We 1 (5-02) Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin National Agricultural Statistics Service USDA Washington, D.C. Released May 29, 2002, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, U.S. Department of Agriculture. For information on "Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin" call Mark E. Miller at (202)720-7621, office hours 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ET. National Weather Summary Volume 89, No. 22 May 19 - 25, 2002 For additional information, call (202) 720-7917. Highlights: A record-setting, late-season cold snap capped a 5-week spell of cool weather across the North, causing additional harm to orchard crops, further slowing the development of winter wheat and emergence of spring-sown crops, and burning back already-emerged summer crops. Widespread freezes were noted across the Intermountain West, northern Plains, upper Midwest, Great Lakes region, and interior Northeast. Elsewhere, showers boosted topsoil moisture for pastures and dryland small grains across northern California and the interior Northwest. Meanwhile, drought persisted in the Southwest, although cooler weather eased irrigation demands. Pastures and small grains on Montana's drought-stricken High Plains benefited from widespread precipitation, but the central and southern High Plains received only localized drought relief. In contrast, very wet conditions persisted on the east-central Plains. Dry weather prevailed in the Ohio and middle Mississippi Valleys from May 18-23, followed by periodic showers that were heaviest in Missouri and southern Iowa. As a result, the planting pace remained sluggish in the southwestern Corn Belt, but gradually accelerated in the Ohio Valley. Soil moisture remained mostly adequate across the interior South, but dryness stressed pastures and dryland summer crops along and near the Gulf Coast. In southern Florida, however, heavy showers curbed the threat of wildfires and eased irrigation demands. Early in the week, a cool regime intensified its grip on the Midwest and East, while a narrow ribbon of warmth spread across the northern Rockies and northern High Plains in advance of a late-season winter storm. Nationwide, nearly 500 daily-record lows were set or tied during the week, with approximately 100 lows apiece noted on May 19 and 20. Many of the records were associated with a very strong and persistent upper-level trough over the Midwest and East, although the Western storm system drew some additional cold air across the Rockies, northern Plains, and upper Midwest during the mid- to late-week period. On Sunday, daily-record highs were posted in locations such as Missoula, MT (91 degrees F), and Orchard Mesa, CO (90 degrees F). The following day, Helena, MT, registered 90 degrees F. However, cold, stormy weather soon returned to portions of the Rockies and northern Plains, leaving daily-record snowfall totals in Montana on May 22 in Great Falls (1.4 inches) and Glasgow (1.3 inches). Daily-record snowfalls were also reported in Williston, ND (0.4 inch on May 23), Cheyenne, WY (2.1 inches on May 24), and North Platte, NE (a trace on May 24). The storm brought some rain to southern California, where downtown Los Angeles' 0.05-inch total on May 20 left the city's season-to-date total (4.41 inches, or 29 percent of normal, since July 1, 2001) in a position to break the record-low value of 4.85 inches in 1960-61. Farther north, downtown Sacramento, CA (1.22 inches on May 20), notched a daily-record rainfall. But the week's biggest story was the pervasive, late-season cold outbreak. A few stations, including Bristol, TN, collected five consecutive daily-record lows. Bristol's records (35, 32, 37, 31, and 37 degrees F), set from May 19-23, included their latest freeze on record (previously, 30 degrees F on May 16, 1997). Elsewhere, Lexington, KY (32 degrees F on May 19), Parkersburg, WV (30 degrees F on May 22), and Salisbury, MD (30 degrees F on May 22), experienced freezes more than 1 week later than ever before recorded. Meanwhile on the northern Plains, Valentine, NE (25 degrees F on May 24), had their latest spring temperature at or below 25 degrees F (previously, 25 degrees F on May 21, 1931), while Bismarck, ND (24 degrees F on May 24) came within 5 days of their latest such reading (25 degrees F on May 29, 1947). By week's end, warmer air began to overspread much of the Nation, resulting in the first high temperature of the month above 80 degrees F in Indianapolis, IN (81 degrees F on May 25). Indianapolis had recorded 5 days with highs at or above 80 degrees F from April 15-19, but none from April 20 - May 24. In fact, Indianapolis' highs reached or exceeded 70 degrees F only 10 times in the 33-day period from April 20 - May 22. Farther north, highs failed to reach 50 degrees F on 16 of the first 25 days of May in Marquette, MI, breaking their May record of 13 days set in 1967, 1970, and 1983. Meanwhile, May 1-27 rainfall totals reached 13.47 inches (310 percent of normal) in Joplin, MO, 9.53 inches (223 percent) in Columbia, MO, 8.41 inches (203 percent) in Paducah, KY, 7.19 inches (180 percent) in Cincinnati, OH, and 7.09 inches (187 percent) in Burlington, IA. In contrast, May 1-27 rainfall totaled 1.12 inches (43 percent of normal) in Dodge City, KS, leaving their 239-day (October 1, 2001 - May 27, 2002) total at 3.67 inches (34 percent). Farther south, May 27 was the 111th consecutive day (starting February 6) without measurable rainfall in El Paso, TX, approaching their February-June 1910 record of 126 days. In Alaska, summer-like conditions propelled weekly temperatures 4 to 16 degrees F above normal. From May 18-26, McGrath notched 8 daily-record highs in 9 days. Fairbanks noted five records during the same period, including a high of 82 degrees F on May 21. Despite frequently wet weather since early April across interior Alaska, the summer-like weather helped to spark several large wildfires. By May 28, Alaska's year-to-date wildfire acreage climbed to about 125,000, including a 20,000-acre blaze 15 miles south of McGrath and a nearly 15,000-acre fire 50 miles east of Fairbanks. Farther south, where dryness lingered, May 1-27 precipitation stood at 2.46 inches (28 percent of normal) in Yakutat and 1.95 inches (64 percent) in Juneau, leaving 88-day (March 1 - May 27) totals at 7.66 inches (23 percent) in Yakutat and 3.75 inches (39 percent) in the latter location. Meanwhile, near-normal temperatures accompanied mostly dry weather in Hawaii. A few heavier showers were noted across the Hawaiian islands early in the week, including a 24-hour total of 1.51 inches at southeastern Oahu's Manoa Lyon Arboretum on May 19-20. National Agricultural Summary May 20 - 26, 2002 Highlights: Field preparations and planting resumed in the eastern Corn Belt, as excess moisture gradually drained from soggy fields. Producers with sandy soils and well-drained fields made good progress, while producers with poorly drained and clay soils worked around wet spots in their fields. At the end of the week, planting remained well behind normal in most areas east of the Mississippi River. Meanwhile, planting proceeded with few delays across much of the South, although rain interrupted progress in parts of the southern Great Plains and moisture shortages limited progress on the southern High Plains. Many recently planted fields in the western Corn Belt and adjacent areas of the Great Plains emerged during the week, but growth was slow due to cold weather. On the northern High Plains, small grains produced very little vegetative growth due to the cold weather, but the accompanying heavy snowfall provided much-needed moisture. Corn: Planting progressed to 83 percent complete, 1 week behind last year at this time and the 5-year average of 94 percent. Fifty-three percent has emerged, compared with 78 percent on this date last year. Moisture surpluses remained in many areas of the central and eastern Corn Belt, but planting resumed on sandy and well-drained soils. Planting was most active in Indiana, where producers seeded 30 percent of their crop during the week. Illinois, Ohio, and Wisconsin producers planted nearly one-fourth of their acreage. Progress was just slightly slower in Michigan. In the western Corn Belt and Great Plains, planting neared completion. Fields rapidly emerged, despite cold weather across the entire Corn Belt and Great Plains. Nearly one-half of the crop emerged during the week in North Dakota, and about one-third of the acreage emerged in Iowa and Minnesota. Crop conditions were much lower in the eastern Corn Belt, where emergence and growth were hampered by cold weather and excessive soil moisture. Soybeans: Fifty-one percent of the crop has been planted and 15 percent has emerged. Planting was about 1 week behind last year and the 5-year average of 68 and 69 percent, respectively. Emergence was nearly 2 weeks behind last year's rapid pace. Planting was most active in the western Corn Belt and northern Great Plains, where most producers have finished done planting corn. South Dakota producers planted 40 percent of their acreage during the week, surpassing the 37-percent progress in North Dakota, and the 30-percent progress in Iowa and Minnesota. Planting gained momentum in the central and eastern Corn Belt, especially in Wisconsin, where one-third of the acreage was planted during the week. At the end of the week however, only one-fith of the acreage was seeded in Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio. Progress was less advanced in Kentucky. Fields quickly emerged in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska, but less than 10 percent were emerged in most areas of the northern Great Plains, upper Mississippi Valley, and the eastern two-thirds of the Corn Belt. Winter Wheat: Seventy-four percent of the acreage has headed, 3 percentage points less than last year and the average for this date. About one-fourth of the Colorado, Indiana, and Ohio acreage entered the heading stage during the week, despite temperatures averaging much below normal in the Great Plains and Corn Belt. Meanwhile, heading neared completion in Kansas, Missouri, and Texas. Farther north, fields rapidly headed in Nebraska, but none were headed in Idaho, Montana, and South Dakota. Harvest continued across the South, with progress reaching 17 percent in Texas. Cotton: Eighty-two percent was planted, and 6 percent was squaring. Planting and squaring were slightly ahead of last year and the average for this date. Planting continued without interruption in the Southeast, and progressed with few delays in the interior Mississippi Delta States. Planting neared completion ahead of normal along the Atlantic Coastal Plain, but remained behind normal in the Mississippi Valley, especially in Missouri and Tennessee. In the Great Plains, rain interrupted progress in southern Oklahoma and northeastern Texas, while moisture shortages limited progress on the High Plains of Texas and New Mexico. Crop development was most advanced in Arizona and Texas, where 10 and 11 percent, respectively, was squaring. Small grains: Spring wheat was 89 percent planted and 52 percent emerged. Planting passed last year's pace and matched the 5-year average. However, emergence lagged about 4 days behind last year's pace and about 1 week behind the 5-year average. Dry weather supported a rapid planting pace in Minnesota and North Dakota, where producers seeded 32 and 24 percent of their acreage, respectively, during the week. Emergence advanced 20 or more percentage points in Minnesota, Montana, and North Dakota, despite cold weather during most of the week. Barley seeding advanced to 92 percent, and emergence progressed to 55 percent. Planting moved ahead of last year and the average for the first time this season. However, emergence remained 5 days behind last year's 67 percent and about 1 week behind the 70-percent average for this date. Dry weather aided rapid planting in Minnesota and North Dakota, where about one-third of the acreage was seeded during the week. Fields quickly emerged across the northern Great Plains, despite temperatures averaging well below normal and widespread sub-freezing nighttime lows. Ninety-four percent of the oat crop has been seeded, and 72 percent has emerged. Planting moved slightly ahead of last year's pace and equaled the 5-year average, but emergence was 4 days behind last year and 5 days behind the 5-year average. In North Dakota, planting and emergence advanced 23 and 26 percent, respectively. Elsewhere, planting remained active in Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin. Rice: Ninety-five percent of the crop has been planted, and 86 percent has emerged. Planting and emergence were 3 percentage points behind this date last year. However, planting progress equaled the 5-year average and emergence exceeded the 82-percent average for this date. Planting was very active in Missouri and California, advancing 25 and 15 percentage points, respectively, during the week. Fields quickly emerged, but growth was slow due to below-normal temperatures. Sorghum: Planting advanced to 45 percent complete, but lagged more than 1 week behind last year's 61-percent pace and 4 days behind the 5-year average of 52 percent. The planting pace slowed in the lower Mississippi Valley, where seeding was nearly complete. Elsewhere, planting accelerated on the central and northern Great Plains, but remained mostly stalled in the southern Corn Belt. Nebraska producers seeded one-fourth of their acreage during the week, while Illinois and Missouri growers seeded just 2 percent of their crop. Other crops: Peanut planting remained active, advancing to 80 percent complete. At the end of the week, progress trailed last year's 84 percent pace, but exceeded the 5-year average of 78 percent. Oklahoma producers planted about one-fourth of their acreage during the week, despite rain delays. Dry weather supported progress throughout the week in the Southeast. Sugarbeet planting advanced to 98 percent complete. Progress exceeded last year's 91-percent pace and the 5-year average of 96 percent. Dry weather supported progress in Minnesota and North Dakota. Twenty-three percent of the sunflower crop has been planted, slightly less than the 27 percent seeded on this date last year. Planting rapidly progressed in North Dakota. Corn: Percent Planted, Selected States 1/ -------------------------------------- : Week Ending : :-----------------------: 1997- State:May 26,:May 19,:May 26,: 2001 : 2002 : 2002 : 2001 : Avg. -------------------------------------- : Percent : CO : 94 83 95 95 IL : 74 51 99 96 IN : 43 13 100 96 IA : 98 94 93 97 KS : 98 94 99 97 KY : 70 55 99 93 MI : 72 51 90 86 MN : 97 90 89 96 MO : 83 78 94 92 NE : 97 93 97 97 NC : 100 99 100 97 ND : 87 73 80 81 OH : 45 22 100 95 PA : 72 56 86 81 SD : 94 79 84 84 TN : 99 95 100 98 TX : 99 98 97 98 WI : 79 56 76 89 : 18 Sts: 83 70 94 94 -------------------------------------- 1/ These 18 States planted 93% of last year's corn acreage. Soybeans: Percent Planted, Selected States 1/ -------------------------------------- : Week Ending : :-----------------------: 1997- State:May 26,:May 19,:May 26,: 2001 : 2002 : 2002 : 2001 : Avg. -------------------------------------- : Percent : AR : 47 32 64 49 IL : 22 10 85 76 IN : 19 4 96 80 IA : 84 54 58 76 KS : 45 26 75 63 KY : 15 5 66 44 LA : 61 43 89 78 MI : 42 23 73 58 MN : 82 52 54 76 MS : 87 72 94 83 MO : 29 18 53 53 NE : 72 45 71 74 NC : 53 38 38 33 ND : 72 35 46 55 OH : 20 7 88 79 SD : 69 29 46 56 TN : 30 20 58 34 WI : 62 28 39 65 : 18 Sts: 51 30 68 69 -------------------------------------- 1/ These 18 States planted 95% of last year's soybean acreage. Corn: Percent Emerged, Selected States 1/ -------------------------------------- : Week Ending : :-----------------------: 1997- State:May 26,:May 19,:May 26,: 2001 : 2002 : 2002 : 2001 : Avg. -------------------------------------- : Percent : CO : 59 35 74 69 IL : 49 33 95 NA IN : 13 7 99 NA IA : 76 45 74 80 KS : 82 68 94 NA KY : 59 47 96 79 MI : 19 8 71 57 MN : 47 13 55 74 MO : 73 65 83 NA NE : 71 50 80 79 NC : 99 95 98 94 ND : 56 8 46 47 OH : 20 10 95 75 PA : 50 26 64 NA SD : 34 11 49 NA TN : 93 88 100 NA TX : 93 86 91 90 WI : 24 13 42 NA : 18 Sts: 53 34 78 NA -------------------------------------- 1/ These 18 States planted 93% of last year's corn acreage. Soybeans: Percent Emerged, Selected States 1/ -------------------------------------- : Week Ending : :-----------------------: 1997- State:May 26,:May 19,:May 26,: 2001 : 2002 : 2002 : 2001 : Avg. -------------------------------------- : Percent : AR : 30 25 49 32 IL : 5 2 68 NA IN : 4 2 85 NA IA : 24 6 20 38 KS : 27 14 49 NA KY : 7 3 58 28 LA : 42 34 79 66 MI : 9 2 53 32 MN : 9 0 11 36 MS : 75 57 87 69 MO : 16 10 32 NA NE : 25 9 36 35 NC : 33 20 23 NA ND : 9 0 12 19 OH : 7 3 74 48 SD : 6 1 12 NA TN : 16 12 45 NA WI : 14 0 20 NA : 18 Sts: 15 6 42 NA -------------------------------------- 1/ These 18 States planted 95% of last year's soybean acreage. Cotton: Percent Planted, Selected States 1/ -------------------------------------- : Week Ending : :-----------------------: 1997- State:May 26,:May 19,:May 26,: 2001 : 2002 : 2002 : 2001 : Avg. -------------------------------------- : Percent : AL : 93 83 92 92 AZ : 98 95 99 98 AR : 92 76 96 95 CA : 100 99 100 98 GA : 86 72 77 81 LA : 95 88 99 98 MS : 93 82 99 96 MO : 89 82 100 99 NC : 96 85 92 89 OK : 74 60 75 57 SC : 92 76 70 82 TN : 76 61 100 94 TX : 66 50 61 59 VA : 100 97 100 98 : 14 Sts: 82 69 80 79 -------------------------------------- 1/ These 14 States planted 98% of last year's cotton acreage. Winter Wheat: Percent Headed, Selected States 1/ -------------------------------------- : Week Ending : :-----------------------: 1997- State:May 26,:May 19,:May 26,: 2001 : 2002 : 2002 : 2001 : Avg. -------------------------------------- : Percent : AR : 100 100 100 100 CA : 100 100 99 99 CO : 58 34 45 58 ID : 0 0 3 6 IL : 89 78 95 91 IN : 78 50 98 85 KS : 94 79 96 96 MI : 1 0 35 31 MO : 94 85 95 89 MT : 0 0 0 4 NE : 36 17 50 46 NC : 100 98 100 100 OH : 41 15 89 71 OK : 100 98 100 100 OR : 33 28 25 29 SD : 0 0 1 10 TX : 96 91 97 95 WA : 25 6 31 30 : 18 Sts: 74 64 77 77 -------------------------------------- 1/ These 18 States planted 90% of last year's winter wheat acreage. Cotton: Percent Squaring, Selected States 1/ -------------------------------------- : Week Ending : :-----------------------: 1997- State:May 26,:May 19,:May 26,: 2001 : 2002 : 2002 : 2001 : Avg. -------------------------------------- : Percent : AL : 9 NA 4 1 AZ : 10 NA 11 13 AR : 0 NA 1 0 CA : 5 NA 3 4 GA : 7 NA 3 3 LA : 1 NA 5 2 MS : 1 NA 3 1 MO : 2 NA 0 0 NC : 0 NA 0 0 OK : 0 NA 0 0 SC : 1 NA 0 3 TN : 0 NA 1 1 TX : 11 NA 10 9 VA : 0 NA 0 0 : 14 Sts: 6 NA 5 5 -------------------------------------- 1/ These 14 States planted 98% of last year's cotton acreage. Rice: Percent Planted, Selected States 1/ -------------------------------------- : Week Ending : :-----------------------: 1997- State:May 26,:May 19,:May 26,: 2001 : 2002 : 2002 : 2001 : Avg. -------------------------------------- : Percent : AR : 95 92 99 96 CA : 95 80 93 86 LA : 99 97 99 99 MS : 98 91 99 97 MO : 81 56 98 97 TX : 100 100 100 98 : 6 Sts : 95 89 98 95 -------------------------------------- 1/ These 6 States planted 100% of last year's rice acreage. Rice: Percent Emerged, Selected States 1/ -------------------------------------- : Week Ending : :-----------------------: 1997- State:May 26,:May 19,:May 26,: 2001 : 2002 : 2002 : 2001 : Avg. -------------------------------------- : Percent : AR : 90 83 94 84 CA : 65 40 56 52 LA : 96 92 98 96 MS : 92 81 94 88 MO : 54 38 93 79 TX : 99 98 98 93 : 6 Sts : 86 76 89 82 -------------------------------------- 1/ These 6 States planted 100% of last year's rice acreage. Spring Wheat: Percent Planted, Selected States 1/ -------------------------------------- : Week Ending : :-----------------------: 1997- State:May 26,:May 19,:May 26,: 2001 : 2002 : 2002 : 2001 : Avg. -------------------------------------- : Percent : ID : 99 97 99 98 MN : 91 59 73 84 MT : 80 70 94 94 ND : 88 64 83 83 SD : 100 98 98 98 WA : 100 97 100 100 : 6 Sts : 89 71 87 89 -------------------------------------- 1/ These 6 States planted 98% of last year's spring wheat acreage. Barley: Percent Planted, Selected States 1/ -------------------------------------- : Week Ending : :-----------------------: 1997- State:May 26,:May 19,:May 26,: 2001 : 2002 : 2002 : 2001 : Avg. -------------------------------------- : Percent : ID : 97 94 99 95 MN : 87 53 72 81 MT : 88 79 97 95 ND : 90 57 82 81 WA : 100 99 100 100 : 5 Sts : 92 74 91 90 -------------------------------------- 1/ These 5 States planted 78% of last year's barley acreage. Oats: Percent Planted, Selected States 1/ -------------------------------------- : Week Ending : :-----------------------: 1997- State:May 26,:May 19,:May 26,: 2001 : 2002 : 2002 : 2001 : Avg. -------------------------------------- : Percent : IA : 100 100 100 100 MN : 95 85 83 91 NE : 100 100 100 100 ND : 88 65 89 85 OH : 97 85 100 100 PA : 94 85 97 98 SD : 99 96 97 97 WI : 90 76 94 99 : 8 Sts : 94 83 93 94 -------------------------------------- 1/ These 8 States planted 49% of last year's oat acreage. Spring Wheat: Percent Emerged, Selected States 1/ -------------------------------------- : Week Ending : :-----------------------: 1997- State:May 26,:May 19,:May 26,: 2001 : 2002 : 2002 : 2001 : Avg. -------------------------------------- : Percent : ID : 93 82 88 87 MN : 53 30 47 68 MT : 43 19 62 69 ND : 40 20 52 61 SD : 93 79 88 88 WA : 95 91 98 97 : 6 Sts : 52 33 61 69 -------------------------------------- 1/ These 6 States planted 98% of last year's spring wheat acreage. Barley: Percent Emerged, Selected States 1/ -------------------------------------- : Week Ending : :-----------------------: 1997- State:May 26,:May 19,:May 26,: 2001 : 2002 : 2002 : 2001 : Avg. -------------------------------------- : Percent : ID : 81 65 86 81 MN : 47 31 44 64 MT : 50 25 72 71 ND : 35 9 48 56 WA : 97 92 96 97 : 5 Sts : 55 34 67 70 -------------------------------------- 1/ These 5 States planted 78% of last year's barley acreage. Oats: Percent Emerged, Selected States 1/ -------------------------------------- : Week Ending : :-----------------------: 1997- State:May 26,:May 19,:May 26,: 2001 : 2002 : 2002 : 2001 : Avg. -------------------------------------- : Percent : IA : 99 98 99 98 MN : 72 51 71 83 NE : 99 97 91 98 ND : 41 15 63 61 OH : 89 77 100 97 PA : 85 81 86 87 SD : 87 70 86 83 WI : 63 48 83 94 : 8 Sts: 72 56 80 82 -------------------------------------- 1/ These 8 States planted 49% of last year's oat acreage. Sorghum: Percent Planted, Selected States 1/ -------------------------------------- : Week Ending : :-----------------------: 1997- State:May 26,:May 19,:May 26,: 2001 : 2002 : 2002 : 2001 : Avg. -------------------------------------- : Percent : AR : 97 94 94 92 CO : 27 12 34 29 IL : 5 3 62 45 KS : 33 21 62 44 LA : 87 78 97 92 MO : 34 32 72 60 NE : 45 20 49 57 NM : 10 6 41 21 OK : 35 32 42 25 SD : 21 12 29 29 TX : 61 56 65 65 : 11 Sts: 45 36 61 52 -------------------------------------- 1/ These 11 States planted 97% of last year's sorghum acreage. Sugarbeets: Percent Planted, Selected States 1/ -------------------------------------- : Week Ending : :-----------------------: 1997- State:May 26,:May 19,:May 26,: 2001 : 2002 : 2002 : 2001 : Avg. -------------------------------------- : Percent : ID : 100 100 100 100 MI : 100 100 100 100 MN : 98 86 88 94 ND : 97 81 84 93 : 4 Sts : 98 90 91 96 -------------------------------------- 1/ These 4 States planted 81% of last year's sugarbeet acreage. Peanuts: Percent Planted, Selected States 1/ -------------------------------------- : Week Ending : :-----------------------: 1997- State:May 26,:May 19,:May 26,: 2001 : 2002 : 2002 : 2001 : Avg. -------------------------------------- : Percent : AL : 82 59 84 91 FL : 75 65 75 79 GA : 85 63 86 87 NC : 95 75 96 83 OK : 82 55 82 72 TX : 66 53 76 58 VA : 93 85 99 93 : 7 Sts : 80 61 84 78 -------------------------------------- 1/ These 7 States planted 98% of last year's peanut acreage. Sunflowers: Percent Planted, Selected States 1/ -------------------------------------- : Week Ending : :-----------------------: 1997- State:May 26,:May 19,:May 26,: 2001 : 2002 : 2002 : 2001 : Avg. -------------------------------------- : Percent : CO : 9 3 6 NA KS : 12 6 42 NA ND : 35 8 33 37 SD : 14 5 15 23 : 4 Sts : 23 6 27 NA -------------------------------------- 1/ These 4 States planted 88% of last year's sunflowers acreage. Corn: Crop Condition by Percent, Selected States -------------------------------------- State : VP : P : F : G : EX -------------------------------------- : Percent : CO : 0 0 18 75 7 IL : 4 20 48 26 2 IN : 5 18 48 27 2 IA : 2 9 36 47 6 KS : 2 6 45 44 3 KY : 2 11 27 45 15 MI : 15 23 42 19 1 MN : 3 17 43 35 2 MO : 5 16 45 30 4 NE : 3 8 35 46 8 NC : 0 5 25 63 7 ND : 0 3 40 56 1 OH : 5 16 47 28 4 PA : 0 10 34 50 6 SD : 5 8 31 50 6 TN : 2 5 17 55 21 TX : 12 20 35 23 10 WI : 3 15 43 36 3 : 18 Sts : 4 13 40 38 5 : Prev Wk : NA NA NA NA NA Prev Yr : 1 4 25 58 12 -------------------------------------- Oats: Crop Condition by Percent, Selected States -------------------------------------- State : VP : P : F : G : EX -------------------------------------- : Percent : IA : 0 3 17 60 20 MN : 0 5 29 55 11 NE : 9 11 26 49 5 ND : 0 2 46 50 2 OH : 1 10 34 50 5 PA : 1 5 26 57 11 SD : 1 4 34 52 9 WI : 0 4 23 62 11 : 8 Sts : 1 4 32 54 9 : Prev Wk : 1 3 32 56 8 Prev Yr : 1 4 29 56 10 -------------------------------------- Winter Wheat: Crop Condition by Percent, Selected States -------------------------------------- State : VP : P : F : G : EX -------------------------------------- : Percent : AR : 2 15 42 36 5 CA : 0 0 10 80 10 CO : 32 35 25 7 1 ID : 1 3 22 68 6 IL : 5 15 35 41 4 IN : 2 9 32 48 9 KS : 18 23 33 24 2 MI : 1 3 23 54 19 MO : 5 12 33 46 4 MT : 38 24 26 11 1 NE : 18 29 35 16 2 NC : 5 8 35 50 2 OH : 3 7 25 51 14 OK : 19 15 28 33 5 OR : 21 26 34 17 2 SD : 3 11 33 45 8 TX : 28 24 28 17 3 WA : 1 8 31 50 10 : 18 Sts : 17 19 31 29 4 : Prev Wk : 16 20 31 29 4 Prev Yr : 10 18 33 33 6 -------------------------------------- Rice: Crop Condition by Percent, Selected States -------------------------------------- State : VP : P : F : G : EX -------------------------------------- : Percent : AR : 4 11 35 42 8 CA : 0 0 20 60 20 LA : 0 2 28 53 17 MS : 0 11 22 65 2 MO : 0 7 38 52 3 TX : 0 1 18 51 30 : 6 Sts : 2 7 30 49 12 : Prev Wk : 2 7 29 52 10 Prev Yr : 0 2 24 57 17 -------------------------------------- VP-Very Poor, P-Poor, F-Fair, G-Good, EX-Excellent. National crop conditions for selected States are weighted based on 2001 planted acres. Pasture and Range: Crop Condition by Percent, Selected States ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- State : VP : P : F : G : EX :: State : VP : P : F : G : EX ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Percent :: : Percent : :: : AL : 3 14 30 46 7 :: NJ : 0 0 40 54 6 AZ : 27 49 20 4 0 :: NM : 50 34 12 4 0 AR : 0 2 15 60 23 :: NY : 0 1 18 59 22 CA : 10 40 40 10 0 :: NC : 3 13 36 46 2 CO : 39 33 27 1 0 :: ND : 3 25 43 28 1 CT : 0 0 19 81 0 :: OH : 1 4 24 57 14 DE : 0 2 22 59 17 :: OK : 8 14 25 39 14 FL : 5 40 45 10 0 :: OR : 3 16 43 36 2 GA : 4 14 33 43 6 :: PA : 0 2 29 53 16 ID : 1 5 30 55 9 :: RI : 0 0 0 93 7 IL : 0 3 16 58 23 :: SC : 2 6 25 56 11 IN : 1 2 17 61 19 :: SD : 6 18 36 35 5 IA : 0 5 21 55 19 :: TN : 0 2 18 62 18 KS : 16 18 30 30 6 :: TX : 22 27 31 15 5 KY : 1 2 17 54 26 :: UT : 15 28 33 24 0 LA : 8 26 42 23 1 :: VT : 1 7 18 73 1 ME : 0 4 19 64 13 :: VA : 1 9 30 52 8 MD : 1 7 28 45 19 :: WA : 0 12 70 18 0 MA : 0 0 11 89 0 :: WV : 0 3 22 64 11 MI : 3 9 27 48 13 :: WI : 3 8 33 46 10 MN : 2 12 37 44 5 :: WY : 23 29 37 11 0 MS : 9 13 32 39 7 :: : MO : 0 3 19 58 20 :: 48 Sts : 10 18 30 34 8 MT : 26 20 35 18 1 :: : NE : 13 24 34 27 2 :: Prev Wk: 9 16 30 37 8 NV : 6 20 48 20 6 :: Prev Yr: 6 13 34 40 7 NH : 0 0 9 82 9 :: : ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Crop Progress and Condition Survey and Estimating Procedures Survey Procedures: Crop progress and condition estimates are based on survey data that are collected each week from early April to the end of November. The Crop progress and condition surveys are non-probability surveys that include a sample of more than 5,000 reporters whose occupations provide them opportunities to make visual observations and frequently bring them in contact with farmers in their counties. Based on standard definitions, these reporters subjectively estimate progress of farmers' activities and progress of crops through their stages of development. They also provide subjective evaluations of crop conditions. Most reporters complete their questionnaire on Friday or early Monday morning and submit it to the Agricultural Statistics Service's office in their State by mail, telephone, fax, e-mail, or through a secured internet website. A small number of reports are completed on Thursday, Saturday, and Sunday. Regardless of the time that the questionnaire is completed, reporters are asked to report for the week ending on Sunday. For reports submitted prior to the Sunday reference date, a degree of uncertainty is introduced into the projections for weekend progress and crop condition changes. By the end of the 2001 season, nearly two-thirds of the data were being submitted through the internet website. As a result, about one-half of all data are submitted on Monday morning, which has significantly reduced this projection uncertainty. Reporters are sent written reporting instructions at the beginning of each season and are contacted periodically to ensure proper reporting. Terms and definitions of crop stages and condition categories that are used as reporting guidelines are available on the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) website at: www.usda.gov/nass/pubs/cwterms.htm. Estimating Procedures: Reported data are reviewed for reasonableness and consistency by comparing with data reported the previous week and data reported in surrounding counties for the current week. Each State Statistical Office summarizes the reported data to district and State levels, weighting each county's reported data by NASS county acreage estimates. Summarized indications are compared with previous week estimates, and progress items are compared with earlier stages of development and historical averages to ensure reasonableness. Weather events and reporter comments are also taken into consideration. State estimates are submitted to the Agricultural Statistics Board (ASB) along with supporting comments, where they are compared with surrounding States and compiled into a National level summary by weighting each State by its acreage estimates. Revision Policy: Progress and condition estimates in the "Crop Progress" report are released at 4:00 pm ET on the first business day of the week. These estimates are preliminary and subject to corrections or updates in the "Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin" National Summary that is released at 12:00 pm ET on the second business day of the week. These estimates are then subject to revision the following week. The next "Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin" report will be released after 12 p.m. ET on June 4, 2002. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact the USDA's TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C., 20250-9410, or call 202-720-5964 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. ACCESS TO REPORTS!! For your convenience, there are several ways to obtain NASS reports, data products, and services: INTERNET ACCESS All NASS reports are available free of charge on the worldwide Internet. For access, connect to the Internet and go to the NASS Home Page at: http:/www.usda.gov/nass/. Select "Today's Reports" or Publications and then Reports by Calendar or Publications and then Search, by Title or Subject. E-MAIL SUBSCRIPTION There are two options for subscribing via e-mail. All NASS reports are available by subscription free of charge direct to your e-mail address. 1) Starting with the NASS Home Page at http:/www.usda.gov/nass/, click on Publications, then click on the Subscribe by E-mail button which takes you to the page describing e-mail delivery of reports. Finally, click on Go to the Subscription Page and follow the instructions. 2) If you do NOT have Internet access, send an e-mail message to: usda-reports@usda.mannlib.cornell.edu. In the body of the message type the word: list. AUTOFAX ACCESS NASSFax service is available for some reports from your fax machine. Please call 202-720-2000, using the handset attached to your fax. Respond to the voice prompts. Document 0411 is a list of available reports. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PRINTED REPORTS OR DATA PRODUCTS CALL OUR TOLL-FREE ORDER DESK: 800-999-6779 (U.S. and Canada) Other areas, please call 703-605-6220 FAX: 703-605-6900 (Visa, MasterCard, check, or money order acceptable for payment.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ASSISTANCE For assistance with general agricultural statistics or further information about NASS or its products or services, contact the Agricultural Statistics Hotline at 800-727-9540, 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ET, or e-mail: nass@nass.usda.gov.