Agricultural Herbicide, : Outlaw, Resolve SG H :Dicamba Digly Salt Clarity H :Dicamba Dimet. salt Banvel, Banvel + 2,4-D, Brash, Range Star, : Sterling, Weedmaster H :Dicamba Pot. salt Marksman, Rifle Plus H :Dicamba Sodium salt Celebrity Plus, Dicamba SG, : Distinct, Yukon Herbicide H :Dicamba iso salt Fallow Star O :Dichloropropene Telone C-17, Telone II F :Dicloran Botran 5F I :Dicofol Dicofol 4 E, Kelthane MF I :Dicrotophos Bidrin 8 I :Diflubenzuron Dimilin 2F H :Diflufenzopyr-sodium Celebrity Plus, Distinct H :Dimethenamid Guardsman Herbicide, LeadOff H :Dimethenamid-P G-Max Lite, Guardsman Max, Outlook O :Dimethipin Harvade - 5F, Leafless I :Dimethoate Dimate 4EC, Dimethoate 2.67 EC, Dimethoate 400, : Dimethoate 4EC, Dimethoate 5 lb., : Dimethoate E-267 F :Dimethomorph Acrobat 50WP H :Diquat dibromide Diquat, Reglone I :Disulfoton Di-Syston 15% G, Di-Syston 8 H :Diuron Direx 4L, Direx 80DF, Diuron 4L, Diuron 80DF, : Diuron 80W, Dropp Ultra, Ginstar EC, Karmex DF, Layby Pro H :EPTC Eptam 7-E, Eradicane 6.7E ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --continued Pesticide class, Common name, and Trade name ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Class : Common Name : Trade Name ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I :Emamectin benzoate Denim I :Endosulfan Endosulfan 3EC, Endosulfan 50W, Thiodan 3EC, : Thionex (Thiodan) 3EC O :Endothall Accelerate, Des-I-Cate (0.52L), Desicate II I :Esfenvalerate Asana, Asana XL O :Ethephon Boll'd, CottonQuik, Ethephon 6, Finish, Finish 6, : Prep brand Ethephon, Super Boll I :Ethoprop Mocap 15G, Mocap EC I :Etoxazole Zeal F :Etridiazole Terraclor Super X 18.8G, : Terraclor Super X Emulsifiable (2.5EC) F :Famoxadone Tanos F :Fenamidone Reason 500 SC H :Fenoxaprop Whip 1EC H :Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl Silverado Herbicide I :Fenpropathrin Danitol 2.4 EC Spray I :Fipronil Regent 4 SC, Regent 80 WG F :Fluazinam Omega 500F H :Flufenacet Axiom DF, DEFINE DF, : DEFINE SC, Epic H :Flumetsulam Accent Gold, Hornet, Hornet WDG, Python WDG, : Scorpion III H :Flumiclorac-pentyl Resource H :Flumioxazin Chateau, Valor H :Fluometuron Cotoran 4L, Cotoran 80W, Cotoran DF, : Flo-Met, Flo-Met 80DF, Meturon 4L H :Fluroxypyr Starane EC H :Fluroxypyr 1-methylh Starane + Sword, WideMatch F :Flutolanil Moncut 50WP, Moncut 70 DF H :Fomesafen Flexstar H :Foramsulfuron Equip Corn Herbicide, Option O :GABA Auxigro I :Gamma-cyhalothrin Proaxis O :Garlic oil Empower O :Gibberellic acid Early Harvest, PGR-IV H :Glufosinate-ammonium Ignite, Liberty, Liberty ATZ, : Rely Herbicide H :Glyphosate Glyphomax XRT, Sequence, Touchdown Herbicide, Touchdown Total H :Glyphosate amm. salt Credit Duo Extra H :Glyphosate iso. salt Accord, Buccaneer Herbicide, ClearOut 41 Plus, : Cornerstone, Credit, Credit Duo Extra, : Durango, Fallow Master, Fallow Star, : Field Master, Gly Star Original, Gly Star Plus, : Gly-4 Plus, Glyfos X-TRA, Glyphomax, Glyphosate 4, : Glyphosate Original, Helosate Plus, : Hi-Yield Killzall, Honcho, Landmaster BW, : Mad Dog Glyphosate, Mirage (4EC), Protocol, : RT Master, Ranger (2EC), Roundup Custom, : Roundup D-Pak, Roundup Original, ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --continued Pesticide class, Common name, and Trade name ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Class : Common Name : Trade Name ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Roundup Original II, Roundup Original Max, : Roundup Pro, Roundup Super Concentrate, : Roundup Ultra, Roundup Ultra Dry, : Roundup Ultra Max, Roundup Weather Max H :Halosulfuron Permit, Sandea, Yukon Herbicide O :Harpin a B protein ProAct O :Harpin protein Messenger STS H :Imazamox Raptor H :Imazapyr Lightning DG H :Imazethapyr Lightning DG, Pursuit DG, Resolve SG I :Imidacloprid Admire 2 Flowable, Leverage 2.7, : Provado 1.6 Flowable, Trimax O :Indolebutyric acid Early Harvest, PGR-IV I :Indoxacarb Avaunt Insecticide, Steward H :Iodosulfuron-Met-Sod Equip Corn Herbicide F :Iprodione Rovral 4 Flowable H :Isoxaflutole Balance Pro, Balance WDG, Epic O :Kinetin Mepex Plus, Mepiquat Extra O :L-Glutamic acid Auxigro H :Lactofen Cobra (2E) I :Lambda-cyhalothrin Karate (1EC), Karate Z, Silencer, Warrior H :Linuron Layby Pro, Linex 4L, : Linex 50DF, Lorox DF H :MCPA MCPA/Weed Rhap A4 H :MCPA 2-ethylhexyl Bromox/MCPA 2-2, Bronate (4EC), : Bronate (Bronate Pro #2), Bronate Advanced, : Curtail M (EC), Dagger, MCP 4 Ester, : Starane + Sword H :MCPA dimethyl. salt MCP Amine 4 H :MCPA sodium salt Chiptox MCPA Sodium (2L), Esteron 6E H :MSMA MSMA 4 Plus, MSMA 6 Plus, MSMA 6.6 (EC), : MSMA 600 Plus, MSMA Plus H.C. (6 lbs) I :Malathion Atrapa 5E, Fyfanon ULV 9.9lbs. (96.5%), : Malathion 5 EC (56%), Malathion 5 EC (57%), : Malathion 8E, Malathion ULV 9.7lbs. (95%) O :Maleic hydrazide Maleic Hydrazide 1.5, Royal MH-30, Royal MH-30 SG, : Royal MH-30 Xtra, Super Sprout Stop F :Mancozeb Curzate M-8, Dithane 75DF Rainshield, : Dithane DF/70, Dithane F-45 Rainshield, : Dithane M-45 (WP), Gavel 75DF, Mancozeb 80% WP, : Manex II (4EC), Manzate 200 (WP), Manzate 75DF, Manzate Flowable, : Manzate Pro-Stick, Penncozeb (80WP), : Penncozeb 75DF, Ridomil Gold MZ F :Maneb Maneb 80W, Maneb Plus Zinc, Manex F :Mefenoxam Ridomil Gold + Bravo Liquid, Ridomil Gold Copper, : Ridomil Gold EC, Ridomil Gold MZ, Ridomil Gold PC, ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --continued Pesticide class, Common name, and Trade name ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Class : Common Name : Trade Name ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Ridomil Gold PC GR, Ridomil Gold Platinum, : Ridomil Gold/Bravo, Ultra Flourish, Uniform O :Mepiquat Pentaborate Pentia O :Mepiquat chloride Compact, Mepex, Mepex Plus, Mepichlor 4.2% Liquid, : Mepichlor Pill, Mepiquat Chloride, Farm Saver, : Mepiquat Extra, Pix, Pix Concentrate, Pix DF, : Pix Plus, Pix Ultra H :Mesotrione Callisto (4L), Camix, Lexar Herbicide, Lumax F :Metalaxyl Prevail O :Metaldehyde Metaldehyde 3.5G (aka Trail's End) O :Metam-potassium K-Pam HL O :Metam-sodium Metam CLR 42%, Nemasol 42%, Sectagon 42, Vapam, : Vapam HL (4.26 lb.) I :Methamidophos Monitor 4, Monitor 4 Spray I :Methomyl Lannate LV (2.4 lbs.), Lannate SP I :Methyl parathion Methyl Parathion 4EC, Methyl Parathion 6EC, : Penncap-M F :Metiram Polyram 80 DF, Polyram 80WP H :Metolachlor Bicep 6L, Bicep II, Dual 8E, : Me-Too-Lachlor, Parallel, Stalwart C H :Metribuzin Axiom DF, Boundary, Lexone DF, Metri DF, Sencor 4, : Sencor 50WP, Sencor DF (75%) H :Metsulfuron-methyl Ally Extra O :Monocarbamide dihyd. CottonQuik I :Naled Dibrom 8 Miscible H :Nicosulfuron Accent Gold, Accent Herbicide, Basis Gold, : Celebrity, Celebrity Plus, Steadfast, : Steadfast ATZ H :Norflurazon Zorial Rapid 80 (DF) I :Novaluron Diamond 0.83EC, Rimon 0.83EC I :Oxamyl Vydate C-LV (3.77lbs), Vydate L (2 Lbs) I :Oxydemeton-methyl Metasystox-R (2EC) H :Oxyfluorfen Goal 2XL F :PCNB Blocker 10G, Blocker 4F, PCNB 2-E, Prevail, : Ridomil Gold PC, Ridomil Gold PC GR, : Terraclor Super X 18.8G, : Terraclor Super X Emulsifiable (2.5EC) H :Paraquat Cyclone, Cyclone Concentrate, : Gramox Extra (Missnumbered, a Herbicide), : Gramoxone Extra, Gramoxone Max, Gramoxone Super, : Starfire (1.5L) H :Pendimethalin Pendimax 3.3, Pendimethalin, Prowl (4EC), : Prowl 3.3 EC, Prowl DG, Prowl H2O I :Permethrin Ambush, Arctic 3.2 EC, Perm-UP 3.2 EC, : Permethrin 3.2 AG, Permethrin 3.2 EC, Pounce 1.5G, : Pounce 3.2EC, Waylay 3.2 AG I :Petroleum distillate Oil I :Phorate Phorate 15G, Phorate 20-G, Thimet 10-G, : Thimet 15-G, Thimet 20-G I :Phosmet Imidan 50-WSB, Imidan 70 WSB ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --continued Pesticide class, Common name, and Trade name ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Class : Common Name : Trade Name ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I :Phosphamidon Swat (8E) F :Phosphorous acid Phostrok H :Picloram K salt Tordon 22K H :Primisulfuron NorthStar, Spirit I :Profenofos Curacron 8E H :Prometryn Caparol 4L, Cotton-Pro, Prometryne 4L, Suprend F :Propamocarb hydroch. Previcur Flex I :Propargite Comite (6.55EC), Comite II, Omite 6E F :Propiconazole Tilt H :Prosulfuron Peak, Spirit I :Pymetrozine Fulfill F :Pyraclostrobin Headline, Pristine H :Pyraflufen-ethyl ET I :Pyrethrins Evergreen Growers Spray, PyGanic EC 1.4 II, : PyGanic EC 5.0 II, Rotenone/Pyrethrins EC O :Pyrimethanil SCALA SC I :Pyriproxyfen Knack H :Pyrithiobac-sodium Staple H :Quinclorac Paramount Herbicide H :Quizalofop-P-ethyl Assure II F :Rhamnolipid Zonix Biofungicide H :Rimsulfuron Accent Gold, Basis, Basis Gold, : Matrix, Steadfast, Steadfast ATZ I :Rotenone Rotenone/Pyrethrins EC H :S-Metolachlor Bicep II Magnum, Bicep Lite II Magnum, Boundary, : Brawl, Camix, Cinch, Cinch ATZ, Dual II Magnum, : Dual II Magnum SI, Dual IIG Magnum, Dual Magnum, : Lexar Herbicide, Lumax, Sequence H :Sethoxydim Poast (1.5 EC), Poast Plus (1EC) H :Simazine Princep 4L, Princep 80W, Princep Caliber 90, : Sim-Trol 4L, Simazat 4L, Simazine 4L, : Simazine 80W, Simazine 90DF O :Sodium chlorate Defol 5, Defol 6, First Choice Cotton Defoliant, : Poly-Foliant Liquid Defoliant, : Sodium Chlorate 2lb, Sodium Chlorate 3lb, : Sodium Chlorate 6lb I :Spinosad Entrust, SpinTor 2SC, Tracer I :Spiromesifen Oberon 2 SC H :Sulfentrazone Spartan H :Sulfosate Touchdown 5, Touchdown 6 F :Sulfur Bravo S (EC), Kumulus DF, : Microsperse Wettable Sulfur, Microthiol Disperss, : Microthiol Special, Sulfur Flowable (6F), : Super Six, Thiolux (80DF) O :Sulfuric Acid Sulfuric Acid Potato Vine Desiccant I :Tebupirimphos Aztec 2.1% Granular, Aztec 4.67% Granular I :Tefluthrin Force 3G I :Terbufos Counter, Counter 20CR I :Thiamethoxam Actara, Centric, Platinum, Ridomil Gold Platinum O :Thidiazuron DAZE 4SC, Dropp 50WP, Dropp SC, Dropp Ultra, ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --continued Pesticide class, Common name, and Trade name ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Class : Common Name : Trade Name ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : FreeFall, Ginstar EC, Leafless, Takedown SC, Thidiazuron 50 WSB H :Thifensulfuron Affinity BroadSpec Herbicide, Ally Extra, Basis, : Harmony Extra XP I :Thiodicarb Larvin 3.2 I :Tralomethrin Scout 0.3 EC, Scout X-TRA H :Triasulfuron Amber H :Tribenuron-methyl Affinity BroadSpec Herbicide, Ally Extra, : Express (DF), Harmony Extra XP O :Tribufos Def 6 Emulsifiable Defoliant, Folex 6EC F :Trichoderma harz. PlantShield H :Triclopyr Remedy F :Trifloxystrobin Gem H :Trifloxysulfuron-sod Envoke, Suprend H :Trifluralin Treflan 5 (EC), Treflan E.C., Treflan HFP, : Treflan M.T.F., Treflan TR-10, Tri-4 (EC), : Trific 60DF, Trifluralin 10G, Trifluralin 4 (EC), : Trilin, Trust 4EC F :Triphenyltin hydrox. Agri Tin, Super Tin 80WP I :Zeta-cypermethrin Fury 1.5 EC, Mustang, Mustang Max F :Zoxamide Gavel 75DF ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Survey Instrument The following questionnaire sections come from the ARMS 2005 Cotton Questionnaire to provide an example of the survey instrument. The questions used in the Fertilizer and Nutrient Applications section and Pesticide Applications section are the same for the corn, fall potato, oats, upland cotton, and soybean questionnaires. However, the Pest Management Practices section has some questions that are specific to each commodity being surveyed. Report Features Released May 17, 2006 by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, U.S. Department of Agriculture. For information on "Agricultural Chemical Usage" call Russell Knight at (202) 720-5581, office hours 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ET. Listed below are persons within the National Agricultural Statistics Service to contact for additional information. Russell Knight, Environmental Statistician (202) 720-5581 Mark R. Miller, Head, Environmental and Demographics Section (202) 720-0684 Linda Hutton, Chief, Environmental, Economics, and Demographics Branch (202) 720-6146 ACCESS TO REPORTS!! For your convenience, there are several ways to obtain NASS reports, data products, and services: INTERNET ACCESS All NASS reports are available free of charge on the worldwide Internet. For access, connect to the Internet and go to the NASS Home Page at: www.nass.usda.gov. E-MAIL SUBSCRIPTION All NASS reports are available by subscription free of charge direct to your e-mail address. Starting with the NASS Home Page at www.nass.usda.gov, under the right navigation, Receive reports by Email, click on National or State. Follow the instructions on the screen. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PRINTED REPORTS OR DATA PRODUCTS CALL OUR TOLL-FREE ORDER DESK: 800-999-6779 (U.S. and Canada) Other areas, please call 703-605-6220 FAX: 703-605-6900 (Visa, MasterCard, check, or money order acceptable for payment.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ASSISTANCE For assistance with general agricultural statistics or further information about NASS or its products or services, contact the Agricultural Statistics Hotline at 800-727-9540, 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ET, or e-mail: nass@nass.usda.gov. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.