Ag Ch 1 (07)a United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service Agricultural Chemical Usage 2006 Field Crops Summary May 2007 ******************************************** Update Alert **************************************************** Corrections on pages 71 and 72. Data and stubs were misaligned on Winter Wheat tables for Oregon and South Dakota. ************************************************************************************************************** Table of Contents Page Overview 2 Program States Surveyed for 2006 Field Crops 3 Agricultural Chemical Applications - Highlights 4 Agricultural Chemical Applications Tables: Rice 7 Soybeans 18 Wheat, Durum 40 Wheat, Other Spring 46 Wheat, Winter 57 Agricultural Chemical Distribution Tables - Highlights 75 Agricultural Chemical Distribution Tables: Rice 76 Soybeans 80 Wheat, Durum 84 Wheat, Other Spring 86 Wheat, Winter 90 Pest Management Practices - Highlights 93 Pest Management Practices Tables: Rice 94 Soybeans 96 Wheat, Durum 102 Wheat, Other Spring 104 Wheat, Winter 106 Survey and Estimation Procedures 110 Reliability 111 Terms and Definitions 112 Pesticide Class, Common Name, and Trade Name 116 Survey Instrument (Fertilizer, Pesticide, and Pest Management Sections) 121 Report Features 126 Overview The agricultural chemical use estimates in this report refer to on-farm use of commercial fertilizers and pesticides on targeted field crops for the 2006 crop year. Field crops include rice, organic soybeans, soybeans, durum wheat, other spring wheat, and winter wheat. Farm operators were enumerated late in the growing season after the farm operator had indicated that planned applications were completed. The chemical use data were not summarized for geographical areas other than by those States published in this report. The data were compiled from 2 surveys, the Agricultural Resources Management Survey (ARMS) and Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP). Data collection occurred primarily during the months of September to December of 2006. An example of the survey instrument used in data collection is included in the back of this publication. The table below shows the number of States included in the survey, the number of summarized reports from the States, and the percent of the Program States= acres planted to that commodity compared with the U.S. total. Producers of soybeans, durum wheat, other spring wheat, and winter wheat were last surveyed using both ARMS and CEAP surveys in 2004. Rice producers were last surveyed in 2000. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Agricultural Chemical Use Survey Coverage, 2006 and 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 2006 : 2004 :----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : : U.S : : : U.S. : : : Acreage : : : Acreage : States : Reports : Included : States : Reports : Included in Crop : Surveyed : Summarized : in Survey : Surveyed : Summarized : Survey :----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : -- Number -- : Percent : -- Number -- : Percent -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rice : 6 710 100 Soybeans : 19 3,051 96 11 3,163 81 : Soybeans : --- --- --- --- --- --- Organic : 19 311 : Wheat : --- --- --- --- --- --- Durum : 2 283 92 2 211 90 Other : --- --- --- --- --- --- Spring : 6 760 99 7 953 81 Winter : 14 1,828 87 14 2,087 85 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Program States Surveyed for 2006 Field Crops Other Organic Durum Spring Winter State Rice Soybeans Soybeans Wheat Wheat Wheat Arkansas X X X California X Colorado X Idaho X X Illinois X X X Indiana X X Iowa X X Kansas X X X Kentucky X X Louisiana X X X Michigan X X X Minnesota X X X Mississippi X X X Missouri X X X X Montana X X X Nebraska X X X North Carolina X X North Dakota X X X X Ohio X X X Oklahoma X Oregon X South Dakota X X X X Tennessee X X Texas X X Virginia X X Washington X X Wisconsin X X Highlights Rice: Nitrogen was applied to 97 percent of the 2006 rice planted acreage in the 6 Program States: Arkansas, California, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, and Texas. Rice growers applied an average of 183 pounds of nitrogen per acre per crop year. Phosphate was applied to 67 percent of the rice planted acreage in the Program States at an average rate of 53 pounds per acre per crop year. Potash, applied at 65 pounds per acre per crop year, was applied to 54 percent of the acreage planted to rice. Sulfur was applied to 18 percent of the acres planted at an average rate of 26 pounds per acre per crop year. Herbicides were applied to 95 percent of the Program States' rice planted acreage in 2006. Clomazone was the most widely applied herbicide with 50 percent of the planted acreage being treated. It was applied at an average rate of 0.437 pounds per acre per crop year. Propanil was applied to 46 percent of the planted acres at an average rate of 3.445 pounds per acre per crop year. Quinclorac was the third most commonly applied, with 24 percent of the planted acres treated. An average of 0.295 pounds per acre per year was applied. In 2006, 21 percent of the rice planted acreage in the Program States was treated with insecticides. Lambda-cyhalothrin, Zeta-cypermethrin, and Methyl parathion were the most widely applied insecticides, at 9, 6, and 4 percent, respectively, to the acres planted to rice. Fungicides were applied to 41 percent of the planted acres in the Program States. Azoxystrobin was applied to 27 percent of the acres at an average rate of 0.153 pounds per acre per year. Propiconazole was applied to 19 percent of the planted acres at an average rate of 0.118 pounds per acre per year. Trifloxystobin was applied to 9 percent of the planted acres at an average rate of 0.118 pounds per acre per year. Sodium chlorate was the only Other Chemical reported often enough to publish application data. It was applied to 4 percent of the planted acres at an average rate of 4.280 pounds per acre per year. Soybeans: Nineteen States were included in the 2006 survey: Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia, and Wisconsin. Nitrogen was applied to 18 percent of the 2006 soybean planted acres in the Program States at an average rate of 16 pounds per acre per year. Phosphate was applied to 23 percent of the planted acres, at an average rate of 46 pounds per acre. An average of 80 pounds per acre of Potash was applied to 25 percent of the planted acreage. Sulfur was applied to 3 percent of the planted acres at an average rate of 11 pounds per acre. Herbicides were applied to 98 percent of the soybean planted acreage in 2006 in the 19 Program States. Glyphosate isopropylamine salt was the most widely applied herbicide with 92 percent of planted acres treated at an average rate of 1.330 pounds per acre per crop year. The herbicide 2,4-D, 2-EHE was a distant second, in terms of percent of acres treated, with 7 percent of the acres receiving an application with an average rate of 0.503 pounds per acre per year. Insecticides were applied to 16 percent of the 2006 soybean planted acreage. The three most common, Lambda-cyhalothrin, Chlorpyrifos, and Esfenvalerate, were applied to 6, 5, and 3 percent of the planted acres, respectively. Fungicide were applied to 4 percent of the soybean planted acreage in the Program States. Pyraclostrobin and Azoxystrobin were the only two fungicides reported on more than one half of one percent of the planted acres. Pyraclostrobin was applied to 2 percent of the planted acres at an average rate of 0.112 pounds per acre per year. Azoxystrobin was applied to 1 percent of planted acres at an average rate of 0.106 pounds per acre per year. Organic Soybeans: Nineteen States were included in the 2006 survey: Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia, and Wisconsin. There were insufficient reports of organic pesticides applied to the organic soybean acreage in the 19 surveyed States to publish any usage data. Durum Wheat: Two durum wheat producing States were included in the 2006 survey: Montana and North Dakota. Nitrogen applications averaged 62 pounds per acre per crop year and were applied to 92 percent these States' planted acres. An average of 23 pounds per acre of phosphate was applied to 74 percent of the durum wheat planted acres in the Program States. Potash was applied to 7 percent of the planted acreage at an average of 9 pounds per acre per year in the States surveyed. Sulfur was applied on 4 percent of the acres planted with an average application of 4 pounds per acre per year. Herbicides were applied to 95 percent of the durum wheat acreage in 2006 in the Program States. Glyphosate isopropylamine salt was the most widely used herbicide, applied to 47 percent of the planted acreage at a rate of 0.396 pounds per acre per crop year. The next most commonly applied herbicide on a per acre basis was Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl. It was applied to 37 percent of the acres at an average rate of 0.052 pounds per acre per year. That was followed by MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl applied to 34 percent of the planted acreage for durum wheat with an average rate of 0.274 pounds per acre per year. The fungicide Propiconazole was applied to 5 percent of the durum wheat planted acres with an average rate of 0.056 pounds per acre per crop year. This was the only fungicide reported often enough to provide usage data. Other spring wheat: Six other spring wheat producing States were included in the 2006 survey: Idaho, Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Washington. Nitrogen applications averaged 72 pounds per acre per crop year to 95 percent of these States' planted acres. An average of 32 pounds per acre per year of phosphate was applied to 85 percent of the other spring wheat planted acres in the Program States. Potash was applied to 27 percent of the planted acreage at an average of 18 pounds per acre per year in the Program States. Sulfur was applied on 13 percent of the acres planted at an average application rate of 13 pounds per acre per year. Herbicides were applied to 93 percent of the Program State planted acreage. MCPA, 2ethyhexyl was the most commonly applied herbicide with 40 percent of the planted acres receiving one application. It was applied at an average rate of 0.281 pounds per acre per year. Bromoxynil octanoate was applied to 32 percent of the planted acres at an average rate of 0.241 pounds per acre per year. Glyphosate isopropylamine salt was used on 30 percent of all planted acres at an average application rate of 0.624 pounds was applied per acre per crop year. Insecticides were applied to 1 percent of the Program State acres, but each individual active ingredient was applied to less than one half of one percent of the planted acres. Dimethoate and Lambda-cyhalothrin were applied at an average rate of 0.384 and 0.023 pounds per acre per year, respectively. Fungicides were applied to 15 percent of the other spring wheat planted acres in 2006. Propiconazole and Pyraclostrobin were each applied to 7 percent of the planted acreage at an average rate of 0.069 and 0.055 pounds per acre per year, respectively. Tebuconozole and Trifloxystrobin were each applied to 2 percent of the other spring wheat planted acres in 2006 with average rates per crop year of 0.101 and 0.074 pounds per acre, respectively. Winter Wheat: Fourteen winter wheat producing States were included in the 2006 survey: Colorado, Idaho, Illinois, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Texas, and Washington. Nitrogen applications averaged 64 pounds per acre per crop year and were applied to 80 percent of the Program States' planted acres. An average of 34 pounds of phosphate per acre per year was applied to 57 percent of the winter wheat planted acres in the Program States. Potash was applied to 17 percent of the planted acreage at an average rater of 49 pounds per acre per year in the States surveyed. Sulfur was applied on 14 percent of the acres planted at an average of 14 pounds per acre per year. Herbicides were applied to 49 percent of the winter wheat planted acreage in 2006 in the 14 Program States. Glyphosate isopropylamine salt was the most widely used herbicide, applied to 15 percent of the planted acreage at a rate of 0.963 pounds per acre per crop year. The two next most commonly applied herbicides, on a per acre basis were 2,4-D, 2-EHE and Metsulfuron- methyl, at 14 percent with average application rates of 0.440 and 0.002 pounds per acre per year, respectively. Insecticides were applied to 3 percent of the 2006 winter wheat planted acreage. Chlorpyrifos, at 2 percent, was the only insecticide applied to more than one half of one percent of the planted acres. It was applied at an average rate of 0.378 pounds per acre per year. Fungicide treatments were applied to 2 percent of the winter wheat acreage in the Program States. Azoxystrobin, Propiconazole, and Pyraclostrobin were each applied to 1 percent of the winter wheat planted acres. They were applied at 0.055, 0.082, and 0.078 pounds per acre per year respectively. Rice: Fertilizer Use by State, 2006 Percent of Acres Treated and Total Applied ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : Percent of Acres Treated and Total Applied State : Planted :---------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Acreage : Nitrogen : Phosphate : Potash : Sulfur ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :1,000 Acres Percent Mil. lbs. Percent Mil. lbs. Percent Mil. lbs. Percent Mil. lbs. : AR : 1,406 97 281.2 68 54.7 60 64.9 9 6.0 CA : 526 94 61.4 75 18.2 40 7.2 31 4.0 LA : 350 99 52.8 78 14.6 75 16.2 4 0.3 MS : 190 99 35.8 29 2.5 4 0.5 42 1.5 MO : 216 100 45.2 47 5.5 42 5.7 29 0.7 TX : 150 97 29.2 92 5.8 89 6.0 30 0.6 : Total : 2,838 97 505.6 67 101.2 54 100.4 18 13.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rice: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2006 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Primary : Planted : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Nutrient : Acreage : Applied : cations :Application : Crop Year : Applied ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Mil. lbs : : : Arkansas : 1,406 Nitrogen : 97 2.2 96 206 281.2 Phosphate : 68 1.0 56 57 54.7 Potash : 60 1.0 76 77 64.9 Sulfur : 9 1.2 37 45 6.0 : California : 526 Nitrogen : 94 2.1 58 124 61.4 Phosphate : 75 1.1 41 46 18.2 Potash : 40 1.0 34 34 7.2 Sulfur : 31 1.2 20 24 4.0 : Louisiana : 350 Nitrogen : 99 2.3 67 152 52.8 Phosphate : 78 1.2 47 54 14.6 Potash : 75 1.1 54 62 16.2 Sulfur : 4 1.4 13 18 0.3 : Mississippi : 190 Nitrogen : 99 3.2 59 190 35.8 Phosphate : 29 1.1 40 45 2.5 Potash : 4 1.0 68 68 0.5 Sulfur : 42 1.8 11 19 1.5 : Missouri : 216 Nitrogen : 100 2.2 94 209 45.2 Phosphate : 47 1.0 51 54 5.5 Potash : 42 1.0 63 63 5.7 Sulfur : 29 1.0 11 11 0.7 : Texas : 150 Nitrogen : 97 3.9 52 201 29.2 Phosphate : 92 1.2 37 42 5.8 Potash : 89 1.1 40 45 6.0 Sulfur : 30 1.1 12 13 0.6 : Program States : 2,838 Nitrogen : 97 2.3 79 183 505.6 Phosphate : 67 1.1 49 53 101.2 Potash : 54 1.0 62 65 100.4 Sulfur : 18 1.3 21 26 13.1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rice: Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2006 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Program States :-------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : AR : CA : LA : MS : MO : TX --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : * * * 2,4-D, dieth salt : * * * * * 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : P P * P P * * 2,4-DP, dimeth. salt : P * * Acifluorfen, sodium : P P * P * Bensulfuron-methyl : P P * P * P Bentazon : P * * Bispyribac-sodium : P P P P * * P Carfentrazone-ethyl : P P * * P P P Clomazone : P P P P P P P Cyhalofop-butyl : P P P P P P P Fenoxaprop : P P * P * P * Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl : * * * * Flumioxazin : P * * * Glyphosate amm. salt : * * Glyphosate iso. salt : P P * P P * P Halosulfuron : P P P P P P Imazamox : P P * * * * Imazethapyr : P P P P P P Molinate : P P P P P P Paraquat : * * Pendimethalin : P * * * P P P Penoxsulam : P * P * * Propanil : P P P P P P P Quinclorac : P P P P P P Sethoxydim : * * Sulfosate : P * * * Thifensulfuron : P * * * P Thiobencarb : P * P * * Tribenuron-methyl : P * * * P Triclopyr : P P P * * P --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Rice: Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2006 (continued) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Program States :-------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : AR : CA : LA : MS : MO : TX --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Insecticides : Carbaryl : * * Carbofuran : * * * Chlorpyrifos : * * Diflubenzuron : * * Gamma-cyhalothrin : P * * Lambda-cyhalothrin : P P P P P P Malathion : P * P * Methyl parathion : P * P * P Tebufenozide : * * Zeta-cypermethrin : P P P P P P : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : P P P P P P P Copper sulfate : P P Propiconazole : P P * P P * P Trifloxystrobin : P P * P P * P : Other Chemicals : Gibberellic acid : * * Sodium chlorate : P P * P * --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P Usage data are published for this active ingredient. * Usage data are not published for this active ingredient. Rice: Planted Acreage, Pesticide, Percent of Area Receiving Applications and Total Applied, Program States and Total, 2006 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : Area Receiving and Total Applied State : Planted :------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Acreage : Herbicide : Insecticide : Fungicide : Other -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 : Acres lbs lbs lbs lbs : : AR : 1,406 95 3,054 10 14 37 109 5 269 CA : 526 93 2,500 14 2 50 738 LA : 350 96 475 42 49 46 30 1/ MS : 190 100 502 55 14 46 16 3 36 MO : 216 100 454 25 12 1/ TX : 150 97 496 77 83 55 21 : Total : 2,838 95 7,481 21 161 41 926 4 493 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Insufficient reports to publish data for pesticide class. Rice: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 12 1.1 0.772 0.863 289 2,4-DP, dimeth. salt : 1 1.0 0.163 0.168 4 Acifluorfen, sodium : 4 1.0 0.220 0.227 27 Bensulfuron-methyl : 14 1.0 0.030 0.031 12 Bentazon : 1 1.1 0.442 0.480 18 Bispyribac-sodium : 8 1.0 0.026 0.026 5 Carfentrazone-ethyl : 13 1.0 0.034 0.035 13 Clomazone : 50 1.0 0.427 0.437 624 Cyhalofop-butyl : 14 1.1 0.261 0.277 107 Fenoxaprop : 3 1.0 0.060 0.060 6 Flumioxazin : 1 1.0 0.061 0.061 1 Glyphosate iso. salt : 23 1.2 0.773 0.959 630 Halosulfuron : 18 1.0 0.029 0.030 15 Imazamox : 2 1.0 0.047 0.049 3 Imazethapyr : 23 1.7 0.068 0.118 77 Molinate : 4 1.0 3.114 3.131 360 Pendimethalin : 3 1.0 0.847 0.847 82 Penoxsulam : 5 1.0 0.031 0.031 5 Propanil : 46 1.1 3.194 3.445 4,518 Quinclorac : 24 1.1 0.280 0.295 202 Sulfosate : 1 1.0 0.733 0.733 17 Thifensulfuron : 1 1.0 0.013 0.013 2/ Thiobencarb : 3 1.1 3.220 3.402 322 Tribenuron-methyl : 1 1.0 0.006 0.006 2/ Triclopyr : 21 1.0 0.208 0.218 131 : Insecticides : Gamma-cyhalothrin : 1 1.4 0.015 0.021 1 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 9 1.1 0.023 0.025 7 Malathion : 1 1.3 0.975 1.272 48 Methyl parathion : 4 1.9 0.467 0.908 97 Zeta-cypermethrin : 6 1.2 0.024 0.029 5 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 27 1.1 0.140 0.153 116 Copper sulfate : 7 1.0 3.386 3.398 715 Propiconazole : 19 1.0 0.118 0.118 64 Trifloxystrobin : 9 1.0 0.117 0.118 31 : Other Chemicals : Sodium chlorate : 4 1.0 4.280 4.280 493 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for the 6 Program States was 2.8 million acres. States included are AR, CA, LA, MS, MO, and TX. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Rice: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Arkansas, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 9 1.3 0.641 0.802 104 Acifluorfen, sodium : 6 1.0 0.242 0.253 21 Bensulfuron-methyl : 14 1.0 0.026 0.027 5 Bispyribac-sodium : 7 1.0 0.024 0.024 3 Carfentrazone-ethyl : 12 1.0 0.020 0.021 4 Clomazone : 67 1.0 0.404 0.408 382 Cyhalofop-butyl : 9 1.0 0.271 0.280 35 Fenoxaprop : 4 1.0 0.055 0.055 3 Glyphosate iso. salt : 28 1.3 0.800 1.020 398 Halosulfuron : 19 1.1 0.031 0.032 9 Imazamox : 4 1.0 0.050 0.052 3 Imazethapyr : 23 1.8 0.064 0.112 37 Molinate : 1 1.0 1.812 1.812 32 Propanil : 45 1.1 2.508 2.818 1,767 Quinclorac : 28 1.1 0.294 0.309 120 Triclopyr : 21 1.1 0.275 0.291 84 : Insecticides : Lambda-cyhalothrin : 5 1.0 0.020 0.020 1 Zeta-cypermethrin : 3 1.0 0.023 0.024 1 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 28 1.1 0.137 0.157 62 Propiconazole : 21 1.0 0.110 0.110 33 Trifloxystrobin : 8 1.0 0.116 0.117 14 : Other Chemicals : Sodium chlorate : 5 1.0 3.612 3.612 269 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for Arkansas was 1.4 million acres. Rice: Agricultural Chemical Applications, California, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : Bispyribac-sodium : 10 1.0 0.019 0.019 1 Clomazone : 26 1.0 0.573 0.576 78 Cyhalofop-butyl : 19 1.0 0.247 0.255 26 Molinate : 8 1.0 4.381 4.381 188 Penoxsulam : 15 1.0 0.034 0.034 3 Propanil : 77 1.0 4.410 4.529 1,843 Thiobencarb : 15 1.1 3.468 3.695 301 Triclopyr : 51 1.0 0.124 0.128 35 : Insecticides : Lambda-cyhalothrin : 8 1.0 0.025 0.025 1 Zeta-cypermethrin : 5 1.0 0.040 0.040 1 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 22 1.0 0.166 0.166 19 Copper sulfate : 40 1.0 3.386 3.398 715 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for California was 526,000 acres. Rice: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Louisiana, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 35 1.0 1.056 1.077 132 Bensulfuron-methyl : 39 1.0 0.038 0.038 5 Bispyribac-sodium : 8 1.0 0.036 0.036 1 Clomazone : 16 1.0 0.465 0.486 27 Cyhalofop-butyl : 16 1.0 0.259 0.260 15 Fenoxaprop : 3 1.0 0.075 0.075 1 Glyphosate iso. salt : 11 1.0 0.797 0.829 31 Halosulfuron : 20 1.0 0.019 0.020 1 Imazethapyr : 38 1.6 0.078 0.127 17 Molinate : 6 1.0 2.690 2.771 58 Propanil : 16 1.0 2.643 2.701 153 Quinclorac : 19 1.0 0.264 0.264 18 : Insecticides : Lambda-cyhalothrin : 22 1.1 0.021 0.022 2 Malathion : 7 1.5 1.053 1.559 38 Methyl parathion : 5 1.3 0.323 0.427 8 Zeta-cypermethrin : 9 1.2 0.025 0.030 1 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 34 1.0 0.149 0.149 18 Propiconazole : 17 1.0 0.122 0.122 7 Trifloxystrobin : 12 1.0 0.117 0.117 5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for Louisiana was 350,000 acres. Rice: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Mississippi, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 29 1.1 0.788 0.851 46 Acifluorfen, sodium : 14 1.0 0.174 0.174 5 Carfentrazone-ethyl : 26 1.0 0.020 0.021 1 Clomazone : 44 1.1 0.562 0.611 51 Cyhalofop-butyl : 28 1.1 0.267 0.299 16 Glyphosate iso. salt : 75 1.2 0.749 0.918 130 Halosulfuron : 20 1.0 0.029 0.030 1 Imazethapyr : 42 1.8 0.063 0.115 9 Pendimethalin : 13 1.0 0.805 0.805 20 Propanil : 30 1.1 3.083 3.522 199 Quinclorac : 31 1.0 0.246 0.251 15 : Insecticides : Lambda-cyhalothrin : 23 1.1 0.024 0.026 1 Zeta-cypermethrin : 12 1.1 0.016 0.018 2/ : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 11 1.0 0.120 0.120 2 Propiconazole : 37 1.0 0.112 0.112 8 Trifloxystrobin : 26 1.0 0.111 0.111 6 : Other Chemicals : Sodium chlorate : 3 1.0 5.980 5.980 36 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for Mississippi was 190,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Rice: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Missouri, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : Carfentrazone-ethyl : 38 1.1 0.020 0.021 2 Clomazone : 54 1.0 0.424 0.424 50 Cyhalofop-butyl : 5 1.0 0.290 0.290 3 Fenoxaprop : 5 1.0 0.073 0.073 1 Halosulfuron : 21 1.0 0.030 0.031 1 Imazethapyr : 34 1.8 0.079 0.140 10 Molinate : 12 1.0 2.776 2.776 72 Pendimethalin : 4 1.0 0.971 0.971 9 Propanil : 35 1.0 3.244 3.304 248 Quinclorac : 46 1.0 0.287 0.287 29 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 17 1.1 0.154 0.173 6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for Missouri was 216,000 acres. Rice: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Texas, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : Bensulfuron-methyl : 15 1.0 0.026 0.026 1 Bispyribac-sodium : 9 1.0 0.028 0.028 2/ Carfentrazone-ethyl : 14 1.0 0.017 0.017 2/ Clomazone : 66 1.2 0.312 0.360 35 Cyhalofop-butyl : 24 1.3 0.253 0.316 12 Glyphosate iso. salt : 35 1.3 0.668 0.863 45 Halosulfuron : 53 1.0 0.033 0.033 3 Imazethapyr : 22 1.7 0.059 0.102 3 Molinate : 5 1.0 1.277 1.277 9 Pendimethalin : 18 1.0 0.885 0.885 25 Propanil : 59 1.0 3.304 3.457 307 Quinclorac : 46 1.2 0.242 0.295 20 Thifensulfuron : 7 1.0 0.013 0.013 2/ Tribenuron-methyl : 7 1.0 0.006 0.006 2/ Triclopyr : 11 1.1 0.285 0.301 5 : Insecticides : Lambda-cyhalothrin : 19 1.6 0.029 0.046 1 Methyl parathion : 41 2.5 0.503 1.268 78 Zeta-cypermethrin : 28 1.5 0.021 0.031 1 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 46 1.1 0.107 0.115 8 Propiconazole : 50 1.0 0.132 0.132 10 Trifloxystrobin : 15 1.0 0.127 0.127 3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for Texas was 150,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Soybeans: Fertilizer Use by State, 2006 Percent of Acres Treated and Total Applied ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : Percent of Acres Treated and Total Applied State : Planted :---------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Acreage : Nitrogen : Phosphate : Potash : Sulfur ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :1,000 Acres Percent Mil. lbs. Percent Mil. lbs. Percent Mil. lbs. Percent Mil. lbs. : AR : 3,110 3 0.9 34 60.4 36 94.4 1/ IL : 10,100 11 18.1 16 96.0 31 290.2 1/ IN : 5,700 16 15.2 20 54.6 32 177.4 1/ IA : 10,150 7 10.8 12 64.4 20 172.6 1 0.9 KS : 3,150 21 10.5 25 32.0 8 8.8 1/ KY : 1,380 28 14.6 40 35.3 41 44.5 1/ LA : 870 4 0.4 13 4.9 16 9.3 1/ MI : 2,000 28 5.9 28 19.5 56 96.7 3 0.2 MN : 7,350 16 15.3 18 53.2 16 57.4 1/ MS : 1,670 6 1.0 14 9.0 19 25.6 1/ MO : 5,150 12 10.9 19 45.7 22 76.2 1/ NE : 5,050 32 20.2 32 70.4 12 15.8 12 8.0 NC : 1,370 39 11.0 42 25.6 44 50.8 1/ ND : 3,900 43 22.6 42 58.3 3 1.9 1/ OH : 4,650 19 11.9 20 40.5 40 171.4 2 1.7 SD : 3,950 29 19.7 31 49.4 8 8.6 1/ TN : 1,160 42 12.0 48 28.1 63 63.8 8 0.7 VA : 520 32 3.9 34 7.4 39 15.1 4 0.3 WI : 1,650 31 7.4 33 18.0 55 74.2 10 2.3 : Total : 72,880 18 212.4 23 772.8 25 1,454.7 3 20.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Insufficient reports to publish data for the fertilizer primary nutrient. Soybeans: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2006 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Primary : Planted : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Nutrient : Acreage : Applied : cations :Application : Crop Year : Applied ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Mil. lbs : : : Arkansas : 3,110 Nitrogen : 3 1.5 7 11 0.9 Phosphate : 34 1.0 57 57 60.4 Potash : 36 1.0 85 85 94.4 Sulfur 1/ : : Illinois : 10,100 Nitrogen : 11 1.1 15 16 18.1 Phosphate : 16 1.1 53 58 96.0 Potash : 31 1.0 91 94 290.2 Sulfur 1/ : : Indiana : 5,700 Nitrogen : 16 1.0 16 17 15.2 Phosphate : 20 1.1 44 47 54.6 Potash : 32 1.0 96 98 177.4 Sulfur 1/ : : Iowa : 10,150 Nitrogen : 7 1.0 14 14 10.8 Phosphate : 12 1.0 54 54 64.4 Potash : 20 1.0 85 85 172.6 Sulfur : 1 1.0 7 7 0.9 : Kansas : 3,150 Nitrogen : 21 1.1 14 16 10.5 Phosphate : 25 1.0 40 41 32.0 Potash : 8 1.0 35 35 8.8 Sulfur 1/ : : Kentucky : 1,380 Nitrogen : 28 1.2 32 38 14.6 Phosphate : 40 1.0 63 64 35.3 Potash : 41 1.0 75 78 44.5 Sulfur 1/ : : Louisiana : 870 Nitrogen : 4 1.0 13 13 0.4 Phosphate : 13 1.0 44 44 4.9 Potash : 16 1.0 67 67 9.3 Sulfur 1/ : ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Soybeans: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2006 (continued) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Primary : Planted : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Nutrient : Acreage : Applied : cations :Application : Crop Year : Applied ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Mil. lbs : : : Michigan : 2,000 Nitrogen : 28 1.2 9 11 5.9 Phosphate : 28 1.2 30 35 19.5 Potash : 56 1.2 75 87 96.7 Sulfur : 3 1.0 3 3 0.2 : Minnesota : 7,350 Nitrogen : 16 1.0 13 13 15.3 Phosphate : 18 1.0 40 40 53.2 Potash : 16 1.0 48 49 57.4 Sulfur 1/ : : Mississippi : 1,670 Nitrogen : 6 1.0 10 10 1.0 Phosphate : 14 1.0 37 37 9.0 Potash : 19 1.0 83 83 25.6 Sulfur 1/ : : Missouri : 5,150 Nitrogen : 12 1.0 18 18 10.9 Phosphate : 19 1.0 46 46 45.7 Potash : 22 1.0 67 67 76.2 Sulfur 1/ : : Nebraska : 5,050 Nitrogen : 32 1.0 12 13 20.2 Phosphate : 32 1.0 43 43 70.4 Potash : 12 1.0 25 25 15.8 Sulfur : 12 1.1 13 13 8.0 : North Carolina : 1,370 Nitrogen : 39 1.0 20 21 11.0 Phosphate : 42 1.0 43 44 25.6 Potash : 44 1.0 82 84 50.8 Sulfur 1/ : : North Dakota : 3,900 Nitrogen : 43 1.1 12 13 22.6 Phosphate : 42 1.0 36 36 58.3 Potash : 3 1.0 15 15 1.9 Sulfur 1/ : : Ohio : 4,650 Nitrogen : 19 1.0 13 14 11.9 Phosphate : 20 1.0 43 43 40.5 Potash : 40 1.0 93 93 171.4 Sulfur : 2 1.1 16 17 1.7 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Soybeans: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2006 (continued) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Primary : Planted : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Nutrient : Acreage : Applied : cations :Application : Crop Year : Applied ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Mil. lbs : : : South Dakota : 3,950 Nitrogen : 29 1.0 17 17 19.7 Phosphate : 31 1.0 40 40 49.4 Potash : 8 1.0 27 27 8.6 Sulfur 1/ : : Tennessee : 1,160 Nitrogen : 42 1.0 25 25 12.0 Phosphate : 48 1.0 50 51 28.1 Potash : 63 1.0 86 88 63.8 Sulfur : 8 1.0 8 8 0.7 : Virginia : 520 Nitrogen : 32 1.0 24 24 3.9 Phosphate : 34 1.0 42 42 7.4 Potash : 39 1.0 76 76 15.1 Sulfur : 4 1.0 14 14 0.3 : Wisconsin : 1,650 Nitrogen : 31 1.1 14 15 7.4 Phosphate : 33 1.0 32 33 18.0 Potash : 55 1.0 79 81 74.2 Sulfur : 10 1.0 13 13 2.3 : Program States : 72,880 Nitrogen : 18 1.1 15 16 212.4 Phosphate : 23 1.0 45 46 772.8 Potash : 25 1.0 79 80 1,454.7 Sulfur : 3 1.1 10 11 20.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Insufficient reports to publish fertilizer data. Soybeans: Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2006 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Program States :----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : AR : IL : IN : IA : KS : KY : LA : MI : MN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D : * * 2,4-D, 2-EHE : P P P P P P P * * 2,4-D, BEE : P * * * 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : P P P * * * P 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : * 2,4-DB, dimeth. salt : * * * * Acetochlor : * * Acifluorfen, sodium : P * * Alachlor : P * * * Atrazine : * * * Bentazon : P * * Carfentrazone-ethyl : P * * Chlorimuron-ethyl : P * P P P * * P * * Clethodim : P * P * P * * P Clopyralid : * Cloransulam-methyl : P P * * * * * * Dicamba : * * Dicamba, digly salt : P * Dicamba, dimet. salt : * Dimethenamid-P : * * Diuron : * Ethalfluralin : * Fenoxaprop : P * * * Fluazifop-P-butyl : P * * * * Flufenacet : P * Flumetsulam : P * * * * Flumiclorac-pentyl : P * * * * Flumioxazin : P P * * * P * * Fluroxypyr : * * Fomesafen : P P P * * * * * * Glufosinate-ammonium : * Glyphosate : P * P P * * * P P P Glyphosate amm. salt : P * * * * Glyphosate iso. salt : P P P P P P P P P P Imazamox : P P * * Imazaquin : P * * P * * Imazethapyr : P P P * * * P * Imazethapyr, ammon : P * * Lactofen : P * * * * Linuron : * MCPA, sodium salt : * Metribuzin : P P P P * * * * Paraquat : P * * P Pendimethalin : P * P P * * * P * ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Soybeans: Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2006 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Program States :----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : MS : MO : NE : NC : ND : OH : SD : TN : VA : WI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : * P P P * * * P 2,4-D, BEE : * * 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : P P P * P P * * 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : * 2,4-DB, dimeth. salt : Acetochlor : * Acifluorfen, sodium : * * * Alachlor : * * * * * Atrazine : * Bentazon : * * Carfentrazone-ethyl : * * * * * * Chlorimuron-ethyl : * P P * P * P P Clethodim : * * * P P * P Clopyralid : * Cloransulam-methyl : * P * * * * P Dicamba : Dicamba, digly salt : * Dicamba, dimet. salt : * Dimethenamid-P : * Diuron : * * Ethalfluralin : * Fenoxaprop : * * Fluazifop-P-butyl : * * * Flufenacet : * * * Flumetsulam : * * * * Flumiclorac-pentyl : * P P * * * Flumioxazin : * * * * P P * * * Fluroxypyr : Fomesafen : * * * P * Glufosinate-ammonium : * Glyphosate : * * P * P * * P Glyphosate amm. salt : * * Glyphosate iso. salt : P P P P P P P P P P Imazamox : * * P Imazaquin : * P * Imazethapyr : P * P * * * P Imazethapyr, ammon : * * * Lactofen : * * * Linuron : * MCPA, sodium salt : * * Metribuzin : * P * P * * P Paraquat : P * * * * Pendimethalin : * P * * P * P ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Soybeans: Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2006 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Program States :----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : AR : IL : IN : IA : KS : KY : LA : MI : MN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides (continued) : Prometryn : * * Propachlor : * * Pyraflufen-ethyl : * Quizalofop-P-ethyl : P * * * * * Quizalofop-ethyl : * Rimsulfuron : * S-Metolachlor : P * * * * * * * Sethoxydim : P * Sulfentrazone : P P * * * * Sulfosate : P P * * * P * Thifensulfuron : P P * * * * * * Tribenuron-methyl : P * * * * Trifluralin : P * * * P * P : Insecticides : Acephate : P * * P Aldicarb : * Azadirachtin : * * Benzoic acid : P * Carbaryl : P * * * Carbofuran : * * Chlorpyrifos : P * P * P Cyfluthrin : P * P Cypermethrin : * * * Deltamethrin : * * Diflubenzuron : P * P Esfenvalerate : P * P * P Gamma-cyhalothrin : P * Indoxacarb : * * Lambda-cyhalothrin : P P P * * P P P P Malathion : * * Methyl parathion : P * * * Neem oil, clar. hyd. : * * Permethrin : P * * * * Thiodicarb : P * Zeta-cypermethrin : P * * * * * * * ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Soybeans: Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2006 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Program States :----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : MS : MO : NE : NC : ND : OH : SD : TN : VA : WI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides (continued) : Prometryn : Propachlor : Pyraflufen-ethyl : * Quizalofop-P-ethyl : * * Quizalofop-ethyl : * Rimsulfuron : * S-Metolachlor : * * P * * P Sethoxydim : * * * * * Sulfentrazone : * * * P * * Sulfosate : * * * * * * * * * Thifensulfuron : * * * * * P * P Tribenuron-methyl : P * * P * Trifluralin : * * * * * P * : Insecticides : Acephate : P * * * * Aldicarb : * Azadirachtin : * Benzoic acid : * Carbaryl : * * * * Carbofuran : Chlorpyrifos : P P * * * Cyfluthrin : * * * * * * * Cypermethrin : Deltamethrin : * Diflubenzuron : * Esfenvalerate : * * * P * * Gamma-cyhalothrin : * P * Indoxacarb : Lambda-cyhalothrin : P * P P P P P P * Malathion : Methyl parathion : * Neem oil, clar. hyd. : Permethrin : * * * Thiodicarb : * Zeta-cypermethrin : P * P * ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Soybeans: Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2006 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Program States :----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : AR : IL : IN : IA : KS : KY : LA : MI : MN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : P P * * * P Chlorothalonil : * Coniothyrium minitan : * Mefenoxam : * Propiconazole : P P * Pyraclostrobin : P * P * * * P * * Tebuconazole : P * * * P Tetraconazole : * * Thiophanate-methyl : * * Trifloxystrobin : P P * : Other Chemicals : Sodium chlorate : * * ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Soybeans: Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2006 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Program States :----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : MS : MO : NE : NC : ND : OH : SD : TN : VA : WI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : P * * * P * * Chlorothalonil : * Coniothyrium minitan : * Mefenoxam : * Propiconazole : * * * * * Pyraclostrobin : * P * * * P P * * Tebuconazole : Tetraconazole : * Thiophanate-methyl : Trifloxystrobin : * : Other Chemicals : Sodium chlorate : * ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ P Usage data are published for this active ingredient. * Usage data are not published for this active ingredient. Soybeans: Planted Acreage, Pesticide, Percent of Area Receiving Applications and Total Applied, Program States and Total, 2006 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : Area Receiving and Total Applied State : Planted :------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Acreage : Herbicide : Insecticide : Fungicide : Other -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 : Acres lbs lbs lbs lbs : : AR : 3,110 88 4,317 12 96 9 26 1/ IL : 10,100 99 13,794 5 141 2 12 IN : 5,700 100 8,910 1/ 6 44 IA : 10,150 99 13,946 9 127 1/ KS : 3,150 100 4,386 6 7 KY : 1,380 97 1,978 7 1 8 40 LA : 870 97 1,664 75 499 37 66 MI : 2,000 98 2,390 1/ 1/ MN : 7,350 99 9,715 56 896 1/ 1/ MS : 1,670 100 3,770 26 65 12 30 1/ MO : 5,150 95 6,577 8 28 6 70 NE : 5,050 97 7,837 5 129 1/ NC : 1,370 92 1,968 22 30 6 12 ND : 3,900 100 4,982 57 480 1/ OH : 4,650 99 6,871 4 23 4 19 SD : 3,950 99 5,620 21 111 TN : 1,160 98 1,866 25 8 35 43 VA : 520 99 842 23 4 1/ WI : 1,650 98 2,058 4 13 1/ : Total : 72,880 98 103,489 16 2,674 4 468 1/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Insufficient reports to publish data for pesticide class. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 7 1.0 0.493 0.503 2,505 2,4-D, BEE : * 1.1 0.426 0.459 68 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 3 1.0 0.462 0.475 953 Acifluorfen, sodium : * 1.0 0.287 0.296 47 Alachlor : * 1.0 1.931 1.931 485 Bentazon : * 1.0 0.687 0.687 70 Carfentrazone-ethyl : * 1.2 0.038 0.046 10 Chlorimuron-ethyl : 4 1.0 0.017 0.017 52 Clethodim : 3 1.1 0.096 0.102 190 Cloransulam-methyl : 1 1.0 0.019 0.019 17 Dicamba, digly salt : * 1.0 0.250 0.250 16 Fenoxaprop : * 1.0 0.031 0.031 9 Fluazifop-P-butyl : 1 1.0 0.099 0.099 43 Flufenacet : * 1.0 0.265 0.265 80 Flumetsulam : * 1.0 0.048 0.048 8 Flumiclorac-pentyl : 1 1.4 0.020 0.028 17 Flumioxazin : 3 1.0 0.066 0.066 138 Fomesafen : 2 1.2 0.190 0.233 330 Glyphosate : 4 1.7 0.630 1.044 2,841 Glyphosate amm. salt : * 1.5 0.489 0.745 142 Glyphosate iso. salt : 92 1.7 0.802 1.330 88,903 Imazamox : * 1.0 0.030 0.030 9 Imazaquin : 1 1.0 0.061 0.062 66 Imazethapyr : 3 1.0 0.053 0.053 100 Imazethapyr, ammon : * 1.0 0.048 0.048 5 Lactofen : * 1.0 0.110 0.110 23 Metribuzin : 2 1.0 0.255 0.260 437 Paraquat : 1 1.0 0.492 0.511 335 Pendimethalin : 3 1.0 0.920 0.926 1,894 Quizalofop-P-ethyl : * 1.1 0.038 0.041 14 S-Metolachlor : 1 1.0 1.023 1.023 837 Sethoxydim : * 1.0 0.153 0.153 10 Sulfentrazone : 1 1.0 0.087 0.091 70 Sulfosate : 1 1.8 0.967 1.701 970 Thifensulfuron : 1 1.1 0.004 0.004 3 Tribenuron-methyl : 1 1.0 0.008 0.008 5 Trifluralin : 2 1.0 0.818 0.818 1,454 : Insecticides : Acephate : 1 1.3 0.720 0.934 546 Benzoic acid : * 1.1 0.051 0.056 9 Carbaryl : * 1.0 0.633 0.633 91 Chlorpyrifos : 5 1.1 0.454 0.480 1,663 Cyfluthrin : * 1.1 0.028 0.030 10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2006 1/ (continued) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Insecticides (continued) : Diflubenzuron : * 1.7 0.037 0.062 10 Esfenvalerate : 3 1.1 0.035 0.037 70 Gamma-cyhalothrin : * 1.0 0.011 0.011 3 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 6 1.1 0.020 0.021 97 Methyl parathion : * 1.1 0.529 0.565 66 Permethrin : * 1.0 0.065 0.065 12 Thiodicarb : * 1.0 0.320 0.320 39 Zeta-cypermethrin : 1 1.0 0.022 0.022 14 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 1 1.0 0.102 0.106 101 Propiconazole : * 1.0 0.102 0.104 28 Pyraclostrobin : 2 1.0 0.110 0.112 188 Tebuconazole : * 1.0 0.213 0.213 36 Trifloxystrobin : * 1.0 0.082 0.082 7 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Area applied is less than 0.5 percent. 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for the 19 Program States was 72.9 million acres. States included are AR, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, MI, MN, MS, MO, NE, NC, ND, OH, SD, TN, VA, and WI. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Arkansas, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : Fomesafen : 17 1.4 0.146 0.205 109 Glyphosate iso. salt : 82 1.8 0.812 1.479 3,782 : Insecticides : Lambda-cyhalothrin : 7 1.0 0.010 0.010 2 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 7 1.0 0.092 0.092 21 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for Arkansas was 3.1 million acres. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Illinois, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 13 1.0 0.445 0.449 575 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 2 1.0 0.355 0.355 70 Chlorimuron-ethyl : 5 1.2 0.015 0.017 9 Clethodim : 2 1.2 0.085 0.106 25 Cloransulam-methyl : 2 1.0 0.024 0.024 4 Flumioxazin : 4 1.0 0.070 0.070 27 Fomesafen : 3 1.2 0.197 0.242 62 Glyphosate : 6 1.6 0.688 1.111 728 Glyphosate iso. salt : 90 1.6 0.787 1.232 11,192 Imazamox : 2 1.0 0.033 0.033 6 Imazethapyr : 3 1.0 0.052 0.052 16 Metribuzin : 2 1.0 0.193 0.193 37 Pendimethalin : 7 1.0 0.892 0.908 671 Sulfentrazone : 2 1.1 0.078 0.089 21 Sulfosate : * 1.5 1.157 1.772 85 Thifensulfuron : 1 1.6 0.002 0.003 2/ : Insecticides : Lambda-cyhalothrin : 2 1.2 0.025 0.030 5 : Fungicides : Pyraclostrobin : 1 1.0 0.098 0.098 11 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Area applied is less than 0.5 percent. 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for Illinois was 10.1 million acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Indiana, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 17 1.0 0.585 0.588 562 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 5 1.0 0.525 0.525 157 Chlorimuron-ethyl : 5 1.0 0.017 0.017 5 Glyphosate : 6 2.0 0.687 1.374 483 Glyphosate iso. salt : 93 1.7 0.822 1.402 7,405 Imazaquin : 6 1.0 0.072 0.072 25 Imazethapyr : 6 1.0 0.061 0.061 21 Metribuzin : 4 1.0 0.253 0.253 58 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for Indiana was 5.7 million acres. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Iowa, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 3 1.0 0.460 0.460 149 Chlorimuron-ethyl : 3 1.0 0.017 0.017 6 Clethodim : 4 1.1 0.078 0.089 35 Glyphosate iso. salt : 97 1.5 0.809 1.233 12,113 Metribuzin : 4 1.0 0.128 0.128 49 Pendimethalin : 4 1.0 1.050 1.050 387 Trifluralin : 9 1.0 0.774 0.774 728 : Insecticides : Chlorpyrifos : 2 1.0 0.475 0.475 100 Esfenvalerate : 3 1.0 0.036 0.036 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for Iowa was 10.2 million acres. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Kansas, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 9 1.0 0.508 0.508 140 Glyphosate iso. salt : 96 1.7 0.754 1.315 3,990 : Insecticides : Lambda-cyhalothrin : 3 1.0 0.022 0.022 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for Kansas was 3.2 million acres. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Kentucky, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 10 1.0 0.476 0.476 67 Glyphosate iso. salt : 90 1.7 0.771 1.315 1,642 : Insecticides : Lambda-cyhalothrin : 6 1.0 0.014 0.014 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for Kentucky was 1.4 million acres. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Louisiana, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 9 1.1 0.577 0.640 48 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 10 1.3 0.621 0.786 66 Chlorimuron-ethyl : 4 1.0 0.006 0.006 2/ Flumioxazin : 6 1.0 0.055 0.055 3 Glyphosate : 8 2.3 0.601 1.396 102 Glyphosate iso. salt : 79 2.3 0.758 1.767 1,214 Paraquat : 36 1.0 0.458 0.469 146 Sulfosate : 4 2.0 1.053 2.055 64 : Insecticides : Acephate : 42 1.4 0.786 1.124 412 Cyfluthrin : 9 1.1 0.028 0.030 2 Diflubenzuron : 7 1.0 0.031 0.031 2 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 10 1.3 0.018 0.023 2 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 20 1.1 0.114 0.127 22 Propiconazole : 14 1.1 0.091 0.096 12 Pyraclostrobin : 10 1.0 0.135 0.135 11 Tebuconazole : 6 1.0 0.128 0.128 6 Trifloxystrobin : 8 1.0 0.075 0.075 5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for Louisiana was 870,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Michigan, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : Glyphosate : 6 1.3 0.716 0.898 107 Glyphosate iso. salt : 91 1.4 0.846 1.169 2,128 Imazethapyr : 2 1.0 0.059 0.059 3 Pendimethalin : 3 1.0 0.871 0.871 57 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for Michigan was 2.0 million acres. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Minnesota, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : Clethodim : 3 1.0 0.058 0.058 15 Glyphosate : 5 1.5 0.671 1.005 341 Glyphosate iso. salt : 93 1.6 0.797 1.300 8,935 Trifluralin : 2 1.0 0.631 0.631 90 : Insecticides : Chlorpyrifos : 23 1.0 0.465 0.484 832 Esfenvalerate : 8 1.1 0.033 0.037 23 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 24 1.1 0.020 0.022 38 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for Minnesota was 7.4 million acres. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Mississippi, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 19 1.0 0.602 0.627 194 Glyphosate iso. salt : 95 2.6 0.791 2.029 3,225 Paraquat : 7 1.0 0.460 0.469 58 : Insecticides : Acephate : 4 1.3 0.349 0.439 28 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 11 1.4 0.015 0.020 4 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 8 1.0 0.086 0.086 11 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for Mississippi was 1.7 million acres. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Missouri, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 3 1.6 0.714 1.149 155 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 2 1.1 0.636 0.709 91 Chlorimuron-ethyl : 7 1.0 0.019 0.019 7 Flumiclorac-pentyl : 5 1.0 0.017 0.017 5 Glyphosate iso. salt : 93 1.5 0.846 1.268 6,061 Tribenuron-methyl : 4 1.0 0.008 0.008 2 : Insecticides : Zeta-cypermethrin : 2 1.1 0.024 0.027 3 : Fungicides : Pyraclostrobin : 5 1.1 0.098 0.107 27 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for Missouri was 5.2 million acres. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Nebraska, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 7 1.0 0.363 0.363 120 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 4 1.0 0.269 0.269 48 Chlorimuron-ethyl : 4 1.0 0.028 0.028 6 Glyphosate : 3 2.0 0.607 1.208 208 Glyphosate iso. salt : 93 1.7 0.824 1.382 6,473 Imazethapyr : 7 1.0 0.059 0.059 21 Metribuzin : 6 1.0 0.439 0.439 128 Pendimethalin : 5 1.0 0.904 0.904 235 S-Metolachlor : 3 1.0 1.248 1.248 173 : Insecticides : Chlorpyrifos : 5 1.0 0.525 0.525 126 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for Nebraska was 5.1 million acres. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, North Carolina, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : Cloransulam-methyl : 7 1.0 0.012 0.012 1 Flumiclorac-pentyl : 7 2.1 0.014 0.029 3 Glyphosate iso. salt : 86 1.9 0.816 1.524 1,791 : Insecticides : Lambda-cyhalothrin : 9 1.0 0.022 0.022 3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for North Carolina was 1.4 million acres. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, North Dakota, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : Clethodim : 5 1.0 0.119 0.119 25 Glyphosate iso. salt : 93 1.8 0.738 1.317 4,759 Imazethapyr : 7 1.0 0.045 0.045 13 : Insecticides : Chlorpyrifos : 27 1.0 0.408 0.416 434 Esfenvalerate : 15 1.1 0.035 0.039 23 Gamma-cyhalothrin : 3 1.0 0.012 0.012 1 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 16 1.0 0.025 0.026 16 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for North Dakota was 3.9 million acres. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Ohio, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 22 1.0 0.483 0.483 488 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 7 1.0 0.583 0.583 197 Chlorimuron-ethyl : 18 1.0 0.017 0.017 14 Clethodim : 6 1.0 0.132 0.132 36 Flumioxazin : 9 1.0 0.072 0.072 30 Fomesafen : 5 1.2 0.237 0.291 66 Glyphosate : 10 1.6 0.570 0.904 434 Glyphosate iso. salt : 83 1.6 0.853 1.330 5,158 Imazaquin : 9 1.0 0.063 0.063 25 Metribuzin : 7 1.0 0.237 0.237 75 Sulfentrazone : 5 1.0 0.080 0.080 18 Thifensulfuron : 6 1.0 0.003 0.003 1 Tribenuron-methyl : 2 1.0 0.007 0.007 1 : Insecticides : Lambda-cyhalothrin : 3 1.0 0.025 0.025 4 : Fungicides : Pyraclostrobin : 3 1.0 0.095 0.095 13 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for Ohio was 4.7 million acres. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, South Dakota, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : Flumioxazin : 6 1.0 0.070 0.070 17 Glyphosate iso. salt : 97 1.7 0.761 1.311 5,047 Pendimethalin : 4 1.0 0.837 0.837 127 Trifluralin : 5 1.0 1.147 1.147 216 : Insecticides : Lambda-cyhalothrin : 10 1.0 0.021 0.021 8 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for South Dakota was 4.0 million acres. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Tennessee, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 6 1.0 0.284 0.284 21 Glyphosate iso. salt : 98 2.0 0.776 1.583 1,806 : Insecticides : Lambda-cyhalothrin : 19 1.1 0.015 0.016 3 Zeta-cypermethrin : 5 1.0 0.016 0.016 1 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 12 1.1 0.074 0.084 12 Pyraclostrobin : 23 1.0 0.115 0.115 31 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for Tennessee was 1.2 million acres. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Virginia, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : Chlorimuron-ethyl : 4 1.0 0.010 0.010 2/ Glyphosate iso. salt : 89 1.7 0.915 1.541 716 : Insecticides : Lambda-cyhalothrin : 19 1.1 0.016 0.018 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for Virginia was 520,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Soybeans: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Wisconsin, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 11 1.0 0.473 0.473 83 Chlorimuron-ethyl : 6 1.0 0.006 0.006 1 Clethodim : 5 1.0 0.082 0.082 7 Cloransulam-methyl : 3 1.0 0.020 0.020 1 Glyphosate : 8 1.5 0.584 0.877 122 Glyphosate iso. salt : 77 1.3 0.858 1.157 1,467 Imazamox : 3 1.0 0.035 0.035 2 Imazethapyr : 9 1.0 0.049 0.049 7 Metribuzin : 2 1.0 0.287 0.287 9 Pendimethalin : 9 1.0 1.010 1.010 149 S-Metolachlor : 2 1.0 1.163 1.163 48 Thifensulfuron : 6 1.1 0.003 0.003 2/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for Wisconsin was 1.7 million acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Durum Wheat: Fertilizer Use by State, 2006 Percent of Acres Treated and Total Applied ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : Percent of Acres Treated and Total Applied State : Planted :---------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Acreage : Nitrogen : Phosphate : Potash : Sulfur ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :1,000 Acres Percent Mil. lbs. Percent Mil. lbs. Percent Mil. lbs. Percent Mil. lbs. : MT : 400 93 20.6 82 7.3 8 0.3 4 0.1 ND : 1,300 92 77.4 71 21.3 7 0.8 4 0.1 : Total : 1,700 92 98.0 74 28.6 7 1.1 4 0.3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Durum Wheat: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2006 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Primary : Planted : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Nutrient : Acreage : Applied : cations :Application : Crop Year : Applied ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Mil. lbs : : : Montana : 400 Nitrogen : 93 1.5 38 56 20.6 Phosphate : 82 1.0 22 22 7.3 Potash : 8 1.0 10 10 0.3 Sulfur : 4 1.0 8 8 0.1 : North Dakota : 1,300 Nitrogen : 92 1.7 39 64 77.4 Phosphate : 71 1.0 23 23 21.3 Potash : 7 1.0 9 9 0.8 Sulfur : 4 1.0 3 3 0.1 : Program States : 1,700 Nitrogen : 92 1.6 39 62 98.0 Phosphate : 74 1.0 23 23 28.6 Potash : 7 1.0 9 9 1.1 Sulfur : 4 1.0 4 4 0.3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Durum Wheat: Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2006 --------------------------------------------------------- : Program States :-------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : MT : ND --------------------------------------------------------- : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : P P P 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : P P P 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : P P P Aminopyralid : * * Bromoxynil heptanoat : P * * Bromoxynil octanoate : P P P Carfentrazone-ethyl : * * * Chlorsulfuron : * * Clodinafop-propargil : P P P Clopyralid : P * * Dicamba : P P P Dicamba, digly salt : P P P Dicamba, dimet. salt : P P P Dicamba, iso salt : * * Dicamba, sodium salt : P * * Dimethenamid-P : * * Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl : P P P Flucarbazone-sodium : P P Fluroxypyr : P P P Fluroxypyr 1-MHE : P P P Glyphosate : P * * Glyphosate amm. salt : * * * Glyphosate iso. salt : P P P MCPA : * * MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : P P P MCPA, dimethyl. salt : P * * MCPA, isooctyl ester : P * * Mesosulfuron-Methyl : * * * Metsulfuron-methyl : * * Pinoxaden : * * Propoxycarbazone-sod : * * * Sulfosate : * * Thifensulfuron : P P P Triallate : P * * Triasulfuron : * * Tribenuron-methyl : P P P Trifluralin : P P P : Insecticides : Chlorpyrifos : * * : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : * * Propiconazole : P * * Pyraclostrobin : * * Tebuconazole : * * Trifloxystrobin : * * --------------------------------------------------------- P Usage data are published for this active ingredient. * Usage data are not published for this active ingredient. Durum Wheat: Planted Acreage, Pesticide, Percent of Area Receiving Applications and Total Applied, Program States and Total, 2006 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : Area Receiving and Total Applied State : Planted :------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Acreage : Herbicide : Insecticide : Fungicide : Other -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 : Acres lbs lbs lbs lbs : : MT : 400 89 250 1/ ND : 1,300 97 862 1/ 1/ : Total : 1,700 95 1,112 1/ 5 6 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Insufficient reports to publish data for pesticide class. Durum Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 29 1.0 0.344 0.351 171 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 9 1.0 0.307 0.319 50 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : 17 1.1 0.042 0.046 13 Bromoxynil heptanoat : 7 1.0 0.235 0.235 28 Bromoxynil octanoate : 16 1.0 0.221 0.227 61 Clodinafop-propargil : 26 1.0 0.042 0.042 19 Clopyralid : 10 1.0 0.073 0.073 12 Dicamba : 9 1.0 0.058 0.059 9 Dicamba, digly salt : 4 1.1 0.063 0.067 5 Dicamba, dimet. salt : 10 1.0 0.105 0.109 19 Dicamba, sodium salt : 3 1.0 0.029 0.030 2 Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl : 37 1.0 0.052 0.052 33 Flucarbazone-sodium : 2 1.0 0.015 0.015 1 Fluroxypyr : 15 1.0 0.076 0.076 20 Fluroxypyr 1-MHE : 13 1.0 0.082 0.082 18 Glyphosate : 1 1.1 0.271 0.310 6 Glyphosate iso. salt : 47 1.0 0.381 0.396 319 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 34 1.0 0.268 0.274 156 MCPA, dimethyl. salt : 2 1.0 0.258 0.258 9 MCPA, isooctyl ester : 1 1.0 0.220 0.220 5 Thifensulfuron : 11 1.0 0.010 0.010 2 Triallate : 2 1.0 0.971 0.971 33 Tribenuron-methyl : 13 1.0 0.004 0.004 1 Trifluralin : 7 1.0 0.894 0.894 112 : Fungicides : Propiconazole : 5 1.0 0.056 0.056 5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for the 2 Program States was 1.7 million acres. States included are MT and ND. Durum Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Montana, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 30 1.1 0.292 0.314 37 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 20 1.1 0.235 0.253 20 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : 10 1.2 0.042 0.049 2 Bromoxynil octanoate : 9 1.2 0.221 0.264 10 Clodinafop-propargil : 29 1.0 0.038 0.038 4 Dicamba : 11 1.0 0.094 0.098 4 Dicamba, digly salt : 9 1.1 0.071 0.079 3 Dicamba, dimet. salt : 28 1.1 0.061 0.064 7 Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl : 18 1.0 0.046 0.046 3 Fluroxypyr : 5 1.0 0.105 0.105 2 Fluroxypyr 1-MHE : 3 1.0 0.084 0.084 1 Glyphosate iso. salt : 40 1.1 0.374 0.402 64 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 23 1.1 0.243 0.271 25 Thifensulfuron : 8 1.1 0.009 0.011 2/ Tribenuron-methyl : 13 1.1 0.005 0.005 2/ Trifluralin : 11 1.0 0.333 0.333 15 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for Montana was 400,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Durum Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, North Dakota, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 28 1.0 0.362 0.362 133 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 6 1.0 0.389 0.389 30 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : 19 1.1 0.042 0.045 11 Bromoxynil octanoate : 18 1.0 0.221 0.221 51 Clodinafop-propargil : 25 1.0 0.044 0.044 14 Dicamba : 8 1.0 0.043 0.043 5 Dicamba, digly salt : 3 1.0 0.056 0.056 2 Dicamba, dimet. salt : 5 1.0 0.186 0.186 12 Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl : 43 1.0 0.053 0.053 30 Flucarbazone-sodium : 3 1.0 0.015 0.015 1 Fluroxypyr : 18 1.0 0.074 0.074 17 Fluroxypyr 1-MHE : 16 1.0 0.082 0.082 17 Glyphosate iso. salt : 50 1.0 0.383 0.394 255 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 37 1.0 0.274 0.274 130 Thifensulfuron : 12 1.0 0.010 0.010 2 Tribenuron-methyl : 14 1.0 0.004 0.004 1 Trifluralin : 6 1.0 1.193 1.193 98 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for North Dakota was 1.3 million acres. Other Spring Wheat: Fertilizer Use by State, 2006 Percent of Acres Treated and Total Applied ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : Percent of Acres Treated and Total Applied State : Planted :---------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Acreage : Nitrogen : Phosphate : Potash : Sulfur ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :1,000 Acres Percent Mil. lbs. Percent Mil. lbs. Percent Mil. lbs. Percent Mil. lbs. : ID : 490 96 60.7 56 9.5 25 3.5 59 8.5 MN : 1,700 99 148.5 97 64.0 72 31.6 2 0.4 MT : 2,950 86 129.5 81 57.7 21 9.0 10 2.5 ND : 7,300 99 504.6 88 202.2 21 13.0 11 4.3 SD : 1,850 90 119.4 80 55.6 22 11.9 10 3.5 WA : 430 100 43.6 60 4.7 9 1.6 89 6.4 : Total : 14,720 95 1,006.2 85 393.7 27 70.4 13 25.7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other Spring Wheat: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2006 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Primary : Planted : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Nutrient : Acreage : Applied : cations :Application : Crop Year : Applied ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Mil. lbs : : : Idaho : 490 Nitrogen : 96 1.5 88 129 60.7 Phosphate : 56 1.1 30 34 9.5 Potash : 25 1.0 28 28 3.5 Sulfur : 59 1.2 24 30 8.5 : Minnesota : 1,700 Nitrogen : 99 1.5 61 88 148.5 Phosphate : 97 1.0 38 39 64.0 Potash : 72 1.0 25 26 31.6 Sulfur : 2 1.0 12 12 0.4 : Montana : 2,950 Nitrogen : 86 1.5 35 51 129.5 Phosphate : 81 1.0 24 24 57.7 Potash : 21 1.0 15 15 9.0 Sulfur : 10 1.0 9 9 2.5 : North Dakota : 7,300 Nitrogen : 99 1.7 42 70 504.6 Phosphate : 88 1.0 31 31 202.2 Potash : 21 1.0 8 8 13.0 Sulfur : 11 1.0 5 5 4.3 : South Dakota : 1,850 Nitrogen : 90 1.3 54 72 119.4 Phosphate : 80 1.1 35 37 55.6 Potash : 22 1.1 26 29 11.9 Sulfur : 10 1.1 18 19 3.5 : Washington : 430 Nitrogen : 100 1.6 63 101 43.6 Phosphate : 60 1.1 17 18 4.7 Potash : 9 1.1 37 41 1.6 Sulfur : 89 1.3 13 17 6.4 : Program States : 14,720 Nitrogen : 95 1.6 46 72 1,006.2 Phosphate : 85 1.0 31 32 393.7 Potash : 27 1.0 17 18 70.4 Sulfur : 13 1.1 12 13 25.7 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other Spring Wheat: Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2006 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Program States :-------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : ID : MN : MT : ND : SD : WA --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Herbicides : 2,4-D : P * * * * * 2,4-D, 2-EHE : P P P P P P P 2,4-D, BEE : * * * 2,4-D, dieth salt : P * * * 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : P * * P P P P 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : P P P * * 2,4-D, triiso. salt : P * * * 2,4-DP, dimeth. salt : * * Aminopyralid : * * Bromoxynil : P * * * * Bromoxynil heptanoat : P * P * P P P Bromoxynil octanoate : P P P P P P P Carfentrazone-ethyl : P * * * Chlorimuron-ethyl : * * Chlorsulfuron : * * Clodinafop-propargil : P P * P P * P Clopyralid : P * P P P * Clopyralid mono salt : P * * * Dicamba : P P * * Dicamba, digly salt : P * * P * * * Dicamba, dimet. salt : P * * P * P * Dicamba, sodium salt : P * P * * Diclofop-methyl : * * Difenzoquat : * * * Fenoxaprop : * * Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl : P * P P P P * Flucarbazone-sodium : P * P * P * Flufenacet : * * Fluroxypyr : P P * P P * * Fluroxypyr 1-MHE : P * P * P P * Glyphosate : P * * Glyphosate amm. salt : * * Glyphosate iso. salt : P * * P P P P Glyphosate pot. salt : * * * Imazamox : * * MCPA : P * * * * MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : P P P P P P P MCPA, dimethyl. salt : P P P * * * * MCPA, isooctyl ester : P P P Mesosulfuron-Methyl : P * * P * Metribuzin : * * Metsulfuron-methyl : P P P P P Paraquat : * * Pinoxaden : P P P P P P --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Other Spring Wheat: Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2006 (continued) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Program States :-------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : ID : MN : MT : ND : SD : WA --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Herbicides (continued) : Propoxycarbazone-sod : P * * Prosulfuron : P * * Sethoxydim : * * Sulfosate : * * Sulfosulfuron : * * Thifensulfuron : P P P P P P P Tralkoxydim : P P Triallate : P * * * Triasulfuron : P * P * Tribenuron-methyl : P P P P P P P Trifluralin : * * * : Insecticides : Bt subsp. kurstaki : * * Carbofuran : * * Chlorpyrifos : * * * Dimethoate : P * * Gamma-cyhalothrin : * * Lambda-cyhalothrin : P * * * Methyl parathion : * * Zeta-cypermethrin : * * : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : P * * P Propiconazole : P P P * P * P Pyraclostrobin : P * P * P Tebuconazole : P P * * Trifloxystrobin : P * * * : Other Chemicals : Ethephon : * * --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P Usage data are published for this active ingredient. * Usage data are not published for this active ingredient. Other Spring Wheat: Planted Acreage, Pesticide, Percent of Area Receiving Applications and Total Applied, Program States and Total, 2006 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : Area Receiving and Total Applied State : Planted :------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Acreage : Herbicide : Insecticide : Fungicide : Other -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 : Acres lbs lbs lbs lbs : : ID : 490 95 272 8 9 12 6 1/ MN : 1,700 96 952 5 12 40 45 MT : 2,950 91 2,172 1/ ND : 7,300 95 4,723 14 88 SD : 1,850 84 943 1/ 24 31 WA : 430 96 261 11 19 12 5 : Total : 14,720 93 9,323 1 40 15 175 1/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Insufficient reports to publish data for pesticide class. Other Spring Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D : 1 1.0 0.141 0.141 11 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 21 1.1 0.339 0.360 1,099 2,4-D, dieth salt : * 1.0 0.568 0.568 25 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 8 1.0 0.286 0.297 359 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : 8 1.2 0.062 0.077 88 2,4-D, triiso. salt : 1 1.0 0.372 0.376 29 Bromoxynil : * 1.0 0.276 0.276 7 Bromoxynil heptanoat : 15 1.0 0.256 0.256 547 Bromoxynil octanoate : 32 1.0 0.239 0.241 1,120 Carfentrazone-ethyl : 2 1.0 0.012 0.012 3 Clodinafop-propargil : 11 1.0 0.044 0.044 69 Clopyralid : 17 1.0 0.081 0.081 205 Clopyralid mono salt : 1 1.0 0.071 0.071 6 Dicamba : 2 1.4 0.035 0.048 17 Dicamba, digly salt : 4 1.0 0.127 0.127 82 Dicamba, dimet. salt : 5 1.1 0.093 0.099 66 Dicamba, sodium salt : 1 1.0 0.064 0.064 12 Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl : 28 1.0 0.064 0.064 269 Flucarbazone-sodium : 9 1.0 0.018 0.018 22 Fluroxypyr : 9 1.0 0.104 0.104 140 Fluroxypyr 1-MHE : 19 1.0 0.090 0.090 247 Glyphosate : 1 1.0 0.361 0.369 55 Glyphosate iso. salt : 30 1.3 0.485 0.624 2,757 MCPA : * 1.0 0.350 0.350 13 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 40 1.0 0.279 0.281 1,662 MCPA, dimethyl. salt : 2 1.0 0.415 0.415 111 MCPA, isooctyl ester : 1 1.0 0.223 0.223 28 Mesosulfuron-Methyl : 2 1.0 0.002 0.002 1 Metsulfuron-methyl : 4 1.0 0.003 0.003 2 Pinoxaden : 3 1.0 0.068 0.068 26 Propoxycarbazone-sod : 2 1.0 0.010 0.010 3 Prosulfuron : * 1.0 0.016 0.016 1 Thifensulfuron : 16 1.0 0.012 0.012 29 Tralkoxydim : * 1.0 0.159 0.159 5 Triallate : 1 1.0 0.438 0.438 36 Triasulfuron : 2 1.0 0.017 0.017 4 Tribenuron-methyl : 15 1.0 0.004 0.004 9 : Insecticides : Dimethoate : * 1.0 0.384 0.384 21 Lambda-cyhalothrin : * 1.0 0.023 0.023 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Other Spring Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2006 1/ (continued) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 1 1.0 0.032 0.032 5 Propiconazole : 7 1.0 0.068 0.069 68 Pyraclostrobin : 7 1.0 0.055 0.055 55 Tebuconazole : 2 1.0 0.097 0.101 32 Trifloxystrobin : 2 1.0 0.074 0.074 17 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Area applied is less than 0.5 percent. 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for the 6 Program States was 14.7 million acres. States included are ID, MN, MT, ND, SD, and WA. Other Spring Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Idaho, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 14 1.0 0.459 0.459 32 Bromoxynil octanoate : 37 1.0 0.277 0.277 50 Clodinafop-propargil : 32 1.0 0.047 0.047 7 Fluroxypyr : 27 1.0 0.142 0.142 19 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 59 1.0 0.312 0.312 90 MCPA, dimethyl. salt : 5 1.0 0.542 0.542 13 Metsulfuron-methyl : 5 1.0 0.002 0.002 2/ Pinoxaden : 7 1.0 0.053 0.053 2 Thifensulfuron : 26 1.0 0.013 0.013 2 Tralkoxydim : 6 1.0 0.159 0.159 5 Tribenuron-methyl : 27 1.0 0.005 0.005 1 : Fungicides : Propiconazole : 9 1.0 0.079 0.079 4 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for Idaho was 490,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Other Spring Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Minnesota, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 10 1.0 0.381 0.381 64 Bromoxynil heptanoat : 36 1.0 0.235 0.235 144 Bromoxynil octanoate : 65 1.0 0.232 0.232 257 Clopyralid : 8 1.0 0.080 0.080 10 Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl : 29 1.0 0.075 0.075 37 Flucarbazone-sodium : 13 1.0 0.021 0.021 5 Fluroxypyr 1-MHE : 7 1.0 0.087 0.087 11 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 72 1.0 0.254 0.254 310 MCPA, dimethyl. salt : 4 1.0 0.388 0.388 27 Pinoxaden : 6 1.0 0.088 0.088 9 Thifensulfuron : 11 1.0 0.011 0.011 2 Tribenuron-methyl : 9 1.0 0.004 0.004 1 : Fungicides : Propiconazole : 9 1.1 0.065 0.074 11 Pyraclostrobin : 24 1.0 0.052 0.052 21 Tebuconazole : 9 1.0 0.085 0.085 13 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for Minnesota was 1.7 million acres. Other Spring Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Montana, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 47 1.1 0.310 0.351 488 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 13 1.1 0.280 0.309 123 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : 8 2.0 0.061 0.122 28 Bromoxynil octanoate : 16 1.0 0.225 0.225 109 Clodinafop-propargil : 23 1.0 0.038 0.038 26 Dicamba : 10 1.5 0.035 0.051 15 Dicamba, digly salt : 17 1.0 0.083 0.083 42 Dicamba, dimet. salt : 7 1.2 0.070 0.083 17 Dicamba, sodium salt : 6 1.0 0.066 0.066 12 Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl : 7 1.0 0.035 0.035 7 Fluroxypyr : 7 1.0 0.053 0.053 11 Glyphosate iso. salt : 43 1.7 0.430 0.738 945 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 13 1.0 0.247 0.247 94 MCPA, isooctyl ester : 3 1.0 0.234 0.234 21 Metsulfuron-methyl : 11 1.0 0.003 0.003 1 Pinoxaden : 1 1.0 0.062 0.062 2 Thifensulfuron : 12 1.0 0.011 0.011 4 Triasulfuron : 8 1.0 0.017 0.017 4 Tribenuron-methyl : 14 1.0 0.005 0.005 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for Montana was 3.0 million acres. Other Spring Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, North Dakota, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 16 1.0 0.365 0.365 416 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 7 1.0 0.183 0.183 88 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : 11 1.0 0.060 0.063 52 Bromoxynil heptanoat : 14 1.0 0.256 0.256 260 Bromoxynil octanoate : 29 1.0 0.232 0.232 490 Clodinafop-propargil : 9 1.0 0.047 0.047 31 Clopyralid : 31 1.0 0.082 0.082 185 Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl : 45 1.0 0.065 0.065 213 Flucarbazone-sodium : 13 1.0 0.017 0.017 16 Fluroxypyr : 11 1.0 0.123 0.123 97 Fluroxypyr 1-MHE : 34 1.0 0.090 0.090 221 Glyphosate iso. salt : 37 1.1 0.518 0.576 1,572 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 44 1.0 0.292 0.292 933 Mesosulfuron-Methyl : 4 1.0 0.002 0.002 1 Pinoxaden : 3 1.0 0.063 0.063 12 Thifensulfuron : 19 1.0 0.012 0.012 17 Tribenuron-methyl : 16 1.0 0.004 0.004 4 : Fungicides : Propiconazole : 10 1.0 0.068 0.068 48 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for North Dakota was 7.3 million acres. Other Spring Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, South Dakota, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 14 1.0 0.323 0.323 82 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 10 1.0 0.388 0.399 74 Bromoxynil heptanoat : 22 1.0 0.291 0.291 120 Bromoxynil octanoate : 34 1.1 0.274 0.291 181 Clopyralid : 6 1.0 0.077 0.077 8 Dicamba, dimet. salt : 8 1.0 0.173 0.173 26 Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl : 8 1.3 0.053 0.067 10 Fluroxypyr 1-MHE : 8 1.0 0.094 0.094 14 Glyphosate iso. salt : 15 1.1 0.574 0.624 169 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 38 1.1 0.271 0.286 201 Metsulfuron-methyl : 7 1.0 0.003 0.003 2/ Thifensulfuron : 10 1.0 0.012 0.012 2 Tribenuron-methyl : 10 1.0 0.006 0.006 1 : Fungicides : Pyraclostrobin : 20 1.0 0.059 0.060 22 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for South Dakota was 1.9 million acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Other Spring Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Washington, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 9 1.1 0.417 0.456 17 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 26 1.0 0.523 0.523 58 Bromoxynil heptanoat : 8 1.0 0.279 0.279 9 Bromoxynil octanoate : 31 1.0 0.243 0.243 32 Clodinafop-propargil : 19 1.0 0.052 0.052 4 Glyphosate iso. salt : 18 1.3 0.452 0.577 45 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 31 1.0 0.253 0.253 34 MCPA, isooctyl ester : 8 1.0 0.196 0.196 7 Metsulfuron-methyl : 15 1.0 0.004 0.004 2/ Pinoxaden : 6 1.0 0.049 0.049 1 Thifensulfuron : 37 1.0 0.013 0.013 2 Tribenuron-methyl : 37 1.0 0.005 0.005 1 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 7 1.0 0.036 0.036 1 Propiconazole : 12 1.0 0.075 0.075 4 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for Washington was 430,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. This page intentionally left blank. Winter Wheat: Fertilizer Use by State, 2006 Percent of Acres Treated and Total Applied ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : Percent of Acres Treated and Total Applied State : Planted :---------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Acreage : Nitrogen : Phosphate : Potash : Sulfur ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :1,000 Acres Percent Mil. lbs. Percent Mil. lbs. Percent Mil. lbs. Percent Mil. lbs. : CO : 2,150 54 36.8 36 13.5 1/ 4 0.7 ID : 750 93 80.9 66 13.7 16 2.2 63 9.6 IL : 930 93 82.1 76 49.8 76 68.4 3 0.5 KS : 9,800 88 493.0 66 197.5 8 29.0 5 5.3 MI : 660 98 57.6 74 22.2 85 33.9 37 3.0 MO : 1,000 97 90.7 73 35.5 74 44.8 12 1.8 MT : 1,950 87 96.8 84 46.2 31 9.9 12 2.0 NE : 1,800 75 73.3 57 34.0 4 1.4 13 1.9 OH : 990 98 86.2 84 53.0 82 57.5 23 7.2 OK : 5,700 89 283.4 65 130.9 8 9.8 1/ OR : 760 95 46.2 12 2.8 10 1.4 48 4.9 SD : 1,450 82 78.7 57 28.1 15 4.7 12 1.1 TX : 5,550 44 152.1 29 47.3 8 20.8 11 5.3 WA : 1,850 99 140.8 36 12.0 10 3.5 71 18.0 : Total : 35,340 80 1,798.6 57 686.5 17 288.5 14 66.4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Insufficient reports to publish data for the fertilizer primary nutrient. Winter Wheat: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2006 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Primary : Planted : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Nutrient : Acreage : Applied : cations :Application : Crop Year : Applied ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Mil. lbs : : : Colorado : 2,150 Nitrogen : 54 1.3 24 31 36.8 Phosphate : 36 1.2 15 17 13.5 Potash 1/ : Sulfur : 4 1.4 7 10 0.7 : Idaho : 750 Nitrogen : 93 1.7 69 116 80.9 Phosphate : 66 1.1 26 28 13.7 Potash : 16 1.0 18 18 2.2 Sulfur : 63 1.3 15 20 9.6 : Illinois : 930 Nitrogen : 93 1.7 56 95 82.1 Phosphate : 76 1.0 70 71 49.8 Potash : 76 1.0 95 97 68.4 Sulfur : 3 1.2 14 16 0.5 : Kansas : 9,800 Nitrogen : 88 1.6 36 57 493.0 Phosphate : 66 1.0 30 31 197.5 Potash : 8 1.0 35 36 29.0 Sulfur : 5 1.3 10 12 5.3 : Michigan : 660 Nitrogen : 98 2.0 46 89 57.6 Phosphate : 74 1.0 44 46 22.2 Potash : 85 1.0 59 61 33.9 Sulfur : 37 1.3 10 12 3.0 : Missouri : 1,000 Nitrogen : 97 1.7 54 94 90.7 Phosphate : 73 1.0 48 49 35.5 Potash : 74 1.0 58 60 44.8 Sulfur : 12 1.5 10 15 1.8 : Montana : 1,950 Nitrogen : 87 1.6 36 57 96.8 Phosphate : 84 1.0 28 28 46.2 Potash : 31 1.0 16 16 9.9 Sulfur : 12 1.0 8 8 2.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Winter Wheat: Fertilizer Primary Nutrient Applications, Program States and Total, 2006 (continued) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Primary : Planted : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Nutrient : Acreage : Applied : cations :Application : Crop Year : Applied ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :1,000 Acres Percent Number Pounds per Acre Mil. lbs : : : Nebraska : 1,800 Nitrogen : 75 1.6 35 54 73.3 Phosphate : 57 1.0 33 33 34.0 Potash : 4 2.0 9 18 1.4 Sulfur : 13 1.4 6 8 1.9 : Ohio : 990 Nitrogen : 98 2.0 44 89 86.2 Phosphate : 84 1.0 61 64 53.0 Potash : 82 1.0 69 71 57.5 Sulfur : 23 1.3 23 32 7.2 : Oklahoma : 5,700 Nitrogen : 89 1.5 37 56 283.4 Phosphate : 65 1.1 33 35 130.9 Potash : 8 1.1 21 23 9.8 Sulfur 1/ : : Oregon : 760 Nitrogen : 95 1.2 52 64 46.2 Phosphate : 12 1.1 27 29 2.8 Potash : 10 1.0 18 19 1.4 Sulfur : 48 1.0 13 13 4.9 : South Dakota : 1,450 Nitrogen : 82 1.5 43 66 78.7 Phosphate : 57 1.1 31 34 28.1 Potash : 15 1.0 21 22 4.7 Sulfur : 12 1.3 5 6 1.1 : Texas : 5,550 Nitrogen : 44 1.3 48 62 152.1 Phosphate : 29 1.0 29 30 47.3 Potash : 8 1.3 36 48 20.8 Sulfur : 11 1.0 9 9 5.3 : Washington : 1,850 Nitrogen : 99 1.3 57 77 140.8 Phosphate : 36 1.0 17 18 12.0 Potash : 10 1.1 17 19 3.5 Sulfur : 71 1.2 12 14 18.0 : Program States : 35,340 Nitrogen : 80 1.5 41 64 1,798.6 Phosphate : 57 1.0 33 34 686.5 Potash : 17 1.1 46 49 288.5 Sulfur : 14 1.2 11 14 66.4 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Insufficient reports to publish fertilizer data. Winter Wheat: Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2006 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Program States :----------------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : CO : ID : IL : KS : MI : MO : MT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D : * * 2,4-D, 2-EHE : P P P P P P * P 2,4-D, BEE : * * 2,4-D, dieth salt : * 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : P P P P P P P P 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : P * * * P 2,4-D, triiso. salt : * * 2,4-DP, dimeth. salt : * * Aminopyralid : * * Atrazine : P P Bromoxynil : * Bromoxynil heptanoat : P P * * Bromoxynil octanoate : P * P * P Carfentrazone-ethyl : P * * * * Chlorsulfuron : P P P Clodinafop-propargil : P P P Clopyralid : P * * * Clopyralid mono salt : * * Dicamba : P * * P Dicamba, Pot. salt : * * Dicamba, digly salt : P * * * * P Dicamba, dimet. salt : P P * * * * P Dicamba, iso salt : * * * Dicamba, sodium salt : P * * P P Dimethenamid : * Diuron : * * Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl : P * * Flucarbazone-sodium : P * * Flufenacet : P Fluroxypyr : P P Fluroxypyr 1-MHE : P * * * Glufosinate-ammonium : * * Glyphosate : * * Glyphosate amm. salt : * * Glyphosate iso. salt : P P P * P * * P Glyphosate pot. salt : * * Imazamox : P * * * MCPA : P * MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : P P * * * P MCPA, dimethyl. salt : P * * * MCPA, isooctyl ester : * * Mesosulfuron-Methyl : P P * Metribuzin : P * Metsulfuron-methyl : P P P P P ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Winter Wheat: Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2006 (continued) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Program States :-------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : NE : OH : OK : OR : SD : TX : WA --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Herbicides : 2,4-D : * * 2,4-D, 2-EHE : P P * P P P P 2,4-D, BEE : * * 2,4-D, dieth salt : * * 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : P P P P P P P 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : * * P P * * 2,4-D, triiso. salt : 2,4-DP, dimeth. salt : Aminopyralid : * Atrazine : Bromoxynil : * * Bromoxynil heptanoat : * P P Bromoxynil octanoate : P P P Carfentrazone-ethyl : * * * * Chlorsulfuron : * P P * Clodinafop-propargil : P Clopyralid : * * P * Clopyralid mono salt : Dicamba : P Dicamba, Pot. salt : Dicamba, digly salt : * * * * Dicamba, dimet. salt : P * * P * * * Dicamba, iso salt : * Dicamba, sodium salt : * * * * * Dimethenamid : * Diuron : Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl : * * Flucarbazone-sodium : * Flufenacet : P Fluroxypyr : * * P Fluroxypyr 1-MHE : * P Glufosinate-ammonium : Glyphosate : * Glyphosate amm. salt : Glyphosate iso. salt : P P P P P P Glyphosate pot. salt : Imazamox : P P MCPA : * MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : * P P P MCPA, dimethyl. salt : * * P MCPA, isooctyl ester : Mesosulfuron-Methyl : * P P Metribuzin : P * Metsulfuron-methyl : P * P P * P --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Winter Wheat: Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2006 (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Program States :----------------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : ALL : CO : ID : IL : KS : MI : MO : MT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides (continued) : Paraquat : * * Picloram, K salt : * * * Pinoxaden : * * * Propoxycarbazone-sod : P * * * Prosulfuron : P P * P Quizalofop-P-ethyl : * * Sulfosulfuron : P * P Thifensulfuron : P P P P P P P P Tralkoxydim : * * Triallate : * * Triasulfuron : P P * P P Tribenuron-methyl : P P P P P P P P : Insecticides : Carbofuran : * * Chlorpyrifos : P * * * * Cyfluthrin : * * Dimethoate : P * * Disulfoton : * * Endosulfan : * Esfenvalerate : * * Gamma-cyhalothrin : * * Lambda-cyhalothrin : P * * * Malathion : * Methyl parathion : * Zeta-cypermethrin : P * * * : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : P * P * * Propiconazole : P * P P * * Pyraclostrobin : P * * P * * Tebuconazole : P * P Thiophanate-methyl : * Trifloxystrobin : P * * * ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Winter Wheat: Active Ingredients and Publication Status By Program States, 2006 (continued) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Program States :-------------------------------------------------------------- Active Ingredient : NE : OH : OK : OR : SD : TX : WA --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Herbicides (continued) : Paraquat : Picloram, K salt : * Pinoxaden : Propoxycarbazone-sod : P P P Prosulfuron : * * * P Quizalofop-P-ethyl : Sulfosulfuron : * P P Thifensulfuron : P P * P P * P Tralkoxydim : * Triallate : Triasulfuron : P * * * P Tribenuron-methyl : P P * P P * P : Insecticides : Carbofuran : Chlorpyrifos : * P * Cyfluthrin : * Dimethoate : * * * Disulfoton : * * Endosulfan : * Esfenvalerate : Gamma-cyhalothrin : * Lambda-cyhalothrin : * Malathion : * Methyl parathion : * Zeta-cypermethrin : * * : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : * * * * * Propiconazole : * * P P P Pyraclostrobin : * * * P Tebuconazole : * Thiophanate-methyl : * Trifloxystrobin : * * --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P Usage data are published for this active ingredient. * Usage data are not published for this active ingredient. Winter Wheat: Planted Acreage, Pesticide, Percent of Area Receiving Applications and Total Applied, Program States and Total, 2006 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : : Area Receiving and Total Applied State : Planted :------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Acreage : Herbicide : Insecticide : Fungicide : Other -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 Percent 1,000 : Acres lbs lbs lbs lbs : : CO : 2,150 54 1,018 1/ ID : 750 84 349 1/ 5 3 IL : 930 46 62 1/ 6 7 KS : 9,800 53 2,600 1/ MI : 660 71 148 3 2/ 23 17 MO : 1,000 28 49 12 12 6 10 MT : 1,950 92 2,315 1/ 1/ NE : 1,800 56 399 4 8 OH : 990 44 93 1/ 1/ OK : 5,700 20 495 7 138 OR : 760 87 366 1/ 3 3 SD : 1,450 74 749 1/ 21 27 TX : 5,550 22 1,299 4 92 WA : 1,850 94 1,077 1/ 2 5 : Total : 35,340 49 11,019 3 315 2 86 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Insufficient reports to publish data for pesticide class. 2/ Total applied is less than 50 pounds. Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 14 1.2 0.354 0.440 2,128 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 9 1.3 0.365 0.474 1,553 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : 3 2.0 0.058 0.117 104 Atrazine : * 1.0 0.676 0.676 55 Bromoxynil heptanoat : 1 1.0 0.268 0.268 116 Bromoxynil octanoate : 3 1.0 0.256 0.256 295 Carfentrazone-ethyl : 1 1.1 0.011 0.012 3 Chlorsulfuron : 6 1.0 0.010 0.010 22 Clodinafop-propargil : 1 1.0 0.031 0.031 6 Clopyralid : * 1.0 0.079 0.079 12 Dicamba : 1 1.4 0.074 0.102 29 Dicamba, digly salt : 1 1.0 0.103 0.103 55 Dicamba, dimet. salt : 4 1.3 0.229 0.302 399 Dicamba, sodium salt : 2 1.1 0.080 0.088 65 Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl : * 1.0 0.079 0.079 5 Flucarbazone-sodium : * 1.0 0.022 0.022 1 Flufenacet : * 1.0 0.334 0.334 3 Fluroxypyr : * 1.0 0.129 0.129 13 Fluroxypyr 1-MHE : * 1.0 0.086 0.086 12 Glyphosate iso. salt : 15 1.9 0.495 0.963 5,078 Imazamox : 1 1.0 0.036 0.036 7 MCPA : * 1.0 0.283 0.283 25 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 4 1.0 0.304 0.304 455 MCPA, dimethyl. salt : 1 1.0 0.332 0.332 69 Mesosulfuron-Methyl : 2 1.0 0.008 0.008 5 Metribuzin : 1 1.0 0.174 0.174 37 Metsulfuron-methyl : 14 1.0 0.002 0.002 12 Propoxycarbazone-sod : 2 1.0 0.024 0.025 21 Prosulfuron : 1 1.0 0.014 0.014 4 Sulfosulfuron : 2 1.0 0.030 0.030 17 Thifensulfuron : 12 1.0 0.009 0.009 39 Triasulfuron : 4 1.0 0.014 0.014 19 Tribenuron-methyl : 12 1.0 0.004 0.004 18 : Insecticides : Chlorpyrifos : 2 1.0 0.378 0.378 209 Dimethoate : * 1.0 0.283 0.283 41 Lambda-cyhalothrin : * 1.0 0.017 0.017 2 Zeta-cypermethrin : * 1.0 0.022 0.022 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Program States, 2006 1/ (continued) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 1 1.0 0.054 0.055 10 Propiconazole : 1 1.0 0.080 0.082 30 Pyraclostrobin : 1 1.1 0.072 0.078 34 Tebuconazole : * 1.0 0.106 0.106 9 Trifloxystrobin : * 1.0 0.065 0.066 3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Area applied is less than 0.5 percent. 1/ Harvested acreage in 2006 for the 14 Program States was 35.3 million acres. States included are CO, ID, IL, KS, MI, MO, MT, NE, OH, OK, OR, SD, TX, and WA. Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Colorado, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 16 1.5 0.207 0.319 112 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 27 1.4 0.249 0.337 196 Atrazine : 4 1.0 0.676 0.676 55 Dicamba, dimet. salt : 15 2.0 0.076 0.150 49 Glyphosate iso. salt : 23 2.2 0.514 1.114 553 Metsulfuron-methyl : 15 1.1 0.003 0.003 1 Thifensulfuron : 10 1.0 0.004 0.004 1 Triasulfuron : 7 1.0 0.013 0.013 2 Tribenuron-methyl : 10 1.0 0.002 0.002 2/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Harvested acreage in 2006 for Colorado was 2.2 million acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Idaho, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 15 1.0 0.465 0.465 51 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 8 1.1 0.496 0.551 32 Bromoxynil heptanoat : 10 1.0 0.291 0.291 22 Bromoxynil octanoate : 24 1.0 0.265 0.265 48 Clodinafop-propargil : 6 1.0 0.023 0.023 1 Fluroxypyr : 8 1.0 0.123 0.123 7 Glyphosate iso. salt : 6 1.0 0.386 0.386 16 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 45 1.0 0.333 0.333 112 Mesosulfuron-Methyl : 15 1.0 0.011 0.011 1 Metsulfuron-methyl : 16 1.0 0.003 0.003 2/ Prosulfuron : 6 1.0 0.015 0.015 1 Thifensulfuron : 36 1.0 0.012 0.012 3 Tribenuron-methyl : 38 1.0 0.004 0.004 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Harvested acreage in 2006 for Idaho was 750,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Illinois, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 3 1.4 0.303 0.425 12 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 4 1.0 0.503 0.503 17 Thifensulfuron : 41 1.0 0.015 0.016 6 Tribenuron-methyl : 39 1.0 0.007 0.008 3 : Fungicides : Propiconazole : 2 1.0 0.110 0.110 3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Harvested acreage in 2006 for Illinois was 930,000 acres. Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Kansas, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 10 1.3 0.340 0.450 434 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 9 1.3 0.418 0.560 480 Chlorsulfuron : 16 1.0 0.011 0.011 18 Dicamba, sodium salt : 5 1.0 0.091 0.091 47 Glyphosate iso. salt : 14 1.7 0.519 0.892 1,207 Metsulfuron-methyl : 25 1.0 0.002 0.002 6 Thifensulfuron : 12 1.0 0.005 0.005 6 Triasulfuron : 6 1.0 0.014 0.014 8 Tribenuron-methyl : 12 1.0 0.003 0.003 3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Harvested acreage in 2006 for Kansas was 9.8 million acres. Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Michigan, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 23 1.0 0.438 0.438 67 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 11 1.0 0.585 0.585 41 Prosulfuron : 2 1.0 0.016 0.016 2/ Thifensulfuron : 29 1.0 0.017 0.017 3 Tribenuron-methyl : 29 1.0 0.006 0.006 1 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 3 1.0 0.043 0.043 1 Propiconazole : 10 1.0 0.078 0.078 5 Pyraclostrobin : 8 1.0 0.082 0.082 4 Tebuconazole : 9 1.0 0.106 0.106 6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Harvested acreage in 2006 for Michigan was 660,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Missouri, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 3 1.0 0.588 0.588 18 Thifensulfuron : 19 1.0 0.017 0.017 3 Tribenuron-methyl : 16 1.0 0.008 0.008 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Harvested acreage in 2006 for Missouri was 1.0 million acres. Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Montana, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 54 1.5 0.321 0.467 491 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 10 1.1 0.254 0.285 53 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : 17 2.4 0.050 0.121 39 Bromoxynil octanoate : 11 1.0 0.214 0.214 47 Chlorsulfuron : 5 1.0 0.006 0.006 1 Clodinafop-propargil : 6 1.0 0.035 0.035 4 Dicamba : 5 1.0 0.060 0.060 6 Dicamba, digly salt : 8 1.0 0.097 0.097 16 Dicamba, dimet. salt : 8 1.3 0.084 0.112 18 Dicamba, sodium salt : 4 1.1 0.081 0.093 7 Glyphosate iso. salt : 63 2.7 0.417 1.131 1,379 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 8 1.0 0.274 0.274 42 Metsulfuron-methyl : 24 1.0 0.002 0.002 1 Sulfosulfuron : 9 1.0 0.032 0.032 6 Thifensulfuron : 19 1.0 0.006 0.006 2 Triasulfuron : 8 1.2 0.010 0.012 2 Tribenuron-methyl : 22 1.0 0.004 0.004 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Harvested acreage in 2006 for Montana was 2.0 million acres. Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Nebraska, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 16 1.3 0.219 0.283 80 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 13 1.0 0.343 0.343 79 Dicamba, dimet. salt : 3 1.0 0.071 0.071 4 Glyphosate iso. salt : 10 1.5 0.809 1.241 220 Metsulfuron-methyl : 26 1.0 0.003 0.003 1 Thifensulfuron : 17 1.0 0.006 0.006 2 Triasulfuron : 11 1.0 0.014 0.014 3 Tribenuron-methyl : 17 1.0 0.003 0.003 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Harvested acreage in 2006 for Nebraska was 1.8 million acres. Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Ohio, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 9 1.0 0.340 0.340 31 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 11 1.0 0.352 0.352 40 Thifensulfuron : 17 1.0 0.016 0.016 3 Tribenuron-methyl : 22 1.0 0.009 0.009 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Harvested acreage in 2006 for Ohio was 990,000 acres. Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Oklahoma, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 6 1.2 0.443 0.520 187 Chlorsulfuron : 7 1.0 0.006 0.006 2 Glyphosate iso. salt : 6 1.4 0.469 0.640 230 : Insecticides : Chlorpyrifos : 6 1.0 0.399 0.399 136 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Harvested acreage in 2006 for Oklahoma was 5.7 million acres. Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Oregon, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 47 1.0 0.424 0.442 159 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 16 1.0 0.303 0.303 37 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : 2 1.0 0.060 0.060 1 Bromoxynil octanoate : 5 1.0 0.290 0.290 10 Chlorsulfuron : 5 1.0 0.008 0.008 2/ Dicamba : 9 1.0 0.047 0.047 3 Dicamba, dimet. salt : 6 1.0 0.080 0.080 4 Flufenacet : 1 1.0 0.334 0.334 3 Glyphosate iso. salt : 15 1.2 0.530 0.651 76 Imazamox : 5 1.0 0.035 0.035 1 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 8 1.0 0.348 0.348 22 Metribuzin : 12 1.0 0.229 0.229 20 Metsulfuron-methyl : 37 1.1 0.003 0.003 1 Propoxycarbazone-sod : 14 1.1 0.032 0.036 4 Sulfosulfuron : 3 1.0 0.025 0.025 1 Thifensulfuron : 41 1.0 0.008 0.008 3 Tribenuron-methyl : 41 1.0 0.004 0.004 1 : Fungicides : Propiconazole : 2 1.0 0.067 0.069 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Harvested acreage in 2006 for Oregon was 760,000 acres. 2/ Total applied is less than 500 lbs. Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, South Dakota, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 22 1.2 0.348 0.407 129 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 12 1.2 0.412 0.474 85 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : 7 1.8 0.053 0.096 9 Bromoxynil heptanoat : 12 1.0 0.290 0.290 49 Bromoxynil octanoate : 19 1.0 0.267 0.267 74 Clopyralid : 3 1.0 0.100 0.100 4 Fluroxypyr 1-MHE : 4 1.0 0.094 0.094 6 Glyphosate iso. salt : 27 1.5 0.487 0.725 289 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 20 1.0 0.262 0.262 77 Mesosulfuron-Methyl : 6 1.0 0.008 0.008 1 Metsulfuron-methyl : 13 1.0 0.003 0.004 1 Propoxycarbazone-sod : 6 1.0 0.013 0.013 1 Thifensulfuron : 17 1.0 0.010 0.010 3 Tribenuron-methyl : 14 1.0 0.004 0.004 1 : Fungicides : Propiconazole : 7 1.0 0.060 0.062 6 Pyraclostrobin : 16 1.1 0.063 0.070 17 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Harvested acreage in 2006 for South Dakota was 1.5 million acres. Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Texas, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 5 1.0 0.806 0.806 204 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 4 2.8 0.267 0.760 151 Glyphosate iso. salt : 15 1.9 0.564 1.091 906 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Harvested acreage in 2006 for Texas was 5.6 million acres. Winter Wheat: Agricultural Chemical Applications, Washington, 2006 1/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Active : Area : Appli- : Rate per : Rate per : Total Ingredient : Applied : cations : Application : Crop Year : Applied ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent Number Pounds per Acre 1,000 lbs : : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 33 1.0 0.469 0.481 296 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 14 1.0 0.539 0.539 135 Bromoxynil heptanoat : 4 1.0 0.283 0.283 23 Bromoxynil octanoate : 23 1.0 0.263 0.263 113 Clodinafop-propargil : 2 1.0 0.028 0.028 1 Fluroxypyr : 2 1.0 0.146 0.146 4 Glyphosate iso. salt : 12 1.6 0.466 0.729 162 Imazamox : 7 1.0 0.039 0.039 5 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 31 1.0 0.304 0.306 174 MCPA, dimethyl. salt : 4 1.0 0.372 0.372 26 Mesosulfuron-Methyl : 20 1.0 0.007 0.007 3 Metsulfuron-methyl : 10 1.0 0.003 0.003 1 Propoxycarbazone-sod : 18 1.0 0.014 0.014 5 Prosulfuron : 4 1.0 0.011 0.011 1 Sulfosulfuron : 11 1.0 0.029 0.029 6 Thifensulfuron : 18 1.0 0.012 0.012 4 Triasulfuron : 8 1.0 0.018 0.018 3 Tribenuron-methyl : 17 1.0 0.005 0.005 1 : Fungicides : Propiconazole : 2 1.1 0.094 0.104 4 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ Harvested acreage in 2006 for Washington was 1.9 million acres. This page intentionally left blank. Distribution Tables - Highlights The following distribution tables provide details about the distribution of agricultural chemical active ingredients commonly applied to the selected field. Chemical distribution rates are listed by active ingredient for the Percent of Acres Treated, Number of Applications, Rate per Application, and Rate per Crop year. In order for an active ingredient to be published in these tables, at least 30 farm operators reported an application of the active ingredient on the specified crop. The data in each table are summarized for a specific group of States, called Program States. The Program States designation is specific for each crop and provided in tables within the publication (See page 3). These distribution tables show the 10th percentile, median, 90th percentile, mean, and coefficient of variation (cv) of the reported rates. The 10th percentile is the value below which 10 percent of all application rates fall. Thus, only 10 percent of operators reported an application rate for the active ingredient on the specified crop that was lower than the 10th percentile value. Likewise, the 90th percentile is a value for which 90 percent of all applications were at rates lower than this value. The median is the midpoint of the distribution with half of the reported application rates higher and half lower than the median value. The mean is the weighted average calculated by summing the application rate multiplied by the acres applied and then dividing by the acres applied. The cv is a relative measure of the variability, expressed as a percentage of the estimate. For a specific commodity, the States have different agricultural practices which can lead to a wide range of pesticide usage rates. These ranges can lead to higher cv rates for different active ingredients. Some active ingredients are only applied in one manner resulting in smaller cv=s, while other active ingredients have more varied agricultural uses which will have larger cv=s. Please see the Survey and Estimation Procedures and Reliability sections for more information. The Number of Applications, Rate per Application, and Rate per Crop Year distribution tables are calculated using data only from reports where the farm operator applied the active ingredient. Data presented in the Percent of Acres Treated table account for all operations in the sample producing the target commodity, whether or not the listed active ingredient was applied. Rice: Percent of Acres Treated Distribution, Program States, 2006 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 0 0 100 12 11 Acifluorfen, sodium : 0 0 0 4 22 Bensulfuron-methyl : 0 0 100 14 11 Bispyribac-sodium : 0 0 0 8 17 Carfentrazone-ethyl : 0 0 100 13 13 Clomazone : 0 99 100 50 3 Cyhalofop-butyl : 0 0 100 14 12 Glyphosate iso. salt : 0 0 100 23 6 Halosulfuron : 0 0 100 18 8 Imazethapyr : 0 0 100 23 6 Molinate : 0 0 0 4 18 Pendimethalin : 0 0 0 3 21 Propanil : 0 0 100 46 4 Quinclorac : 0 0 100 24 8 Triclopyr : 0 0 100 21 7 : Insecticides : Lambda-cyhalothrin : 0 0 0 9 12 Methyl parathion : 0 0 0 4 16 Zeta-cypermethrin : 0 0 0 6 17 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 0 0 100 27 6 Copper sulfate : 0 0 0 7 10 Propiconazole : 0 0 100 19 7 Trifloxystrobin : 0 0 0 9 14 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for the 6 Program States was 2.8 million acres. Rice: Number of Applications Distribution, Program States, 2006 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 7.0 Acifluorfen, sodium : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 Bensulfuron-methyl : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Bispyribac-sodium : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Carfentrazone-ethyl : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 Clomazone : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Cyhalofop-butyl : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 2.0 Glyphosate iso. salt : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.2 4.0 Halosulfuron : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 Imazethapyr : 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.7 4.0 Molinate : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Pendimethalin : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Propanil : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 2.0 Quinclorac : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 2.0 Triclopyr : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 : Insecticides : Lambda-cyhalothrin : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 3.0 Methyl parathion : 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.9 15.0 Zeta-cypermethrin : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.2 6.0 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 5.0 Copper sulfate : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Propiconazole : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Trifloxystrobin : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for the 6 Program States was 2.8 million acres. Rice: Rate Per Application Distribution, Program States, 2006 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 0.297 0.789 1.175 0.772 7 Acifluorfen, sodium : 0.125 0.250 0.260 0.220 4 Bensulfuron-methyl : 0.017 0.030 0.047 0.030 5 Bispyribac-sodium : 0.010 0.025 0.034 0.026 7 Carfentrazone-ethyl : 0.008 0.019 0.080 0.034 23 Clomazone : 0.234 0.375 0.625 0.427 3 Cyhalofop-butyl : 0.223 0.274 0.279 0.261 1 Glyphosate iso. salt : 0.492 0.750 1.125 0.773 3 Halosulfuron : 0.015 0.029 0.047 0.029 4 Imazethapyr : 0.047 0.063 0.094 0.068 3 Molinate : 1.500 3.000 4.950 3.114 8 Pendimethalin : 0.500 0.875 1.000 0.847 6 Propanil : 1.000 3.000 5.000 3.194 3 Quinclorac : 0.155 0.248 0.375 0.280 5 Triclopyr : 0.094 0.188 0.375 0.208 4 : Insecticides : Lambda-cyhalothrin : 0.013 0.020 0.033 0.023 6 Methyl parathion : 0.250 0.500 0.760 0.467 10 Zeta-cypermethrin : 0.007 0.023 0.047 0.024 7 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 0.066 0.138 0.228 0.140 5 Copper sulfate : 2.520 3.780 3.780 3.386 5 Propiconazole : 0.056 0.114 0.163 0.118 4 Trifloxystrobin : 0.098 0.130 0.138 0.117 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for the 6 Program States was 2.8 million acres. Rice: Rate per Crop Year Distribution, Program States, 2006 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 0.229 0.789 1.410 0.863 12 Acifluorfen, sodium : 0.125 0.250 0.281 0.227 4 Bensulfuron-methyl : 0.017 0.030 0.047 0.031 4 Bispyribac-sodium : 0.010 0.025 0.034 0.026 7 Carfentrazone-ethyl : 0.008 0.019 0.100 0.035 23 Clomazone : 0.234 0.375 0.625 0.437 3 Cyhalofop-butyl : 0.223 0.279 0.298 0.277 3 Glyphosate iso. salt : 0.500 0.750 1.500 0.959 5 Halosulfuron : 0.015 0.028 0.047 0.030 5 Imazethapyr : 0.063 0.125 0.188 0.118 5 Molinate : 1.500 3.000 4.950 3.131 8 Pendimethalin : 0.500 0.875 1.000 0.847 6 Propanil : 1.000 3.300 5.673 3.445 4 Quinclorac : 0.188 0.300 0.375 0.295 5 Triclopyr : 0.094 0.188 0.375 0.218 6 : Insecticides : Lambda-cyhalothrin : 0.013 0.020 0.037 0.025 8 Methyl parathion : 0.125 0.500 2.000 0.908 23 Zeta-cypermethrin : 0.008 0.025 0.050 0.029 9 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 0.068 0.145 0.228 0.153 8 Copper sulfate : 2.520 3.780 3.780 3.398 5 Propiconazole : 0.056 0.114 0.163 0.118 4 Trifloxystrobin : 0.098 0.130 0.138 0.118 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for the 6 Program States was 2.8 million acres. Soybeans: Percent of Acres Treated Distribution, Program States, 2006 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 0 0 0 7 8 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 0 0 0 3 16 Chlorimuron-ethyl : 0 0 0 4 10 Clethodim : 0 0 0 3 15 Cloransulam-methyl : 0 0 0 1 17 Flumioxazin : 0 0 0 3 15 Fomesafen : 0 0 0 2 17 Glyphosate : 0 0 0 4 12 Glyphosate iso. salt : 100 100 100 92 1 Imazaquin : 0 0 0 1 20 Imazethapyr : 0 0 0 3 13 Metribuzin : 0 0 0 2 16 Paraquat : 0 0 0 1 19 Pendimethalin : 0 0 0 3 15 S-Metolachlor : 0 0 0 1 20 Sulfentrazone : 0 0 0 1 19 Sulfosate : 0 0 0 1 13 Thifensulfuron : 0 0 0 1 20 Trifluralin : 0 0 0 2 14 : Insecticides : Acephate : 0 0 0 1 17 Chlorpyrifos : 0 0 0 5 11 Esfenvalerate : 0 0 0 3 14 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 0 0 0 6 9 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 0 0 0 1 19 Pyraclostrobin : 0 0 0 2 12 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for the 19 Program States was 72.9 million acres. Soybeans: Number of Applications Distribution, Program States, 2006 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Chlorimuron-ethyl : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 Clethodim : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 4.0 Cloransulam-methyl : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Flumioxazin : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Fomesafen : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.2 8.0 Glyphosate : 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.7 4.0 Glyphosate iso. salt : 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.7 1.0 Imazaquin : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 Imazethapyr : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Metribuzin : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Paraquat : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Pendimethalin : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 S-Metolachlor : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Sulfentrazone : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 Sulfosate : 1.0 2.0 3.0 1.8 4.0 Thifensulfuron : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 6.0 Trifluralin : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 : Insecticides : Acephate : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.3 6.0 Chlorpyrifos : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 2.0 Esfenvalerate : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 4.0 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 3.0 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 Pyraclostrobin : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for the 19 Program States was 72.9 million acres. Soybeans: Rate Per Application Distribution, Program States, 2006 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 0.240 0.475 0.720 0.493 4 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 0.176 0.470 0.881 0.462 8 Chlorimuron-ethyl : 0.005 0.015 0.028 0.017 7 Clethodim : 0.050 0.094 0.141 0.096 7 Cloransulam-methyl : 0.008 0.016 0.028 0.019 12 Flumioxazin : 0.048 0.064 0.080 0.066 3 Fomesafen : 0.059 0.176 0.353 0.190 15 Glyphosate : 0.469 0.605 0.782 0.630 3 Glyphosate iso. salt : 0.516 0.750 1.125 0.802 1 Imazaquin : 0.025 0.045 0.109 0.061 12 Imazethapyr : 0.032 0.063 0.064 0.053 4 Metribuzin : 0.080 0.158 0.500 0.255 14 Paraquat : 0.305 0.492 0.703 0.492 4 Pendimethalin : 0.422 1.000 1.250 0.920 6 S-Metolachlor : 0.563 0.984 1.905 1.023 9 Sulfentrazone : 0.044 0.088 0.117 0.087 6 Sulfosate : 0.750 0.938 1.125 0.967 3 Thifensulfuron : 0.002 0.003 0.006 0.004 15 Trifluralin : 0.500 0.750 1.000 0.818 5 : Insecticides : Acephate : 0.225 0.833 0.900 0.720 6 Chlorpyrifos : 0.125 0.500 0.750 0.454 6 Esfenvalerate : 0.026 0.033 0.050 0.035 4 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 0.012 0.020 0.031 0.020 4 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 0.065 0.098 0.195 0.102 9 Pyraclostrobin : 0.078 0.098 0.163 0.110 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for the 19 Program States was 72.9 million acres. Soybeans: Rate per Crop Year Distribution, Program States, 2006 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 0.240 0.475 0.713 0.503 5 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 0.176 0.470 0.940 0.475 9 Chlorimuron-ethyl : 0.007 0.015 0.031 0.017 6 Clethodim : 0.050 0.094 0.141 0.102 7 Cloransulam-methyl : 0.008 0.016 0.032 0.019 12 Flumioxazin : 0.048 0.064 0.080 0.066 3 Fomesafen : 0.088 0.191 0.470 0.233 11 Glyphosate : 0.492 1.031 1.564 1.044 5 Glyphosate iso. salt : 0.750 1.272 2.250 1.330 1 Imazaquin : 0.025 0.045 0.109 0.062 12 Imazethapyr : 0.032 0.063 0.064 0.053 4 Metribuzin : 0.080 0.158 0.469 0.260 14 Paraquat : 0.305 0.492 0.750 0.511 5 Pendimethalin : 0.422 1.000 1.300 0.926 6 S-Metolachlor : 0.563 0.984 1.905 1.023 9 Sulfentrazone : 0.044 0.086 0.176 0.091 8 Sulfosate : 0.938 1.781 2.813 1.701 6 Thifensulfuron : 0.002 0.003 0.008 0.004 13 Trifluralin : 0.500 0.750 1.000 0.818 5 : Insecticides : Acephate : 0.360 0.900 1.665 0.934 9 Chlorpyrifos : 0.100 0.500 1.000 0.480 6 Esfenvalerate : 0.031 0.033 0.050 0.037 5 Lambda-cyhalothrin : 0.012 0.020 0.031 0.021 4 : Fungicides : Azoxystrobin : 0.065 0.098 0.195 0.106 9 Pyraclostrobin : 0.078 0.098 0.196 0.112 5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for the 19 Program States was 72.9 million acres. Durum Wheat: Percent of Acres Treated Distribution, Program States, 2006 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 0 0 100 29 11 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 0 0 0 9 23 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : 0 0 100 17 14 Bromoxynil octanoate : 0 0 100 16 9 Clodinafop-propargil : 0 0 100 26 11 Dicamba, dimet. salt : 0 0 97 10 18 Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl : 0 0 100 37 8 Fluroxypyr : 0 0 100 15 13 Fluroxypyr 1-MHE : 0 0 100 13 21 Glyphosate iso. salt : 0 0 100 47 5 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 0 0 100 34 8 Thifensulfuron : 0 0 100 11 21 Tribenuron-methyl : 0 0 100 13 17 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for the 2 Program States was 1.7 million acres. Durum Wheat: Number of Applications Distribution, Program States, 2006 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 5.0 Bromoxynil octanoate : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 Clodinafop-propargil : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Dicamba, dimet. salt : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Fluroxypyr : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Fluroxypyr 1-MHE : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Glyphosate iso. salt : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Thifensulfuron : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 Tribenuron-methyl : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for the 2 Program States was 1.7 million acres. Durum Wheat: Rate Per Application Distribution, Program States, 2006 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 0.149 0.313 0.625 0.344 11 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 0.119 0.294 0.475 0.307 11 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : 0.034 0.044 0.050 0.042 6 Bromoxynil octanoate : 0.156 0.234 0.250 0.221 4 Clodinafop-propargil : 0.019 0.047 0.057 0.042 5 Dicamba, dimet. salt : 0.055 0.063 0.125 0.105 24 Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl : 0.039 0.047 0.063 0.052 4 Fluroxypyr : 0.023 0.070 0.126 0.076 11 Fluroxypyr 1-MHE : 0.047 0.089 0.100 0.082 8 Glyphosate iso. salt : 0.258 0.375 0.563 0.381 4 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 0.165 0.250 0.375 0.268 4 Thifensulfuron : 0.003 0.013 0.015 0.010 15 Tribenuron-methyl : 0.001 0.004 0.008 0.004 13 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for the 2 Program States was 1.7 million acres. Durum Wheat: Rate per Crop Year Distribution, Program States, 2006 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 0.156 0.350 0.625 0.351 11 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 0.119 0.356 0.475 0.319 11 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : 0.034 0.044 0.063 0.046 6 Bromoxynil octanoate : 0.156 0.244 0.313 0.227 4 Clodinafop-propargil : 0.019 0.047 0.057 0.042 5 Dicamba, dimet. salt : 0.050 0.063 0.125 0.109 24 Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl : 0.039 0.047 0.063 0.052 4 Fluroxypyr : 0.023 0.070 0.126 0.076 11 Fluroxypyr 1-MHE : 0.047 0.089 0.100 0.082 8 Glyphosate iso. salt : 0.258 0.375 0.563 0.396 4 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 0.165 0.250 0.378 0.274 4 Thifensulfuron : 0.003 0.013 0.015 0.010 15 Tribenuron-methyl : 0.001 0.004 0.008 0.004 14 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for the 2 Program States was 1.7 million acres. Other Spring Wheat: Percent of Acres Treated Distribution, Program States, 2006 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 0 0 100 21 10 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 0 0 0 8 20 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : 0 0 0 8 20 Bromoxynil heptanoat : 0 0 100 15 11 Bromoxynil octanoate : 0 0 100 32 6 Clodinafop-propargil : 0 0 100 11 12 Clopyralid : 0 0 100 17 9 Dicamba, dimet. salt : 0 0 0 5 31 Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl : 0 0 100 28 6 Flucarbazone-sodium : 0 0 0 9 21 Fluroxypyr : 0 0 0 9 20 Fluroxypyr 1-MHE : 0 0 100 19 9 Glyphosate iso. salt : 0 0 100 30 8 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 0 0 100 40 4 Metsulfuron-methyl : 0 0 0 4 18 Pinoxaden : 0 0 0 3 21 Thifensulfuron : 0 0 100 16 11 Tribenuron-methyl : 0 0 100 15 13 : Fungicides : Propiconazole : 0 0 0 7 19 Pyraclostrobin : 0 0 0 7 16 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for the 6 Program States was 14.7 million acres. Other Spring Wheat: Number of Applications Distribution, Program States, 2006 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 3.0 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.2 12.0 Bromoxynil heptanoat : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Bromoxynil octanoate : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Clodinafop-propargil : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Clopyralid : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Dicamba, dimet. salt : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 5.0 Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Flucarbazone-sodium : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Fluroxypyr : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Fluroxypyr 1-MHE : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Glyphosate iso. salt : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.3 5.0 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Metsulfuron-methyl : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Pinoxaden : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Thifensulfuron : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Tribenuron-methyl : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 : Fungicides : Propiconazole : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 Pyraclostrobin : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for the 6 Program States was 14.7 million acres. Other Spring Wheat: Rate Per Application Distribution, Program States, 2006 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 0.190 0.288 0.480 0.339 8 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 0.059 0.235 0.475 0.286 11 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : 0.034 0.063 0.100 0.062 6 Bromoxynil heptanoat : 0.179 0.250 0.375 0.256 4 Bromoxynil octanoate : 0.179 0.250 0.313 0.239 2 Clodinafop-propargil : 0.023 0.050 0.055 0.044 4 Clopyralid : 0.053 0.092 0.094 0.081 4 Dicamba, dimet. salt : 0.031 0.063 0.125 0.093 21 Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl : 0.041 0.063 0.094 0.064 4 Flucarbazone-sodium : 0.012 0.017 0.025 0.018 6 Fluroxypyr : 0.035 0.094 0.188 0.104 13 Fluroxypyr 1-MHE : 0.059 0.094 0.131 0.090 6 Glyphosate iso. salt : 0.281 0.469 0.750 0.485 4 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 0.188 0.250 0.381 0.279 4 Metsulfuron-methyl : 0.001 0.003 0.006 0.003 15 Pinoxaden : 0.052 0.053 0.104 0.068 9 Thifensulfuron : 0.005 0.013 0.020 0.012 6 Tribenuron-methyl : 0.001 0.004 0.008 0.004 8 : Fungicides : Propiconazole : 0.041 0.056 0.084 0.068 10 Pyraclostrobin : 0.049 0.049 0.065 0.055 6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for the 6 Program States was 14.7 million acres. Other Spring Wheat: Rate per Crop Year Distribution, Program States, 2006 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 0.208 0.350 0.525 0.360 7 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 0.059 0.235 0.525 0.297 12 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : 0.034 0.050 0.188 0.077 16 Bromoxynil heptanoat : 0.179 0.250 0.375 0.256 4 Bromoxynil octanoate : 0.179 0.250 0.313 0.241 2 Clodinafop-propargil : 0.023 0.050 0.059 0.044 4 Clopyralid : 0.053 0.092 0.094 0.081 4 Dicamba, dimet. salt : 0.031 0.063 0.188 0.099 22 Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl : 0.041 0.063 0.094 0.064 4 Flucarbazone-sodium : 0.012 0.017 0.025 0.018 6 Fluroxypyr : 0.035 0.094 0.188 0.104 13 Fluroxypyr 1-MHE : 0.059 0.094 0.131 0.090 6 Glyphosate iso. salt : 0.281 0.469 1.125 0.624 6 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 0.188 0.250 0.438 0.281 4 Metsulfuron-methyl : 0.001 0.003 0.006 0.003 15 Pinoxaden : 0.052 0.053 0.104 0.068 9 Thifensulfuron : 0.005 0.013 0.020 0.012 6 Tribenuron-methyl : 0.001 0.004 0.008 0.004 8 : Fungicides : Propiconazole : 0.041 0.056 0.097 0.069 10 Pyraclostrobin : 0.049 0.049 0.065 0.055 6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for the 6 Program States was 14.7 million acres. Winter Wheat: Percent of Acres Treated Distribution, Program States, 2006 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 0 0 100 14 8 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 0 0 0 9 11 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : 0 0 0 3 22 Bromoxynil heptanoat : 0 0 0 1 23 Bromoxynil octanoate : 0 0 0 3 11 Chlorsulfuron : 0 0 0 6 16 Dicamba, digly salt : 0 0 0 1 28 Dicamba, dimet. salt : 0 0 0 4 20 Glyphosate iso. salt : 0 0 100 15 8 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 0 0 0 4 9 Mesosulfuron-Methyl : 0 0 0 2 17 Metsulfuron-methyl : 0 0 100 14 11 Propoxycarbazone-sod : 0 0 0 2 23 Thifensulfuron : 0 0 100 12 10 Triasulfuron : 0 0 0 4 20 Tribenuron-methyl : 0 0 100 12 10 : Fungicides : Propiconazole : 0 0 0 1 17 Pyraclostrobin : 0 0 0 1 18 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for the 1 Program State was 35.3 million acres. Winter Wheat: Number of Applications Distribution, Program States, 2006 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.2 5.0 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.3 10.0 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : 1.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 10.0 Bromoxynil heptanoat : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Bromoxynil octanoate : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Chlorsulfuron : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Dicamba, digly salt : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Dicamba, dimet. salt : 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.3 10.0 Glyphosate iso. salt : 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.9 7.0 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Mesosulfuron-Methyl : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Metsulfuron-methyl : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Propoxycarbazone-sod : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 Thifensulfuron : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Triasulfuron : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 Tribenuron-methyl : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 : Fungicides : Propiconazole : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Pyraclostrobin : 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 5.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for the 1 Program State was 35.3 million acres. Winter Wheat: Rate Per Application Distribution, Program States, 2006 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 0.175 0.350 0.525 0.354 5 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 0.118 0.269 0.718 0.365 11 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : 0.038 0.050 0.086 0.058 7 Bromoxynil heptanoat : 0.156 0.250 0.391 0.268 9 Bromoxynil octanoate : 0.156 0.250 0.375 0.256 5 Chlorsulfuron : 0.004 0.010 0.013 0.010 9 Dicamba, digly salt : 0.063 0.094 0.188 0.103 11 Dicamba, dimet. salt : 0.057 0.094 1.000 0.229 35 Glyphosate iso. salt : 0.281 0.500 0.750 0.495 3 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 0.188 0.266 0.488 0.304 4 Mesosulfuron-Methyl : 0.003 0.008 0.013 0.008 9 Metsulfuron-methyl : 0.001 0.002 0.004 0.002 5 Propoxycarbazone-sod : 0.004 0.026 0.039 0.024 15 Thifensulfuron : 0.002 0.007 0.016 0.009 5 Triasulfuron : 0.005 0.013 0.022 0.014 8 Tribenuron-methyl : 0.001 0.004 0.008 0.004 5 : Fungicides : Propiconazole : 0.053 0.081 0.114 0.080 6 Pyraclostrobin : 0.049 0.065 0.098 0.072 8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for the 1 Program State was 35.3 million acres. Winter Wheat: Rate per Crop Year Distribution, Program States, 2006 1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : 10th : : 90th : : Active Ingredient : Percentile : Median : Percentile : Mean : cv(%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Herbicides : 2,4-D, 2-EHE : 0.184 0.360 0.700 0.440 7 2,4-D, dimeth. salt : 0.178 0.353 0.999 0.474 8 2,4-D, isoprop. salt : 0.038 0.100 0.206 0.117 13 Bromoxynil heptanoat : 0.156 0.250 0.391 0.268 9 Bromoxynil octanoate : 0.156 0.250 0.375 0.256 5 Chlorsulfuron : 0.004 0.010 0.013 0.010 9 Dicamba, digly salt : 0.063 0.094 0.188 0.103 11 Dicamba, dimet. salt : 0.063 0.125 1.000 0.302 31 Glyphosate iso. salt : 0.375 0.750 1.758 0.963 9 MCPA, 2-ethylhexyl : 0.188 0.266 0.488 0.304 4 Mesosulfuron-Methyl : 0.003 0.008 0.013 0.008 9 Metsulfuron-methyl : 0.001 0.002 0.004 0.002 5 Propoxycarbazone-sod : 0.004 0.026 0.039 0.025 15 Thifensulfuron : 0.002 0.007 0.016 0.009 5 Triasulfuron : 0.005 0.013 0.022 0.014 8 Tribenuron-methyl : 0.001 0.004 0.008 0.004 5 : Fungicides : Propiconazole : 0.041 0.081 0.114 0.082 6 Pyraclostrobin : 0.049 0.082 0.098 0.078 6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/ Planted acreage in 2006 for the 1 Program State was 35.3 million acres. This page intentionally left blank. Integrated Pest Management Practices - Highlights Rice: No-till or minimum till practices were incorporated on 38 percent of the rice acreage in the prevention of pests, while 57 percent of the planted acreage was rotated with some other crop(s) to avoid pests. Scouting for weeds was used on 97 percent of the farms growing rice and on 98 percent of the rice acres. Soybeans: To prevent pests, 75 percent of the soybean acreage was under no- till or minimum till production practice. In addition, 86 percent of the soybean acreage had been rotated with some other crop(s) to control pests. Ninety-one percent of the soybean acreage was scouted for weeds, and the scouting was performed by the operator, partner, or family member on 85 percent of the farms. Durum wheat: To aid in the prevention of pests, 85 percent of the farms utilized no-till or minimum till practices. Additionally, 48 percent of the farms cleaned implements after field work to prevent the spread pests. Of the durum wheat acres in the two surveyed States, 38 percent was planted to a crop variety resistant to pests. Scouting for weeds, insects, and diseases took place on 97, 68, and 68 percent, respectively, of the durum wheat acres. Other spring wheat: No-till or minimum till practices were utilized on 69 percent of the other spring wheat farms to aid in the prevention of pests. In addition, 50 percent of the other spring wheat acres were planted to a crop variety resistant to pests. Scouting for weeds, insects, and diseases took place on 96, 68, and 74 percent, respectively, of the other spring wheat acres. Winter wheat: To aid in the prevention of pests, 54 percent of the winter wheat farms utilized no-till or minimum till practices. In addition, 41 percent winter wheat acres were planted to a crop variety resistant to pests. Scouting for weeds, insects, and diseases took place on 80, 64, and 62 percent, respectively, of the winter wheat acres. Prior to the 2006 surveys producers of soybeans, durum wheat, other spring wheat, and winter wheat were last asked about their pest management practices in 2004. Rice producers were last surveyed in 2000. Pest Management Practices Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice Rice, 2006 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Practice : States :------------------------------------------------------- : ALL : AR : CA : LA : MS : MO : TX ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 39 51 6 22 44 35 50 Plow down crop residue : 50 45 76 58 35 35 58 Remove crop residue : 30 35 21 15 29 41 23 Clean implements after fieldwork : 36 32 43 47 54 15 45 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 53 50 82 38 47 56 51 Water management practices : 24 12 56 47 32 8 32 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 11 7 17 20 6 10 25 Rotate crops to control pests : 61 71 12 74 63 57 64 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 22 22 10 24 26 33 36 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 10 11 6 13 4 9 10 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 73 78 72 44 67 82 94 Deliberate scouting activities : 24 21 24 55 33 3 6 Field was not scouted : 2 1 3 1 14 Scouted for pests : 36 34 33 22 48 49 67 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 9 11 8 3 10 4 14 Scouting due to pest development model : 13 11 27 1 12 7 37 Scouted for weeds : 97 99 97 98 100 86 100 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 44 39 54 60 45 36 55 An Employee : 3 2 7 * 3 1 6 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 18 17 35 25 4 10 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 35 42 4 15 48 63 30 Scouted for insects or mites : 93 95 85 98 97 86 99 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 43 38 54 60 39 34 53 An Employee : 3 2 8 * 3 1 6 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 18 17 34 25 5 1 11 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 36 42 4 15 54 63 30 Scouted for diseases : 91 95 83 99 73 86 99 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 42 37 54 59 33 34 53 An Employee : 3 2 7 * 4 7 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 18 18 34 25 8 2 10 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 36 43 5 15 56 63 30 Records kept to track pests : 46 50 36 21 47 64 43 Field mapping of weed problems : 17 13 35 6 19 25 11 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 4 3 9 1 2 13 2 Weather monitoring : 53 52 56 63 61 33 65 : Suppression Practices: : Biological pesticides : 1 2 2 1 Scouting used to make decisions : 31 34 26 17 34 32 46 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 11 8 14 10 10 23 22 Adjust planting methods : 8 8 14 1 8 6 24 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 16 12 34 15 19 11 13 Non-chemical blackbird control : 9 4 17 24 4 1 30 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Percentage is less than 0.5 Pest Management Practices Percent of Acres Utilizing Practice Rice, 2006 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Practice : States :------------------------------------------------------- : ALL : AR : CA : LA : MS : MO : TX ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 38 52 6 24 42 34 53 Plow down crop residue : 51 41 77 65 38 37 50 Remove crop residue : 27 33 18 14 29 35 20 Clean implements after fieldwork : 36 30 43 51 49 16 40 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 54 49 76 47 46 59 45 Water management practices : 27 14 55 50 28 6 32 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 10 4 18 23 3 11 22 Rotate crops to control pests : 57 69 11 74 65 57 58 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 22 22 11 27 25 34 36 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 10 10 5 17 4 11 10 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 72 76 70 41 69 85 95 Deliberate scouting activities : 26 23 26 58 31 2 5 Field was not scouted : 2 1 4 1 12 Scouted for pests : 37 33 36 23 48 52 68 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 8 10 7 2 9 4 11 Scouting due to pest development model : 13 10 26 1 8 6 43 Scouted for weeds : 98 99 96 98 100 88 100 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 44 40 44 55 49 36 53 An Employee : 3 2 9 1 3 2 5 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 19 16 42 22 4 10 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 34 42 5 22 45 62 33 Scouted for insects or mites : 93 95 85 98 98 88 99 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 43 40 45 55 44 35 50 An Employee : 3 2 10 1 3 2 5 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 18 16 40 22 5 1 11 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 35 43 4 22 49 62 34 Scouted for diseases : 92 96 84 99 75 88 99 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 42 39 45 54 36 35 51 An Employee : 3 2 9 1 4 5 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 19 16 40 22 8 3 11 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 35 42 6 22 52 62 34 Records kept to track pests : 44 50 36 20 44 64 43 Field mapping of weed problems : 19 15 37 9 15 24 12 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 5 2 13 * 1 15 3 Weather monitoring : 55 53 58 62 61 31 70 : Suppression Practices: : Biological pesticides : 1 2 1 1 Scouting used to make decisions : 32 34 30 17 38 33 51 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 12 6 19 14 10 27 17 Adjust planting methods : 8 7 13 2 8 6 21 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 16 11 30 15 18 10 11 Non-chemical blackbird control : 11 3 19 30 6 4 26 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Percentage is less than 0.5 Pest Management Practices Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice Soybeans, 2006 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Practice : States :------------------------------------------------------- : ALL : AR : IL : IN : IA : KS : KY ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 74 56 75 74 78 77 86 Plow down crop residue : 17 44 10 10 12 19 7 Remove crop residue : 7 20 5 15 1 6 9 Clean implements after fieldwork : 30 28 27 22 24 38 42 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 41 40 57 46 40 32 31 Water management practices : 1 3 * 1 * 3 Treat seed for insect or disease after purchase : 8 8 3 9 13 15 8 Maintain beneficial insect or vertebrate habitat: 4 1 4 1 2 10 3 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 12 14 15 10 6 21 7 Rotate crops to control pests : 84 43 91 85 93 87 85 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 50 31 51 51 64 58 39 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 13 3 13 9 10 14 6 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 58 50 54 65 66 61 36 Deliberate scouting activities : 33 36 41 23 26 31 48 Field was not scouted : 10 14 5 12 8 7 16 Scouted for pests : 16 15 18 13 17 14 2 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 13 12 13 7 16 5 3 Scouting due to pest development model : 10 6 14 4 15 5 3 Scouted for weeds : 89 85 94 88 87 93 83 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 85 73 82 93 88 90 92 An Employee : 1 5 1 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 9 16 15 6 9 1 7 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 5 6 2 1 2 9 1 Scouted for insects or mites : 72 70 82 64 76 40 63 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 81 69 80 88 87 78 91 An Employee : 1 5 1 1 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 11 21 16 9 11 3 7 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 7 6 3 2 2 19 1 Scouted for diseases : 53 60 72 44 45 29 61 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 79 64 78 88 81 76 91 An Employee : 1 6 1 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 11 22 17 9 14 7 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 9 9 4 2 4 23 1 Records kept to track pests : 18 20 23 17 12 14 4 Field mapping of weed problems : 7 7 7 5 7 5 1 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 2 2 3 3 2 4 Weather monitoring : 59 38 70 64 55 50 16 : Suppression Practices: : Biological pesticides : 2 3 1 * Scouting used to make decisions : 23 18 29 15 26 13 4 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 44 7 49 25 59 51 27 Adjust planting methods : 20 9 28 17 16 18 16 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 14 4 23 15 16 13 4 Beneficial organisms : 1 2 * 1 2 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Pest Management Practices Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice Soybeans, 2006 (continued) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Practice : States :------------------------------------------------------- : LA : MI : MN : MS : MO : NE : NC ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 68 67 55 59 78 88 73 Plow down crop residue : 48 36 33 23 12 6 19 Remove crop residue : 21 3 1 7 6 4 20 Clean implements after fieldwork : 29 35 45 26 21 24 37 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 57 25 35 53 46 34 41 Water management practices : 2 1 1 4 1 8 Treat seed for insect or disease after purchase : 18 13 12 8 4 6 3 Maintain beneficial insect or vertebrate habitat: 3 4 4 6 3 3 12 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 16 10 10 8 11 12 25 Rotate crops to control pests : 44 86 99 25 82 93 64 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 62 46 51 33 49 63 45 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 5 21 12 2 17 17 12 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 79 54 88 46 46 54 44 Deliberate scouting activities : 18 30 10 28 41 36 40 Field was not scouted : 3 16 2 26 13 10 17 Scouted for pests : 36 20 31 18 7 17 8 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 3 10 43 6 3 7 3 Scouting due to pest development model : 7 6 19 11 6 9 2 Scouted for weeds : 91 83 93 74 86 88 81 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 59 90 86 82 95 82 97 An Employee : 2 2 3 * * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 12 6 6 8 3 6 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 27 2 7 7 2 12 3 Scouted for insects or mites : 94 72 94 61 63 69 53 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 43 88 81 76 95 78 89 An Employee : 2 2 * 4 * * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 13 7 10 10 2 6 3 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 43 3 9 10 2 16 8 Scouted for diseases : 88 54 40 47 58 45 50 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 41 88 73 74 94 73 92 An Employee : 2 4 5 * * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 15 5 12 9 4 4 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 42 3 15 12 2 22 8 Records kept to track pests : 29 13 33 20 6 20 8 Field mapping of weed problems : 6 6 17 7 4 8 11 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 5 3 3 1 2 1 8 Weather monitoring : 61 46 62 73 34 65 68 : Suppression Practices: : Biological pesticides : 1 2 3 3 * Scouting used to make decisions : 35 22 47 23 11 19 19 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 10 45 55 18 45 61 29 Adjust planting methods : 16 18 22 13 24 13 20 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 2 12 12 4 10 10 15 Beneficial organisms : * * 3 * * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Pest Management Practices Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice Soybeans, 2006 (continued) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Practice : States :----------------------------------------------- : ND : OH : SD : TN : VA : WI -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 58 77 79 81 86 80 Plow down crop residue : 23 15 25 26 3 15 Remove crop residue : 2 5 6 17 8 3 Clean implements after fieldwork : 66 25 30 56 27 24 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 55 35 37 62 33 17 Water management practices : * 1 2 * * Treat seed for insect or disease after purchase : 13 9 9 13 10 6 Maintain beneficial insect or vertebrate habitat: 2 3 2 1 7 3 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 12 11 12 24 6 10 Rotate crops to control pests : 90 79 95 73 75 92 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 37 31 67 60 58 48 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 19 10 24 7 8 17 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 55 51 70 50 59 49 Deliberate scouting activities : 45 34 25 40 37 42 Field was not scouted : * 15 4 9 4 8 Scouted for pests : 30 7 19 6 28 20 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 54 10 14 5 24 10 Scouting due to pest development model : 22 5 11 16 4 10 Scouted for weeds : 100 85 96 85 96 91 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 75 85 75 90 93 72 An Employee : * * 2 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 6 12 10 7 4 18 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 19 3 14 1 3 11 Scouted for insects or mites : 95 64 87 60 69 78 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 71 81 72 80 92 69 An Employee : * * 2 8 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 6 15 12 11 4 18 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 22 4 15 1 4 12 Scouted for diseases : 66 43 63 62 40 64 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 67 79 71 89 98 63 An Employee : 1 2 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 3 15 8 9 1 22 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 30 5 18 1 1 15 Records kept to track pests : 31 14 22 11 9 22 Field mapping of weed problems : 8 3 11 1 2 11 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 3 1 1 1 1 1 Weather monitoring : 89 54 79 67 56 60 : Suppression Practices: : Biological pesticides : 4 1 3 1 3 Scouting used to make decisions : 54 12 30 7 29 24 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 66 27 59 26 54 54 Adjust planting methods : 33 14 28 28 6 21 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 20 14 9 16 1 21 Beneficial organisms : 2 * 3 * 3 * -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Percentage is less than 0.5 Pest Management Practices Percent of Acres Utilizing Practice Soybeans, 2006 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Practice : States :------------------------------------------------------- : ALL : AR : IL : IN : IA : KS : KY ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 75 61 74 78 79 75 90 Plow down crop residue : 18 51 15 6 13 17 6 Remove crop residue : 7 30 4 14 2 8 14 Clean implements after fieldwork : 33 27 33 26 25 36 48 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 45 45 59 48 43 32 25 Water management practices : 2 3 * 3 * 5 Treat seed for insect or disease after purchase : 11 10 5 10 15 9 7 Maintain beneficial insect or vertebrate habitat: 3 1 3 1 3 8 3 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 12 19 18 9 7 17 5 Rotate crops to control pests : 86 45 93 88 93 81 90 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 54 38 59 52 65 56 42 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 13 2 13 9 13 13 7 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 63 50 55 70 70 69 35 Deliberate scouting activities : 30 39 41 22 23 26 52 Field was not scouted : 7 11 4 9 6 6 14 Scouted for pests : 21 17 23 13 20 21 2 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 16 11 15 5 17 7 4 Scouting due to pest development model : 13 6 18 5 16 7 5 Scouted for weeds : 91 87 95 91 88 94 83 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 83 69 81 92 89 77 91 An Employee : 1 8 1 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 8 16 13 6 9 2 5 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 8 7 4 2 2 19 4 Scouted for insects or mites : 77 74 82 70 79 49 62 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 79 64 79 89 87 58 89 An Employee : 1 7 2 * 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 10 21 14 8 10 4 6 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 10 8 5 3 2 36 5 Scouted for diseases : 53 61 67 47 43 34 61 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 76 57 77 87 82 57 89 An Employee : 2 10 2 3 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 10 22 14 10 14 6 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 13 11 7 4 4 40 5 Records kept to track pests : 23 20 28 23 14 22 7 Field mapping of weed problems : 9 8 9 5 8 8 2 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 3 2 4 5 3 6 Weather monitoring : 60 39 71 59 54 45 17 : Suppression Practices: : Biological pesticides : 2 2 * 1 Scouting used to make decisions : 29 18 40 19 27 21 3 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 46 5 45 22 59 50 23 Adjust planting methods : 20 15 31 12 13 20 15 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 14 5 25 16 16 13 6 Beneficial organisms : 1 4 * 1 1 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Pest Management Practices Percent of Acres Utilizing Practice Soybeans, 2006 (continued) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Practice : States :------------------------------------------------------- : LA : MI : MN : MS : MO : NE : NC ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 74 71 54 66 78 91 81 Plow down crop residue : 44 24 32 21 16 4 22 Remove crop residue : 25 5 2 12 8 2 11 Clean implements after fieldwork : 26 37 46 27 20 22 34 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 65 31 42 58 50 36 37 Water management practices : 3 2 4 8 1 10 Treat seed for insect or disease after purchase : 22 13 15 16 8 7 7 Maintain beneficial insect or vertebrate habitat: 2 5 3 8 3 1 12 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 15 8 11 13 11 11 27 Rotate crops to control pests : 50 84 99 24 80 92 73 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 57 50 62 28 51 61 44 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 6 17 16 2 16 13 19 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 79 67 89 48 54 54 51 Deliberate scouting activities : 18 25 8 27 32 38 36 Field was not scouted : 4 8 2 26 14 8 13 Scouted for pests : 42 25 38 22 7 19 18 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 3 11 46 4 5 7 6 Scouting due to pest development model : 4 5 23 9 8 8 5 Scouted for weeds : 86 92 92 74 84 90 86 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 64 88 83 79 93 77 97 An Employee : 2 2 5 * * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 7 4 7 8 3 5 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 27 6 9 8 4 17 3 Scouted for insects or mites : 95 81 93 66 65 75 51 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 54 84 81 70 91 72 91 An Employee : 2 2 * 6 * * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 7 6 9 12 3 6 1 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 37 8 10 12 5 22 8 Scouted for diseases : 87 59 39 47 58 47 50 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 50 82 72 67 92 65 97 An Employee : 2 3 9 1 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 9 5 13 9 3 4 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 39 10 16 15 5 30 3 Records kept to track pests : 30 22 38 28 11 22 18 Field mapping of weed problems : 3 8 14 6 6 10 14 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 5 5 5 4 4 1 6 Weather monitoring : 61 45 67 67 34 66 63 : Suppression Practices: : Biological pesticides : 1 3 2 2 * Scouting used to make decisions : 38 31 51 27 14 20 19 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 6 53 60 15 43 65 39 Adjust planting methods : 15 23 18 15 21 14 22 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 2 13 11 2 10 7 11 Beneficial organisms : * 1 1 * 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Pest Management Practices Percent of Acres Utilizing Practice Soybeans, 2006 (continued) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Practice : States :----------------------------------------------- : ND : OH : SD : TN : VA : WI -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 59 86 85 80 88 80 Plow down crop residue : 20 10 20 27 1 14 Remove crop residue : 3 7 2 19 12 4 Clean implements after fieldwork : 70 29 32 55 30 24 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 57 36 37 60 34 23 Water management practices : * 2 3 1 * Treat seed for insect or disease after purchase : 16 13 11 17 12 11 Maintain beneficial insect or vertebrate habitat: 3 3 4 1 11 4 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 13 10 11 19 5 8 Rotate crops to control pests : 86 86 95 65 77 92 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 38 35 67 63 67 51 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 23 10 26 10 13 15 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 62 50 71 51 69 53 Deliberate scouting activities : 38 36 26 40 25 40 Field was not scouted : * 14 2 9 6 8 Scouted for pests : 33 7 23 10 33 23 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 49 10 15 9 15 10 Scouting due to pest development model : 27 8 13 25 7 12 Scouted for weeds : 100 86 98 88 94 92 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 74 83 74 89 92 69 An Employee : 1 * 4 4 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 9 12 6 4 7 18 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 16 5 16 3 2 13 Scouted for insects or mites : 97 69 86 67 71 81 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 72 82 71 78 94 66 An Employee : 1 * 2 11 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 10 11 9 8 5 19 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 18 6 18 3 1 15 Scouted for diseases : 64 48 61 62 48 61 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 70 78 68 88 97 57 An Employee : 1 3 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 4 13 6 6 2 24 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 25 9 24 4 1 19 Records kept to track pests : 29 20 26 14 20 29 Field mapping of weed problems : 5 4 14 4 3 15 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 3 1 1 1 1 1 Weather monitoring : 90 60 78 79 52 60 : Suppression Practices: : Biological pesticides : 6 3 1 2 3 Scouting used to make decisions : 54 16 35 10 42 27 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 62 31 60 21 57 54 Adjust planting methods : 30 20 29 31 6 22 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 13 19 7 22 2 23 Beneficial organisms : 3 * 2 * 6 * -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Percentage is less than 0.5 Pest Management Practices Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice Durum Wheat, 2006 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Practice : States :----------------------- : ALL : MT : ND -------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 85 75 87 Plow down crop residue : 21 35 18 Remove crop residue : 16 13 17 Clean implements after fieldwork : 48 56 45 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 20 31 17 Water management practices : * * : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 27 28 27 Rotate crops to control pests : 80 69 83 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 36 44 34 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 31 38 30 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 59 67 57 Deliberate scouting activities : 40 28 43 Field was not scouted : 1 4 Scouted for pests : 9 8 10 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 2 3 2 Scouting due to pest development model : 2 2 Scouted for weeds : 98 96 99 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 93 98 92 An Employee : * 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 5 1 6 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 2 2 Scouted for insects or mites : 68 69 68 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 94 98 93 An Employee : * 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 3 4 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 2 3 Scouted for diseases : 66 60 68 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 96 98 96 An Employee : * 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 1 1 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 2 3 Records kept to track pests : 17 21 16 Field mapping of weed problems : 34 44 31 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 2 4 1 Weather monitoring : 73 66 75 : Suppression Practices: : Scouting used to make decisions : 12 20 10 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 68 63 69 Adjust planting methods : 14 15 14 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 41 45 39 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Percentage is less than 0.5 Pest Management Practices Percent of Acres Utilizing Practice Durum Wheat, 2006 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Practice : States :----------------------- : ALL : MT : ND -------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 85 84 86 Plow down crop residue : 19 26 16 Remove crop residue : 14 10 15 Clean implements after fieldwork : 50 51 50 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 20 26 18 Water management practices : 1 1 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 25 25 25 Rotate crops to control pests : 78 63 83 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 38 41 37 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 31 36 30 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 67 71 66 Deliberate scouting activities : 32 25 34 Field was not scouted : 1 4 Scouted for pests : 12 12 12 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 2 1 2 Scouting due to pest development model : 4 5 Scouted for weeds : 97 96 97 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 94 97 93 An Employee : 1 3 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 4 1 5 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 1 2 Scouted for insects or mites : 68 68 67 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 96 96 96 An Employee : 1 4 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 1 2 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 2 2 Scouted for diseases : 68 67 68 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 96 96 96 An Employee : 1 4 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 2 2 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 2 2 Records kept to track pests : 18 21 17 Field mapping of weed problems : 36 40 34 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 2 6 1 Weather monitoring : 75 72 76 : Suppression Practices: : Scouting used to make decisions : 14 18 13 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 67 64 68 Adjust planting methods : 14 17 13 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 37 39 36 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pest Management Practices Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice Other Spring Wheat, 2006 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Practice : States :------------------------------------------------------- : ALL : ID : MN : MT : ND : SD : WA ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 69 42 40 68 77 74 58 Plow down crop residue : 31 64 52 35 24 25 41 Remove crop residue : 12 19 20 8 11 13 15 Clean implements after fieldwork : 63 51 49 62 70 59 73 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 41 56 47 36 40 42 57 Water management practices : 3 21 5 2 3 1 12 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 20 18 7 16 20 34 21 Rotate crops to control pests : 86 85 97 67 86 97 86 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 47 40 42 47 48 50 62 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 29 19 16 32 26 44 32 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 61 61 84 74 49 60 93 Deliberate scouting activities : 34 32 14 23 47 28 5 Field was not scouted : 5 7 2 2 3 12 1 Scouted for pests : 17 18 29 15 12 21 32 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 7 3 12 2 9 6 8 Scouting due to pest development model : 7 1 10 * 10 4 18 Scouted for weeds : 95 89 97 98 96 87 99 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 86 72 68 97 91 80 56 An Employee : * * 1 * 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 6 24 14 1 3 9 38 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 7 4 18 * 6 11 4 Scouted for insects or mites : 63 75 64 61 63 61 79 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 83 72 62 96 88 78 47 An Employee : 1 * 2 2 3 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 7 20 14 1 3 9 46 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 10 8 22 1 8 14 5 Scouted for diseases : 68 84 72 67 64 73 84 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 83 69 61 97 91 77 51 An Employee : * * 2 3 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 6 23 14 1 1 10 42 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 10 7 25 8 13 5 Records kept to track pests : 28 26 45 23 26 23 52 Field mapping of weed problems : 30 44 35 52 21 24 44 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 5 17 10 7 1 4 15 Weather monitoring : 66 54 47 55 76 61 78 : Suppression Practices: : Scouting used to make decisions : 21 17 23 11 24 20 37 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 69 56 47 53 75 86 72 Adjust planting methods : 21 22 8 17 21 34 18 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 39 38 30 36 47 26 66 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Percentage is less than 0.5 Pest Management Practices Percent of Acres Utilizing Practice Other Spring Wheat, 2006 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Practice : States :------------------------------------------------------- : ALL : ID : MN : MT : ND : SD : WA ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 72 41 36 79 76 87 66 Plow down crop residue : 30 58 64 25 26 13 38 Remove crop residue : 11 20 20 8 10 8 16 Clean implements after fieldwork : 64 61 44 69 68 57 76 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 42 53 57 35 40 35 64 Water management practices : 4 18 8 3 2 2 9 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 24 19 8 30 25 29 22 Rotate crops to control pests : 84 88 99 59 88 96 88 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 50 42 35 61 51 44 65 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 30 20 19 33 30 36 35 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 68 70 92 76 60 59 96 Deliberate scouting activities : 29 27 7 21 38 32 4 Field was not scouted : 3 3 1 3 2 9 1 Scouted for pests : 20 23 38 15 15 26 36 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 8 4 16 2 9 8 11 Scouting due to pest development model : 7 1 12 1 8 5 20 Scouted for weeds : 96 96 98 97 97 90 99 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 85 64 63 94 91 78 57 An Employee : 1 * 4 1 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 6 32 14 2 2 10 36 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 8 3 23 * 7 11 4 Scouted for insects or mites : 68 75 72 70 66 64 83 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 83 71 60 92 90 79 49 An Employee : 1 * 1 5 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 7 24 17 2 3 9 44 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 8 4 23 * 8 12 5 Scouted for diseases : 74 88 84 73 71 74 89 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 83 65 58 93 91 77 54 An Employee : 1 * 5 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 7 30 15 2 2 10 39 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 9 4 27 7 14 5 Records kept to track pests : 30 39 52 23 26 28 55 Field mapping of weed problems : 32 47 40 45 26 23 45 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 7 20 9 15 1 6 20 Weather monitoring : 69 59 49 66 77 63 82 : Suppression Practices: : Scouting used to make decisions : 26 23 29 17 30 23 39 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 72 61 46 63 79 82 77 Adjust planting methods : 23 17 7 22 25 33 24 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 43 48 36 45 47 22 70 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Percentage is less than 0.5 Pest Management Practices Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice Winter Wheat, 2006 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Practice : States :--------------------------------------------------------------- : ALL : CO : ID : IL : KS : MI : MO : MT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 54 62 50 74 54 81 67 67 Plow down crop residue : 39 41 58 12 42 23 10 28 Remove crop residue : 13 6 26 8 19 9 11 19 Clean implements after fieldwork : 49 48 51 26 55 39 24 51 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 40 40 67 51 41 37 51 36 Water management practices : 2 6 11 3 1 1 2 2 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 28 18 37 37 28 25 25 22 Rotate crops to control pests : 68 73 90 95 76 91 81 64 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 37 42 57 37 45 30 34 57 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 17 14 22 16 22 20 22 20 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 43 39 69 44 43 55 35 77 Deliberate scouting activities : 37 44 23 38 41 21 36 18 Field was not scouted : 20 17 8 18 16 24 29 5 Scouted for pests : 8 6 28 9 5 22 2 17 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 6 1 4 8 2 11 3 6 Scouting due to pest development model : 3 3 3 2 2 7 3 1 Scouted for weeds : 75 83 91 79 82 75 70 94 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 88 87 60 89 89 70 91 96 An Employee : 1 2 3 1 2 1 2 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 8 4 31 6 7 26 2 3 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 3 7 6 4 2 3 4 Scouted for insects or mites : 58 74 74 61 50 54 56 78 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 87 87 56 89 90 65 91 97 An Employee : 2 2 3 1 4 1 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 8 5 35 6 4 31 3 1 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 4 6 6 4 2 4 5 * Scouted for diseases : 56 70 82 65 51 55 57 75 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 87 87 57 86 93 64 89 98 An Employee : 2 2 3 1 3 3 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 8 5 33 9 2 32 3 1 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 4 5 7 4 2 4 5 Records kept to track pests : 13 21 33 13 14 12 9 37 Field mapping of weed problems : 15 11 43 9 15 13 11 41 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 5 4 9 4 8 4 2 7 Weather monitoring : 26 28 52 31 25 35 11 57 : Suppression Practices: : Scouting used to make decisions : 11 5 25 6 10 27 10 17 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 52 55 60 56 62 52 43 55 Adjust planting methods : 17 19 22 17 20 15 16 13 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 12 8 42 1 11 9 3 39 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Pest Management Practices Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice Winter Wheat, 2006 (continued) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Practice : States :------------------------------------------------------- : NE : OH : OK : OR : SD : TX : WA ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 68 64 32 54 81 29 46 Plow down crop residue : 26 26 45 39 19 73 52 Remove crop residue : 13 9 13 8 13 5 15 Clean implements after fieldwork : 46 34 55 71 45 57 75 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 30 49 40 78 27 26 61 Water management practices : 3 2 6 3 5 6 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 29 54 25 30 37 18 16 Rotate crops to control pests : 89 93 26 57 90 36 84 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 30 45 20 58 42 27 54 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 21 13 9 17 32 9 23 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 37 39 46 79 54 17 86 Deliberate scouting activities : 48 29 30 21 38 51 12 Field was not scouted : 15 32 24 8 31 1 Scouted for pests : 7 5 6 37 12 4 25 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 3 9 14 16 4 3 11 Scouting due to pest development model : 2 6 12 6 * 10 Scouted for weeds : 85 64 64 100 92 56 98 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 91 79 97 70 87 91 67 An Employee : 5 * 3 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 4 19 1 20 4 5 31 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 5 2 1 5 8 1 2 Scouted for insects or mites : 54 53 60 63 71 54 77 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 90 76 96 65 87 93 61 An Employee : 8 3 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 3 23 1 23 3 1 36 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 8 1 3 4 11 3 3 Scouted for diseases : 54 59 47 71 68 46 82 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 89 75 94 68 86 94 65 An Employee : 8 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 3 23 2 21 3 2 33 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 8 2 4 3 11 3 2 Records kept to track pests : 12 13 4 51 16 3 53 Field mapping of weed problems : 15 16 12 40 16 3 40 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 3 6 2 18 3 2 16 Weather monitoring : 27 23 11 84 54 14 77 : Suppression Practices: : Scouting used to make decisions : 4 16 11 27 15 3 26 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 67 38 46 54 73 26 67 Adjust planting methods : 15 17 14 18 20 12 12 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 15 7 6 54 24 4 65 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Percentage is less than 0.5 Pest Management Practices Percent of Acres Utilizing Practice Winter Wheat, 2006 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Practice : States :--------------------------------------------------------------- : ALL : CO : ID : IL : KS : MI : MO : MT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 53 67 57 80 53 82 69 72 Plow down crop residue : 43 38 52 11 48 19 13 20 Remove crop residue : 11 6 15 7 16 9 13 10 Clean implements after fieldwork : 58 58 67 30 58 43 22 56 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 43 42 68 56 44 41 61 41 Water management practices : 3 5 7 3 1 1 1 1 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 27 21 40 39 31 27 35 37 Rotate crops to control pests : 64 74 91 98 76 92 86 61 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 41 46 62 42 45 32 47 69 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 20 20 28 19 25 25 25 30 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 47 44 79 48 42 60 46 79 Deliberate scouting activities : 37 38 14 34 45 21 34 18 Field was not scouted : 16 18 7 18 12 18 20 3 Scouted for pests : 10 7 35 11 5 26 3 21 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 5 1 4 10 1 14 3 6 Scouting due to pest development model : 3 4 4 1 2 8 3 3 Scouted for weeds : 80 80 92 77 86 81 78 97 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 88 91 60 86 89 67 88 95 An Employee : 1 2 3 2 2 1 2 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 8 2 32 7 7 28 3 3 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 4 5 6 4 3 4 7 Scouted for insects or mites : 64 70 74 65 57 59 63 84 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 86 91 51 85 88 63 86 95 An Employee : 1 2 4 2 3 1 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 8 3 39 8 5 32 4 2 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 5 5 6 5 4 5 9 1 Scouted for diseases : 62 68 82 69 56 61 64 81 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 87 92 52 84 92 62 85 96 An Employee : 1 2 3 2 3 2 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 7 3 38 9 1 33 4 3 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 5 3 7 4 4 5 9 Records kept to track pests : 16 24 40 13 13 18 12 40 Field mapping of weed problems : 16 15 50 15 12 14 12 46 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 6 4 9 5 8 3 5 10 Weather monitoring : 29 29 56 35 24 42 19 62 : Suppression Practices: : Scouting used to make decisions : 12 9 34 8 9 38 13 20 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 57 60 62 60 66 59 50 63 Adjust planting methods : 19 21 24 20 22 14 24 23 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 16 15 48 2 12 8 5 49 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued Pest Management Practices Percent of Acres Utilizing Practice Winter Wheat, 2006 (continued) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Practice : States :------------------------------------------------------- : NE : OH : OK : OR : SD : TX : WA ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Prevention Practices: : No-till or minimum till used to manage pests : 65 64 30 59 90 39 55 Plow down crop residue : 27 25 45 32 11 71 47 Remove crop residue : 10 6 11 12 6 5 12 Clean implements after fieldwork : 47 37 64 79 53 65 72 Field edges/etc. chopped, mowed/etc : 27 51 41 78 28 34 58 Water management practices : 3 2 4 2 7 4 : Avoidance Practices: : Adjust planting/harvesting dates : 34 49 24 35 38 13 15 Rotate crops to control pests : 88 90 25 48 95 40 78 Crop variety choosen for pest resistance : 29 49 28 64 46 27 51 Planting locations planned to avoid pests : 19 14 10 11 33 13 19 : Monitoring Practices: : Scouting by general observation : 42 40 51 73 65 18 83 Deliberate scouting activities : 48 28 29 27 30 52 14 Field was not scouted : 10 32 20 5 31 3 Scouted for pests : 11 5 7 28 21 3 19 Scouting due to pest advisory warning : 3 9 15 8 6 3 7 Scouting due to pest development model : 3 4 4 9 1 8 Scouted for weeds : 90 67 68 99 95 59 96 Scouting for weeds was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 88 80 97 73 86 94 67 An Employee : 4 1 2 * Farm supply or chemical dealer : 3 18 2 16 3 2 31 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 9 1 1 6 11 2 2 Scouted for insects or mites : 61 54 64 61 80 60 80 Scouting for insects or mites was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 84 77 94 73 84 94 62 An Employee : 7 2 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 4 22 2 17 3 1 35 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 13 * 4 3 13 3 2 Scouted for diseases : 67 55 52 71 80 56 82 Scouting for diseases was done by: : Operator, partner, or family member : 85 75 92 76 84 94 64 An Employee : 6 1 Farm supply or chemical dealer : 3 23 3 16 3 1 34 Indep. crop consultant or comm. scout : 12 2 5 2 13 4 2 Records kept to track pests : 17 10 5 48 23 3 47 Field mapping of weed problems : 16 19 11 41 15 4 37 Soil/plant tissue analysis to detect pests : 2 11 3 14 3 4 13 Weather monitoring : 32 21 11 86 57 11 69 : Suppression Practices: : Scouting used to make decisions : 5 16 15 25 16 3 27 Maintain ground cover or physical barriers : 68 41 49 64 78 35 69 Adjust planting methods : 24 15 16 17 27 13 10 Alternate pesticides with different MOA : 18 5 6 48 27 5 65 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Percentage is less than 0.5 Survey and Estimation Procedures Survey Procedures: Data for rice, soybeans, organic soybeans, durum wheat, other spring wheat, and winter wheat were collected on two 2006 surveys, the Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS) and the Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP). Data collection for the ARMS and CEAP surveys occurred during the months of September through December 2006 and only those CEAP samples that matched the ARMS crops and states were included. Data collection and sampling procedures were similar for both the ARMS and CEAP surveys. ARMS screening samples were drawn from the NASS List Sampling Frame. This extensive sampling frame covers all types of farms and accounts for approximately 90 percent of all land in farms in the United States. All farms on the list had a possibility of being selected for the screening sample. Farms thought to have the crops of interest were more likely to be in the screening sample. Sampled farms were screened to determine if they grew the target crops in 2006. From this subpopulation of operations identified as producing a crop of interest, a subsample of farms was selected in such a way as to insure that each identified producer had an opportunity to be selected. In general, larger farms were more likely to be selected than smaller farms. Once a farm producing rice, soybeans, organic soybeans, durum wheat, other spring wheat, or winter wheat was selected, one field was randomly chosen from all the fields on the farm. The operator of the sampled field was personally interviewed to obtain information on chemical applications made to the selected field. The CEAP was a nationwide, area-based sample survey based on the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)National Resources Inventory (NRI) points. CEAP samples which reported a commodity of interest which matched the ARMS commodities were combined with the ARMS data for use in this publication. Estimation Procedures: The chemical application data, reported by product name or trade name, are reviewed within each State and across States for reasonableness and consistency. This review compares reported data with manufacturers= recommendations and with data from other farm operators using the same product. Following this review, product information is converted to an active ingredient level. The chemical usage estimates in this publication consist of survey estimates of those active ingredients. For this publication, detailed data within a table may not multiply across or add down due to independent rounding of the published values. Estimates of the total amount of active ingredient applied are based on the acreage estimates published in the annual NASS report ACrop Production - 2006 Summary@ [Cr Pr 2-1 (07)] for rice, soybeans, durum wheat, other spring wheat, and winter wheat. Please note that the estimates for total amount of an active ingredient applied will not be revised even if there are subsequent revisions to acreage for a given crop. Reliability The surveys were designed so that the estimates are statistically representative of chemical use on the targeted crops in the Program States. The reliability of these survey results is affected by sampling variability and non-sampling errors. Since all operations producing the crops of interest are not included in the sample, survey estimates are subject to sampling variability. The sampling variability expressed as a percent of the estimate is called the coefficient of variation (cv). Sampling variability of the estimates differed considerably by chemical and crop. Variability for estimates of percent of acres treated will be higher than the variability for estimates of application rates. This is because application rates have a narrower range of responses, which are recommended by the manufacturer of the product, and are generally followed. In general, the more often the chemical was applied, the smaller the sampling variability. For example, estimates of a commonly used active ingredient such as Glyphosate isopropylamine salt will exhibit less variability than a rarely used chemical. A commonly used active ingredient is defined as an active ingredient used on at least 40 percent of the acres planted for a crop at the Program State level. For these active ingredients, cv=s range from 1 percent to 10 percent at the Program State level and 1 percent to 52 percent at the individual state level. Active ingredients that are less frequently used have cv=s that range from 2 percent to 70 percent. Non-sampling errors can occur in complete censuses as well as sample surveys. They are caused by the inability to obtain correct information from each person surveyed, differences in interpreting questions or definitions, and mistakes in coding or processing the data. Special efforts are taken at each step of the survey to minimize non-sampling errors. Terms and Definitions Active ingredient: The specific chemical which kills or controls the target pest(s). Usage data are reported by pesticide product and are converted to an amount of active ingredient. A single method of conversion has been chosen for active ingredients having more than one way of being converted. For example in this report, copper compounds are expressed in their metallic copper equivalent, and others such as 2,4-D and glyphosate are expressed in their salt and acid equivalent. Application Rates: Refer to the average number of pounds of a fertilizer primary nutrient or pesticide active ingredient applied to an acre of land. Rate per application is the average number of pounds applied per acre in one application. Rate per crop year is the average number of pounds applied per acre counting multiple applications. Number of applications is the average number of times a treated acre received a specific primary nutrient or active ingredient. Area applied: Represents the percentage of crop acres receiving one or more applications of a specific primary nutrient or active ingredient. Avoidance: May be practiced when pest populations exist in a field or site but the impact of the pest on the crop can be avoided through some cultural practice. Examples of avoidance tactics include crop rotation such that the crop of choice is not a host for the pest, choosing cultivars with genetic resistance to pests, using trap crops, choosing cultivars with maturity dates that may allow harvest before pest populations develop, fertilization programs to promote rapid crop development, and simply not planting certain areas of fields where pest populations are likely to cause crop failure. Some tactics for prevention and avoidance strategies may overlap. The following pest management questions were categorized as avoidance practices: Were planting or harvesting dates adjusted for this field to manage pests? Were crops rotated in this field during the past 3 years for the purpose of managing pests? Were planting locations planned to avoid infestation of pests? Was a trap crop grown to help manage insects in this field? Was a seed variety chosen to plant in this field because it had resistance to a specific pest? Beneficial Insects: Insects collected and introduced into locations because of their value in biologic control as prey on harmful insects and parasites. Chemigation: Application of an agricultural chemical by injecting it into irrigation water. Common name: An officially recognized name for an active ingredient. This report shows active ingredient by common name. Crop year: Refers to the period immediately following harvest of the previous crop through harvest of the current crop. Cultivar: A horticulturally or agriculturally derived variety of a plant, as distinguished from a natural variety. Farm: Any establishment from which $1,000 or more of agricultural products were sold or would normally be sold during the year. Government payments are included in sales. Places with all acreage enrolled in set aside or other government programs are considered to be a farm. Fertilizer: Refers to applications of the primary nutrients; nitrogen, phosphate, and potash. Fungi: A lower form of parasitic plant life which often reduces crop production and/or lowers the grade quality of its host. Land in Farms: All land operated as part of a farming operation during the year. It includes crop and livestock acreage, wasteland, woodland, pasture, land in summer fallow, idle cropland, and land enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program and other set-aside, conservation, or commodity acreage programs. It excludes public, industrial, and grazing association land, and nonagricultural land. It also excludes all land operated by establishments not qualifying as farms. Mechanism of Action (MOA): The method/biological pathway the pesticide uses to kill the pest. Monitoring: Includes proper identification of pests through systematic sampling or counting or other forms of scouting. Also, weather monitoring to predict levels of pest populations or to determine the most effective time to make pesticide applications, and soil testing where appropriate. The following pest management practices questions were categorized as monitoring practices: In 2006, how was this field primarily scouted for insects, weeds, diseases and/or beneficial organisms? (By conducting general observations while performing routine tasks? By deliberately going to the field specifically for scouting activities? This field was not scouted?) Was an established scouting process used (systematic sampling, recording counts, etc.) or were insect traps used in this field? Was scouting for pests done in this field due to a pest advisory warning? Was scouting for pests done in this field due to a pest development model? Was this field scouted for weeds? (If so, Who did the majority of the scouting? Operator, partner or family member, OR An employee, OR Farm supply or chemical dealer, OR Independent crop consultant or commercial scout?) Was this field scouted for insects and mites? (If so, Who did the majority of the scouting? Operator, partner or family member, OR An employee, OR Farm supply or chemical dealer, OR Independent crop consultant or commercial scout?) Was this field scouted for diseases? (If so, Who did the majority of the scouting? Operator, partner or family member, OR An employee, OR Farm supply or chemical dealer, OR Independent crop consultant or commercial scout?) Were written or electronic records kept for this field to track the activity or numbers of weeds, insects or diseases? Was field mapping data used for making weed management decisions on this field? Were the services of a diagnostic laboratory used for pest identification or soil or plant tissue pest analysis for this field? Was weather data used to assist in determining either the need or when to make pesticide applications? Were floral lures, attractants, repellants, pheromone traps or other biological pest controls used on this field? Nematodes: Microscopic, worm-shaped parasitic animals. Damage to many crops can be severe. Pesticides: As defined by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), pesticides include any substance or mixture of substances intended for preventing, destroying, repelling or mitigating any pest, and any substance or mixture of substances intended for use as a plant regulator, defoliant, or desiccant. The four classes of pesticides presented in this report and the pests targeted are: herbicides - weeds, insecticides - insects, fungicides - fungi, and other chemicals - other forms of life. Miticides and nematicides are included as insecticides while soil fumigants, growth regulators, defoliants, and desiccants are included as other chemicals. Pheromone: A chemical substance produced by an insect which serves as a stimulus to other individuals of the same species for one or more behavioral responses. Prevention: The practice of keeping a pest population from infesting a crop or field. It includes such tactics as using pest-free seeds or transplants, alternative tillage approaches such as no-till or strip-till systems, choosing cultivars with genetic resistance to insects or disease, irrigation scheduling to avoid situations conducive to disease development, cleaning tillage and harvesting equipment between fields or operations, using field sanitation procedures, and eliminating alternate hosts or sites for insect pests and disease organisms. The following pest management questions were categorized as prevention practices: Were field edges, lanes, ditches, roadways or fence lines chopped, mowed, plowed, or burned to manage pests for this field? Were crop residues plowed down or removed in this field to manage pests? Were equipment and implements cleaned after completing field work in this field to reduce the spread of pests? Were water management practices such as irrigation scheduling, controlled drainage, or treatment of retention water used on this field to manage pests? Was this field cultivated for weed control during the growing season? Was no-till or minimum till used to manage pests in this field? Suppression: Tactics include cultural practices such as narrow row spacings or optimized in-row plant populations, using cover crops or mulches, or using crops with allelopathic potential in the rotation. Physical suppression tactics may include cultivation or mowing for weed control, baited or pheromone traps for certain insects, and temperature management or exclusion devices for insect and disease management. Biological pesticides and controls, including mating disruption for insects, can be considered as alternatives to conventional pesticides. Determining pest thresholds and alternating pesticide active ingredients to avoid resistance buildup are suppression methods which minimize pesticide use. The following questions were categorized as suppression practices: Was scouting data compared to published information on infestation thresholds to determine when to take measures to manage pests in this field? Were any biological pesticides such as Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis), insect growth regulators (Courier, Intrepid, etc.) neem or other natural/biological based products sprayed or applied to manage pests in this field? Were any beneficial organisms (insects, nematodes, fungi) applied or released in this field to manage pests? Were ground covers, mulches, or other physical barriers maintained for this field to manage pest problems? Was row spacing or plant density adjusted in this field to manage pests? Were pesticides with different mechanisms of action rotated or tank mixed for the primary purpose of keeping pests from becoming resistant to pesticides? Trade name: A trademark name given to a specific formulation of a pesticide product. A formulation contains a specific concentration of the active ingredient, carrier materials, and other ingredients such as emulsifiers and wetting agents. Pesticide class, Common name, and Trade name The following is a list of common name, associated class and trade name of active ingredients in this publication. The classes are herbicides (H), insecticides (I), fungicides (F), and other chemicals (O). This list is provided as an aid in reviewing pesticide data. Pre-mixes are not cataloged. The list is not complete for all pesticides used on field crops and NASS does not mean to promote use of any specific trade name. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Class : Common Name : Trade Name ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- H : 24-D Tiller EC, Unison H : 24-D 2-EHE 2,4-D L.V. 4 Ester (3.84 lbs/g), : 2,4-D LV4 (3.80 lbs/g), 2,4-D LV6, 2,4-D Lo-V Este : Agsco 400 (EC), Agsco B-4, Barrage, Barrage HF, : Double Up B+D, LV 400 2,4-D Weed Killer, : Low Vol 4 Ester Weed Killer, Maestro D, : Outlaw (aka Bushwhacker), Salvo, Starane+Salvo, : Turret, WECO MAX, Weed Pro 6lb., : Weedone LV4 Solventless H : 24-D BEE E-99 Herbicide, Weedone 638, Weedone LV6 H : 24-D dieth salt Hi-Dep, Weedar 64A H : 24-D dimeth. salt 2,4-D Amine, 2,4-D Amine 4, 2,4-D Amine 6, : Banvel + 2,4-D, Brash, Formula 40, Hi-Dep, : Range Star, Rifle-D, Saber, Savage, Weedar 64, : Weedaxe, Weedmaster H : 24-D isoprop. salt RT Master H : 24-D triiso. salt Curtail (EC) H : 24-DB dimeth. salt Butyrac 175, Butyrac 200 H : 24-DP dimeth. salt 2,4-D Amine 4CA I : Acephate Acephate 75 WSP, Acephate 90SP, Bracket 90, : Orthene 90 WSP, Orthene 90S H : Acetochlor Confidence, TopNotch H : Acifluorfen sodium Blazer 2L, Storm, Ultra Blazer H : Alachlor Intrro (4E), Lasso I : Aldicarb Temik 15G H : Aminopyralid CleanWave H : Atrazine Atrazine 4L, Atrazine 90DF, Banvel-K + Atrazine I : Azadirachtin Neemix 4.5 F : Azoxystrobin Quadris, Quilt H : Bensulfuron-methyl Duet, Londax (60DF) H : Bentazon Basagran, Rezult B, Storm I : Benzoic acid Intrepid 2F H : Bispyribac-sodium Regiment (Rice) H : Bromoxynil Buctril (2EC), Moxy 2E H : Bromoxynil heptanoat Agsco B-4, Bison Advanced, Bronate Advanced, : Buctril 4EC, Rhino, WECO MAX H : Bromoxynil octanoate Agsco B-4, Bison, Bison Advanced, Bromox/MCPA 2-2, : Bronate (4EC), Bronate (Bronate Pro #2), : Bronate Advanced, Brox 2EC, Brox-M, Buctril 4EC, : Connect 20 WSP, Double Up B+D, HBN Plus, Maestro D : Maestro MA, Rhino, WECO MAX I : Bt subsp. kurstaki Costar Biological Insecticide, Javelin (FC) I : Carbaryl Sevin 4F, Sevin SL, Sevin XLR Plus I : Carbofuran Furadan 4F, Furadan 5G ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --continued Pesticide class, Common name, and Trade name --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Class : Common Name : Trade Name --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- H : Carfentrazone-ethyl Aim (40% WDG), Aim EC, Aim EW, Shark H : Chlorimuron-ethyl Canopy, Canopy EX, Canopy SP, Canopy XL, Classic, : Synchrony STS, Synchrony XP I : Chlorpyrifos Govern 4E, Lorsban 15G, Lorsban 4E, Lorsban 4E SG, : Pilot 4E, Warhawk H : Chlorsulfuron Finesse, Glean FC (75DF) H : Clethodim Arrow 2EC, Clethodim 2EC, Intensity, Select 2 EC, : Volunteer H : Clodinafop-propargil Discover, Discover NG H : Clomazone Cerano 5 MEG, Command 3ME, Command 4EC, : Command Xtra (Co-Pack 3009 & 3010) H : Clopyralid Curtail M (EC), Stinger (3EC), WideMatch, : WideMatch M H : Clopyralid mono salt Curtail (EC) H : Cloransulam-methyl Amplify (For Soybeans), FirstRate (soybeans), : Gangster (Co-Pack-4964 & 4965), : Gangster FR (aka FirstRate) F : Coniothyrium minitan Contans WG F : Copper sulfate Bluestone, Copper Sulfate H : Cyanazine Bladex 80WP I : Cyfluthrin Baythroid 2 (EC) H : Cyhalofop-butyl Clincher SF I : Cypermethrin Ammo 2.5 EC, Battery 2.5 EC I : Deltamethrin Delta Gold H : Dicamba Banvel SGF (2EC), : Oracle Dicamba Agricultural Herbicide, : Outlaw (aka Bushwhacker) H : Dicamba Pot. salt Banvel-K + Atrazine H : Dicamba digly salt Clarity H : Dicamba dimet. salt Banvel (4L), Banvel + 2,4-D, Brash, Diablo, : Range Star, Rifle, Rifle-D, Sterling, Weedmaster H : Dicamba iso salt Fallow Master H : Dicamba sodium salt Dicamba SG, Rave H : Diclofop-methyl Hoelon 3EC H : Difenzoquat Avenge (2L) I : Diflubenzuron Dimilin 25W, Dimilin 2L H : Dimethenamid Frontier 6.0 H : Dimethenamid-P Outlook I : Dimethoate Digon 400, Dimate 4EC, Dimethoate 400, : Dimethoate 4EC I : Disulfoton Di-Syston 8 H : Diuron Direx 4L I : Endosulfan Thiodan 3EC I : Esfenvalerate Asana XL H : Ethalfluralin Sonalan 10G O : Ethephon Ethephon 2 H : Fenoxaprop Dakota, Fusion, RiceStar Herbicide, Whip 1EC H : Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl Cheyenne FM (container #2), : Puma 1EC (Bronate Pro #1), Tiller EC, Whip 360 H : Fluazifop-P-butyl Fusilade DX, Fusion --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --continued Pesticide class, Common name, and Trade name --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Class : Common Name : Trade Name --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- H : Flucarbazone-sodium Everest 70% H : Flufenacet Axiom DF, DEFINE DF, DEFINE SC, Domain DF H : Flumetsulam Python WDG H : Flumiclorac-pentyl Resource H : Flumioxazin Gangster (Co-Pack-4964 & 4965), : Gangster V (aka Valor), Valor WP H : Fluometuron Cotoran 4L H : Fluroxypyr Starane EC H : Fluroxypyr 1-MHE CleanWave, Starane + Sword, Starane+Salvo, : WideMatch, WideMatch M H : Fomesafen Flexstar, Reflex I : Gamma-cyhalothrin Proaxis, Prolex O : Garlic oil Garlic Barrier AG O : Gibberellic acid GA3 4% H : Glufosinate-ammonium Liberty H : Glyphosate Sequence, Touchdown CF, Touchdown Herbicide, : Touchdown HiTech, Touchdown Total H : Glyphosate amm. salt Credit Duo, Credit Duo Extra, Roundup Ultra Dry H : Glyphosate iso. salt Alecto 41S, Backdraft, Buccaneer, Buccaneer Plus, : ClearOut 41 Plus, Cornerstone, Credit, Credit Duo, : Credit Duo Extra, Durango, Extreme, Fallow Master, : Genesis, Genesis Extra Broad Spectrum, : Gly Star Plus, Gly-4 Plus, Glyfos X-TRA, Glyphomax : Glyphomax Plus, Glyphomax XRT, : Glyphosate 4 (Turf & Ornamental), : Glyphosate Original, Grandslam 4XS, Helosate Plus, : Hi-Yield Killzall, Honcho, Honcho Plus, : Imitator Plus, Mad Dog Glyphosate, Mirage (4EC), : Mirage Plus, RT 3 Herbicide, RT Master, Rascal, : Rascal Plus, Roundup Custom, Roundup D-Pak, : Roundup Export, Roundup Original, : Roundup Original II, Roundup Original Max, : Roundup Pro (T & O), Roundup Ultra, : Roundup Ultra Max, Roundup Weather Max, : Silhouette Herbicide, StrikeOut Extra, Supersate, : Wise Up Plus Glyphosate Herbicide H : Glyphosate pot. salt RT Master II H : Halosulfuron Permit H : Imazamox Beyond (Clearfied Crops), Raptor H : Imazaquin Backdraft, Scepter (1.5L), Scepter 70DG H : Imazethapyr Clearpath, Extreme, Newpath (Clearfield Rice), : Pursuit DG, Pursuit Plus EC H : Imazethapyr ammon Pursuit I : Indoxacarb Steward H : Lactofen Cobra (2E), Phoenix Herbicide I : Lambda-cyhalothrin Demand CS, Karate (1EC), Karate Z, Silencer, : Taiga Z, Warrior H : Linuron Linex 4L H : MCPA Dakota, Rhonox (EC), Tiller EC H : MCPA 2-ethylhexyl Agsco MXL, Bison Advanced, Bromox/MCPA 2-2, --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --continued Pesticide class, Common name, and Trade name --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Class : Common Name : Trade Name --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Bronate (4EC), Bronate (Bronate Pro #2), : Bronate Advanced, Brox-M, : Cheyenne FM (container #2), Curtail M (EC), Dagger : HBN Plus, MCP 4 Ester, MCPE Phenoxy, Maestro MA, : Rhino, See MCPA Ester, Solve MCPA Ester, : Starane + Sword, Sword, WideMatch M, WildCard H : MCPA dimethyl. salt MCP Amine 4, Rhomene MCPA Amine H : MCPA isooctyl ester Bison H : MCPA sodium salt Esteron 6E I : Malathion Malathion 5 EC (56%), Malathion 5 EC (57%), : Malathion 8E F : Mefenoxam Apron XL LS H : Mesosulfuron-Methyl Olympus Flex (For Wheat), Osprey, : Rimfire (For Use in Wheat) I : Methomyl Lannate LV (2.4 lbs.) I : Methyl parathion Methyl Parathion 4EC, Methyl Parathion 6EC, : Penncap-M H : Metribuzin Authority, Axiom DF, Boundary, Boundary 6.5EC, : Canopy, Canopy SP, Domain DF, Sencor 4, : Sencor DF (75%) H : Metsulfuron-methyl Ally Extra, Ally XP (60DF), Finesse, : Metsulfuron 60ED AG, Purestand DF, Valuron 60DF H : Molinate Arrosolo 3-3E, Ordram 10-G, Ordram 15-G, : Ordram 15-GM, Ordram 8-E I : Neem oil clar. hyd. NeemGard H : Paraquat Cyclone, Gramoxone Extra, Gramoxone Inteon, : Gramoxone Max H : Pendimethalin Pendimax 3.3, Prowl (4EC), Prowl 3.3 EC, Prowl H2O : Pursuit Plus EC H : Penoxsulam Granite GR, Grasp SC I : Permethrin Permethrin 3.2 AG, Pounce 25WP, Pounce 3.2EC H : Picloram K salt Tordon 22K (2EC) H : Pinoxaden Axial (For Wheat & Barley) H : Propachlor Ramrod 65 (WP) H : Propanil Arrosolo 3-3E, Duet, Prop-Job 4E, Propanil 3E, : Propanil 4E, Propanil WDG (50%), : Stam 4SC (For Rice), Stam 80 EDF (For Rice), : Stam M4 (For Rice), Wham! EZ F : Propiconazole Bumper 41.8 EC, PropiMax EC, Quilt, Stratego, Tilt H : Propoxycarbazone-sod Olympus 70%G, Olympus Flex (For Wheat), : Rimfire (For Use in Wheat) H : Prosulfuron Peak (WDG) F : Pyraclostrobin Headline, Headline SBR H : Pyraflufen-ethyl ET H : Quinclorac Clearpath, Facet 50WP, Facet 75 DF (For Rice) H : Quizalofop-P-ethyl Assure II H : Quizalofop-ethyl Targa H : Rimsulfuron Matrix (aka Shadeout) H : S-Metolachlor Boundary, Boundary 6.5EC, Dual II Magnum, : Dual Magnum, Sequence --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --continued Pesticide class, Common name, and Trade name --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Class : Common Name : Trade Name --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- H : Sethoxydim Poast, Poast Plus, Prestige (1EC), Rezult G O : Sodium chlorate Sodium Chlorate 2lb, Sodium Chlorate 3lb, : Sodium Chlorate 5lb, Sodium Chlorate 6lb H : Sulfentrazone Authority, Canopy XL, : Command Xtra (Co-Pack 3009 & 3010) H : Sulfosate Touchdown 5, Touchdown 6 H : Sulfosulfuron Maverick F : Tebuconazole Folicur 3.6 F, Headline SBR I : Tebufenozide Confirm 2F F : Tetraconazole Domark 230 ME H : Thifensulfuron Affinity BroadSpec Herbicide, Affinity Tankmix, : Ally Extra, Harmony Extra XP, Harmony GT XP, : Synchrony STS, Synchrony XP H : Thiobencarb Abolish 8 EC, Bolero 10G, Bolero 15 G, Bolero 8EC I : Thiodicarb Larvin 3.2 F : Thiophanate-methyl Topsin 4.5FL, Topsin M 70WP H : Tralkoxydim Achieve 40DG, Achieve SC I : Tralomethrin Scout X-TRA H : Triallate Buckle (G), Far-Go, Far-Go Granular (10%) H : Triasulfuron Amber, Rave H : Tribenuron-methyl Affinity BroadSpec Herbicide, Affinity Tankmix, : Ally Extra, Canopy EX, Express XP (DF), : Harmony Extra XP H : Triclopyr Grandstand R (Rice) F : Trifloxystrobin Stratego H : Trifluralin Buckle (G), Treflan 4L, Treflan 5 (EC), : Treflan E.C., Treflan HFP, Treflan TR-10, Tri-4, : Trifluralin 4EC, Trilin, Trilin 10G, Trust 4EC I : Zeta-cypermethrin Mustang, Mustang Max --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Report Features Released May 16, 2007 by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, U.S. Department of Agriculture. For information on "Agricultural Chemical Usage" call Mark Miller at (202) 720-0684, office hours 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ET. Listed below are persons within the National Agricultural Statistics Service to contact for additional information. Kevin Barnes, Chief, Environmental, Economics, and Demographics Branch (202) 720-6146 Mark R. Miller, Head, Environmental and Demographics Section (202) 720-0684 Doug Farmer, Environmental Statistician (202) 720-7492 Liana Cuffman, Environmental Statistician (202) 690-0392 ACCESS TO REPORTS!! For your convenience, there are several ways to obtain NASS reports, data products, and services: INTERNET ACCESS All NASS reports are available free of charge on the worldwide Internet. For access, connect to the Internet and go to the NASS Home Page at: www.nass.usda.gov. Select "Today's Reports" or "Publications" and the "Reports Calendar" or "Publications" and then search, by Title or Subject. E-MAIL SUBSCRIPTION All NASS reports are available by subscription free of charge direct to your e-mail address. Starting with the NASS Home Page at www.nass.usda.gov, click on "Publications", then click on the "Subscribe by E-mail" button which takes you to the page describing e-mail delivery of reports. Finally, click on "Go to the Subscription Page" and follow the instructions. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PRINTED REPORTS OR DATA PRODUCTS CALL OUR TOLL-FREE ORDER DESK: 800-999-6779 (U.S. and Canada) Other areas, please call 703-605-6220 FAX: 703-605-6900 (Visa, MasterCard, check, or money order acceptable for payment.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ASSISTANCE For assistance with general agricultural statistics or further information about NASS or its products or services, contact the Agricultural Statistics Hotline at 800-727-9540, 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ET, or e-mail: nass@nass.usda.gov. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA=s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (202) 720-6382 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.